•   
  •   
  •   

Crime Religious Liberty Law Firm Praises SCOTUS Shadow Docket in Bid to Take Down California’s COVID Restrictions

23:50  08 april  2021
23:50  08 april  2021 Source:   lawandcrime.com

NFL eyeing onsite offseason workouts; NFLPA prefers virtual setup

  NFL eyeing onsite offseason workouts; NFLPA prefers virtual setup The NFL indicated meetings will likely remain virtual for the foreseeable future, but this year’s offseason workouts are not expected to be fully virtual like they were in 2020. However, the union has offered pushback to an onsite offseason returning this year.As of now, teams can schedule onsite OTAs to begin April 19. This is, however, contingent on no offseason plan being agreed to between the NFL and NFLPA. The union has offered pushback to an onsite offseason returning this year, with Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk reporting little progress has been made between the sides on this front.

A religious liberty public interest law firm heaped praise on the Supreme Court’s controversial use of the “shadow docket” in a Wednesday amicus brief. The brief asks the justices to grant emergency relief by banning the state of California from enforcing Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) COVID-19 pandemic health restrictions.

Gavin Newsom wearing a suit and tie © Provided by Law & Crime

Coined by University of Chicago law professor William Baude in 2015, the term “shadow docket” refers to rulings decided outside the court’s regular docket without oral argument. The public is able to see the court’s ultimate decision, but how the justices voted and much of the underlying reasoning remain a mystery. The mechanism is not new to the high court, but legal scholars have increasingly warned that the court’s reliance on the shadow docket is a point of high concern.

‘Proud Boy’ Ethan Nordean Says He Should Stay Out of Jail Because Guards Are Beating Capitol Siege Defendants

  ‘Proud Boy’ Ethan Nordean Says He Should Stay Out of Jail Because Guards Are Beating Capitol Siege Defendants Ethan Nordean, the Seattle-area Proud Boys member also known as Rufio Panman to audiences on InfoWars with Alex Jones, is joining a chorus of complaints about defendants' treatment behind bars as they await further proceedings on charges connected to the breach of the U.S. Capitol Complex on Jan. 6. Nordean, who is free on bond, says the alleged mistreatment of other inmates should be taken into account by a federal judge. Prosecutors are asking that judge to send Nordean back to jail as he awaits trial. A three-page court filing by Nordean’s lawyers directly references a Politico report which claims guards at Washington, D.C.

In the wake of the pandemic, the use of the shadow docket has continued to grow, and that growth has caused an immediate impact on California’s ability to enforce health restrictions. The trend is one which attorneys at the Becket Law Fund for Religious Liberty urged the court to continue in its latest filing seeking an emergency order.

“To hear some people tell it, there is something shady about the Court’s emergency docket. Indeed, they’ve even given it the moniker ‘shadow docket.’ On this account, the Court’s willingness to rule on emergency applications endangers ‘consistency’ and ‘transparency,’ thus creating a ‘fog of uncertainty’ about what its rulings mean,” the Becket brief stated. “These are ivory tower objections that partake more of the ‘heaven of legal concepts’ than the actual experience of litigation. Every court in the country (except perhaps traffic court) provides for emergency proceedings, because courts have to resolve time-sensitive and important disputes including, among other things, persistent outrages to the Constitution.”

Immigrant aid, lifeguard shortage, Frontier Days: News from around our 50 states

  Immigrant aid, lifeguard shortage, Frontier Days: News from around our 50 states How the COVID-19 pandemic is affecting every stateStart the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

The case stems from a coalition of religious groups contending that Newsom’s restrictions on gatherings during the pandemic discriminated against religious worship. In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit last month held that the limits affected secular and religious activity equally.

“There is no indication that the State is applying the restrictions to in-home private religious gatherings any differently than to in-home private secular gatherings,” Judge Patrick J. Bumatay wrote.

According to Becket, the only people concerned with the court’s reliance on the shadow docket are “academics focused solely on the Supreme Court,” while those who appear before the justices in practice recognize the rigorousness of the process.

“But for practitioners who have to seek temporary restraining orders in district court, or an emergency injunction in a court of appeals, the Supreme Court’s emergency procedures are unfamiliar only in their stringency. Indeed, if anything, this Court’s emergency process is more transparent than many other courts’ procedures,” the brief stated.

Chef initiative, ice fishing trash, Tribeca plans: News from around our 50 states

  Chef initiative, ice fishing trash, Tribeca plans: News from around our 50 states How the COVID-19 pandemic is affecting every stateStart the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

“Some academics have looked at the Court’s interventions on COVID worship restrictions and complained that the Court is doing too much to protect core constitutional and civil rights. But that gets things exactly backward.”

One of those academics, University of Texas Law School professor Steve Vladeck, who recently testified about the shadow docket before the House Judiciary Committee, took issue with Becket’s assertions.

According to Vladeck, who is cited three times in Becket’s 12-page brief, the group severely mischaracterized the issues raised by the increased use of the shadow docket.

“The objections aren’t to the *existence* of an emergency docket; it goes without saying that every court, including [the Supreme Court], needs one,” he wrote on Twitter. “Rather, the objections are to (1) how often #SCOTUS has used such orders to change the status quo recently; (2) usually *without* any reasoning for the Court; (3) in at least apparent defiance of its own standards for granting such relief; & (4) *sometimes*, with no ‘emergency.’”

He added, “Becket may believe that these criticisms are outweighed by the benefits of the *results* in these cases. So be it. But that’s not the same as insinuating, as its amicus brief does, that the criticisms are specious charges (and by folks who don’t know what they’re talking about).”

Music festivals, Opening Day, casino clinics: News from around our 50 states

  Music festivals, Opening Day, casino clinics: News from around our 50 states How the COVID-19 pandemic is affecting every stateStart the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

Read the full amicus brief below.

Becket SCOTUS Amicus Brief by Law&Crime on Scribd

[image via YouTube screengrab]

The post Religious Liberty Law Firm Praises SCOTUS Shadow Docket in Bid to Take Down California’s COVID Restrictions first appeared on Law & Crime.

WNBA schedule release: 7 marquee series to watch .
The WNBA will open its 25th anniversary season on May 14 and feature every team in action over the first weekend of play. The league will launch its "Count It" season on Friday night and roll out two marquee games on Saturday that include Candace Parker's debut with the Chicago Sky, Elena Delle Donne's return for the Washington Mystics and a 2020 Finals rematch. The WNBA released the full schedule on Tuesday that will see teams and stars return to their home markets after the 2020 bubble season in Florida. Fans will be allowed in arenas based on federal, state and local health and safety protocols. That information will be announced by individual teams.

usr: 0
This is interesting!