•   
  •   
  •   

Entertainment Appeals court upholds ruling Trump cannot block critics on Twitter

21:33  23 march  2020
21:33  23 march  2020 Source:   msn.com

Trump abortion referral 'gag rule' can be enforced, U.S. appeals court says

  Trump abortion referral 'gag rule' can be enforced, U.S. appeals court says Trump abortion referral 'gag rule' can be enforced, U.S. appeals court saysIn a 7-4 decision, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling last June by a unanimous three-judge panel to lift injunctions won by California, Oregon and Washington against enforcing the rule, which deprives clinics of Title X family planning funds if they provide abortion referrals.

Video by GeoBeats

NEW YORK — The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals upheld its decision Monday that President Donald Trump cannot block critics on Twitter, rejecting his long-shot bid to reargue the case.

Trump had asked for a nine-judge panel to reconsider the ruling. A majority rejected that bid.

Clarence Thomas laments ruling that let FCC kill net neutrality

  Clarence Thomas laments ruling that let FCC kill net neutrality Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas doesn't have many fans among open internet advocates. His decision in the 2005 Brand X broadband case let the FCC classify internet service any way it liked as long as there was a justification, giving Ajit Pai's FCC the tools it needed to kill net neutrality. However, he appears to have had a change of heart. In the lone dissent on a case addressing the IRS' interpretation of American law, Thomas said he felt Brand X was "inconsistent" with the Constitution, the Administrative Procedure Act and other approaches to interpreting laws. He added that he would "revisit" his decision if he could.

Judge Barrington Parker, writing for the majority, said Trump’s use of Twitter was fundamental to his duties.

“Excluding people from an otherwise public forum such as this by blocking those who express views critical of a public official is, we concluded, unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination,” Parker wrote.

“Twitter is not just an official channel of communication for the President; it is his most important channel of communication.”

Two Trump-appointed judges, Richard Sullivan and Michael Park, dissented, writing that the president’s Twitter account did not constitute a public forum and that his use of it did not represent a “state action.”

They argued that important constitutional questions were unresolved.

Court won't let Trump pardon void guilty verdict against Arpaio

  Court won't let Trump pardon void guilty verdict against Arpaio But sheriff's lawyers declare victory over ruling that criminal contempt finding has 'no legal consequences.'The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that Arpaio is not entitled to have the guilty verdict on a misdemeanor contempt-of-court charge vacated because it has no legal significance in the wake of Trump's pardon.

Donald Trump, Deborah Birx are posing for a picture: U.S. President Donald Trump pauses during a Coronavirus Task Force news conference in the briefing room of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Friday, March 20, 2020. Americans will have to practice social distancing for at least several more weeks to mitigate U.S. cases of Covid-19, Anthony S. Fauci of the National Institutes of Health said today. © Al Drago/Abaca Press/TNS U.S. President Donald Trump pauses during a Coronavirus Task Force news conference in the briefing room of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Friday, March 20, 2020. Americans will have to practice social distancing for at least several more weeks to mitigate U.S. cases of Covid-19, Anthony S. Fauci of the National Institutes of Health said today.

“It is not clear from the panel’s decision when President Trump’s Twitter activity crossed into state action,” Park wrote. “Did it happen on Inauguration Day? Upon a particular ‘official announcement’ from @realDonaldTrump? And how many ‘official’ tweets does it take to convert ‘personal’ tweets into state action? The panel decision raises difficult questions but provides little guidance for officials today or to litigants, lawyers, and judges tomorrow.”

The Knight First Amendment Institute, which brought the suit on behalf of seven Twitter users blocked by Trump, hailed the ruling.

Federal appeals court rules against Trump in two major immigration cases

  Federal appeals court rules against Trump in two major immigration cases The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated a block of the administration’s policy forcing migrants seeking asylum in the U.S. to wait in Mexico while the cases play out.In a long-awaited decision, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 to reinstate a block on the policy forcing migrants seeking asylum in the U.S. to wait in Mexico while their cases play out. The court also ruled 3-0 to uphold a block on a rule seeking to bar asylum eligibility from migrants who cross the border between ports of entry.

“We’re pleased that the full appeals court will leave the panel’s original ruling in place,” said Jameel Jaffer, Knight Executive Director. “The ruling is an important affirmation of core First Amendment principles as applied to new communications technology.”

The 2nd Circuit rarely grants requests for “en banc” hearings before large panels of judges.

“When he receives responses from the public to the Account, and when he blocks responders whose views he disfavors, he remains the President,” Parker wrote for the majority. “The critical question in this case is not the nature of the Account when it was set up a decade ago. The critical question for First Amendment purposes is how the President uses the Account in his capacity as President.”

———

©2020 New York Daily News

Visit New York Daily News at www.nydailynews.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Judge puts hold on Democrats' suit for Trump's tax returns .
The judge cited uncertainties about how another court may act in a different case that raises similar issues.District Court Judge Trevor McFadden, in his order, cited uncertainties about how another court may act in a different case that raises issues similar to the ones in the suit for Trump’s returns. In that second case, House Judiciary Committee Democrats are appealing a ruling that former White House counsel Don McGahn can defy a congressional subpoena for his testimony.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
usr: 0
This is interesting!