•   
  •   
  •   

Crime 'Vigorous' self-defense laws likely prevented homicide charges in Breonna Taylor's death, experts say

02:15  24 september  2020
02:15  24 september  2020 Source:   usatoday.com

Louisville braces for fallout ahead of decision on charging police in Breonna Taylor case

  Louisville braces for fallout ahead of decision on charging police in Breonna Taylor case Louisville was bracing for a decision on whether any police officers will be charged in the March 13 shooting death of Breonna Taylor.Louisville police prepare city for an upcoming decision in Breonna Taylor case

No officers directly charged in Taylor ’ s death . Breonna Taylor killing: attorney general calls for calm as no officers directly charged – video. Criminal justice experts had said ahead of the grand jury announcement that a tangled legal doctrine in Kentucky mean t a form of self - defense stalemate

Breonna Taylor ' s death , along with the police killing of George Floyd, a Black man, in Minneapolis last spring, catalyzed the protest-driven movement to reform police organization nationwide. Grand jury indicts former Louisville cop Brett Hankison in shooting that killed Breonna Taylor .

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — In the end, the case went down just as many criminal law experts predicted.

No homicide charges were filed against any of the three Louisville Metro Police officers who fired their weapons during the aborted March 13 search that ended in Breonna Taylor's death.

Louisville police chief 'very concerned' about safety after 2 officers shot amid Breonna Taylor protests

  Louisville police chief 'very concerned' about safety after 2 officers shot amid Breonna Taylor protests Louisville Metro Police Department Interim Chief Robert Schroeder said the two officers sustained "non-life-threatening" injuries.Protests follow Breonna Taylor decision

Breonna Taylor case:When will Daniel Cameron announce his decision? Some criminal defense lawyers have said it' s unlikely that the officers will be charged with murder, as protesters have demanded for months, and activists have asked Fischer to fire them if they aren't indicted.

Breonna Taylor , a 26-year-old EMT, was killed during a Louisville Metro Police Department raid, in March 2020. Both Cosgrove and Mattingly were said to be justified in firing their weapons, as they did so in self - defense . Taylor ’ s boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, had fired his gun thinking someone was

The identity of the grand jurors who made that decision Wednesday is secret by law, so unless they volunteer to speak, their reasoning may never be known.

Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

But it likely hinged on what Attorney General Daniel Cameron told reporters Wednesday: Kentucky’s "vigorous laws on self-defense."

Cameron said there were no homicide charges again Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly and Officer Myles Cosgrove — who together fired 18 shots, six of which hit Taylor — “because they were justified in firing after being fired upon.”

a man in a suit standing in front of a curtain: Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron speaks during a press conference in Frankfort on Wednesday, September 13, 2020, on the results of his office's examination of the Breonna Taylor shooting case. © Michael Clevenger/Courier Journal Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron speaks during a press conference in Frankfort on Wednesday, September 13, 2020, on the results of his office's examination of the Breonna Taylor shooting case.

Criminal defense lawyers said they were not surprised by the outcome — including the decision to indict only former Officer Brett Hankison, who already had been fired for shooting blindly into Taylor’s apartment.

'This city has failed us': Louisville protesters angered over lack of indictments in Breonna Taylor case

  'This city has failed us': Louisville protesters angered over lack of indictments in Breonna Taylor case Protesters marched through Louisville after a grand jury declined to indict two of three police officers involved in Breonna Taylor's death.Thousands line up to see Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg lie in repose outside Supreme Court

Black Lives Matter protesters began mobilizing in the streets after a Louisville police officer was indicted Wednesday for the raid that led to the death of Breonna Taylor in Brett Hankison, who was indicted on endangerment charges in the police raid but not charged for any crimes related to Taylor ’ s death .

Breonna Taylor , a 26-year-old African-American woman, was fatally shot by Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD) officers Jonathan Mattingly, Brett Hankison, and Myles Cosgrove on March 13

The biggest surprise in Hankison's indictment on three counts of wanton endangerment, they said, is that charges were for bullets that went into an adjoining apartment — not Taylor's apartment.

Breonna Taylor updates: Protesters begin marching; ex-cop indicted; 2 others said to be 'justified' in use of force'

The decision: What is wanton endangerment, the charge one Louisville officer faces?

Attorney: Once shot is fired, it's 'pursuant to training' for officer to return fire

Seven criminal defense experts with an average of 37 years of practice told The Louisville Courier Journal, part of the USA TODAY Network, earlier this summer that homicide charges against the other two officers were unlikely because they had a right to return fire once Taylor's boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, fired one “warning shot” that police say struck Mattingly in the femoral artery, nearly killing him.

Fact checking 8 myths in Breonna Taylor case: Was she asleep when police shot her? Is there body-cam footage?

  Fact checking 8 myths in Breonna Taylor case: Was she asleep when police shot her? Is there body-cam footage? We gathered the facts based on public records, official statements and interviews with witnesses and people close to the case to knock down myths.Trump blasts China in speech before United Nations General Assembly

None of the charges are related to her death . Cameron justified the charges in his announcement by revealing the officers were not serving a “no knock” drug warrant, as was previously reported, and had announced themselves before Taylor ’ s boyfriend began firing at them.

shooting death of Breonna Taylor in March 2020 was indicted Wednesday on criminal charges . Last Update just in. Breonna Taylor shooting: Fired Louisville officer indicted on criminal charges A termination letter sent to him by interim Louisville Police Chief Robert Schroeder said the White officer

Walker has said he didn't know police were at the door before they broke in with a battering ram while trying to search for drugs and cash.

Frankfort, Kentucky, attorney William E. Johnson, who was admitted to practice in 1957 and is considered the dean of Kentucky criminal defense lawyers, said when “a shot is fired by someone in the house, it is logical and pursuant to training that the officer or officers would return fire.”

Even though Taylor was not armed, she was near Walker, who was, he said.

The grand jury had the option of indicting the officers on any of four degrees of homicide — from reckless homicide to murder, and prominent athletes and celebrities across the country demanded the most serious charge.

But the attorneys predicted that would never happen because in Kentucky, a murder conviction requires that a defendant act intentionally to cause a death. In other words, his conscious objective must be to kill someone.

To prove the wanton endangerment charges against Hankison, which are each punishable by one to five years in prison, special prosecutors must show that under circumstances demonstrating extreme indifference to the value of human life, he wantonly engaged in conduct that created a substantial danger of death or serious physical injury to another person.

Cameron said one of the apartments Hankison shot was occupied by a couple and a young child.

Was a case against Mattingly or Cosgrove ever presented to grand jury?

Former prosecutor Brian Butler told The Louisville Courier Journal the case against Hankison will be difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt if evidence shows he opened fire immediately after Mattingly was shot.

Hopes dashed twice for Breonna Taylor's mother over lack of charges against officers

  Hopes dashed twice for Breonna Taylor's mother over lack of charges against officers Tamika Palmer made the hour-long drive to hear the news from Attorney General Cameron directly and learned she wouldn't get the justice she sought.Tamika Palmer made the hourlong drive from Louisville to Frankfort on Wednesday to hear the news from Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron directly — only to learn she wouldn't get the justice she sought.

Memorial to Breonna Taylor in Louisville, Kentucky [Laurin-Whitney Gottbrath/Al Jazeera]. Sam Marcosson, a professor at the University of Louisville School of Law , said he believes homicide charges are unlikely, in part because officers could claim they acted in self - defence after Taylor ’ s

The charges are reportedly not directly related to Taylor ' s death ; rather, they were tied to the fact that Per the AP, no officers were charged directly in Breonna Taylor ' s death . The 3 counts against Hankison Attorney General Daniel Cameron said that despite reports that it was a no-knock raid

"If it was nearly instantaneous, he could argue he was returning fire in defense of others. If time elapsed, it will be harder for him to argue that he was defending the other officers,” Butler said. “It will depend on how much time elapsed.”

Although the charges were expected, some lawyers said Cameron’s announcement — and his refusal to say what his prosecutors recommended — leave troubling questions.

Louisville attorney Jan Waddell said it is possible that no case was ever presented against Mattingly or Cosgrove to the Jefferson County grand jury.

He noted that Jefferson Circuit Judge Annie O’Connell announced only that Hankison was indicted — not that a “no true bill” had been returned against the other two officers, which is customarily done when a grand jury decides not to charge potential defendants.

Les Abramson, a professor of criminal procedure at the University of Louisville’s Brandeis School of Law, said the absence of a “no true bill” suggests the grand jury never voted on whether to indict Mattingly and Cosgrove.

A spokeswoman for Cameron, Elizabeth Kuhn, did not immediately respond to questioning about the "no true bill.".

Cameron told reporters he would not disclose if he made a recommendation to the panel because of grand jury secrecy rules.

But commonwealth's attorneys in Jefferson County in previous police shootings have disclosed that.

Despite the decision, Cosgrove and Mattingly are not entirely exonerated.

Abramson noted that the case could be presented to another grand jury and that the Justice Department could seek a federal indictment for a civil rights violation.

Follow reporter Andrew Wolfson on Twitter: @adwolfson

A 'superhero' who 'never quit': Justice Ginsburg returns to Supreme Court for final time

Opinion: My generation is being raised to hate America — it’s time to stand up for our history

This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: 'Vigorous' self-defense laws likely prevented homicide charges in Breonna Taylor's death, experts say

Breonna Taylor neighbor wants to know why cop wasn't charged for shooting into his unit .
"If that bullet went through my bed maybe I would have been dead too," Breonna Taylor's neighbor Stanley David said.One punched through the hallway. The other passed right in front of his bedroom door, roughly 5 feet from where he was sleeping.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
usr: 3
This is interesting!