US News: Climate Change Is Not World War - PressFrom - United Kingdom
  •   
  •   

US NewsClimate Change Is Not World War

16:05  18 september  2019
16:05  18 september  2019 Source:   msn.com

EU sees US being swayed by its climate change 'example'

EU sees US being swayed by its climate change 'example' Europe believes the United States will end up following its lead in fighting climate change once it sees the economic benefits that carbon-cutting can bring, EU officials said Wednesday. This incentive will be stressed at a UN Climate Change Summit two weeks from now at the United Nations in New York, when parties to the 2015 Paris climate agreement will talk up its implementation despite Washington's withdrawal from the pact under President Donald Trump A special message from MSN: Now is the time to take urgent action to protect our planet.

When Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Senator Edward Markey of Massachusetts introduced their Green New Deal proposal in February, they chose language loaded with nostalgia for one of the country’s most transformative historical moments

By most of the ways we measure wars, climate change is the real deal: Carbon and methane are seizing physical territory, sowing havoc and panic, racking up casualties, and even destabilizing governments. The question is not , are we in a world war ?

Climate Change Is Not World War © Frank Scherschel/The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images American troops on parade before the D-Day invasion.

A special message from MSN:

Now is the time to take urgent action to protect our planet. We’re committed to stopping the devastating effects of the climate crisis on people and nature by supporting Friends of the Earth. Join us here.

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

When Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Senator Edward Markey of Massachusetts introduced their Green New Deal proposal in February, they chose language loaded with nostalgia for one of the country’s most transformative historical moments, urging the country to undertake “a new national, social, industrial and economic mobilization on a scale not seen since World War II and the New Deal era.”

Extreme Weather Displaced a Record 7 Million in First Half of 2019

Extreme Weather Displaced a Record 7 Million in First Half of 2019 Extreme weather events displaced a record seven million people from their homes during the first six months of this year, a figure that put 2019 on pace to be one of the most disastrous years in almost two decades even before Hurricane Dorian battered the Bahamas. The Internal Displacement Monitoring Center, which compiles data from governments, United Nations humanitarian agencies and media reports, concluded in a report published Thursday that floods, landslides, cyclones and other extreme weather events temporarily displaced more people in the first half of this year than during the same period in any other year.

His thesis is simple: Climate change is tantamount to a global war, being waged on us by physics. " World War III is well and truly underway," he That is a mind-boggling pace of building, but McKibben draws from WWII history, particularly historian Mark Wilson’s Destructive Creation, to show that it is

" World War III is well and truly underway," said Bill McKibben, founder of the climate activist group 350.org. By most of the ways we measure wars, climate change is the real deal: Carbon and methane are seizing physical territory, sowing havoc and panic, racking up casualties and even

They are not the first to hark back to the struggles of that era. Former Vice President Al Gore, Senator Lamar Alexander and the environmentalist Lester Brown have all been calling for national “mobilization” to fight climate change for more than a decade. In 2011, environmental groups wrote a letter to President Barack Obama and China’s president, Hu Jintao, demanding “wartime-like mobilization by the governments of the United States and China to cut carbon emissions.” In 2014, the climate psychologist Margaret Klein Salamon and the journalist Ezra Silk founded the group Climate Mobilization, dedicated to an “all-out effort to deploy the strongest and most aggressive solutions for reversing climate breakdown.”

Climate change could lead to food shortages say MPs

Climate change could lead to food shortages say MPs The UK's food supply could be at risk as a result of the impact of climate change on agriculture around the world. MPs say the government needs to recognise the risks to national food security from importing 40% of food, including a fifth of fruit and vegetables from countries at risk of "climate breakdown". The risks are heightened by uncertainty over trade after Brexit, according to the the report from the Environmental Audit Committee. Its chair Mary Creagh said: "We are facing a food security crisis, exacerbated by uncertainty over the UK's future trading position with the EU and the rest of the world.

The warnings about an unfolding climate catastrophe are getting more desperate, yet the march to destruction continues.

Routinizing: Climate change is not adequately addressed in the routine activities of governance organizations responsible for security. However, in the case of a changing climate , our ability to foresee risk has improved significantly. For at least thirty years, world leaders have known that these

Climate Change Is Not World War © Reuters Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Two years later, Bill McKibben wrote an article arguing that climate change was actually World War III, and that the only way to keep from losing this war would be “to mobilize on the same scale as we did for the last world war.”

Yet much of this rhetoric involves little or no understanding of what national mobilization actually meant for Americans living through World War II. As a result, the sacrifices and struggles of the 1940s have begun to seem like a romantic story of collective heroism, when they were in fact a time of rage, fear, grief and social disorder. Countless Americans experienced firsthand the terror and excitement of mortal violence, and nearly everyone saw himself caught up in an existential struggle for the future of the planet.

Gallery: Places around the world already affected by climate change (Photos)

Greta Thunberg met Barack Obama and people are obsessed

Greta Thunberg met Barack Obama and people are obsessed In this age of political madness, the Obama nostalgia is real, and his latest tweet epitomises exactly why. The former president posted a picture in which he is shaking hands with Greta Thunberg - probably one of the most well-known and respected (at least among progressive circles) teenager on the planet. Just 16, @GretaThunberg is already one of our planet’s greatest advocates. Recognizing that her generation will bear the brunt of climate change, she’s unafraid to push for real action. She embodies our vision at the @ObamaFoundation: A future shaped by young leaders like her. pic.twitter.

Climate scientist Wallace Broecker coined the term "global warming in 1975," with a paper entitled Climatic Change : Are We on the Brink of a And they are not alone. Local and state governments around the world have set their own emissions reductions targets and deadlines to give up coal

For years now, people like environmentalist and journalist Bill McKibben have been screaming from the treetops that we need a World War II-scale mobilization to fight the scourge of climate change .

Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War

The experience of war brutalized, dehumanized and traumatized millions. More than 30 million Americans were uprooted from their homes and migrated across the country for military or economic reasons; the 16 million service members among them were stripped of their civilian identities and then shuttled through a vast national bureaucracy in the greatest experiment in social mixing and mass indoctrination in American history. Some were sent to isolated bases in Texas and Alaska, others across the sea to fight in the South Pacific or North Africa. More than 400,000 were killed, and 670,000 more were wounded.

Climate Change Is Not World War © Bettmann Archive/Getty Images Women doing factory work in support of American war efforts. Women entered the work force en masse, experiencing new forms of financial and sexual independence. Both marriage and divorce rates spiked. More than a million African-Americans served in segregated military combat and support units, and millions more migrated north and west to work in an expanding defense industry: the black populations of Los Angeles, Detroit, Cleveland and Philadelphia nearly doubled from 1940 to 1950. Ferocious race riots erupted in cities as whites protested working with blacks, and blacks protested discriminatory violence from the police and military commanders.

Entire industries were retooled to meet wartime needs, and the material culture of American life was transformed beyond imagining: food production, housewares, automobiles, home building, highways, television, film, clothing, travel and music all underwent phenomenal metamorphoses from the 1930s to the 1950s, spurred by wartime consumption, government investment and a metastasizing military.

____________________________________________________

More on our Empowering the Planet campaign:

Make a donation to help our cause

Sign our petition to help prevent plastic in the ocean

Learn how you can ask UK parliament to stop climate change

____________________________________________________

Meanwhile, free speech and labor organizing were curtailed, Americans of Japanese descent were interred in concentration camps (as were draft resisters), families were separated, careers were derailed, and young people’s educations were disrupted. The nation was swept by waves of racial hatred, primarily against the Japanese, whom many Americans thought deserved to be exterminated.

Much of that racial hatred was fed by mass media propaganda focused relentlessly on war. The war was, in the words of the poet William Carlos Williams, “the first and only thing in the world.” It dominated news, advertising, magazines, literature, Hollywood, children’s cartoons, radio programming and politics.

Total mobilization during World War II also led to the birth of what President Dwight D. Eisenhower would in 1961 define as the “military-industrial complex.” Annual military spending (adjusted for inflation) skyrocketed from less than $10 billion before the war to nearly $1 trillion during it, and except for a brief dip between the end of World War II and the Korean War, has never sunk below $300 billion, whether the United States was at war or not. The country now spends more on its military budget than the next seven nations combined, and maintains the largest number of military bases on foreign soil of any country.

Climate Change Is Not World War © Bettmann Archive/Getty Images A white mob in Detroit torched a black man’s car, showering burning gasoline on a passenger-packed trolley, during a race riot in 1943. Such is the legacy of America’s mobilization during World War II, which inaugurated a long-term transformation in American politics, permanently shifting power from the legislative branch to the executive, and gave birth to the national security state, the nuclear arms race, and a culture of militarism. As the journalist Fred Cook wrote in 1962, “No break with the traditions of America’s past has been so complete, so drastic, as the one that has resulted in the growth of the military-industrial complex.”

When people who have never personally experienced war and have little historical sense of what it was like to live through World War II talk about a “war for the climate” or demand a “World War II-scale mobilization,” they are reaching for old-fashioned costumes in which to dress contemporary problems. But the global challenge we face today in climate change differs from what the United States faced in World War II in several key ways.

First, climate change is not a war. There is no clear enemy to mobilize against, and thus no way to ignite the kind of hatred that moved Americans against Japan during World War II. No clear enemy also means no clear victory. It was easy to tell when World War II was over: The Americans, British and Russians had killed enough Germans and Japanese that Axis leaders surrendered. How would we know when the “war on climate change” ends?

Second, as opposed to World War II, when national mobilization meant a flood of government money that truly did lift all boats, the transformations required to address climate change would have real economic losers. Many major players in industry, tech, energy, and government have little incentive to go along with climate mobilization, since it would undermine their profit and power.

Third, mobilization during World War II was a national mobilization against foreign enemies, while what’s required today is a global mobilization against an international economic system: carbon-fueled capitalism. It took President Franklin D. Roosevelt years of political groundwork and a foreign attack to get the United States into World War II. What kind of work over how many years would it take to unify and mobilize the entire industrialized world — against itself?

Climate Change Is Not World War © Ansel Adams/Library of Congress Japanese-Americans preparing for travel to an internment camp in California. The demand for a World War II-scale mobilization to fight climate change faces other problems as well. While many supporters voice the need for revolutionary change to face the existential challenge climate change poses, the fact is that climate change is just one of several progressive concerns. Democrats show a profound lack of unity on whether climate change should come before economic justice, racial justice, revitalizing American democracy, labor rights, immigration reform, health care and gun control.

Campaign promises that we can fix everything at once are sheer pabulum; real legislation requires real priorities, compromises, and sacrifices. In seeking support from Southern Democrats for his efforts to mobilize for war, for example, Roosevelt left Jim Crow segregation untouched, even while his administration was drafting black men into the military. What similar compromises would modern-day Democrats be willing to make?

Finally, national climate mobilization would have cascading unforeseen consequences, perhaps even contradicting its original goals, just like America’s total mobilization during World War II. Looking at the myriad ways that World War II changed America, for better and worse, suggests that it’s difficult to know in advance the ramifications of such a sweeping agenda.

Gallery: Biggest news stories of 2019 (Photos)

Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War
Climate Change Is Not World War

Nevertheless, total mobilization may be our only hope. Ecological collapse is happening all around us. We may be nearing or have already crossed the line where it becomes unstoppable. Piecemeal, consensus-driven, incrementalist solutions are tantamount to global suicide. According to a summary paper last year from leading scientists on global climate trajectories, the changes needed to stabilize the earth’s climate “require a fundamental reorientation and restructuring of national and international institutions.”

Such a program would be another order of magnitude larger and more complex than America’s military mobilization during World War II. The problem of climate change is bigger than the New Deal. It’s bigger than the Great Depression. It’s bigger than war. The problem of climate change is the problem of how and whether human beings can live together sustainably on this planet.

What would total mobilization really mean? Judging from what happened in World War II, it would mean social upheaval, violence, censorship, curtailed freedoms, dubious compromises and radical changes in American culture and politics. Yet it also just might mean the survival of human civilization.

Roy Scranton (@royscranton), an assistant professor of English at Notre Dame, is the author of “Learning to Die in the Anthropocene,” the novel “I Heart Oklahoma!” and “Total Mobilization: World War II and American Literature.”

______

______

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: [email protected].

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

MSN UK is committed to Empowering the Planet and taking urgent action to protect our environment. We’re supporting Friends of the Earth to help solve the climate crisis - please give generously here or find out more about our campaign here.

Tea drinkers urged to avoid plastic tea bags after tests found bags shed billions of particles of microplastic .
Billions of particles of microplastic are being shed into every cuppa that is made using plastic tea bags, experts have found. A team of scientists from McGill University in Canada say the a plastic tea bag brewing in 95C temperatures releases a staggering 11.6 billion microplastics into one single cup. These tiny microplastics - at levels higher than other foods and drinks - are then consumed. Nathalie Tufenkji, from the university, told NewBillions of particles of microplastic are being shed into every cuppa that is made using plastic tea bags, experts have found.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!