UK News: Explainer: How the British courts may decide the fate of Brexit - PressFrom - United Kingdom
  •   
  •   

UK News Explainer: How the British courts may decide the fate of Brexit

17:50  09 october  2019
17:50  09 october  2019 Source:   reuters.com

Varadkar says leaks of UK proposals to leave EU ‘not promising’

  Varadkar says leaks of UK proposals to leave EU ‘not promising’ Varadkar says leaks of UK proposals to leave EU ‘not promising’Leo Varadkar, speaking on Wednesday afternoon, said he had not had a chance to hear Mr Johnson’s speech at the Conservative Party conference, or look at the written proposals, and was remiss to comment until he had.

Brexit - British exit - refers to the UK leaving the EU. A public vote - or referendum - was held on Thursday 23 June 2016, to decide whether the UK should leave or remain. Brexit was originally due to happen on 29 March 2019. That was two years after then Prime Minister Theresa May triggered

" The fate of Brexit is in the hands of our British friends. As the EU, we are prepared for the worst, but The UK must decide by then whether it will be taking part in European Parliamentary elections On Friday, Mrs May 's deputy David Lidington met opposition parties to discuss how MPs could vote

a person standing next to a fence: A woman holds a flag during a protest against Brexit outside the EU Commission headquarters in Brussels © Reuters/Yves Herman A woman holds a flag during a protest against Brexit outside the EU Commission headquarters in Brussels

By Michael Holden

LONDON (Reuters) - Scotland's highest court on Wednesday said it would wait before deciding whether to take action to force Prime Minister Boris Johnson to ask for a Brexit delay if he has failed to secure a divorce deal with the European Union by Oct. 19.

Johnson has repeatedly said he would not seek any extension and Britain would leave as scheduled on Oct. 31, "do or die", despite legislation which compels him to ask for a delay if he fails to reach a deal.

He has not explained how he would achieve a no-deal divorce by the end of the month while also promising not to break the law. Opponents fear he has found a loophole, though others think he is bluffing.

Whale spotted swimming around River Liffey

  Whale spotted swimming around River Liffey Whale spotted swimming around River LiffeyThe creature, which is believed to be a minke whale, was seen around lunchtime today by Stenna Berth in Dublin Port.

There is speculation that an emergency EU summit on Brexit might be held in this month, if a However, if Speaker John Bercow decides the motion is amendable, MPs could change its wording. But there are significant disagreements about how this will work - and the EU's decision to exclude

The British government has proposed a new version of the Brexit deal which the EU is considering. Brexit : What happens now? By Peter Barnes Senior elections and political analyst, BBC News. The deal negotiated by former prime minister Theresa May and her government was defeated in the

With politicians deadlocked, the issue of whether Britain delays Brexit could now be one for judges to decide.

THE BENN ACT

On Sept. 4, parliament voted through legislation to prevent Johnson taking Britain out of the EU without a deal. The law was backed by an alliance of rebels in Johnson's Conservative Party and opposition lawmakers.

Called the Benn Act after the lawmaker who proposed it, the law says Johnson must write to the EU to request a three-month Brexit extension until Jan. 31, 2020 if he has not managed to agree a divorce deal by Oct. 19 and parliament has not given its approval to leave without agreement.

If the EU offers a delay or a different length of extension, the law says he must accept. It even includes a text of the letter Johnson must send.

Brexit raises stakes for Britain in aircraft trade war

  Brexit raises stakes for Britain in aircraft trade war Brexit raises stakes for Britain in aircraft trade warThe United States has pledged tariffs on goods worth $7.5 billion a year in a dispute over Airbus subsidies from Oct. 18, days before Britain's planned end-October exit. And the EU is due to hit back in a parallel case concluding next spring.

Brexit is the scheduled withdrawal of the United Kingdom (UK) from the European Union (EU). Following a June 2016 referendum, in which 51.9% of participating voters voted to leave

" The fate of Brexit is in the hands of our British friends. As the EU, we are prepared for the worst, but The UK must decide by then whether it will be taking part in European Parliamentary elections On Friday, Mrs May 's deputy David Lidington met opposition parties to discuss how MPs could vote

Despite the legislation, which Johnson has dubbed "the surrender act", he has repeatedly said Britain would still leave the bloc on Oct. 31 as planned, and he would rather be "dead in a ditch" than ask for any delay. Such comments have provoked a number of pre-emptive court challenges from opponents who argue that Johnson must be prevented from breaking the law.

CAN JOHNSON GET ROUND LAW?

Former attorney general Dominic Grieve, who has been kicked out of the Conservative Party over his backing for the Benn Act, says he is confident that the law is legally watertight and that Johnson cannot avoid asking for an extension.

However, government ministers have said the law has a number of deficiencies and only imposes "narrow duties", suggesting Johnson could somehow get round it without having to break it. Such legal escape routes have not been spelled out.

One idea mooted has been that the government could declare a national emergency, allowing it to circumvent the law.

Brexit: Court of Session continues legal challenge until after October 19 deadline

  Brexit: Court of Session continues legal challenge until after October 19 deadline A legal challenge aimed at forcing Boris Johnson to stick to the Benn Act has been temporarily postponed to allow time to see if the Prime Minister will meet its October 19 deadline. © Provided by Johnston Publishing Ltd Three judges at Scotland’s highest civil court ruled today there was currently no basis on which they could grant either of the pro-Remain campaigners’ requests, and that ordinarily, they would have been refused.But in their statement, the judges added that the political debate must be played out before they could make any final decision.

How did the vote break down? Most voters in England and Wales supported Brexit , particularly in rural areas and smaller cities. The move drew swift and fierce backlash from the opposition — and some lawmakers within Mr. Johnson’s own Conservative Party — and caused the British pound to plunge.

The British government has proposed a new version of the Brexit deal which the EU is considering. Brexit : What happens now? By Peter Barnes Senior elections and political analyst, BBC News. The deal negotiated by former prime minister Theresa May and her government was defeated in the

Former Prime Minister John Major also suggested that government ministers could use something called an "order in council" which would allow them to suspend the Benn Act using royal powers without requiring the assent of parliament or Queen Elizabeth. However, the government has said it does not recognise such a plan.

On Tuesday, an unidentified official in Johnson's office, which some lawmakers say could be his senior adviser Dominic Cummings, told the Spectator magazine that the government could "do all sorts of things to scupper delay".

The official said Britain would withhold cooperation with EU countries which supported a delay, including on security and defence issues, and that the government would make clear any extension would be pointless as it would refuse to engage in any further talks.

THE SCOTTISH CASE

In order to ensure that Johnson does abide by the Benn Act, a legal challenge was launched in Scotland by anti-Brexit campaigners, fronted by tax lawyer Jo Maugham and Scottish National Party lawmaker Joanna Cherry who have led previous successful Brexit-related court cases.

The Latest: Brexit negotiators facing critical few hours

  The Latest: Brexit negotiators facing critical few hours LUXEMBOURG (AP) — The Latest on Brexit (all times local): 12:35 p.m. Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney says Brexit negotiators are facing a critical few hours to see if they can deliver a deal ahead of a summit of European Union leaders on Thursday. He said that from the EU side, the belief is that "this is difficult, but it is doable." He said the EU's chief Brexit negotiator, Michel Barnier, noted to EU ministers that there had been "progress in the last number of days" but that there will need to be "significant progress today" to secure a deal in time.

Theresa May has insisted the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in the UK will come to an end with Brexit . In the latest publication, about how to enforce disputes after Brexit , the government has outlined several models used by other countries that it says show there is no need for the ECJ to

The British Government has suffered a momentous defeat in a High Court ruling over whether Article 50 can be triggered by law without a parliamentary The case is expected to be heard on 7 December after it was fast-tracked following the Prime Minister’s pledge to start Brexit negotiations next spring.

They asked Edinburgh's Outer House of the Court of Session to issue an order compelling Johnson to comply with the law or risk penalties including a fine or imprisonment.

During the hearings, Johnson's government promised to abide by the law. Judge Paul Cullen, known as Lord Pentland, ruled that these promises meant the court did not have to take action to compel Johnson to do so - at least not yet. But he also said it would be a serious matter if Johnson were to renege on those promises.

"I approach matters on the basis that it would be destructive of one of the core principles of constitutional propriety and of the mutual trust that is the bedrock of the relationship between the court and the crown for the prime minister or the government to renege on what they have assured the court that the prime minister intends to do," he said.

The campaigners also asked Scotland's highest court, the Court of Session's Inner House, to say it would send a letter on Johnson's behalf to the EU to ask for the extension if he refused to do so, using a power known as "nobile officium".

In its ruling on Wednesday, the court said normally the challenge would be rejected and said judges should only interfere if there was "demonstrable unlawfulness".

"Until the time for sending the letter has arrived, the PM has not acted unlawfully, whatever he and his officials are reported to have said privately or in public," the court's three judges said.

Brexit deal 'almost there' as crunch talks go on

  Brexit deal 'almost there' as crunch talks go on British and EU negotiators worked late into the night into Thursday in the hopes of presenting a last-minute Brexit deal to leaders meeting for a crunch European summit. Both sides said they were close to finding a basis for a treaty to ensure Britain heads for a managed withdrawal from the European bloc it has been part of for nearly half a century. But officials had to iron out details on how British-ruled Northern Ireland would remain under the European VAT regime.It was also not clear if British Prime Minister Boris Johnson will be able to sell the deal at home.

After Prime Minister Theresa May ’s Brexit plan was rejected by Parliament, Jeremy Corbyn, the leader of the “ How do they maintain or even get back an electoral coalition of workers and middle-class, more With a majority of those members now wanting to let the British people vote again on Brexit

Second, it allows the British to move on with Brexit without staring into an eternal backstop or the chaos and recrimination of a no-deal exit. In fact, unionists might even see it as an opportunity to strengthen a more modern union of Britain and Northern Ireland which Brexit undoubtedly weakens.

But, because of the time pressure to take action if Johnson does not comply with the law, it said it would hold off making a decision until Oct. 21, a move which campaigners said left a judicial "Sword of Damacles" hanging over the prime minister.

OTHER LEGAL CASES

Other legal cases are also planned to force Johnson to abide by the Benn Act. The Independent Workers' Union of Great Britain (IWGB), which represents low paid workers, said on Tuesday it had filed papers at London's High Court seeking an injunction to prevent Johnson undermining the law.

Human rights group Liberty said it would also start a case to force Johnson's compliance with the act, saying it was not about Brexit but the rule of law.

On the other side of the argument, Conservative lawmaker Daniel Kawczynski has said he is seeing whether he can launch a legal challenge to the Benn Act itself.

PREVIOUS CASES

The challenges over the Benn Act are the latest cases that have seen major decisions over Brexit end up being decided by judges, with all major rulings going against the government.

In 2017, the Supreme Court, the highest judicial body in the United Kingdom, ruled that then-Prime Minister Theresa May could not officially notify the EU of Britain's intention to leave without approval from parliament.

In December last year, a case at the European Court of Justice established that Britain could unilaterally revoke its decision to leave. Last month, Britain's Supreme Court concluded that Johnson acted unlawfully in suspending parliament for five weeks in the run-up to Brexit.

The cases have led to charges from Brexit supporters that the judiciary is meddling in political matters which should not concern the courts, something the Court of Session indicated it was conscious of in its ruling on Wednesday.

"The political debate requires to be played out in the appropriate forum," the judges said. "The court may only interfere in that debate if there is demonstrable unlawfulness which it requires to address and to correct. At present there has been no such unlawfulness."

(Reporting by Michael Holden; Editing by Guy Faulconbridge and Peter Graff)

Boost for PM as judge rejects Remainers' bid to suspend Brexit deal .
Remain campaigners have failed in a legal bid to suspend the Brexit deal negotiated by Boris Johnson. © Getty Boris Johnson pictured with EU leaders in Brussels The campaigners had asked Scotland's Court of Session to rule that the EU withdrawal agreement was unlawful because it did not comply with UK trade laws. © PA The Supreme Courts and Court of Session in Parliament Square, Edinburgh They argued that the designation of Northern Ireland in a separate customs territory was contrary to trade law, but their petition was dismissed by the judge Lord Pentland.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!