The tragic death of 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska in Charlotte, allegedly at the hands of a repeat offender recently let out of jail, has sparked widespread criticism about how the legal system deals with violent suspects.
Many are pointing fingers at judges for being too lenient. Legal expert Nicole Brenecki, a trial attorney based in New York City, suggests that the reality is more complicated than it may seem.
“We can all see there’s a troubling trend right now,” she told Fox News Digital. “Statistics show that repeat offenders are increasingly back on the streets. The rates of recidivism are soaring to alarmingly high levels.”
LEAVITT CHARGES ‘MANY MEDIA OUTLETS’ FOR IGNORING ZARUTSKA’S MURDER
Brenecki notes that the time right after individuals are released from incarceration is the highest risk period for reoffending, primarily due to issues like unstable housing, joblessness, and a lack of essential resources. She also highlighted the growing pressures on courts to expedite cases amidst heavy caseloads.
“There’s a noticeable trend towards leniency,” she observes. “Sadly, this leniency often leads to the same individuals committing new crimes, posing a threat to public safety.”
CHECK OUT MORE ON THE FOX NEWS APP
Decarlos Brown Jr., the man charged with killing Zarutska, is reported to have a violent background, including multiple assaults and robberies, in addition to being diagnosed with schizophrenia. Still, he was allowed to walk free.
Brenecki explained that judges often face backlash from the public in cases like these, but many do not understand the legal constraints that judges navigate.
IRYNA ZARUTSKA FLED VIOLENCE IN UKRAINE, BUT POLICIES FAILED TO PROTECT HER IN U.S.
She elaborated, “This is really a tough topic because we deal with what’s called ‘judicial discretion.’ When it comes to decisions around bail or release, it’s largely at the judge’s discretion. They have to consider risk assessment factors, but often things slip through the cracks.”
Brenecki emphasized that judges need to find a balance between presuming someone innocent until proven guilty and ensuring the public’s safety. However, some of the choices made seem puzzling at best.
“When you read reports of people being released with, say, 70 prior arrests without serious attention given, that’s definitely a red flag,” she stated. “Somehow, this is not being adequately addressed during sentencing or release phases.”
While it’s true that not every arrest results in a conviction, frequent arrests are indicators of risky behavior.
“Just because someone hasn’t been convicted doesn’t mean they aren’t dangerous,” she noted. “If they find themselves repeatedly caught up in these situations where they get arrested, plenty of suspicion clouds their actions.”
WATCH: Latest train attack in Chicago reignites discussion on cashless bail for repeat offenders
Brenecki pointed out that judges may be swayed, either intentionally or not, by societal and political calls for a reduction in incarceration.
CATCH MORE DETAILS THROUGH THE FOX NEWS APP
“Judges shouldn’t be influenced by public sentiment such as the need to alleviate poverty,” she contended. “Their role isn’t to manage social issues; their primary responsibility is to prioritize public safety.”
“To summarize, I’d put it plain and simple: it all comes down to flaws within the judicial framework,” she added.
Original article source:Judices Let Repeat Offenders Slip Through the Cracks, Raising Concerns About Public Safety
