US News United States: Twitter, Google and Facebook defend their immunity before the Senate
US Presidential: Facebook rejects 2.2 million ads suspected of influencing the
campaign 120,000 posts have also been removed from the social network, suspected of seeking to obstruct the US presidential election © Richard Drew / AP / SIPA Facebook (Illustration) FAKE NEWS - 120,000 posts were also removed from the social network, suspected of seeking to obstruct the US presidential election "2.2 million ads were rejected" and "120,000 posts Facebook and Instagram have were withdrawn for attempting to obstruct participation in the poll ”, ahead of the US election.
Democrats and Republicans, but for opposite reasons, want to review the protection enjoyed by social networks in terms of freedom of expressionACT - Democrats and Republicans, but for opposite reasons, want to review the protection enjoyed by social networks in terms of freedom of expression
The bosses of, Facebook and agree to the less on one point: the law on network immunity, which many elected officials want to reform, does not protect only platforms, but also users, including politicians and organizations who use it at leisure. On the eve of their hearing in the US Senate on Wednesday, they defended Section 230 of the “Communications Decency Act,” which prevents legal action related to content posted by third parties. This law is considered the cornerstone of .
Covid-19. In the United States, a "third wave" looms
© JONATHAN ERNST / REUTERS US President Donald Trump throws a mask to the crowd during his first campaign rally in Florida on Monday October 12th. After being hospitalized for a few days because of the coronavirus. The United States faces what looks like a third wave of the Covid-19 epidemic. The country recorded 52,774 new cases linked to the novel coronavirus on Oct. 17, after a relatively calm end to the summer.
But for the senators who summoned the bosses, it is above all a way for the platforms not to take their responsibilities. This Section 230 "encourages expression" and "allows platforms to moderate content," Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg said in the speech he is due to read to the Commerce Committee. Without the law, platforms would censor more content so as not to take the risk of being held accountable, and face prosecution for removing incitement to hatred or violence, he argues.Freedom of speech issue
"I don't think anyone in this room or the American people want less freedom of speech or more online harassment," notes Jack Dorsey, founder of Twitter, in his speech. This central argument takes place in a context of tensions a few days before the elections of November 3: the networks are widely criticized, especially on the left, for not sufficiently moderating the exchanges on their services and for allowing too much racist content to pass, violent or insulting.
New judge at the Supreme Court: Trump's greatest triumph
With the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett, US President Trump has turned the Supreme Court into a conservative bastion. The Democrats have a little hope. © Alex Brandon / AP President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, Amy Coney Barrett and her husband Jesse on a balcony of the White House shortly after Barrett's swearing-in. Trump's probably greatest triumph Finally, the group picture without a mask on the Blue Room Balcony of the White House.
On the right, many American conservatives accuse them, without tangible proof, of favoring the Democratic camp. In June, the government and elected officials mobilized to translate Donald Trump's anger against Silicon Valley into a reform of Section 230. Republican Senator Roger Wicker, who chairs the Trade Committee, proposed a law that would cut corners the immunity of platforms, forcing them to prove "the reasonableness and objective" of their decision when they remove content. "Every tweet marked 'fake' Trump cries like a baby," said Hany Farid, platform specialist at UC Berkeley. “While the networks are dominated by conservative voices! »A change that would favor the big players in the market?
Section 230 effectively protects the host status of networks, as opposed to media publishers. Facebook and Twitter claim to be in favor of more transparency on their moderation process. Mark Zuckerberg has repeatedly indicated that he is in favor of content regulations. It goes so far as to support an update to Section 230, "to make sure it works as expected." Jack Dorsey is not going that far, and is worried that reform will favor existing monopolies.
How are the voters appointed, who then choose the President of the United States?
On November 3, the citizens of the United States are called to vote to elect the President of the United States. But unlike the French poll, this is an indirect election. On November 3, American voters are called to vote, indirectly, for the future American president. Formally, it is in fact the 538 voters, elected state by state, who will lead, on December 19, to the election of the 45th President of the United States.
"In certain circumstances, cookie-cutter regulations can strengthen companies with large market shares and which have the resources to apply the new rules on a large scale," he warns, noting that Twitter has more limited means than its rivals. The argument could fly, when Google, Facebook, Apple and Amazon are accused of abuse of dominance. This is also the reasoning of many activists, because Section 230 also protects forums and blogs from repercussions for improper user behavior.campaign
US Presidential: If Biden comes to power, the United States will immediately join the Paris climate agreement .
© Provided by Le Point Joe Biden, Paris agreement, climate Even before knowing if he is elected at the White House, Joe Biden has promised that the United States, which actually left the Paris climate agreement on Wednesday, November 4, will join the international treaty at the start of his possible term as president. “Today, the Trump administration officially left the Paris climate agreement. And in exactly 77 days, a Biden government will join him, ”he tweeted.