Weekend ReadsSupreme Court double jeopardy case could impact presidential pardon power

21:30  06 december  2018
21:30  06 december  2018 Source:   cnn.com

Supreme Court strikes down victim surcharges

Supreme Court strikes down victim surcharges The Supreme Court of Canada says a law that makes people convicted of crimes pay surcharges to helps victims is unconstitutional. In a 7-2 decision delivered this morning in Ottawa, the Supreme Court found the mandatory victim surcharge amounts to cruel and unusual punishment. The court says the surcharge creates a crushing financial burden on poor people and places them under constant threat of being arrested and jailed if they do not pay. Judges have been forced to impose a one-size-fits all punishment that does not take into account the individual's ability to pay, the court says.

Why the Big Double Jeopardy Supreme Court Case Isn’t a Threat to the Mueller Probe. Gamble v. U.S. is not actually about the presidential pardon power . It is about the Fifth Amendment protection against double jeopardy and whether a defendant is safe from state prosecution after a completed

A Supreme Court Case Could Liberate Trump to Pardon His Associates. A key Republican senator has quietly weighed in on an upcoming Supreme Court case that could have important The 150-year-old exception to the Fifth Amendment’s double - jeopardy clause allows state and federal courts

Supreme Court double jeopardy case could impact presidential pardon power© Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images WASHINGTON - JUNE 29: "Equal Justice Under Law" is carved into the facade of the United States Supreme Court building June 29, 2009 in Washington, DC.

The Supreme Court on Thursday will consider an exception to the Fifth Amendment's ban on prosecuting an individual twice for the same offense in a case that could also possibly impact President Donald Trump's pardon power as it applies to the Robert Mueller probe.

Decades ago, the Supreme Court developed an exception to the Fifth Amendment's double jeopardy clause and it is now being asked to rethink precedent.

The so-called "separate sovereigns exception" provides that a person can be tried twice for the same offense if the prosecutions occur in state and federal courts. The rationale is that the states and the federal government are different sovereigns.

Supreme Court asked to reconsider Quebec National Assembly kirpan ban

Supreme Court asked to reconsider Quebec National Assembly kirpan ban A Sikh man and woman who were barred from entering Quebec’s legislature while wearing kirpans have filed a motion for reconsideration.

Under current Supreme Court precedent, a presidential pardon of an individual does not prevent that individual from being A win for Gamble could also indirectly strengthen the President ’s pardon power , by precluding a state “ Supreme Court Agrees to Hear ‘ Double Jeopardy ’ Case in the Fall.”

The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear a case in the fall to consider whether the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment bars If the court overrules its prior precedent, it could make it more difficult for a state to try someone who has been pardoned by the federal government if trial

Critics contend that in the modern day it leads to harassment of defendants -- especially the poor -- who can't afford to fight on two fronts. They also point to a recent trend they argue has led to an increase of federal prosecutions in areas that had traditionally been left to the states.

In addition, it could also impact the presidential pardon power, leading to a question of what would happen if President were to pardon an individual like his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort for federal offenses. Under the exception, a state could conceivably bring a prosecution for the same crimes. That might not occur if the court were to strike the exception.

The case before the justices Thursday is brought by Terance Gamble, who was convicted of second-degree robbery in Alabama in 2008 and 2013. He was subsequently stopped in 2015 and found with a weapon in his car. Federal and state law forbid a convicted felon from possessing a firearm. After convictions in both federal and state courts, Gamble said that his dual convictions prolonged his incarceration by three years.

Schiff: Trump may face ‘real prospect of jail time’

Schiff: Trump may face ‘real prospect of jail time’ Schiff: Trump may face ‘real prospect of jail time’ Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) on Sunday said that President Trump might "face the real prospect of jail time" after prosecutors indicated last week that he directed illegal payments during his 2016 presidential campaign."There's a very real prospect that on the day Donald Trump leaves office, the Justice Department may indict him. That he may be the first president in quite some time to face the real prospect of jail time," he said on CBS's "Face the Nation." .

If it does, the presidential pardon power could be strengthened. After mulling whether to take the case for several months last spring, the Supreme Court finally agreed to add the Some have noted that if the justices do reverse course, the impact of a presidential pardon may rise, as states would

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear a case on Thursday that some say could significantly strengthen the president ’s power to pardon criminals. Now with a distinct conservative tilt, the court is set to decide whether the state and federal governments can separately charge and try a suspect for

An appeals court ruled against him citing Supreme Court precedent which, the court said, "has determined that prosecution in federal and state court for the same conduct does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause because the state and federal governments are separate sovereigns."

Gamble appealed to the Supreme Court, asking it to overrule the separate sovereigns doctrine.

In court papers, Gamble's lawyers argued that "for centuries" federal and state criminal justice systems operated with little to no overlap and that state criminal law was dominant.

In the modern day, they say, that has changed.

Presidential pardon power limits?

Although the case does not touch on the special counsel's investigation, some believe that it might have ramifications for Manafort. The President has not ruled out the possibility of a pardon. If the Supreme Court strikes down the exception, a state could, theoretically, prosecute him.

Woman loses bid to speed up assisted-dying case

Woman loses bid to speed up assisted-dying case OTTAWA - The Supreme Court of Canada has rejected a bid by a severely ill woman and a civil liberties group to speed up their lawsuit that argues the right to assisted dying is unfairly limited by federal government law. Julia Lamb and the B.C. Civil Liberties Association are spearheading a challenge of the law that allows assisted dying only for individuals whose natural death is "reasonably foreseeable.'' The plaintiffs asked a lower court to prevent Canada from relitigating facts already decided in the Supreme Court's landmark 2015 case that overturned a ban on assisted dying.

The Supreme Court is considering Gamble’s case on Thursday, and the outcome could have a At issue is whether to overturn a court -created exception to the Constitution’s double - jeopardy bar The court ’s ruling could be relevant if President Donald Trump were to pardon someone implicated in

The Supreme Court is considering Gamble’s case on Thursday, and the outcome could have a spillover effect on the At issue is whether to overturn a court -created exception to the Constitution’s double - jeopardy bar that Trump has refused to rule out an eventual pardon for Manafort, who has

"There's more than nothing to the concern that, if the court overturns the separate-sovereigns doctrine, a state could not then prosecute someone like Paul Manafort for the federal crimes for which he might be pardoned," said CNN legal analyst and University of Texas Law School Professor Steve Vladeck.

"But the criminal jurisdiction of states tends to be so much broader than the federal government that such a move might not close the door to all potential criminal liability in such cases," Vladeck added.

Adam Kurland, a profess of law at Howard University School of Law, doubts the case will impact the Mueller investigation.

"New York law already has a statute that limits some state prosecutions based on the same conduct as a prior federal prosecution," he said in a statement.

The Justice Department has urged the court to uphold the separate sovereigns exception, citing the intent of the framers.

"The framers wrote the Constitution to manifest the sovereign power of the United States and the states, including the power to enforce their own criminal laws," argued Principal Deputy Solicitor General Jeff Wall in court papers.

Wall also argued that under longstanding policy, the government only pursues a federal prosecution when the state case has left "substantial federal interest demonstrably unvindicated."

Will Conrad Black be pardoned by Donald Trump?.
The Office of the Pardon Attorney says he hasn’t applied. And Black calls the speculation ‘bunk’. But they have a history and reasons to help each other.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!