•   
  •   

US News The Impeachment Hearings Revealed a Lot — None of It Great for Trump

10:25  22 november  2019
10:25  22 november  2019 Source:   msn.com

Labour Dáil hopeful said he wouldn't 'mourn any of them' if a bomb went off in TV studio

  Labour Dáil hopeful said he wouldn't 'mourn any of them' if a bomb went off in TV studio Labour Dáil hopeful said he wouldn't 'mourn any of them' if a bomb went off in TV studioFingal county councillor Duncan Smith, who is running in the forthcoming Dáil by-election, said he regretted the tweet posted in June 2012 “if it caused offence”, but later said “there is nothing really offensive there”.

In his opening statement on Thursday, the last day of the scheduled public hearings in the House’s impeachment inquiry, Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, expressed his hope that “today’s hearing marks the merciful end of this spectacle in the

In Ukraine, the impeachment hearings are met with a big yawn. KYIV — Ukraine is at the center of the impeachment inquiry against Trump . Ukrainian leaders have done their best to stay out of it , seeing only peril in commenting for fear Democrats or Republicans could use them as fuel in their

  The Impeachment Hearings Revealed a Lot — None of It Great for Trump © AP

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

In his opening statement on Thursday, the last day of the scheduled public hearings in the House’s impeachment inquiry, Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, expressed his hope that “today’s hearing marks the merciful end of this spectacle in the impeachment committee.”

One can understand Mr. Nunes’s eagerness to be done with this phase of the investigation, which was prompted by allegations that President Trump conditioned certain diplomatic and military support of Ukraine, including nearly $400 million in aid, on the willingness of that nation’s president to do his political bidding. Specifically, Mr. Trump wanted Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, to announce an investigation into a debunked conspiracy theory that Ukraine, not Russia, had hacked Democratic computers during the 2016 campaign, along with a second inquiry, into alleged corruption by one of Mr. Trump’s 2020 political rivals, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son Hunter.

Sondland says Giuliani was pushing for Ukraine quid pro quo

  Sondland says Giuliani was pushing for Ukraine quid pro quo Sondland says Giuliani was pushing for Ukraine quid pro quo“Mr. Giuliani was expressing the desires of the president of the United States, and we knew that these investigations were important to the president,” Sondland testified.

Are the impeachment hearings moving the needle on public opinion? With David Leonhardt out He thinks the inability to persuade more Americans of President Trump ’s guilt argues for impeaching the president quickly before moving onto other issues. I think education reform has accomplished a lot .

Trump impeachment hearings : Sondland says 'We followed the president's orders' – live. Trump ’s impeachment by the Democratic-controlled House would put him on trial in the Senate, but a Republican majority there That’s how President Trump and I communicate. A lot of four-letter words.

Despite Mr. Nunes’s fantasyland contentions that the testimony of the past two weeks has served only to expose Democrats’ “asinine,” “pitiful” attempts to “overthrow a president,” in reality the proceedings have produced a number of startling revelations, none of them exonerating the president.

Related: The blunt speaking British miner's daughter who tried to steady Trump (Telegraph)

a woman standing in front of a mirror posing for the camera: Fiona Hill and David Holmes being sworn in before the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday. © Damon Winter/The New York Times Fiona Hill and David Holmes being sworn in before the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday.

The biggest bombshell came Wednesday, with the appearance of Gordon Sondland, the Trump megadonor turned ambassador to the European Union, who dismantled the top talking points of presidential apologists. Key takeaway: There was a quid pro quo.

Dublin City Council considers re-trial of street recycling bins

  Dublin City Council considers re-trial of street recycling bins The council previously trialed the idea at two city centre locations in 2018.The first meeting of the council’s Climate Change, Environment and Energy next week will unveil plans to trial segregated street bins in certain parts of the city as part of its latest litter management plan.

In the ongoing impeachment hearings into US President Donald Trump , his former top Russia adviser Fiona Hill described the idea that Ukraine rather than Hill made the remarks as part of the ongoing impeachment hearing into Trump . She said that Russian interference in 2016 was "beyond dispute"

After 10 witnesses and more than 30 hours of testimony, public impeachment hearings continued Thursday, with Fiona Hill and David Holmes testifying on Capitol Hill.

Thursday brought only more grief for Mr. Nunes and other Trump defenders. As their closing witnesses, House Democrats called Fiona Hill, formerly the National Security Council’s top expert on Russia, and David Holmes, a political officer at the American Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine.

Mr. Holmes is the official who overheard the July 26 phone call between Mr. Trump and Mr. Sondland in which the president quizzed the ambassador about the status of the investigations he was seeking. Mr. Holmes also recalled Mr. Sondland telling him after the call that the president didn’t give a fig about Ukraine except for the “big stuff” that directly affected him, such as the “Biden investigation.”

Former White House national security aide Fiona Hill. © AP Former White House national security aide Fiona Hill. Mr. Holmes had more general observations about the impact of playing politics with America’s Ukraine policy. Beginning in March, he recalled, “the three priorities of security, economy and justice and our support for Ukrainian democratic resistance to Russian aggression became overshadowed by a political agenda promoted by former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and a cadre of officials operating with a direct channel to the White House.” Mr. Holmes explained the confused lines of authority that developed, fueling conflicting agendas and threatening to undermine longstanding policy goals.

How Russian President Vladimir Putin Emerged as a Winner in President Donald Trump's Impeachment Hearings

  How Russian President Vladimir Putin Emerged as a Winner in President Donald Trump's Impeachment Hearings How Russian President Vladimir Putin Emerged as a Winner in President Donald Trump's Impeachment Hearings“I would ask that you please not promote politically driven falsehoods that so clearly advance Russian interests,” Hill said in her Nov. 21 opening statement to lawmakers, some of whom had questioned witnesses about a widely debunked theory that Trump had pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate.

We’re closing in on the second full week of public impeachment hearings , during which diplomats and administration officials have delivered compelling testimony that has largely obliterated nearly every Republican defense of Trump ’s Ukraine conduct. The theory, for example

On Day 5 of the House impeachment hearings , Fiona Hill, a former Russia expert for the National Security Council, and David Holmes, political counselor at U.S. embassy in Ukraine, testify before lawmakers following a day of explosive testimony on Wednesday.

“President Zelensky needed to show U.S. support at the highest levels in order to demonstrate to Russian President Putin that he had U.S. backing, as well as to advance his ambitious anticorruption reform agenda at home,” said Mr. Holmes.

Dr. Hill was even more pointed with her message, which boiled down to: Republican lawmakers need to stop behaving like Russian stooges.

“Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of you on the committee appear to believe that Russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country — and that perhaps, somehow, for some reason, Ukraine did,” she said. “This is a fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves.”

Former White House national security aide Fiona Hill. © Reuters Former White House national security aide Fiona Hill. Dr. Hill warned that Russia’s “goal is to weaken our country” and that indulging such fantasies played into Vladimir Putin’s hands. (Dr. Hill, it should be noted, co-wrote a 500-page book analyzing the Russian president’s psyche.) She stressed, “These fictions are harmful even if they are deployed for purely domestic political purposes.”

Man who attempted to rob Cork fast food restaurant at knife point is arrested

  Man who attempted to rob Cork fast food restaurant at knife point is arrested Man who attempted to rob Cork fast food restaurant at knife point is arrestedThe man, who is in his 20s, was detained by gardaí in the Tower Street area of the city centre by officers responding to a report of an attempted armed robbery.

Dr. Hill is not one to get intimidated or flustered. This is, after all, a woman who, at age 11, once had a classmate set fire to one of her pigtails. She put out her flaming hair with her bare hands and finished the test she was taking.

With her crisp British accent, she at times came across as an exasperated adult chiding naughty children. “In the course of this investigation, I would ask that you please not promote politically driven falsehoods that so clearly advance Russian interests,” she said. “If the president, or anyone else, impedes or subverts the national security of the United States in order to further domestic political or personal interests, that is more than worthy of your attention.”

Dr. Hill also recalled her frustration over Mr. Sondland working at cross purposes with what she and other colleagues understood to be official United States policy aims. “He was being involved in a domestic political errand, and we were being involved in national security foreign policy, and those two things had just diverged.” She acknowledged that Mr. Sondland had not been wrong in feeling “that the National Security Council was always trying to block him. What we were trying to do was block us from straying into domestic or personal politics.”

Gallery: Quotes from the fifth impeachment hearing (Reuters)

Man arrested in connection with investigation into sudden death of baby in Armagh

  Man arrested in connection with investigation into sudden death of baby in Armagh Man arrested in connection with investigation into sudden death of baby in ArmaghPolice Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) detectives are investigating the circumstances surrounding the death in the Keady area of the Northern Ireland county.

a group of people sitting in front of a crowd: The fifth day of public proceedings in the impeachment inquiry against Trump featured testimony by the official former National Security Council aide Fiona Hill and by David Holmes, political counselor at the U.S. embassy official in Kiev. Andrew Harrer/Pool via Reuters

Both witnesses seemed intent on conveying the serious national security implications of the behavior being investigated by the committee. It was a critical message both for the general public and for the assembled lawmakers.

The Republicans’ pushback was what we have come to expect. They relied heavily on a swirl of distractions and conspiracy theories, with frequent invocations of the Steele dossier, alleged Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 race and deep-state actors ostensibly intent on bringing down Mr. Trump.

The president hit Twitter to imply that Mr. Holmes was lying about having overheard his phone call with Mr. Sondland. And the White House press secretary, Stephanie Grisham, went with a variation on the “hearsay” defense: “As has been the case throughout the Democrats’ impeachment sham, today’s witnesses rely heavily on their own presumptions, assumptions and opinions. These two witnesses, just like the rest, have no personal or direct knowledge regarding why U.S. aid was temporarily withheld.”

As the hearings wound down, it seemed unlikely that the trajectory of the inquiry had meaningfully shifted. House Democrats appeared all the more convinced that the president has committed impeachable offenses, with House Republicans equally committed to standing by their man.

But the witnesses fulfilled their public duty no less admirably — especially considering Mr. Trump’s demands that people not cooperate.

“I believe that those who have information that the Congress deems relevant have a legal and a moral obligation to provide it,” said Dr. Hill.

She’s not wrong. The first goal of these hearings was to air the facts, with hopes of enabling the public to make sense of the overheated partisan spin. Too bad the president and his defenders had a different goal in mind.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Gardai treating death of man whose body discovered in container in Dublin as 'tragic incident' .
Gardai treating death of man whose body discovered in container in Dublin as 'tragic incident'The man's body was discovered just before 11am in Ballymun , north Dublin on Monday morning.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!