•   
  •   

US NewsU.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now

16:21  05 september  2019
16:21  05 september  2019 Source:   msn.com

Why the Queen Didn’t Say No to Boris Johnson

Why the Queen Didn’t Say No to Boris Johnson The country’s monarch is the head of state, but her role is largely ceremonial, and she tries to stay out of politics.

Brexit protesters in London on Wednesday, with one holding a defaced picture of Dominic Cummings, an aide to Prime Minister Boris Johnson .Credit LONDON — In his first days as Britain’s prime minister, Boris Johnson has attempted some of the most tried-and-true tactics of the populist era.

© Drew Angerer/Getty Images Drew Angerer/Getty Images. Joe Biden used his first phone call with Boris Johnson as President-elect to issue a warning against Boris Johnson 's Brexit plans. The President-elect raised the Good Friday Agreement

U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now © Reuters

LONDON — In his first days as Britain’s prime minister, Boris Johnson has attempted some of the most tried-and-true tactics of the populist era.

He sought a hostile takeover of his own party and governing institutions, moving to consolidate their power in his hands.

He exploited the rules and procedures of British democracy, announcing he would suspend Parliament and, later, calling for an election that his opponents suspect he intends to delay.

______________________________________________________________

More on this story:

Second attempt to trigger snap election (Independent)

What happens now MPs have moved to block Boris Johnson from forcing a no-deal Brexit?

What happens now MPs have moved to block Boris Johnson from forcing a no-deal Brexit? Boris Johnson has been dealt a major blow to his authority after MPs wrestled control of parliament and moved to block a no-deal Brexit.

Boris Johnson is battling to reach a Brexit deal. But hardliners already fear betrayal. Even if that is the case, even threatening to renege on an international treaty Johnson now has roughly five weeks to agree a deal with the EU, or face the economic and political repercussions of maximum trade disruption.

Joe Biden used his first phone call with Boris Johnson as U .S. president-elect to warn the British leader not to compromise peace in Northern Ireland in his pursuit of Brexit . President-elect called big European allies starting with U . K . Yet readout points to priorities and concerns on N. Ireland.

PM's brother quits as a Tory MP (Independent)

Revealed: Boris Johnson 'will sabotage Remainer plot by sending letter requesting Brexit extension to EU as new law requires... then send ANOTHER explaining why they should ignore the first'

Revealed: Boris Johnson 'will sabotage Remainer plot by sending letter requesting Brexit extension to EU as new law requires... then send ANOTHER explaining why they should ignore the first' Today, a Bill passed by opposition parties and Tory rebels will receive Royal Assent. It insists that - if a deal is not reached - Mr Johnson must agree to postpone Brexit for at least three months. On Sunday, Mr Johnson bunkered down in Chevening, the Foreign Secretary's country residence, with his closest aides. What next for Brexit? Follow key developments, expert analysis and multiple perspectives as the UK edges closer to leaving the EU It is understood to have included chief strategist Dominic Cummings, where he is thought to have wargamed how the crucial week ahead could pan out.

'The UK's internal market bill is not about undermining the Belfast agreement' says the Environment Secretary George Eustice on Sky News. The House of Lords is expected to vote on the UK's internal market bill later.

Boris Johnson ’s Move: Maybe Constitutional, Definitely Not Democratic . Direct democracy isn’t more valid than representative democracy . It also doesn’t matter that public opinion on Brexit may have shifted since the vote, that referenda in the U . K . are relatively rare, that referenda on issues of

Tories fume over Cummings' foul-mouthed tirade (Guardian)

_____________________________________________________________

He leveraged Britain’s worsening political polarization, portraying any opposition to his plans as support for Jeremy Corbyn, the widely unpopular leader of the Labour Party.

What next for Brexit? Follow key developments, expert analysis and multiple perspectives as the UK edges closer to leaving the EU

And he justified it all by positioning himself as a champion of the people at war with an untrustworthy establishment that must be confronted, even smashed, from within.

Across the democratic world, this playbook has found growing success. And in Britain, the conditions for it are favorable. Polls show rising distrust of institutions and support for radical outsiders and strong-handed leaders. The 2016 vote to leave the European Union, followed by Mr. Corbyn’s takeover of the Labour Party and Mr. Johnson’s of the Conservatives, all underscored populism’s hold.

Johnson vows to 'step up the tempo' of Brexit talks

Johnson vows to 'step up the tempo' of Brexit talks Boris Johnson has said Brexit talks with the European Union will be stepped up in the coming weeks in a bid to secure a new deal. The prime minister's lead negotiator, David Frost, met EU officials this week and agreed to "intensify talks". Downing Street said the initial discussions showed the two sides remain some distance apart on key issues. However, Mr Johnson said he was "encouraged" by the reaction from EU leaders in recent weeks and said it was "now time for both sides to step up the tempo".

But his election increases the costs for Prime Minister Boris Johnson of a failure in the negotiations. For Team Biden and many Democrats , Brexit is an act of self-isolation. The U . K . and the U .S. will retain plenty of common interests from trade and intelligence to fighting climate change, but losing its

Ian Blackford The SNP's Latest Desperate Bid To Stop Brexit Claim Boris Johnson Is Denying Democracy Subscribe To My Live streaming & gaming Channel https

U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now © Andrew Testa for The New York Times Demonstrators filled the street in late August as the prime minister vowed to pursue a “no deal” Brexit.

Yet Mr. Johnson’s moves have, so far, blown up in his face. Parliament rose against him. His party revolted in sufficient numbers that he has lost his governing majority. Voters have made little show of rallying behind him or against his opponents.

Deep into the era of tear-it-all-down populism, in one of the countries most disrupted by that trend, the fail-safes meant to keep politicians in check are, for once, working as intended.

In a time of faltering institutions and norms, they have held. U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now © Andrew Testa for The New York Times Brexit protesters in London on Wednesday (the man in the poster is an aide to Prime Minister Boris Johson).

Britain, for all its evident political chaos, is bucking global populist trends. While that might not hold for long, experts say it offers striking lessons for when and how democracy can work as intended — and when it doesn’t.

DAN HODGES: Boris Johnson is taking a beating... but Jeremy Corbyn will step forward to save him this week

DAN HODGES: Boris Johnson is taking a beating... but Jeremy Corbyn will step forward to save him this week DAN HODGES:The Prime Minister should hold his nerve. Because a man on a white charger may be about to come riding to his rescue. A man by the name of Jeremy Corbyn. © Provided by Associated Newspapers Limited 'Corbyn had better watch himself,' one MP tells me. 'I'm going to keep my head down for the next couple of weeks. But when reselection is out of the way, they can't touch me. And then I'm coming for him'. The Labour leader is pictured on Friday in Fife, Scotland The Labour Party conference starts this week in Brighton. With the Government in disarray, it should be the moment for the Opposition to pounce.

Less Democracy, in an Era of More

Daniel Ziblatt, a Harvard University political scientist who studies democratic decline, credited several technical aspects of British democracy.

Gallery: Leave vs Remain - Brexit reveals a divided UK (Photos)

U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now

Its parliamentary system is thought to be more resistant to charismatic leaders and hardball tactics than a presidential model. And under its unwritten constitution, norms are unusually important and so fiercely guarded. But Mr. Ziblatt repeatedly underscored a broader lesson that he acknowledged could be uncomfortable.

British democracy is, in certain ways, less directly democratic than other Western systems. It puts less power in the hands of voters and party grass roots, and more in the hands of party officials and institutional gatekeepers.

“The parties are much stronger — that’s the reason,” Mr. Ziblatt said. Compared with countries like the United States, he said, “it’s still an incredibly closed system.”

That has hardly made Britain immune to populism, and indeed may have aggravated suspicion of elites as distant and unaccountable. But it has strengthened Britain’s institutional barricades against the effects of polarization and populist backlash.

This hints, Mr. Ziblatt said, at a possible factor in populism’s Western rise that is receiving growing attention among scholars: A wave of modern reforms that made democracies more democratic may have also eroded those internal checks.

Political parties, which once chose candidates by hand, now let party members decide in primaries. Referendums and ballot initiatives are more common. Social media and internet fund-raising opened the door to outsiders. Electoral reforms make it easier for outsider parties to run and win.

Those reforms empowered voters, but at the cost of institutions and norms meant to constrain politics.

U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now © Getty

It is easier now for an outsider like Donald Trump to overtake a party that is more accountable to primary voters than to party bosses. Open elections make is easier for extremist parties like the far-right Alternative for Germany to chip away at mainstream majorities. Governance by referendum allows 52 percent of British voters to overrule the government technocrats who say Brexit would risk disaster.

In a book tracing how democracies collapse, which he wrote with a fellow Harvard University political scientist, Steven Levitsky, Mr. Ziblatt identified too much direct democracy as a risk factor, but found that the conclusion contradicted readers’ belief in democracy as a categorical force for good.

“When Steve and I go around giving talks, this is always the least popular thing that we say,” Mr. Ziblatt said.

There is growing support for this view, however unpopular. A recent book by the political scientists Frances McCall Rosenbluth and Ian Shapiro, “Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy From Itself,” found that some reforms worsen the quality and responsiveness of democracy.

But Britain has lagged somewhat in instituting these reforms. Where it has tried them, for instance in allowing a primary-style open election of party leaders, populist forces have risen. Where Britain has not yet followed, its institutions and norms have held. U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now © PA

Rank-and-file British lawmakers, for example, still win their party’s nomination by being selected rather than running in a primary. So while Mr. Johnson can become party leader by appealing to its most fervently ideological members, his own coalition can more easily ignore those voters, as they have done in halting their leader’s hard-line Brexit strategy.

When Hardball Fails

Legal scholars have a phrase for moves like Mr. Johnson’s attempt to suspend Parliament: constitutional hardball.

He was technically within the rules of British democracy, which allow the prime minister to “prorogue” Parliament, suspending it with the monarch’s ascent. But he was exploiting those rules for political advantage, excluding Parliament for much of a Brexit debate that he was likely to lose. And he did so at the expense of unwritten norms, which favor involving Parliament in a decision of that magnitude.

Gallery: Leave vs Remain - Brexit reveals a divided UK (Photos)

U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now
U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now

Constitutional hardball of this sort has been a hallmark of the populist era. It is encouraged by political polarization, which leads supporters of one party to see their opponents as so dangerous that stopping them is more important than safeguarding democratic norms. It is favored by populist leaders who see strong-handed rule and smashing the system as upsides in their own right.

But it can be dangerous. It forces opposition parties to either fight back in kind, risking a tit-for-tat cycle that has led democracies to erode or collapse outright, or to show restraint at the cost of accepting a potentially permanent disadvantage.

“Look at any failing democracy and you will find constitutional hardball,” Mr. Levitsky and Mr. Ziblatt have written.

U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now © AP

But Mr. Johnson failed, bucking the trend. And the opposition turned him back without playing hardball themselves, upholding rather than eroding the norms that Mr. Johnson had sought to leverage.

“When the government overstepped its executive authority, M.P.s were successful in using formal institutions to take back control to try and fix the current crisis,” said Alexandra Cirone, a Cornell University political scientist. “That’s a good thing!”

This underscores one of the oldest laws in political science: Parliamentary systems like Britain’s are considered more stable than presidential models. That is especially true when it comes to the dangers from constitutional hardball.

In the latter, a president and an opposition legislature can use their respective power bases to wage partisan warfare, which can escalate out of control. In a parliamentary system, Mr. Johnson is playing hardball against the very coalition members whose support he needs to stay in power. Rather than resorting to similar tactics, those lawmakers simply voted against him or crossed the aisle. U.K. Democracy, Tested by Brexit and Boris Johnson, Holds for Now © Reuters

Britain’s democratic exceptionalism — rooted in its late adoption of the direct democracy measures more common elsewhere in the West — may have also played a role.

John Bercow, the speaker of the House of Commons, called Mr. Johnson’s moves a “constitutional outrage” that “undermine his democratic credentials.”

As a nonpartisan official with tremendous procedural power over Parliament, Mr. Bercow embodies the ways that Britain’s political system manages the tension between popular will on one side and institutions and norms on the other. Every time he prevails over a leader like Mr. Johnson, which is seemingly often, it is a reminder that the system sometimes favors norms and institutions in ways that other democracies do not.

Ms. Cirone said it was unclear whether British democracy’s momentary resilience indicated enduring institutional firewalls against some of populism’s excesses, or merely a temporary pause in populism’s rise there.

Because Conservative lawmakers stopped Mr. Johnson by sacrificing their own party membership, she said, that can work only once. “If a politician shows they’re willing to take a stand, willing to stand up to both the prime minister and Brexit, they’re going to be out of politics,” she said.

In the long run, she noted, “It’s bad for politics.”

The Interpreter is a column by Max Fisher and Amanda Taub exploring the ideas and context behind major world events. Follow them on Twitter @Max_Fisher and @amandataub.

Amanda Taub contributed reporting.

MSN UK is committed to Empowering the Planet and taking urgent action to protect our environment. We’re supporting Friends of the Earth to help solve the climate crisis - please give generously here or find out more about our campaign here.

Labour's 'Stop Boris' deal with the Scots: 'Hypocrite' Corbyn holds talks with SNP to push General Election back to NOVEMBER to guarantee No Deal Brexit is dead.
Jeremy Corbyn met Ian Blackford, the Scottish nationalists' Westminster leader, yesterday to agree an election should only be held after Britain has secured another Brexit delay from the EU. Mr Corbyn believes he can snare the Prime Minister by refusing Mr Johnson's preferred October 15 election date, forcing him to seek another delay to Brexit.

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!