•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Graham now says Trump's Ukraine policy was too 'incoherent' for quid pro quo

22:25  06 november  2019
22:25  06 november  2019 Source:   news.yahoo.com

Top diplomat in Ukraine directly ties Trump to quid pro quo

  Top diplomat in Ukraine directly ties Trump to quid pro quo "That was my clear understanding, that security assistance money would not come until the president (of Ukraine) committed to pursue" investigations, Bill Taylor told Congress.The transcript of Taylor's closed-door testimony before the three House committees leading the impeachment inquiry into Trump — the latest in a series of witness transcripts made public — confirms NBC News' reporting about his more than nine hours of testimony last month. It also contains new details about the language he used in describing the White House's attempted quid pro quo with Ukraine that shed light on his level of concern about the matter.

Graham now says Trump ' s Ukraine policy was too ' incoherent ' for quid pro quo . “I’ve made up my own mind,” he said . “Volker, the special envoy, said there was no quid pro quo . Sunderland [sic] has changed his testimony to say he presumes there was .

Lindsey Graham slammed the impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump while claiming the White House policy towards Ukraine was so “ incoherent ” that the administration could not have formed a quid pro quo even if it tried. The South Carolina Republican described the impeachment as “sour grapes and

A day after saying he wouldn’t bother reading transcripts released by House Democrats in the impeachment inquiry into President Trump, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., now says he did read the testimony, and his conclusion is that the administration’s Ukraine policy was too “incoherent” for it to have orchestrated the quid pro quo that is at the heart of the probe.

Lindsey Graham wearing a suit and tie: Sen. Lindsey Graham at an Oct. 24 press conference on impeachment. (Photo: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)© Provided by Oath Inc. Sen. Lindsey Graham at an Oct. 24 press conference on impeachment. (Photo: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

Testimony released Tuesday included depositions from Gordon Sondland, U.S. ambassador to the European Union, and Kurt Volker, the former special envoy to Ukraine. A revised statement from Sondland, correcting his earlier testimony, acknowledged that he “spoke individually” with a top Ukrainian official and conveyed what Trump was demanding from Kiev in exchange for military and other aid already approved by Congress.

The Trump impeachment is all about an allegation of quid pro quo. But what does that mean?

  The Trump impeachment is all about an allegation of quid pro quo. But what does that mean? Quid pro quo. It's hard to say and a bit confusing to understand, but it's the phrase at the center of a contentious impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. © Scott Olson/Getty Images President Donald Trump addresses the International Association of Chiefs of Police convention on Oct. 28, 2019 in Chicago. Did he withhold military aid to Ukraine by pressuring the country to investigate his political rivals? Trump and his staunch supporters say no. The Democrats say yes. Either way, the idea of quid pro quo stands firmly at the base of the investigation.

Lindsey Graham ' s latest defense of Trump is that his policy is too ' incoherent ' to do a quid pro quo with Ukraine . The senator had previously said there was no evidence of a quid pro quo involving the president. On Wednesday, Graham continued to criticize the impeachment-inquiry process, which

While Graham now defends President Trump ’ s asking the government of Ukraine to look into Burisma and Hunter Biden, he would not, when asked a second time, directly address the question of whether a quid pro quo of military aid for investigations would have been right or wrong.

Graham, who two weeks ago said he would consider new evidence in the impeachment probe, initially said he had no plans to read their testimony.

“I’ve written the whole process off,” he told reporters Tuesday. “I think this is a bunch of BS.”

On Wednesday, Graham said he had, in fact, read the transcripts.

“I’ve made up my own mind,” he said. “Volker, the special envoy, said there was no quid pro quo. Sunderland [sic] has changed his testimony to say he presumes there was. What I can tell you about the Trump policy toward the Ukraine, it was incoherent. It depends on who you talk to. They seem to be incapable of forming a quid pro quo.”

Read: William Taylor's opening statement at impeachment hearing

  Read: William Taylor's opening statement at impeachment hearing Read: William Taylor's opening statement at impeachment hearing(Pictured) Donald Trump, accompanied by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, speaks on Oct. 23 in the Diplomatic Room of the White House in Washington, D.C.

Graham claims Trump admin 'incapable of forming quid pro quo '. "What I can tell you about the Trump policy toward Ukraine : It was incoherent , it depends on who you talk to, they seem to be incapable of forming a quid pro quo ," the South Carolina Republican said outside the Senate

Mr. Trump initially strongly denied there was any quid pro quo involving Ukraine , and numerous Republicans took The whistleblower said quid pro quo eight times. It was a little off — no times. Because here is a Trump appointee saying I delivered a message of a quid pro quo at the direction

Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, added: “I find the whole process to be a sham, and I’m not going to legitimize it.”

In transcripts made public so far this week, Sondland, Volker, former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch and former high-ranking State Department official Michael McKinley all backed up concerns raised by an anonymous intelligence community whistleblower who said Trump was holding up foreign aid to Ukraine in exchange for help in pursuing a conspiracy theory advanced by the president’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani about the 2016 election, and in investigating former Vice President Joe Biden, a potential rival in 2020.

In an interview with Axios in late October, Graham said he was open to hearing evidence beyond the already reported July 25 phone call in which Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for “a favor.”

5 key takeaways from the 1st day of the public impeachment hearing

  5 key takeaways from the 1st day of the public impeachment hearing The House on Wednesday convened its first impeachment hearing in more than 20 years. Here are the key takeaways.(Pictured) Donald Trump, accompanied by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, speaks on Oct. 23 in the Diplomatic Room of the White House in Washington, D.C.

Graham recently defended the Trump administration in comment saying the White House Ukraine policy was too “ incoherent ” for them to form a quid pro quo , and even saying he wouldn’t read the transcripts because “this is a bunch of BS.” Tapper noticed a similarity between those remarks and an

"There is no quid pro quo necessary to betray your country or your oath of office. Even though many read this as a quid pro quo . "I'll release that, too , if that' s important to you," Trump said of a call which preceded the one the public learned more about Wednesday through a newly released transcript.

“Sure, I mean ... if you could show me that, you know, Trump actually was engaging in a quid pro quo, outside the phone call, that would be very disturbing,” Graham said.

_____

Download the Yahoo News app to customize your experience.

Read more from Yahoo News:

  • 'Insidious': New impeachment testimony backs up quid pro quo allegations

  • Release of House transcripts darkens prospects for Trump

  • Trump demands whistleblower testify in person — something he refused to do

  • Trump’s new defense: The quid pro quo didn’t happen, but if it did, so what?

  • In Trump's America, impeachment is another 'witch hunt'

Analysis: Trump’s core impeachment defense suffers a double blow — including a self-inflicted one .
Two new pieces of evidence suggest President Trump wasn't nearly as consumed with rooting out Ukrainian "corruption" as he would like you to believe.That argument suffered a double blow on Friday — including thanks to Trump himself.

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!