•   
  •   

US News ‘OK, Now What?’: Inside Team Trump’s Scramble to Sell the Soleimani Hit to America

18:00  19 january  2020
18:00  19 january  2020 Source:   thedailybeast.com

Activists warn Shannon Airport could become a terrorist target following Trump’s spat with Iran

  Activists warn Shannon Airport could become a terrorist target following Trump’s spat with Iran An activist group has warned that Ireland could be the next target of extremist actions at Shannon Airport due to US military use of the airport. Video: US-Iran tensions: A timeline of incidents between two longtime rivals (FOX News)

The Trump administration was surprised by the magnitude of the attack on the embassy in Baghdad, viewed it as an escalation and believed that Soleimani was behind it. Presented with a target of opportunity, the president authorised the strike. What's Trump ' s strategy?

Mr Trump said Soleimani "was planning a big attack" when he was killed in a US drone strike in Baghdad last Friday. Soleimani 's killing has raised fears of a conflict between the US and Iran. What are Mr Trump ' s On another of his earlier threats - to hit Iraq with sanctions if it told the US to leave

Photo Illustration by Sarah Rogers/The Daily Beast / Photos Getty © Provided by The Daily Beast Photo Illustration by Sarah Rogers/The Daily Beast / Photos Getty

In the hours after the killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani on Jan. 3, US officials in the White House, Pentagon, and State Department worked overtime on assembling a plan to handle the fallout, only to watch senior administration officials and the president himself scuttle their effort in real time on national television. 

The ensuing days became a mad dash to reconcile the intense intra-administration tensions over what the intelligence actually said about Iranian plots, and how best to sell their case to the American public. At the very top was a president who stewed and complained to staff about how the killing he’d just ordered might negatively affect his re-election prospects and ensnare him in a quagmire in the Middle East of his own creation.

Intelligence says Iranian missile downed airliner, perhaps by mistake: Trudeau

  Intelligence says Iranian missile downed airliner, perhaps by mistake: Trudeau OTTAWA — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says intelligence from multiple sources indicates that an Iranian missile downed the Ukraine International Airlines flight that crashed near Tehran on Wednesday. He says the strike might have been unintentional. Trudeau was providing an update amid multiple reports earlier Thursday that pointed the finger at Iran for the downing of a the plane, killing all on board including 138 people who were headed to Canada."The evidence indicates that the plane was shot down by an Iranian surface-to-air missile. This may well have been unintentional," Trudeau told a Parliament Hill news conference Thursday afternoon.

President Trump said Friday that he ordered the targeted killing of Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani in Iraq in order “to stop a war.” Several of the candidates seeking the Democratic presidential nomination said that killing Soleimani brought the country to the brink of war with Iran.

Trump says he ordered Qassem Soleimani strike to protect American lives. “ Soleimani was plotting imminent and sinister attacks on American diplomats and military personnel, but we caught him in the act and terminated him. “What the United States did yesterday should have been done long ago.

The plan to take out Soleimani had been approved months earlier by President Donald Trump after Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and then-National Security Adviser John Bolton pushed for more to be done to manage Iran’s aggression in the Middle East. But the president for years tried to avoid a direct military confrontation with Tehran, and hitting Soleimani was a move that could edge the two countries closer to war.

When an American contractor was killed in Iraq in late December, President Trump’s national security team presented him with a slew of options on how to respond, and killing Soleimani was on the list. National security advisers reminded the president that he had publicly drawn a line in the sand, saying that if the regime killed Americans there would be severe consequences. Still, the strike was a departure from the regular Trump playbook and officials knew it would take a robust effort to explain not only the reasoning behind the attack but also the administration’s goal on Iran.

BREAKING NEWS: Iranian national 'armed with knives and an ax' is detained on a bridge just four miles from Mar-a-Lago - as police search his car parked at Palm Beach airport

  BREAKING NEWS: Iranian national 'armed with knives and an ax' is detained on a bridge just four miles from Mar-a-Lago - as police search his car parked at Palm Beach airport The man was taken into custody on Flagler Memorial Bridge on Friday on Friday, and also had an undisclosed amount of U.S. currency on him. Police said he had no known address.The man was taken into custody on Flagler Memorial Bridge on Friday on Friday, and also had an undisclosed amount of U.S. currency on him, according to WPTV.

Trump appeared to contradict his previous reasons for killing Soleimani , saying he was a 'noted terrorist' but not mentioning any 'imminent threat' to In his first Friday prayers sermon for eight years, Khamenei also told worshippers chanting 'Death to America ' that the elite Guards could take their

Mr Trump said the general was "directly and indirectly responsible for the deaths of millions of people". Soleimani ' s killing marks a major escalation in Under his leadership, Iran had bolstered Hezbollah in Lebanon and other pro -Iranian militant groups, expanded its military presence in Iraq and Syria and

Video: "Iran Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei says Iran is 'not seeking war with US'" (The Independent)

“There was this sudden nature about it all. Yeah, it had been in the works for some time. But it didn’t feel like we were all thinking the same on how to move forward,” said one US official, referring to the strike on Soleimani. “It was like, ‘OK, now what?’” 

For more than a week, Trump, Pompeo, Vice President Mike Pence and officials from the national security community, including at the Pentagon, held twice-daily meetings and conference calls to make sure all government agencies were on the same page regarding messaging, according to two individuals familiar with those conversations.

Despite that effort, what resulted appeared to be an uncoordinated effort to justify an action by national security officials who were varied in their answers about the pre-strike intelligence and who struggled to define the administration’s strategy on Iran post strike.

Defence Secretary fears US may no longer be UK's key ally in conflicts

  Defence Secretary fears US may no longer be UK's key ally in conflicts Britain may have to fight future conflicts without the help of the US as its key ally, Defence Secretary Ben Wallace has warned. Mr Wallace worries that the increasing isolationist policies of US President Donald Trump mean that the UK may need to rethink the assumptions that have underpinned its defence planning for the last 10 years.The warning comes as Prime Minister Boris Johnson gets ready to lead the "deepest review" of Britain's security, defence and foreign policy since the Cold War.

But most importantly for Americans , Soleimani was behind the deaths of hundreds of American soldiers during the Iraq War. The killing of Soleimani doesn't have the emotional power of the takedown of Osama bin Laden, and he wasn't even as well-known to Americans as ISIS founder Abu

Trump delivered the account Friday night to Republican Party donors at his Florida residence, Mar-a-Lago, for a fundraising dinner, U. S . media said. CNN on Saturday broadcast an audio recording in which the president gave new details about the January 3 strike at the airport in Baghdad.

That internal confusion on how to re-frame the administration’s approach to dealing with Iran led to weeks of what appeared to be frequent mixed messaging, critiques about the administration's apparent lack of strategy, calls from Congress for more robust intelligence briefings—and allegations that Trump and his lieutenants were actively misleading a nation into a sharp military escalation.

This article is based on interviews with 10 US government officials and several former administration officials. The State Department and White House House did not comment on the record for this story.

Worry over the “counterpunch”

For several days following Soleimani’s assassination, Pentagon officials warned Trump and his national security advisers that Iran had a variety of responses it could carry out to make the Americans pay. Among them, sources said, were Iranian attacks on senior US military officers overseas, or violence targeting American outposts in countries like Iraq. Their bottom line was that Iran would hit back, and hit back hard. 

Iran Hasn’t Avenged Soleimani’s Death Yet

  Iran Hasn’t Avenged Soleimani’s Death Yet The killing of Qassem Soleimani was a monumental blow to Iran’s regional ambitions. The country could be about to go back to basics in its response.BEIRUT—About two years ago, Qassem Soleimani delivered a speech at a ceremony in Tehran marking a decade since the death of Imad Mughniyeh, the senior Hezbollah commander killed in a car-bomb explosion in the heart of Damascus, an attack carried out by the CIA with support from Israel.

If 2020 Democrats actually cared about hardworking Americans , they would not be touting a socialist agenda that threatens to destroy the economic progress that has been made over the last three years. That’ s exactly why voters are going to choose @realDonaldTrump again in 2020.

In his address to high-profile GOP sponsors, ahead of the formal start of the 2020 presidential campaign, POTUS pointed out that the Iranian general’ s curses against America caused him to decide on his assassination, arguing the commander had been “down on” their “list".

The president worried aloud to his team about how the strike could impact the way voters viewed him in the upcoming election. After all, avoiding costly foreign wars in the Middle East had been one of the key promises— and points of contrast—he made as a candidate in 2016. 

One official told The Daily Beast that in meetings at the White House Trump was “preoccupied” with ensuring that his public statements on Iran—notably that he would not drag the US into a war with the country—would hold following the assassination. Once Soleimani was gone, Trump was adamant that the administration “get things back to normal” with Iran, one official told The Daily Beast. 

According to another US official, senior administration officials, including President Trump, were framing the strike as a de-escalatory measure even before the attack was ordered. The idea was that if the US didn’t hit Soleimani, more people would die because Iran would continue to carry out attacks in the region.

  ‘OK, Now What?’: Inside Team Trump’s Scramble to Sell the Soleimani Hit to America © Getty

Trump’s insistence on returning to “normal” with Iran directly after he ordered the death of the Islamic republic’s top military leader underscores this president’s wild vacillations between diplomatic overtures and teasing violent retribution, where a call for peace one moment could be followed by a threat to destroy Iranian cultural sites—a tactic that is considered a war crime under international law.

Iranian president says ‘no limit’ to nuclear enrichment

  Iranian president says ‘no limit’ to nuclear enrichment The US has imposed ‘maximum’ sanctions on Iran’s economy.In a speech before the heads of banks, President Hassan Rouhani said the nuclear programme is in a “better situation” than it was before the nuclear agreement with world powers.

Addressing Trump , the commander of the Quds Force of Iran’ s Islamic Revolution Guards Corps Cheers to General Soleimani , very well expressed. The israeli quisling, and neocon, trump is what he said he is. They can not sell to people what corporative fascist powers are selling to westerners

The Trump administration’ s initial justification for the 3 January strike that killed Iran’ s Soleimani was the US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said that the assassination of Qassem Soleimani was part “President Trump and those of us in his national security team are re-establishing deterrents

The president inquired about this not long before greenlighting, then abruptly calling off, military strikes on Iran that he approved knowing the body count was estimated to be high.

And even as he publicly celebrated this massive escalation with Iran and aggressively campaigned on, and fundraised off of, his decision, Trump continued to lament privately to close allies that it would be “crazy” to plunge America into another invasion or full-blown war in the Middle East, according to two people who spoke to Trump in the days following the Soleimani hit.

He then pledged he would not “let it happen” on his “watch.” 

Of course, none of the president’s stated reservations about starting a new war, or his stated desire to bring soldiers home, kept him and his administration from deploying thousands more American troops to the region as the US and Iran walked up to the brink of all-out warfare early this month.

The Soleimani strike, though, forced the president to pause, even just briefly, to consider whether what he had ordered would have lasting, irreversible consequences—repercussions he’d never meant to bump up against.

“You know, he's sincerely grappling with this, which is good. I mean, war should be hard and we should grapple with it. I just don't want any one person to say, okay, I've grappled with it we should do it,” Sen. Tim Kaine told The Daily Beast in an interview about the escalating tension in Iran. Since the Soleimani strike, the Virginia Democrat has led a bipartisan push in the Senate to rein in Trump’s authority to wage war in Iran without congressional approval. 

Rocket fire hits US Embassy compound in Iraq: reports

  Rocket fire hits US Embassy compound in Iraq: reports The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad was struck by at least one rocket on Sunday, though no casualties were reported, according to multiple reports. Fox News and CNN reported that the rocket struck a dining area, which was at least partially burned by the blast. A U.S. official told Fox News that no injuries or deaths were reported and that all personnel were safe and accounted for. © Getty Images Rocket fire hits US Embassy compound in Iraq: reports The attack came as other rockets reportedly struck the side of a river in the city's Green Zone, also failing to cause any casualties or injuries, according to Fox.

President Trump denied on Friday afternoon that the U. S . drone airstrike that killed Iranian general Qassem Soleimani on Thursday was intended to “start a war.” Trump reiterated that Soleimani , whom he called the “number one terrorist anywhere in the world,” was planning “imminent and sinister

The Trump administration will tell Puerto Rico to stop paying contractors on disaster projects an hour, even after it was hit by recurring earthquakes this month, officials said. If there was no ‘imminent’ attack from Iran, killing Soleimani was illegal.

“If I were president I shouldn't have the ability to just on my own say, let’s do this,” Kaine added. “It should be deliberative, because that's what the troops and their families deserve.”

President Trump’s concerns were fed, in part, by comments from lawmakers and other analysts that the strike on Soleimani could lead quickly to a major, sustained conflict.

“We need to get ready for a major pushback. Our people in Iraq and the Middle East are going to be targeted. We need to be ready to defend our people in the Middle East,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) in an interview with The Daily Beast the night of the strike. “I think we need to be ready for a big counterpunch.”

“Overselling the intel”

In the first week after the Jan. 3 strike, officials appeared on television and radio shows in an attempt to frame the Soleimani strike as an act of de-escalation. Just hours after the strike, Brian Hook, the special representative for Iran, went on BBC World Service radio saying that killing Soleimani was designed to “advance the cause of peace.”

Officials at the State Department, in coordination with the White House, drafted talking points advising those who would appear in the media to underscore Soleimani’s “malign activities” and his role in killing American troops over the years, according to two US officials. 

But the White House wanted to advance a different argument—one that wasn’t about what Iran had already done, but what US officials claimed Iran was about to do. They said the US killed Soleimani because he was planning “imminent” attacks that would harm American interests. 

That talking point in particular was emailed out to officials across the Pentagon, White House, and State Department, and even to several GOP lawmakers’ offices repeatedly the week of the strike, according to several officials who spoke to The Daily Beast. It became, for a time, the central rationale the administration offered for the assassination. 

We Can End Our Endless Wars

  We Can End Our Endless Wars America should end its military involvement in conflicts in the Middle East and bring our troops home.Once again, the United States risks being drawn into an unnecessary war in the Middle East. Donald Trump’s impulsive and reckless escalation of conflict with Iran, most recently his decision to order the killing of Qassem Soleimani, illustrates the danger of electing the most corrupt and unqualified president in our nation’s history—a man who has little idea of what it means to put the nation’s interests ahead of his own.

Israel’ s Mossad Targeted Soleimani , Israel’ s Puppet Trump Pulled the Trigger. The Government In Washington Is Criminally Insane. Eric Zuesse Reports That the Russiagate Investigation Now Endangers Obama. The Allied Conspiracy to Originate World War II.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo © AP Secretary of State Mike Pompeo

On the night of the hit, the Pentagon said only that Soleimani was “actively developing plans” for an unspecified attack. By Sunday Jan. 5, Pompeo said on several morning talk shows that there were actually “constant threats” from Iran, rather than a specific one the strike preempted. And officials told a varying story about how many Americans could be killed. 

That next week, in briefings to Congress, the administration struggled to explain what exactly the alleged “imminent” attack was. 

Senators left a closed-door briefing Wednesday, Jan. 8, unconvinced, angry, and warning that the intelligence put forward did not match how senior officials described it. And when the dissatisfied lawmakers pressed for a clearer picture, Graham ended the briefing even though several members had yet to ask their questions.

“It was right when things were really starting to get heated and Graham just said something like, ‘Hey don’t you all have to get back to the White House?’,” the source said.

For Kaine, the problem wasn’t the intel, it was some of the messengers. 

“I think the intel has been strong. But I think some of the political people have been overselling the intel,” said Kaine. “What I heard of the political folks doing seems to me to be significantly beyond what the intel says.”

Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL), a member of the House intelligence committee who received a separate classified briefing on the Soleimani strike, said he “saw nothing related to imminence.”

“To exaggerate your view of what intelligence means is dangerous,” he told The Daily Beast. “This was either a misrepresentation or a degree of incompetence in analysing the intelligence.”

Senators were also displeased with how the administration’s briefers, including Pompeo, answered questions about Iraq and its parliament vote to oust American troops from the country after the Soleimani assassination. According to two people in the room, the briefers dismissed questions about the Baghdad vote, telling lawmakers “don’t worry about it,” according to an individual who was in the room. “One of them said ‘that’s just how the Iraqis talk. We will take care of it.’”

“When you take strikes… in Iraq over their objections, there’s going to be consequences to that. And that’s the kind of thing where you got to be thinking down the board. If they object to us using Iraq as a field of battle… but we’re saying yeah, we’re doing it anyway. Well, what do you think is going to happen?” Kaine told The Daily Beast in reference to the briefing. “I certainly didn't get much sense that they had thought through, like, oh, they are probably going to kick us out of the country.”

Video: "Johnson talks about 'replacing' Iran nuclear deal with 'Trump deal'" (The Independent)

Trump on Jan. 9 told reporters that the intelligence actually showed that Iran was “looking to blow up our embassy.” The next day, he went bigger in a Fox News interview, saying that there “probably would’ve been four embassies.” 

But two days after that, on Jan. 12, Trump’s claim was put into question by his own defense secretary. In an interview on CNN’s State of the Union, Mark Esper conceded that he had not in fact seen a piece of intelligence “with regard to four embassies.” But, in an apparent attempt to cover for Trump, Esper said the president “believed that it probably and could have been attacks against additional embassies.”

According to two officials who spoke to The Daily Beast, Trump was outwardly frustrated by critiques of his embassy claim, telling his close confidants that he was furious with Esper’s performance on CNN.

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill called on the Trump administration to explain the president’s remarks, demanding briefings with Pompeo and other administration officials—which were scheduled this week and then canceled without explanation. According to two senior U.S. officials, Trump and Pompeo spoke about the need to avoid answering more questions about the embassy threats.

“This whole episode has been one of mixed messages. Mixed messages is a function of no real strategy,” said Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT), a member of the House Intelligence Committee. “When you don’t have a strategy, you get all sorts of confusing events on top of each other.”

“Aggressive opinions”

Officials who spoke to The Daily Beast said part of that confusion on messaging came as a result of abundant input by GOP lawmakers with “aggressive opinions on how to handle Iran,” as one official put it. 

In the days after the assassination, Trump spoke with Republican leaders in the Senate and the House, picking their brains on how to redefine the administration’s years-long policy of maximum pressure—a campaign to wage economic warfare on Tehran. 

Some of those same senators had publicly and behind closed doors denounced the administration’s maximum pressure campaign. They argued that the campaign wasn’t doing enough to change Iran’s behaviour. 

In the days leading up to the strike, Graham spoke with President Trump. “I won’t get into the details,” Graham told The Daily Beast. “But he told me Soleimani was a target and that they had caught him red-handed.” Graham said he had advocated for the president to take a tougher military stance against Iran following the attacks on the Saudi oil refineries in September.

“I didn’t have any specific targets in mind,” Graham said. “I just thought we needed to be doing more.”

Gallery: Pictures of the week: Jan. 17 (Photos)

Several national security officials who spoke to The Daily Beast said there was a push by GOP lawmakers, including Graham, in the days after the strike to fundamentally re-vamp the administration’s maximum pressure campaign by adding a military component.

“If there are any more threats against Americans or our interests then we should hit refineries and oil infrastructure inside Iran,” Graham said. “The military option should be on the table.” 

The campaign was not initially designed to include military power as a form of maximum pressure, according to two former Obama administration officials. Instead, its architects envisioned it as a means of economic strangulation, whereby Iran would be put under such crippling sanctions that it would opt to transform its foreign policy and take an unspecified grand bargain that the administration began offering after abandoning the nuclear deal in 2018. 

Graham told The Daily Beast that he is working on an alternative to the Obama administration's 2015 nuclear deal with Iran. 

“I'm not surprised the President has close relationships with these folks,” Kaine told The Daily Beast, referring to GOP lawmakers. “But it makes me nervous. Rather than senators pressuring the president, hey, go after Iran, let them make the case on the floor of the Senate.”

After two weeks of shifting talking points on Iran, re-defining the administration’s policy, Pompeo seemed to edge the closest to articulating a clear response on the administration’s policy when he appeared for a speech at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University on Jan. 13.

“President Trump and those of us on his national security team are re-establishing deterrence… against Iran. The goal is twofold. First we want to deprive the regime of resources. And second we just want Iran to act like a normal nation,” he said, sighing. “Just be like Norway.”

MSN UK is committed to Empowering the Planet and taking urgent action to protect our environment against the climate crisis. We’re supporting those on the front line tackling the Australian bushfire crisis. Find out more about our campaign here.

We Can End Our Endless Wars .
America should end its military involvement in conflicts in the Middle East and bring our troops home.Once again, the United States risks being drawn into an unnecessary war in the Middle East. Donald Trump’s impulsive and reckless escalation of conflict with Iran, most recently his decision to order the killing of Qassem Soleimani, illustrates the danger of electing the most corrupt and unqualified president in our nation’s history—a man who has little idea of what it means to put the nation’s interests ahead of his own.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!