•   
  •   
  •   

Crime Judge Makes Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Walk the Plank, Throws Him Out of Court in Amber Heard Case

16:51  26 october  2020
16:51  26 october  2020 Source:   lawandcrime.com

Supreme Court will rule on Trump's plan to exclude undocumented immigrants from House apportionment

  Supreme Court will rule on Trump's plan to exclude undocumented immigrants from House apportionment Excluding undocumented immigrants likely would reduce the number of House seats in states such as California, Texas, Florida and New York.The action follows President Donald Trump's issuance of a memorandum in July advising that millions of undocumented immigrants should not be counted when it comes to deciding each state's share of the 435 seats in the House of Representatives.

Amber Heard wearing sunglasses and standing in a parking lot © Provided by Law & Crime

Johnny Depp and his ex-wife Amber Heard arrive at a court in the Gold Coast on April 18, 2016.

It turns out there is such a thing as “bad press.”

Publicity in the case involving divorced actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard has been an issue since the case’s inception in March 2019. Chief Judge Bruce White of the Fairfax County Circuit Court apparently reached his limit Friday when he threw Depp’s attorney Adam Waldman off of the case. Judge White reasoned that Waldman had shared confidential information with the press that had been prohibited under a protective order.

Waldman–who often shares accusations of wrongdoing via Twitter with the sign-off, “But back in reality…”—had been admitted to the case “pro hac vice.”

Fact check: True claim about Harris failing bar exam on first try and Barrett's law school rank

  Fact check: True claim about Harris failing bar exam on first try and Barrett's law school rank A post compares the early career qualifications of Judge Amy Coney Barrett and Sen. Kamala Harris. We rate this claim true.One user took to Facebook to compare the qualifications of the conservative Supreme Court nominee and the Democratic vice presidential nominee.

The designation meant that although Waldman was not licensed to practice in Virginia, he had been permitted bar privileges solely for Depp’s case. After Heard’s legal team accused Waldman of spreading rumors to the press, the judge responded by revoking Waldman’s courtroom authority.

The litigation began as a $50 million defamation suit filed by Depp against Heard over allegations that he physically and psychologically abused her. Heard responded by accusing Depp of threatening to kill her and asking for the initial suit’s dismissal.

Senate Democrats will boycott Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearing vote as GOP vows to move forward

  Senate Democrats will boycott Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearing vote as GOP vows to move forward Senate Democrats say they will boycott a committee hearing Thursday where Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination is set to move forward.The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to vote tomorrow afternoon on Barrett's confirmation to the high court, a vote that was expected to pass along party lines and send her nomination to the full Senate for a Monday vote — just eight days before Election Day.

Press involvement has been an issue from the start of the case. Early on, Judge White issued a protective order to protect the confidentiality of both litigants’ personal information (such as contact information and medical diagnoses). Heard moved for sanctions against Waldman in September, arguing that “Throughout this litigation, Mr. Waldman has acted like anything but an attorney this Court has a right to expect.” Heard went on to accuse Waldman of multiple violations of the judge’s protective order, including distributing recordings, surveillance pictures, and witness statements to the public.

Another member of Depp’s legal team, attorney Benjamin Chew, argued on Waldman’s behalf at Friday’s hearing. Chew said the information shared had already been public, and argued that Heard’s lawyers also violated the protective order.

Some legal observers have opined that Depp should have fired Waldman long ago, due to his questionable history of interactions with the press.

Lawyer Benjamin Chew has not responded to Law&Crime’s request for comment on Waldman’s dismissal.

[Image via Patrick Hamilton/AFP/Getty Images]

Fact check: There is no Sen. Rob Donaldson, so posts of his speech about Barrett are fake .
A post on new Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett originated as a hypothetical. It took off, with many people assuming it was from a real senator.Several Facebook posts shared in the wake of those hearings include a long comment appearing to be a transcript of a speech made by a Sen. Rob Donaldson before the committee.

usr: 1
This is interesting!