Crime Opinion: What we can -- and can't -- expect from the Rittenhouse jury
EXPLAINER: Could jury weigh lesser charges for Rittenhouse?
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Prosecutors in Kyle Rittenhouse's murder trial could ask the jury to consider lesser charges when it gets the case, a move that could secure a conviction for some crime but take a possible life sentence off the table. Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger has struggled to counter Rittenhouse's self-defense arguments during the Illinois man's trial, raising questions about whether his office overcharged Rittenhouse. Daniel Adams, a former Milwaukee County assistant district attorney who isn't involved in the trial, described Binger's case as “incredibly underwhelming.”“He's got nothing,” Adams said.
Within the Kyle Rittenhouse homicide trial complete, the jury now faces the monumental task of . The facts in this case are challenging. Any fair analysis of the evidence suggests this will be a complex deliberation.
It's one made all the more difficult by the burden of expectations.
Intense media coverage pushes a public already sharply divided by political differences to expect a social and political message from the jury's verdict. But the law requires something entirely different: a strict analysis of the facts and law by 12 ordinary citizens insulated from outside pressure.
EXPLAINER: Did Rittenhouse lawyers do enough to prevail?
KENOSHA, Wisconsin (AP) — When Kyle Rittenhouse took the stand to testify about his actions the night he shot three men on the streets of Kenosha — sobbing and seemingly unable to continue as he approached the critical moment where he shot the first man — it was one of the most compelling moments in his two-week murder trial. It might have been the most effective part of his three-day defense, too, potentially swaying any jurors inclined toward sympathy for the 18-year-old who has claimed self-defense in the shootings that left two of the men dead.
The evidence presented during the trial has put a full menu of political issues front and center, triggering a divisive national debate. Should Americans, including a then-17-year-old, be permitted to police the streets of a town in a neighboring state when law enforcement appears to some to be inadequate? Was Kyle Rittenhouse acting as a vigilante when he chose to arm himself and enter the fray of protestors and others, claiming his purpose was to protect property and provide first aid? Should this be legal if he was? Was Rittenhouse looking for trouble, and should this restrict his right to assert self-defense? Are we headed toward an America where openly armed political factions and protesters can roam the streets openly carrying AR-15s like militias in other lawless and war-torn countries?
Jury to begin deliberations at Kyle Rittenhouse murder trial
KENOSHA, Wis. (AP) — Jurors will begin deliberations Tuesday at Kyle Rittenhouse's murder trial after two weeks of testimony in which prosecutors and defense attorneys painted starkly different pictures of his actions the night he shot three men on the streets of Kenosha. Prosecutors claimed in closing arguments Monday that Rittenhouse was a “wannabe soldier” who provoked bloodshed by bringing a semi-automatic rifle to a protest and menacing others, then walking off like a “hero in a Western” after killing two men and wounding a third. © Provided by Associated Press A lone protester stands outside the Kenosha County Courthouse, late Monday, Nov.
Yet the verdict sheet has no section devoted to social messaging. The jury's only job is to render a unanimous verdict of "guilty" or "not guilty" on each ofRittenhouse faces, including first-degree intentional homicide.
On August 25, 2020, Rittenhouse armed himself with an AR-15-style assault rifle and carried a medical kit as he went into downtown Kenosha, Wisconsin. Rittenhouse, who'd traveled there from Antioch, Illinois,he intended to protect businesses and provide first aid during a third night of protests following the . The now 18-year-old shot at four people that night, . Prosecutors also allege the gunshots "recklessly" endangered the lives of .
While the prosecution has argued that by arriving at the protests with a weapon he was, Rittenhouse has made an extraordinarily powerful . During the two-week trial, Rittenhouse that one of the men he killed, Joseph Rosenbaum, threatened to kill him and chased him. Rittenhouse testified that he feared that Rosenbaum would be able to get his rifle and kill him. He also that Anthony Huber was shot and killed only after hitting Rittenhouse in the neck with a skateboard and grabbing his gun.
Rittenhouse jury to resume after fresh mistrial request
KENOSHA, Wis. (AP) — The jury in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial was to move into a third day of deliberations Thursday, even as its request to re-watch video in the case sparked a fresh bid from his attorneys for a mistrial. © Provided by Associated Press Kyle Rittenhouse looks back before going on a break during his trail at the Kenosha County Courthouse in Kenosha, Wis., on Monday, Nov. 15, 2021.
Video: The final testimony from witnesses in the Rittenhouse trial before the jury gets the case (CNN)
The jury will need to evaluate the validity of his self-defense claim and other disputed testimony. The man who was wounded by Rittenhouse's gunfire, Gaige Grosskreutz,that he approached of Rittenhouse, first with his hands up in surrender and then lowering his hands, during which his Glock handgun at Rittenhouse. The defense noted Grosskreutz's earlier accounts.
Then there's the fact that Wisconsin is, and Rittenhouse's AR-15-like rifle within those borders. Complicating the case even more is the dispute over one of the best options jury members have to assess Rittenhouse's actions: .
Rittenhouse'sthat the "grainy" video that captures Rittenhouse's actions the night of August 25 is unreliable because it was enhanced by "artificial intelligence" software. The defense attorneys claimed this added pixels to the photographic material now used against their client to prove he "pointed" his weapon, provoking Rosenbaum to attack him; the prosecution didn't offer any to the contrary.
Things we've learned from Kyle Rittenhouse's trial that challenged challenge assumptions that emerged over the last 15 months.
Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial in Wisconsin has been highlighted by the emotional testimony of the 18-year-old man whose actions as a minor have become emblematic of a divided America. © Sean Krajacic/Pool/Getty Images KENOSHA, WISCONSIN - NOVEMBER 17: Kyle Rittenhouse listens as attorneys discuss the potential for a mistrial during Rittenhouse's trial at the Kenosha County Courthouse on November 17, 2021 in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
With this tangle of complexities in the Rittenhouse case, to hope for grander symbolism from the verdict would be foolhardy. If there's any lesson to be found, it's not in the outcome but in the evidence presented at trial. Whether Rittenhouse is found guilty or innocent, one thing remains clear: The video footage introduced, mostly by the prosecution, depicts a frightening, dystopic view of Kenosha's streets that August evening. Law and order had collapsed with heavily armed, militia-like civilians assuming the role of law enforcement.
The only thing that would have been worse would have been if several other demonstrators had also elected to carry and fire AR-15-like assault weapons in Wisconsin on that violent night. Then the city could conceivably have plunged into a condition of open warfare. If the trial should send any message, let it not be to the public but to those who interpret how to apply the Second Amendment to the streets of America in the 21st century. Let's hope the Supreme Court justiceswhether it should be easier to carry weapons in heavily populated urban settings were tuned in to the Rittenhouse trial.
Kenosha feels like a microcosm of the heavily divided American nation. And as the nation awaits a verdict, 500 National Guard troopsto ensure that the verdict is accepted and enforced regardless of outcome. If the nation is to survive and prosper in the future, this is how we must resolve our disputes: In courts of law, not with armed citizens patrolling the streets.
The Kyle Rittenhouse verdict, explained: 'If you believe him when he says self-defense, then you have to acquit him'
Why did jurors acquit Kyle Rittenhouse? "If you've got them convinced of self-defense, that's it," one legal expert told USA TODAY.When they do, they'll likely be asked: Where did they find reasonable doubt?
Acquitted and in demand, Rittenhouse ponders what's next .
KENOSHA, Wis. (AP) — When he was acquitted of murder in shootings during unrest in Wisconsin, Kyle Rittenhouse went from staring at possible life behind bars to red-hot star of the right: an exclusive interview with Tucker Carlson and a visit with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago capped by a photo of both men smiling and snapping a thumbs-up. For Rittenhouse, a year of legal uncertainty over whether his claim of self-defense would stand up has given way to uncertainty over what’s next. He told Carlson, in an appearance that spiked the host’s ratings by some 40%, that he hoped to become a nurse or maybe even a lawyer. He planned to “lay low” but would for sure leave the Midwest.