•   
  •   

UK News Coronavirus: are governments really listening to ‘the science’?

11:50  06 april  2020
11:50  06 april  2020 Source:   theweek.co.uk

Italy coronavirus deaths rise by 756, lifting total death toll to 10,779

  Italy coronavirus deaths rise by 756, lifting total death toll to 10,779 HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS/ITALY-TALLY (URGENT):Italy coronavirus deaths rise by 756, lifting total death toll to 10,779The number of fatalities, by far the highest of any country in the world, account for more than a third of all deaths from the infectious virus worldwide.

The UK government has consistently argued that its approach to the COVID-19 epidemic follows the best scientific knowledge available. But it relies on the widespread belief that there is a correct scientific answer to a problem, and that governments simply need to be led by “ the science ”.

Live Science is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. At the time, CDC guidance recommended that schools close for between 7 and 14 days, according to the study. While the coronavirus is a different disease, with a different

a man wearing a suit and tie © Provided by The Week

Reiner Grundmann, Professor of Science and Technology Studies at the University of Nottingham, looks at how far decisions on coronavirus are really being led by science in an article originally written for The Conversation.

The UK government has consistently argued that its approach to the Covid-19 epidemic follows the best scientific knowledge available. To the average person, it sounds reassuring. But it relies on the widespread belief that there is a correct scientific answer to a problem, and that governments simply need to be led by “the science”.

But as students of science policy know, scientific knowledge does not necessarily lead to a specific course of political action, let alone to the “best” policy. Scientific knowledge is often irrelevant to policy making, and policies are often based on knowledge that is cherry picked for political reasons.

Coronavirus: UK government unveils repatriation plan with airlines to bring Brits back home

  Coronavirus: UK government unveils repatriation plan with airlines to bring Brits back home The UK government outlined how it is trying to help hundreds of thousands of British travellers back home by working with other governments and the airlines amid the coronavirus pandemic by sealing a new arrangement. Foreign secretary Dominic Raab said at the government’s daily press conference on updates about the coronavirus pandemic that “this government is working around the clock, support, advise, and to get British travellers back home.” He said that an “unprecedented” amount of Britons trying to get back home — from backpackers to elderly couples on cruises, in the hundreds of thousands.

By Pallab Ghosh Science correspondent. The scientists - all from UK universities - also questioned the government 's view that people would become fed up with restrictions if they were imposed The UK's approach to coping with the coronavirus pandemic has been in stark contrast to other countries.

English News Lesson on Coronavirus : China coronavirus heightens global alarm - FREE worksheets, online 3. OUTBREAK: Students A strongly believe governments are ready for an outbreak Listening — Guess the answers. Listen to check. 1) Nations around the world are preparing for a

“Being led by the science” evokes a linear model of policy making which is more a myth than reality. In reality, politicians use claims about scientific knowledge in order to justify a course of action.

Knowledge is political

Covid-19 is a threat to everyone, and any course of action will involve a significant number of people dying. Knowing that lives hinge on the outcome of decision making should compel governments to explain the conclusions of different sources of scientific evidence, and be open about how they reached policy decisions. This might involve reaching out to opposition parties, or organising consultations with medical professionals and the public to hear their concerns.

Instead, the government most often decides what the “best available science” means, and tries to reassure rather than consult the public about the best way forward.

Will warmer weather halt the march of coronavirus?

  Will warmer weather halt the march of coronavirus? Researchers say summer conditions will not be enough to defeat the outbreakThe data for infection rates supports a climactic dimension to Covid-19. “Look at the World Health Organization (WHO) map of the coronavirus outbreak, and it is difficult to avoid spotting a pattern,” writes Tom Whipple, science editor of The Times.

The government ’s strategy has shifted and is now focused on marshalling the resources of the entire The coronavirus epidemic is an unknown and the science of epidemiology can only help so much. While the government is talking about delay, many in Whitehall are already at the mitigation

Inslee said the coronavirus crisis was a national crisis demanding a national response, and he “Look, I think it’s important to follow the science , listen to the experts do what they tell you,” Biden said. “I really think they should take it.” Trump also said he “may” take hydroxychloroquine himself

This attitude isn’t unique to the current UK government. As Sheila Jasanoff, professor of science and technology at Harvard University, said of the mad cow disease outbreak in 1996: “The UK’s characteristically insulated decision making process excluded wide public involvement until the government’s disavowal of any risk to human beings was shown to be unfounded.”

The response to radioactive contamination in the Cumbrian fells in 1986, shortly after the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, is another good example. The government referred to modelling of nuclear fallout to predict that it would soon be safe for sheep farmers to return their flocks to pasture. Then a ban was imposed on the movement and slaughter of sheep. Brian Wynne, a professor of science studies, noted, scientific reassurances were made that the ban would only last three weeks, but then the restrictions were imposed indefinitely. The result was massive loss in public trust.

Coronavirus: The window to contain the pandemic in the Middle East closes, according to the WHO

 Coronavirus: The window to contain the pandemic in the Middle East closes, according to the WHO HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS-MIDDLE EAST: Coronavirus: The window to contain the pandemic in the Middle East closes, according to the WHO © Reuters / DENIS BALIBOUSE CORONAVIRUS: WINDOW TO CONTAIN PANDEMIC IN THE MIDDLE EAST IS CLOSING, WHO IS CAIRO (Reuters) - Near East governments must act quickly to halt the spread of the coronavirus confirmed cases of contamination are approaching the threshold of 60,000, almost twice as much as the previous week, the World Health Organization (WHO) said Thursday.

Some scientists believe coronavirus , which has already killed thousands around the world, could be a pandemic. RT talked to US & Russian medics about the In fact, according to the data provided by the European Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the coronavirus mortality rate in Italy currently

Some regions show significant drops in air pollutants as the coronavirus hits work and travel. Scientists say that by May, when CO2 emissions are at their peak thanks to the decomposition of leaves, the levels recorded might be the lowest since the financial crisis over a decade ago.

Acting on ‘the science’

The government announced restrictions on social gatherings and announced a partial lockdown on 24 March, after a slow build up during which pubs and restaurants remained open. The decision to change tack was allegedly based on a new study by researchers from Imperial College London, published on 16 March, which warned that up to 510,000 people could die if no controls were introduced.

But the government’s own chief medical advisor, Chris Whitty, said on 12 March that worst-case scenario planning projected 80% of the country would contract the virus, with a 1% mortality rate. This equated to more than 500,000 deaths.

Taking professional and public concerns seriously, the government could have pointed out the main challenges the UK was facing. While there is still a great deal unknown about Covid-19, these challenges should have been clear from the outset.

We know that the growth of infections follows an exponential function where the doubling time of infection is between two and four days in the first weeks of the epidemic. The incubation period of Covid-19 is rather long, between five and 14 days, which is more than double that of the seasonal flu. This means the likelihood of transmitting the virus before having symptoms is much higher with Covid-19. While the true mortality rate is still unknown, it is assumed to be around 1% for those without underlying health problems. It is much higher otherwise, and it is much higher compared to the seasonal flu.

Coronavirus toll rises to 2,898 dead in Iran

 Coronavirus toll rises to 2,898 dead in Iran SANT-CORONAVIRUS-IRAN-BALANCE SHEET: Coronavirus toll rises to 2,898 dead in Iran © Reuters / WANA NEWS AGENCY CORONAVIRUS BALANCE TURNS UP 2,898 DEAD IN IRAN DUBAI (Reuters) - The death toll of the coronavirus epidemic has further increased in Iran to reach 2,898 dead, 141 more dead in the space of 24 hours, announced Tuesday the word from the Ministry of Health Kianush Jahanpur.

Society for Science & the Public, which publishes Science News, uses cookies to personalize your The name reflects its close similarity to the original SARS coronavirus that sparked an outbreak in 2003 It’s unclear. Health officials and governments have attempted to try to contain the virus — by

Listen to ‘ The Daily’: Failing to Test for Coronavirus . And labs were really quickly able to create a test for that, including the World Health Organization had already approved a test They make their own coronavirus test really fast. And they’re ready to go to help the state by the first week of February.

These three facts provide practical guidance for managing the epidemic. They call for restricting opportunities for exposure to the virus and ramping up the capacity of the healthcare system quickly. Acting sooner rather than later makes a big difference in the total number of infections and deaths.

But as cases mount in the UK, there are nearly 100,000 vacancies for medical professionals in the NHS and the UK has one of the lowest numbers of hospital beds per 1,000 people. Personal protection gear for doctors and nurses is also lacking in many hospitals.

The number of NHS beds per 1,000 people has fallen steadily over the last few decades. (Max Roser, Hannah Ritchie and Esteban Ortiz-Ospina (2020) - 'Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) – Statistics and Research', CC BY)

The UK government has benefited from the British tradition of standing together in a crisis, but it has also thwarted a much-needed critical examination of the government’s actions and pronouncements.

The government determines what knowledge is suitable for public consumption, and tries to develop and update a narrative based on reassurance, rather than transparency and trustworthiness. Precious time has been lost through this top-down approach to crisis management, excluding the public from an important debate.

Reiner Grundmann, Professor of Science and Technology Studies, University of Nottingham

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

More on Coronavirus: are governments really listening to ‘the science’?

Coronavirus / Poland: Debate on planned abortion Wednesday .
HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS-POLAND-ABORTION: Coronavirus / Poland: Debate on planned abortion Wednesday © Reuters / KACPER PEMPEL CORONAVIRUS / POLAND: DEBATE ON PLANNED ABORTION WEDNESDAY WARSAW (Reuters) - Polish lawmakers are due to debate a proposal on Wednesday to tighten up on abortion rules, while human rights activists protested on social media, as public rallies have been limited by l coronavirus epidemic.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!