•   
  •   
  •   

News F1 already finding answers for overtaking 'force field'

00:10  01 april  2018
00:10  01 april  2018 Source:   msn.com

Reunited ’69 Dodge Dart

  Reunited ’69 Dodge Dart In late September of 2001 Tim Winnie and his buddy Gary Klotz took a trip to try and locate a '69 Dodge Dart.The owner claimed that it still had the numbers-matching 340 small-block, four-speed gearbox, interior, and most of the original yellow paint, except for the front end. As the conversation progressed, Tim asked him what he was looking to get for the car. "Ah man, the end is coming. With this stuff with the terrorists, I'm getting rid of everything. I'm asking four grand for it," he said. Tim told him to not even bother pulling it into the car corral, he'd buy it for the asking price right there.

Romain Grosjean, Haas F1 Team VF-18© Sutton Images Romain Grosjean, Haas F1 Team VF-18

Ross Brawn says that Formula 1 has already made progress on finding solutions for the sport’s overtaking problem and addressing the “force field” that makes it hard for a driver to follow the car in front.

After taking the F1 job Brawn hired a team of experts, including Pat Symonds and former Williams head of aerodynamics Jason Sommerville, to help the FIA shape the 2021 technical rules.

Improving overtaking was not part of the remit when the current high-downforce rules were being formulated for 2017, and the consensus is that it has become even more difficult to follow another car, with last weekend's Australian Grand Prix coming in for particular criticism.

Tesla recalls 123,000 Model S cars over faulty steering bolt

  Tesla recalls 123,000 Model S cars over faulty steering bolt No accidents and injuries have been reported in connection with the component, Tesla says.Tesla said there were no accidents or injuries related to the issue and the recall, according to an email sent to customers. The recall is believed to be Tesla's largest ever.

It’s that issue that Brawn’s team has focussed on, and the former Ferrari technical chief and Mercedes boss says that its research has already begun to pay dividends.

“One of the things we’ve started, and we’re now six to nine months into it, is a programme to understand how we can enable these cars to race each other more effectively,” Brawn said in an interview on SiriusXM.

“We need to keep the aerodynamic performance at a high level, but we need to do it in a way that’s more benign and more friendly to the cars around it.

"There’s almost a force field that exists at the moment, a bubble around each car. And the car attacking it can’t get near it, because as soon as it gets within 1.5-2.0s of the car in front, it loses so much performance. It can’t get near.

How Subaru Became the Unofficial Car of Vermont

  How Subaru Became the Unofficial Car of Vermont and New Hampshire, and Maine, and Massachusetts, and Washington, and Oregon.And if you drive a Subaru, you're probably from New England or the Pacific Northwest.

“So we started the programme, and I’m really excited by what I’m seeing."

He added: "The front wing is for sure one area that is sensitive in both respects, in terms the disturbance it creates, and then the sensitivity to the disturbance of the car in front.

“It’s not the only area. There’s all the furniture and bargeboards you see behind the front wheels that are equally as sensitive. And there are areas of the rear floor and rear aerodynamics which are sensitive.”

Changes before 2021 possible

Brawn says that the findings have stressed the importance of addressing the overall aerodynamic package, rather than simply the front wing.

He also hinted that some changes could be introduced for the interim seasons in 2019 and 2020.

“We’re looking at the whole thing, and I don’t think we should get into chopping one piece of without understanding all the implications of the impact we will have," he explained. "So we’re looking at a total solution, a holistic solution, of all the parts.

“We know the percentage drop in performance that comes as a car approaches another car, and already we’ve found ways of improving that in reducing the disturbed flow from the car in front, and reducing the sensitivity of the following car to that disturbed flow.

“We’re trying to do it in a properly structured way, and that will be the solution we’ll apply for 2021. Anything we can learn in the meantime, which we feel is safe and fair and correct to apply, will be done.”

Why The New York Times Tesla Model 3 Review Is Nonsense .
This is what happens when you "downsize" your automotive experts.Remember back in 2016 when Elon Musk suggested that critics of self-driving cars were killing people? He may yet be right, but not until self-driving cars are both commercially available and demonstrably safer than humans. Between now and then we have a deeper problem, which is that the majority of self-driving media coverage is absolute nonsense. The stench of clickbait around self-driving is so thick, it's almost impossible to find a story burdened with accurate information.

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!