•   
  •   

US News Opinions | What would happen if we randomly gave $1,000 to poor families? Now we know.

15:00  09 december  2019
15:00  09 december  2019 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Appeal for witnesses to assault after man found dead in home 13 days later

  Appeal for witnesses to assault after man found dead in home 13 days later Appeal for witnesses to assault after man found dead in home 13 days laterMichael “Mick” Mulvey, a 55-year-old family man who lived in the Darling Estate, just off the Navan Road in Dublin, was found dead by his shocked partner in his home on Wednesday.

a herd of cattle grazing on a lush green field: A herdboy looks after their livestock on the open grassland near the Rift Valley town of Mai Mahiu, Kenya on Nov. 27. © Marius Bosch/Reuters A herdboy looks after their livestock on the open grassland near the Rift Valley town of Mai Mahiu, Kenya on Nov. 27.

What happens to one of the world’s poorest places if you randomly pick more than 10,000 poor families out of an eligible pool and give them $1,000 each, no strings attached?

It sounds like a plan some mad scientist might hatch, but no: It was actually a group of researchers from the University of California at Berkeley, Princeton and the University of California at San Diego who came up with it. They have just unveiled the results of a sprawling, first-of-its-kind study that ought to put to bed some enduring myths about the effects of giving cash directly to the very poor in rural Africa.

Iraq's prime minister to resign after day of deadly violence

  Iraq's prime minister to resign after day of deadly violence Iraq's prime minister has announced that he is resigning in the wake of deadly anti-government protests. © Imagebridge Adel Abdul-Mahdi will offer his resignation Adel Abdul-Mahdi's announcement was broadcast on Iraq's state television, just over a year after he took office.It comes a day after more than 40 protesters were killed by Iraqi security forces, and hours after the country's top Shia cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, called for a change in leadership.Ayatollah Al-Sistani also warned of civil war amid the violence in the country's southern provinces.

Dozens of studies have already shown conclusively that just handing very poor people a considerable sum of cash can transform their lives in lasting ways. That is hardly surprising. But this study set out to ask a different question: What about their neighbors?

Say you’re living in deep poverty in rural Kenya, and the poorest people in the village next door to yours get a big cash transfer, but you don’t. Does that do you any good at all? Or is your neighbor’s luck your misfortune, because local prices jump, say, leaving you worse off than before? Setting aside the direct recipients, what do cash transfers do to local economies?

Working in Siaya County, in rural western Kenya, researchers Dennis Egger, Johannes Haushofer, Edward Miguel, Paul Niehaus and Michael Walker spent five years and more than $10 million to find answers to these questions. 

John Downing: 'Dress rehearsal will give parties much to reflect on ahead of main event next year'

  John Downing: 'Dress rehearsal will give parties much to reflect on ahead of main event next year' The four by-election count results today will sharpen our view of the big tussle next year between Leo Varadkar and Micheál Martin for the keys of Government Buildings. Mr Martin expects a good day out - Mr Varadkar is preparing to put the best gloss on a bad story. Those ballot boxes in Dublin Fingal, Dublin Mid-West, Cork North-Central and Wexford will give us a very strong indicator of the national mood. The canvass revealed that all four constituencies share common problems: health, housing, crime, childcare, transport and traffic. Each brings its own special flavour of local issues.

Three African farmers using a mobile application in Kiambu, Kenya. The image was taken in June 10, 2014. © Getty Three African farmers using a mobile application in Kiambu, Kenya. The image was taken in June 10, 2014.

In partnership with GiveDirectly — a charity I’ve written about before — they carried out detailed surveys of thousands of people both in villages that had been randomly picked to receive cash transfers and in those that didn’t get them. This allowed them to do something no researcher had tried before: Use a randomized controlled trial to identify and measure the impacts of handing out cash on the entire area.

Their findings are significant: Cash transfers benefited the entire local economy, not just direct recipients. As money made its way through the area, both families who did and did not receive cash ended up substantially better off.

Just as importantly, they could find little in the way of adverse effects from the experiment, either in villages that got the cash or in those that didn’t. Spending on temptation goods — such as cigarettes, alcohol and gambling — did not increase. People didn’t work less. Rates of domestic violence didn’t change, nor did more children drop out of school. Local income inequality levels did not change. And contrary to a common fear, the program had minimal effect on prices: Inflation increased less than 1 percent over and above Kenya’s overall rate.

Detectives treating case of 11-month-old boy who died in Armagh as murder

  Detectives treating case of 11-month-old boy who died in Armagh as murder Detectives treating case of 11-month-old boy who died in Armagh as murderThe boy died overnight on Monday in Keady, Co Armagh.

What made the study really path-breaking, though, is that it was huge: The money handed out amounted to more than 15 percent of the GDP in the treatment area, reaching 10,500 of the 65,385 households there. Dump that much cash into a local economy, and you would certainly expect it to grow. But by how much?

That, it turns out, is a hotly disputed question. You might recall the furious debate after the 2008 financial crisis about the “fiscal multiplier” to stimulus spending in the United States: Economists tussled endlessly over just how much extra economic activity the government would generate from each extra dollar it spent.

In the United States, depending on the study, researchers usually put that number in the range of 1.5 to 2.0 — meaning that every $100 the government spends, between $150 and $200 worth of economic activity is generated. Back in 2013, researchers had estimated the number might be in the same ballpark in Kenya.

But this study found a much bigger impact: Every $100 given directly to the poorest households was generating between $250 and $270 in GDP. That’s a fiscal multiplier in the range of 2.5 to 2.7 18 months after the money was spent — a huge number by global standards.

New witness backs up gardaí's theory that Deely 'killed in row with gang'

  New witness backs up gardaí's theory that Deely 'killed in row with gang' New witness backs up gardaí's theory that Deely 'killed in row with gang'Gardaí have been following a line of inquiry that Mr Deely - who will have been missing 19 years this Sunday - got into a row with a criminal gang on the night he disappeared in Dublin.

How come? Because the very poor spend their money locally, and the shops they spend it at, in turn, spend it locally again, a chain effect that stimulates demand and lifts revenue for the tiny businesses throughout the area. The research found some evidence — though not conclusive — that local wages had risen, perhaps more strongly in villages that directly received cash than in their neighbors.

This is, of course, just one study in one area of one country, and generalizations are always perilous. Studies on this scale are expensive to carry out and take years to analyze, a key reason nothing like this had been attempted before. But these results suggest that could change, as donors and developing governments catch on to the elegant simplicity of giving the poorest cash.

“There’s more and more interest in running these programs at scale,” Berkeley’s Miguel, one of the study’s authors, told me in a phone interview in November. “More and more governments are coming around to the benefits of cash transfers.”

One by one, the prejudices against direct cash transfers to the very poor have fallen, as research shows the myths about the indolent poor are just that: myths. As the doubts clear, more and more actors in international development need to come around to the insight that the simplest, cleanest intervention often has the greatest effect. 

Our Christmas Together Appeal proudly supports Age UK and The Children’s Society who are providing vital services to society’s most vulnerable this festive season. Because no one should feel alone. Together we can make a big difference. Join us here.

Warning families facing cost rise as crèches are rocked by 300pc insurance cover hike .
Warning families facing cost rise as crèches are rocked by 300pc insurance cover hikeA number of operators warned the Irish Independent crèche owners now face a stark choice - either pass the cost of massive insurance premium hikes on to parents or face the threat of closure.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!