US News: The Slow Death of the Iran Nuclear Deal - - PressFrom - United Kingdom
  •   
  •   

US NewsThe Slow Death of the Iran Nuclear Deal

09:55  10 may  2019
09:55  10 may  2019 Source:   msn.com

TfL bans adverts from countries with gay death penalty

TfL bans adverts from countries with gay death penalty Transport for London (TfL) has banned adverts from 11 countries with poor human rights records, including six nations which punish gay sex with the death penalty. Iran, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen join Brunei in the list of countries suspended from TfL for their anti-gay laws. Details of the advert review were first reported on May 2 by the Evening Standard. According to The Standard, the changes took place after Green Party London Assembly member Caroline Russell wrote a letter to Mayor Sadiq Khan with concerns about countries with negative human rights records.

Successivo Articolo successivo: The Flash Point Between America and Iran Could Be Iraq’s Militias. Religious freedom card of US ridiculous (Global Times). Why the US is more anxious for a trade deal than China (Global Times).

The Iran nuclear deal framework was a preliminary framework agreement reached in 2015 between the Islamic Republic of Iran and a group of world powers: the P5+1 (the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council—the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, France

The Slow Death of the Iran Nuclear Deal © Official Iranian President website / Handout via Reuters

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

The 2015 Iran deal is dying—not with a bang, but with a series of whimpers. Known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the agreement featured at its center a simple bargain: Iran would agree to verifiable limits on its civil nuclear program given past concerns about nuclear weaponization; in exchange, Tehran would receive economic relief from sanctions related to its nuclear activities. The agreement lasted in that form until last year, when the Trump administration announced that the United States would stop complying with its commitments under the agreement, reimpose sanctions on both Iran and, eventually, those who do business with the Islamic Republic.

US warns Iran of 'unrelenting force' as it deploys carrier

US warns Iran of 'unrelenting force' as it deploys carrier The US has dispatched an aircraft carrier and bomber task force to the Middle East after receiving "clear indications" that Iran was preparing to possibly attack US forces in the region. National security adviser John Bolton said the move to deploy the USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group and a bomber task force to the Gulf was in response to "a number of troubling and escalatory indications and warnings". He did not provide details, but said the US wanted to send a message that "unrelenting force" would meet any attack on US interests or those of its allies.

Iran has reached a historic agreement with major world powers over its nuclear program. What is Iran giving up, and how does it benefit in the long run?

The 2015 Iran deal is dying—not with a bang, but with a series of whimpers. Known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the agreement featured at its center a simple bargain: Iran would agree to verifiable limits on its civil nuclear program, given past concerns about nuclear weaponization

Video: The Real Deal with Iran, Global Oil Inventories (Bloomberg)

Exactly one year to the day since President Trump’s declaration, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani announced a phased set of measures that would suspend some of Iran’s commitments under the agreement, while underscoring that Tehran remained within the JCPOA. He said Tehran would immediately stop observing limits on building up its domestic stockpiles of low-enriched uranium—the kind suitable for reactor use, but not weaponization—and heavy water. After a 60-day period, unless the other signatories of the accord—Britain, France, Germany (the so-called E-3), China, and Russia—managed to deliver on economic benefits in the oil and banking sectors, Tehran would suspend further compliance with sections of the JCPOA, Rouhani added.

After Trump invite, Iran commander says: No talks with US

After Trump invite, Iran commander says: No talks with US Thousands of Iranians have rallied after Friday prayers in support of the country's leaders, chanting traditional anti-U.S. slogans of "Death to America" and "Death to Israel." The demonstrators burned U.S. flags and some threw fake punches at a protester wearing a Trump costume mask. The Trump administration has not offered specific details of the threat allegedly presented by Iran that prompted the U.S. to dispatch the aircraft carrier and B-52 bombers to the Mideast. © Getty B-52 bomber (file photo) The B-52 bombers arrived at an American air base in Qatar, the U.S. Air Force acknowledged Friday.

Isolated, embattled North Korea is the only country to test nuclear weapons in almost 20 years, and it shows no signs of slowing down. Given the controversy surrounding a recent nuclear agreement reached with Iran , it's worth considering exactly how the deal to stop its nuclear ambitions fell apart.

Is the nuclear agreement between the United States and Iran a good or bad deal ? That is what led to World War II and the death of 55 million people. Many in the West denied the darkness of Nazism. They looked the other way when that evil could have been stopped, and then appeased it as it

The Slow Death of the Iran Nuclear Deal © getty Donald J. Trump signs a National Security Presidential Memorandum as he announces the withdrawal of the United States from the Iran nuclear deal. Rouhani’s announcement implicitly made clear recent developments that forced Tehran’s hands. On May 3, a State Department statement said that the U.S. would sanction any individuals or entities involved with the JCPOA-permitted uranium swaps (allowing Iran to send enriched uranium out of its borders in exchange for natural uranium). The statement also noted that the storage of heavy water in excess of current limits would not be permitted by the United States nor should “any such heavy water … be made available to Iran in any fashion.”

In effect, however expensive continued compliance with the deal might have gotten for Iran after the Trump administration reimposed sanctions last year, the U.S. had now sought to change the very terms of compliance—even though it is no longer party to the pact. The remaining countries, try as they might, have been unable to present Iran with a sufficiently robust solution that would work around the reimposed sanctions.

Iran Tells Trump: Don't Wait for Us to Pick Up the Phone

Iran Tells Trump: Don't Wait for Us to Pick Up the Phone Iranian officials rebuffed President Donald Trump’s suggestion that they call him to try to defuse frictions as the U.S. ratcheted up its actions against Tehran. Several top Iranian aides and lawmakers predicted Sunday that the current tensions wouldn’t lead to war, calling the U.S. deployment of an aircraft carrier, warship, bomber jets and missile defenses to the Middle East a propaganda stunt. Antagonism between the countries, already high, has worsened this month since Trump eliminated exceptions to U.S. sanctions on Iranian oil.

So too for the Iran deal . It is neither dishonorable nor unusual for countries to withdraw from international agreements that contravene their vital interests. The Iran nuclear deal , which Mr. Trump has excoriated repeatedly, is hanging by an unraveling thread. Congress won’t improve it.

Mr. X is the first point man the US has headhunted in the ruling elite of post-revolutionary Islamic Iran . 20 divulged his arcane identity, his mode of operation and his prospects of meeting those expectations. This issue also traced the slow demise of the nuclear deal the six powers signed with

The Slow Death of the Iran Nuclear Deal © getty Iranian President Hassan Rouhani addresses the public on Iranian state TV Broadcast in Tehran As a result, Rouhani’s decision to underscore that at the end of the 60-day period Tehran might overshoot existing heavy water and low-enriched uranium limits precisely conveys to the E3, Russia, and China where the blame for its decision should rest: with the United States. Make no mistake: These steps announced by Rouhani would measurably degrade the nonproliferation effectiveness of the JCPOA and, over time, breaking the enriched uranium stockpile limit in particular would serve to shorten Tehran’s breakout time to a single weaponized nuclear device, if a political decision to pursue that path were to be made. Because all the remaining parties to the agreement would seek to avoid that outcome, Iran may hope it is creating the right set of incentives for the E3, Russia, and China to independently seek a rollback from the United States.

The E3+2 remain committed to preserving the JCPOA as agreed in 2015. However, where Iran may have miscalculated in an attempt to increase the urgency with which the remaining parties react is what it said will come after the 60-day period. Rouhani announced that should the remaining parties fail to fulfill their commitments to Iran—specifically on oil and banking, two areas hardest hit by last year’s U.S. sanctions—Tehran would also cease observing JCPOA limits of enrichment levels and roll back modernization of the heavy water IR-40 reactor at Arak. These measures raise the greatest proliferation concern and Iran’s following through on them would take the JCPOA past a point of no return. Most importantly, if the International Atomic Energy Agency were to find Iran in violation of these commitments, the E3+2 may find it difficult to avoid a referral to the UN Security Council to “snap back” pre-2015 nuclear sanctions on Iran. This was always intended to serve as a measure to punish Iran for noncompliance; its use would be agnostic to the reasons why Tehran chose to abjure its commitments. Moreover, the Trump administration would get a vote given the U.S. seat at the Security Council.

Donald Trump Stokes Iran War Fears, Warns 'They Will Suffer Greatly'

Donald Trump Stokes Iran War Fears, Warns 'They Will Suffer Greatly' "We'll see what happens with Iran, if they do anything it will be a big mistake," President Donald Trump warned.

So it goes with America and the Iran deal . President Trump announced Friday that the U.S. would stay in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, even while he refused to certify under U.S. law that the deal is in the national interest. “Decertification,” a bright, shiny object for many, obscures the real

Administrator. Staff member. A Slow Death for the Iran Deal By John R. Bolton. As Abba Eban observed, “Men and nations behave wisely when When Germany, Britain and France began nuclear negotiations with Iran in 2003, they insisted that their objective was to block the mullahs from the

Gallery: Inside the Iran enigma (USA TODAY)

The Slow Death of the Iran Nuclear Deal

In Shakespearean terms, the tragedy of the JCPOA is halfway through the fourth act—the falling action that followed last year’s climactic decision by the United States to gut any value the agreement had for Iran with the reimposition of sanctions. Even while Rouhani emphasized that the 60-day period was designed to allow for negotiations between the E3+2 and Iran, it’s unlikely that Tehran will win back the sanctions benefits it was supposed to receive under the original deal. In the meantime, while Iran seeks to make clear its actions are a reaction to U.S. policy, diplomatic brinkmanship with the remaining parties and, more seriously, violating the deal in ways that increase proliferation concerns will serve to vindicate and empower American hawks, many of whom have been counting Iran to lash out at the JCPOA over the “maximum pressure” campaign.

Tehran didn’t take the bait and announce a complete withdrawal from the agreement, but expect to see the deal’s critics, including John Bolton, the U.S. national security adviser, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, seize on Rouhani’s announcement to shore up the narrative that Iran is not to be trusted. For months, U.S. officials have misrepresented the U.S. intelligence community’s view that Iran remained in compliance with the JCPOA. Now the Trump administration will have additional ammunition to claim—with no basis—that Iran’s noncompliance is a sign that Tehran seeks to rapidly lurch toward the bomb. Preserving the verified limits on Iran’s civil nuclear program the JCPOA conferred was never a priority for this administration; instead, as Pompeo said last year, the source of Iran’s troubles was “the revolutionary nature of the regime itself.”

British General Contradicts U.S. Claim of Increased Threat From Iran-Backed Militias

British General Contradicts U.S. Claim of Increased Threat From Iran-Backed Militias The Pentagon responded with an unusual rebuke of an allied senior officer

The deal was portrayed as a turning point at the time. "This agreement is good for the United States, good for our allies, and good for the safety of the Critics of the Obama administration have argued that the failure of the nuclear agreement with North Korea carries lessons for the recent deal with Iran .

Prior to the Iran deal , the P5+1 had imposed a dizzying and complex set of international sanctions on Iran as punishment for its nuclear development. Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images. “I think we get into a cycle of death by a thousand cuts,” Acton says. “The US does a step to bring it into noncompliance

The Slow Death of the Iran Nuclear Deal © getty Protest against Trump's withdrawal decision from Iran nuclear. The most serious concern now is that the 60-day period elapses without any satisfying result to whatever E3+2 and Iran negotiations might occur and Tehran pushes through enrichment limits and takes steps to reverse the disablement of facilities at Arak. Given a measurable increase in proliferation risks as a result of these actions, well-known views of influential members of the administration like Bolton, and rising tensions between the two countries, the odds of a military conflict grow.

A serious crisis with Iran would not require the total demise of the JCPOA. What makes Iran’s decision to voluntarily announce a suspension of its compliance so risky is the cover it may provide to an administration already motivated by regime change animus to make the case to the American public that Iran is not to be trusted. As far as the administration will be concerned, the “maximum pressure” campaign prosecuted against Iran over the last year worked—not because it was ever meant to bring Iran to the negotiating table to reach a new agreement, but because it got Iran to begin a unilateral move away from compliance with the JCPOA.

MSN UK are Empowering Happiness for mental health awareness month. Find out more about our campaign and the charities working to stop people falling into crisis here.

Foreign Office 'in crisis mode' over US-Iran tensions.
Britain's Foreign Office has gone into crisis mode because of rising tensions in the Gulf between the United States and Iran, Sky News can reveal. At the moment the level of crisis is at the lower end with a small number of additional staff focusing on Iran, and additional reports being produced by officials. However, this level could be increased if the situation in the region worsens, sources said. "We are going into crisis mode," a Whitehall source said, describing it, for now, as "pretty light touch".

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!