Politics There's room to reconcile the Biden and GOP infrastructure plans
American voters overwhelmingly support the nontraditional measures in Biden's infrastructure bill
A CNBC survey found that just 36% of voters like Biden's infrastructure plan as it is. But they largely support measures that GOP lawmakers oppose.According to a CNBC survey released on Thursday, just 36% of Americans supported Biden's infrastructure plan as he presented it - only three percentage points higher than those who oppose the plan, at 33%. This is about half the level of support that Biden's $1.9 trillion stimulus plan received in similar polling in March.
A Republican proposal for an infrastructure bill waswith the support of Sens. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and John Barrasso (R-Wyo.). Although an examination of the proposal will show that it misses the mark in some important areas, it is, nonetheless, an important first step as an initial GOP bargaining position.
Let's take a look at what's in both infrastructure bills.
For traditional transportation - which includes money for roads, bridges, public transit, airports, railways, ports and safety measures - the Republican plan would spend $441 billion. For the same categories, President Biden proposes to spend $447 billion. Both proposals are in addition to the, which is scheduled to occur in September and will spend $500 billion over the next five years on transportation. The Republicans argue, therefore, that their proposal is pretty much the same as the president's when it comes to transportation. That's not exactly correct, however. Biden's plan calls for spending an additional $174 billion to (EVs) and the necessary fueling infrastructure, which will make EVs an important part of our transportation alternatives.
Senate Republicans propose $568 billion infrastructure plan to counter Biden
Republicans proposed eliminating spending on caregivers, combating climate change and manufacturing that go beyond physical infrastructure.Although their plan doesn't specify how to pay for the spending, Republicans suggested new user fees, resisting a corporate tax rate increase pushed by Biden and keeping former President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts intact.
Moreover, total spending under the GOP plan hardly ignores the fact that American infrastructure is far more than just transportation. For example, the Republicans would allocate $65 billion for broadband; the president's plan sets that figure at $100 billion. The Republican plan allocates $49 billion for water and wastewater systems; Biden's plan spends $111 billion to achieve that goal. Water and wastewater experts would tell you that the president's figure is barely adequate to meet needs across the country. The GOP plan allocates nothing for upgrading America's electric grid. The president's plan wisely allocates $100 billion toward that vital effort. So, for these three categories - which no one can argue are not traditional infrastructure - the president's plan spends almost $200 billion more.
Biden's 1st 100 days: Promises kept, broken, or in progress
Here's a look at how President Joe Biden is measuring up against the markers he set for himself. As a candidate and incoming president, he had promised a series of swift and sweeping actions to address the range of challenges he inherited.
Biden'sgoes further, to build out our manufacturing and supply chain capacity as part of our economic infrastructure with $300 billion. I would argue that definition is the correct 21st century infrastructure plan. The GOP's plan fails to address this at all. The president's plan allocates $100 billion for workforce development - commonsense spending on infrastructure because it will dramatically improve worker training to meet new technologies necessary for the implementation of broadband, our power infrastructure, and advanced manufacturing and supply chain techniques. Allocating money to do these important tasks would be fruitless without improving our workers' capabilities.
Biden also allocates $213 billion to produce, upgrade and retrofit affordable places for Americans to live, as part of the needed upgrade to ouracross the country. Surely, homes and housing should be considered part of our nation's infrastructure. The president's plan also allocates $137 billion for improving, repairing and constructing new public schools, community colleges and child care facilities. Again, the condition of our educational institutions should be considered part of our nation's infrastructure that needs significant upgrading.
President Biden's first 100 days: What he's gotten done
President Joe Biden has moved fast since his January 20 swearing-in, signing a $1.9 trillion Covid relief bill into law less than two months into his term and issuing more executive orders so far than his three predecessors. © Genaro Molina/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images A first-grader works on an English exercise on the first day of class in Los Angeles on April 13, 2021. Those efforts have paid off, with the administration reaching the milestones of 200 million coronavirus shots delivered and vaccine eligibility opened to everyone 16 and over before Biden's 100th day in office.
So, together, where Republicans allocate no money for these four things, the president allocates $750 billion - and an additional $197 billion more for water, broadband and the electric grid. All told, Biden would spend $197 billion on things that Republicans totally ignore or underfund. The president's plan projects an investment of $947 billion more than the Republican plan; if you add the $174 billion for electric vehicle infrastructure, it spends $1.121 trillion more.
Now, the president's plan also includes $400 billion for home or community-based care for aging citizens and those with disabilities. This expenditure - which I believe is vitally needed - cannot realistically be considered "infrastructure," no matter how expansively you define the term. So I believe this will be included in a future bill the president proposes, because it fits with important social care spending.
The point of this analysis is that you could fairly reduce total spending in an infrastructure bill to $1.8 trillion, and probably throw in some belt-tightening in all the other programs to save another $100 billion and get the total spending down to $1.7 trillion. This would allow for a compromise on the increase of the corporate tax rate. It would not have to be 28 percent, as, but could be 25 percent or 26 percent. Republicans, however, should get realistic about paying for infrastructure revitalization by keeping in mind that most of corporate America asked former President Trump to reduce the corporate rate when it was 35 percent, to 28 percent.
C'mon, all of you - Republicans, Democrats, moderates and progressive alike. Let's negotiate and come up with legislation to restore Americans' faith in our government's ability to act together in the country's best interests.
Edward G. Rendell was the 45th governor of Pennsylvania. He is a former mayor of Philadelphia and former district attorney in that city. He served as chairman of theduring the 2000 presidential election. Follow him on Twitter .
Fact check: Biden's speech had an estimated 26.9 million viewers .
The president’s first address to Congress had 26.9 million viewers, not 11.6 million as claimed in a social media post.An April 29 Facebook post from James T. Harris, a conservative radio host and social media personality, lists television ratings for five past presidential addresses — four from former President Donald Trump and one from Biden. The post says Biden’s address to Congress had only 11.6 million viewers, compared to 37.2 million viewers for Trump’s 2020 State of the Union speech.