•   
  •   
  •   

Crime This forensic science expert has testified in some notorious cases

23:10  05 april  2018
23:10  05 april  2018 Source:   bostonglobe.com

Expert says Brexit campaign used data mined from Facebook

  Expert says Brexit campaign used data mined from Facebook Computer expert Christopher Wylie said the official campaign backing Britain's exit from the European Union had access to data that was inappropriately collected from millions of Facebook users.Christopher Wylie previously alleged that political consultancy Cambridge Analytica used data harvested from more than 50 million Facebook users to help U.S. President Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign. Wylie worked on Cambridge Analytica's "information operations" in 2014 and 2015.

Veteran forensic expert Robin Cotton says she was horrified — but not entirely surprised – as she watched the two Massachusetts lab scandals unfold. “ Forensic means the application of science to the law. Your science has to be good, and your ability to testify has to be good. If only one of these

Forensic scientists collect, preserve, and analyze scientific evidence during the course of an investigation. In addition to their laboratory role, forensic scientists testify as expert witnesses in both criminal and civil cases and can work for either the prosecution or the defense.

“I don’t need horror movies,” says Robin Cotton, director of biomedical forensic sciences at Boston University’s School of Medicine. “I already know that people do terrible things to each other.” © Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff “I don’t need horror movies,” says Robin Cotton, director of biomedical forensic sciences at Boston University’s School of Medicine. “I already know that people do terrible things to each other.”

Crime lab chemist Annie Dookhan was a classic failure. That’s according to veteran forensic expert Robin Cotton, who was horrified as she watched the Massachusetts crime lab scandal unfold six years ago. Dookhan falsified evidence in thousands of drug-related court cases. As a forensic practitioner herself, Cotton says, she understands the pressures scientists can face from heavy caseloads, law enforcement, and exposure to horrifyingly violent crime scenes. “A lab chemist can somehow get it into their head that they are there to facilitate the prosecution. But really we are here to come to the best and just answer, which is not always clear cut,” says Cotton, who has testified in more than 200 criminal cases, most revolving around DNA identification.

Four teen girl suicide bombers launch deadly attack in Nigeria

  Four teen girl suicide bombers launch deadly attack in Nigeria Four teenage girl suicide bombers have killed two people in multiple attacks in northeast Nigeria, residents said Saturday, in the latest assault since the government announced it was in ceasefire talks with Boko Haram. The suspected Boko Haram attack took place late Friday in the northeast Borno state capital of Maiduguri, the epicentre of the group's Islamist insurgency.The girls, estimated to be between the ages of 13 and 18, attacked the Zawuya settlement on the outskirts of Maiduguri, killing two people, residents told AFP.

Securing a Seat at the Table: How States Support Forensic Science Initiatives This Forensic Science Expert Has Testified in Some Notorious Cases This Forensic Science Expert Has Testified in Some Notorious Cases .

The “ testifying expert ”, however, is entirely different, has no privilege, and everything the testifying expert does, writes, and relies upon is fully In some cases counsel had a great understanding of the financial materials and the implications associated with reported amounts and transactions.

As director of Boston University’s biomedical forensic sciences program, she teaches her students to be unequivocally ethical, and exacting when it comes to protocol. “Forensic means the application of science to the law. Your science has to be good, and your ability to testify has to be good. If only one of these works, that’s a breakdown of the system,” says Cotton, who has been working in the field for more than three decades — she started before molecular biology was used as evidence in crime scenes. She began her career at the National Institutes of Health, researching genes on the Y chromosome. Then she happened upon a research paper on how DNA could be used for sexual assault evidence. “I thought, ‘That’s a really great thing to be able to do,’ ” says Cotton, who was one of the first to apply DNA testing at a private crime lab — a practice soon employed by the FBI.

Mississippi begins its defense in trial on prison conditions

  Mississippi begins its defense in trial on prison conditions The warden of a Mississippi prison accused of being unconstitutionally cruel says conditions there aren't unique to his lockup. JACKSON, Miss. — The alleged unconstitutionally cruel conditions at a Mississippi prison aren't unique to his lockup, the warden testified Monday.

Many disciplines that make up the forensic sciences have the scientific method at their core. Many forensic disciplines depend upon technology or at least use it in some way. Those experts may include scientists , specially trained law enforcement officers, pathologists, or physicians.

In a rare move, the scientific experts for both the prosecution and defense met and unanimously There were clearly fundamental problems with forensic science . A 2009 report by the National No expert should be permitted to testify without showing three things: a public database of patterns from

She was involved in several high-profile cases, including the O.J. Simpson saga, and the case of Gary Ridgway, the “Green River Killer” serial murderer from Washington state.

Cotton spoke to the Globe about her long experience as a forensic scientist.

“It didn’t take me very long to get hooked on the idea of using molecular biology to solve crimes — instead of having an esoteric research goal that lasted for years. Forensic science is an applied science, and I find that fascinating. Although forensic science changed crime solving, not all DNA evidence is definitive. DNA testing is very sensitive and needs proper procedures so there’s no contamination. There has to be enough DNA, and in good enough condition, whether it’s from bodily fluids, blood, semen, saliva, or blood. These differences matter in being able to obtain a viable result. It’s just one example of how a forensic scientist has to understand what they’re doing at the bench because it’s not cookbook. What is the scientific result obtained from the evidence tested? What do the results mean in the context of the case?

Thousands of Massachusetts cases tied to drug chemist get dismissed

  Thousands of Massachusetts cases tied to drug chemist get dismissed A justice on Massachusetts' top court on Thursday ordered the dismissal of 7,690 drug cases because of their link to a former forensic chemist who authorities said for eight years stole drug evidence and worked in a state lab under the influence.A justice on Massachusetts' top court on Thursday ordered the dismissal of 7,690 drug cases because of their link to a former forensic chemist who authorities said for eight years stole drug evidence and worked in a state lab under the influence.

Ethics in Forensic Science . Renowned forensic scientist Paul L. Kirk once Although forensic evidence has great value in identifying various aspects of a crime, the problem remains that due With a flair for being convincing beyond measure, he falsely testified in hundreds of criminal cases and

Having been qualified to testify as an expert in previous court cases may carry weight when the judge is evaluating your qualifications, but it doesn't In some cases , lack of experience in court can even be a positive factor (assuming your creds are solid otherwise) as you may be less likely to be seen as

“When I was testifying around the country, investigators used to pick me up from the airport and promptly start telling me all the horrific details. I’d say, ‘Don’t tell me any more.’ I’m not sure I could stay balanced if I heard what someone else thought had happened. Like the case where a serial killer was chopping up bodies in his apartment and there were all these tiny blood stains that needed to be tested individually. I don’t need horror movies — I already know that people do terrible things to each other.

“You could be the best scientist ever, but you also need to also be able to go into court and properly explain what you’ve done and what it means – and in an unbiased manner. I’ve been an expert witness in 35 states, including [during] the O.J. Simpson trial in California. Some of the items [in that case] were sent to a lab I was at in Delaware. I didn’t actually perform the analysis but was the technical lead and testified to the lab results. I was on the witness stand for five and a half days. That was a media circus, but usually there’s very few people in the courtroom.

“In many cases, my testimony is critical. I’ll give my qualifications, then the DNA testing results. Often, my credibility is questioned, and I’ve had attorneys scream at me, which is unnerving. But my singular job [is] to speak to the data and give accurate information about the results I’ve obtained.

“I don’t testify that much anymore — I mostly consult now, and also teach aspiring forensic scientists. I’ve found that it’s common for my students to say that they’re keen to solve crimes and ‘put away the bad guy,’ as if you could easily identify who the bad guy was.

“But I’m struck by how the defendants, charged with unimaginable crimes, look so ordinary, just a regular person in a suit. The rapist, the murderer, the serial killer — they look like someone you’d run into at the corner market. That was a personal revelation to me. And it’s always sad in court. What happened before is never a good thing.”

Video Shows Nanny in Murder Trial Denying Hallucinations .
Forensic psychiatrists disagree on whether Yoselyn Ortega was capable of psychosis and dissociation. Dr. Khadivi believes otherwise. After examining Ortega and reviewing her medical records and other evidence from the case, he concluded that Ortega was feigning psychosis. During his trial testimony, he implied that she switched to feigning amnesia for her interview with him. Dr. Khadivi believes Ortega suffers from anxiety and depression, which could explain some distortions of reality. He also said Ortega has “low cognitive ability,” which he tested during a series of neuropsychological exams.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!