Just four months prior to the tragic incident, Charlie Kirk engaged with students at the University of Cambridge on contentious topics like abortion and women’s rights. Sadly, on Wednesday, this 31-year-old right-leaning activist suffered a fatal shootingwhile addressing an audience in Utah. His university followers, who often disagreed with his perspectives, condemned the violence against him and acknowledged his dedication to fostering constructive discussions.
‘Political differences should not lead to violence’
This past May, Kirk participated in a debate event at the Cambridge Union that involved a Q&A session.
Sammy McDonald, who debated Kirk last, highlighted the US’s support for Israel during their discussion.
He voiced his thoughts to the BBC, stating: “No political viewpoint ever justifies such a horrific act or inflicts suffering on those connected to him.
“Diverging views must not be a justification for murder. We need to hold on to our shared humanity, especially in such divisive times. Every human life is sacred.”
Expressing his deep disagreement with Kirk’s stances, McDonald respected him for valuing open dialogue. “The capacity to engage in free discourse is what sets democracy apart from tyranny, and it’s the foundation upon which liberal thought and the American constitutional framework stand,” he emphasized.
Recalling tragic examples like MP Jo Cox and Sir David Amess, he noted that young people are present in a world marred by political aggression and toxic debates.
He added, “What surprised me most about interacting with Kirk was the kindness shown by many of his supporters who were open to listening, engaging in respectful argumentation, and changing their views on one another.”
‘He never encouraged violence’
Kai Bevan, a 20-year-old medical student in his third year, debated Kirk regarding his stance on abortion.
“I’d never expect something this awful to occur,” he lamented.
“We had opposing views, yet sharing those viewpoints shouldn’t culminate in tragedy. It’s deeply unsettling.”
Bevan also mentioned that others he talked to were equally “taken aback” by Kirk’s death.
“I’m particularly troubled that someone who openly voiced his opinions without resorting to violence could suffer such fate. It calls for a profound societal introspection,” he shared.
‘Silencing differing views won’t s d’
Looking back on his experience, Archie Mackintosh admitted he felt slightly anxious before questioning Kirk.
“I worried I might end up on YouTube with the title: ‘Charlie Kirk obliterates manbun idiot with facts,'” he joked.
Kirk lightly replied, suggesting, “Or perhaps: `Destroys.’”
The 23-year-old from Norfolk discussed topics like marriage and societal issues with Kirk, claiming he was yet to come to terms with the shocking news of Kirk’s death.
“Despite our disagreements—many in fact—Kirk was indeed committed to making the world better in his perspective,” he added.
Violent reactions to those one disagrees with can elevate them to an unexpected status, with Mackintosh stating, “It can lead onlookers to think, ‘Wow, that person was so impactful they had to be silenced.’
“Even if someone’s remarks seem detrimental, efforts to stifle their expression are ineffective.”
‘Political violence concerns us all’
Tilly Middlehurst, dressed in a cream sweater adorned with American stars and stripes, confronted Kirk on his beliefs surrounding religion and the evolving roles of women.
“I’m a feminist,” she declared at the start of her question.
Following Kirk’s death, she conveyed her feelings to her 91,100 followers on Instagram, admitting it left her “shaken and disgusted.”
“Irrespective of personal stances on Kirk, politics shouldn’t end in this way—it’s catastrophic,” she stated.
In her remarks to the BBC, she lamented that this isn’t the future politics should indicate. “Acts of political violence impact everyone, not just those with opposing beliefs.
“This is far from an improvement; it’s an aggression towards fascism.”
Stay updated with news from Cambridgeshire via BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram, and X.
