Health & Fit Study Claiming He Jiankui's Gene-Edited Babies May Face Earlier Death Retracted by Major Scientific Journal
Is Butter Actually All That Bad for You?
Is butter bad for you? We consulted a registered dietitian to find out if the spread is actually unhealthy and detrimental to your weight loss goals.
One of the world's leading scientific journals has retracted a study that said the first gene-edited babies may have a lower life expectancy as a result of He Jiankui's experiments. The paper, published in Nature Medicine, was retracted by the authors, following correspondence with other researchers who flagged problems in the data they used for their conclusions.
The study, by Xinzhu Wei and Rasmus Nielsen, from the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Copenhagen, Denmark,when it was published in June. The scientists had looked at a mutation to the CCR5 gene. People who carry two copies of this gene appear to be more resistant to HIV—known as the ∆32 mutation.
Science Says Spending This Many Hours on Your Phone Doubles Your Risk of Obesity
A new American College of Cardiology study has found that using a smartphone for five or more hours per day may increase your risk of obesity by 43 percent. © Provided by Best LifeMany folks bring their phone or even a tablet to the beach so they can read a good book. However, you might actually want to leave your electronics behind. A 2015 study published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology showed that an iPad’s reflection could increase ultraviolet light exposure by up to 85 percent in just one hour, while a simple iPhone could up it by 36 percent.
In November last year, He announced that he had edited the CCR5 gene in twin girls born earlier in the year. This was met with global condemnation, with researchers saying his actions were unethical and dangerous. The potential long-term consequences of editing a person's genome is not known—the CCR5 gene is known to relate to the way HIV enters the blood, but research is also starting to suggest it is involved in memory and other neurological mechanisms.
Video: What is gene editing
He did not replicate the ∆32 mutation, but it is thought he was trying to mimic its effects.
The FB4 Study and Weight Loss
Thirteen weeks and 13 strangers. One big goal: to advance the science of weight loss.
Wei and Nielsen had been looking to find out if the mutation had any long-term adverse health impacts. They did this by looking at the data from the U.K. Biobank—a resource containing the genetic information of about 500,000 people. From this, the researchers were able to find people who had the ∆32 mutation and look for health differences between them and the general population.
Their findings indicated people with this mutation may have a lower life expectancy, with carriers being 20 percent less likely to reach the age of 76 than those without it. The mutation also appeared to reduce protection of some infectious diseases. Concluding, they said it appears the mutation had a negative effect on health.
However, these findings have now been discounted. A note published on Nature Medicine said the authors were retracting the paper after exchanges with other scientists who had made them aware of a "genotype calling bias in the underlying U.K. Biobank data." They realized there were problems with the way they had identified people with the ∆32 mutation, meaning the conclusions were wrong.
Babies born by c-section have less of mom's gut bacteria. Here's why that's important
In the largest study of its kind, researchers found babies born via cesarean had more bacteria associated with hospitals in their guts. However, these difference had disappeared by the time the babies were weaned. "We think it's a critical moment in life. Babies are sterile in the womb and the moment they are born is a moment when the immune system has a huge number of bacteria it's presented with. The hypothesis is that that moment of birth is a thermostatic moment that sets the immune system for future life," said Dr.
"Further analyses confirmed that the central finding of the study—that homozygous CCR5-∆32 mutation is associated with increased mortality in the UK Biobank—is a result of this technical artifact. Because the main conclusion of the paper is invalid, both authors, Xinzhu Wei and Rasmus Nielsen, wish and agree to retract the Brief Communication in its entirety,"
, the CCR5 mutation is relatively common in people of European ancestry. Speaking to the magazine, Nielsen said: "I feel I have a responsibility to put the record straight for the public."
Wei and Neilsen worked with Harvard geneticist David Reich,, to identify problems with the original research, finding they had missed out many people with the mutation. After adjusting for the mistake, they found no evidence to suggest people with the ∆32 mutation were more likely to die earlier than those without it.
"There were checks we could have done and should have done that we didn't do. We missed the fact that there was a genotyping error," Nielsen told Nature.
Nuts May Be the Key to Preventing Weight Gain—Here's How to Maximize Their Benefits
A new study from Harvard University found that an increased intake of nuts was associated with less weight gain, despite being calorically dense.Obesity is a growing epidemic in the U.S., with nearly 40 percent of adults having a BMI that is equal to or exceeds a BMI of 30. Keeping weight off in adulthood is a challenge, too, with the average adult gaining about a pound every year. But there might be a way to slow down the weight gain that naturally comes with aging—and nuts are the key.
This does not mean the babies who He gene edited will not have their health impacted because of the scientist's experiments, as the role of the CCR5 gene is still not fully understood. "It's very reasonable to expect that it might have a valuable function that we just don't know how to measure. It seems very unwise to edit it out," Reich told Nature.
After announcing the birth of the gene-edited babies, He was fired from his position at the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, and was apparently placed under some form of house arrest.He had edited the genes of the two girls, despite the practice being "officially banned in the country," Xinhua reported at the time.
His case was then passed to the Ministry of Public Security. "This behavior seriously violates ethics and scientific research integrity, and seriously violates relevant state regulations," the Xinhua report said. "The relevant person in charge of the investigation team said that He Jiankui and the personnel and institutions involved will be dealt with seriously according to the law."
20 Everyday Acts That Divorce-Proof a Marriage .
20 Everyday Acts That Divorce-Proof a Marriage