•   
  •   
  •   

Entertainment Meghan Markle Speaks Out After Winning Court Appeal in Privacy Battle Over Letter to Her Dad

16:00  02 december  2021
16:00  02 december  2021 Source:   people.com

Meghan Markle calling: Duchess lobbies Republican senators for paid family leave

  Meghan Markle calling: Duchess lobbies Republican senators for paid family leave Meghan Markle, the duchess of Sussex, has been calling Republican senators to lobby for paid family and medical leave. In what might show that she's clued into congressional politics, she didn't go after West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin -- who doesn't support including family leave in the spending bill -- but made calls to Republicans, trying to get their votes instead.

NDZ/Star Max/GC Images Meghan Markle © Provided by People NDZ/Star Max/GC Images Meghan Markle

Meghan Markle's lengthy court battle with the publishers of the Mail on Sunday is over.

Meghan Markle © NDZ/Star Max/GC Images Meghan Markle

The Duchess of Sussex scored a major legal victory on Thursday in her privacy and copyright infringement case against Associated Newspapers, when the Court of Appeal in London ruled in her favor against the publisher of the Mail on Sunday after they printed parts of a private letter she wrote to her father.

The decision means that the case will not proceed to trial and that Meghan can now expect to receive substantial financial damages from the newspaper group, plus a public apology printed on the front page of the Mail on Sunday and the homepage of the Mail Online.

Meghan Markle's ex-husband Trevor Engelson welcomes baby #2

  Meghan Markle's ex-husband Trevor Engelson welcomes baby #2 Trevor, 44, and his wife Tracey Kurkland announced that they've welcomed a daughter named Sienna Lee. 'I don't know what I did right, but I'm the luckiest guy I know,' Trevor said.The Hollywood producer, 44, announced the happy news on his private Instagram account, revealing that Tracey delivered a baby girl named Sienna.

"This is a victory not just for me, but for anyone who has ever felt scared to stand up for what's right," Meghan said in a statement after the judgment was delivered in London on Thursday morning.

"While this win is precedent setting, what matters most is that we are now collectively brave enough to reshape a tabloid industry that conditions people to be cruel, and profits from the lies and pain that they create," she continued.

RELATED: Meghan Markle's Lawyer Addresses 'Difficult Boss' Claims: It's 'Just Not True'

Taylor Hill/WireImage Meghan Markle and Prince Harry © Provided by People Taylor Hill/WireImage Meghan Markle and Prince Harry

"From day one, I have treated this lawsuit as an important measure of right versus wrong. The defendant has treated it as a game with no rules," Meghan said. "The longer they dragged it out, the more they could twist facts and manipulate the public (even during the appeal itself), making a straightforward case extraordinarily convoluted in order to generate more headlines and sell more newspapers—a model that rewards chaos above truth. In the nearly three years since this began, I have been patient in the face of deception, intimidation, and calculated attacks.

Meghan Markle DID co-operate with Finding Freedom authors, court hears

  Meghan Markle DID co-operate with Finding Freedom authors, court hears The Duchess of Sussex's denials that she cooperated with the authors of Finding Freedom were contradicted by evidence from former aide Jason Knauf, it was alleged.The Duchess of Sussex's denials that she cooperated with the authors of Finding Freedom - the controversial biography that unleashed a new wave of revelations about the Sussexes' strained relationship with the Royal Family and Megxit, were contradicted by evidence from her former communications chief at Kensington Palace, Jason Knauf, it was alleged.

Thursday's ruling emanates from a three-day appeal hearing in November that re-assessed the merits of a summary judgment delivered in Meghan's favor on February 11.

The original ruling stated that the Mail on Sunday had breached Meghan's privacy by reproducing parts of a handwritten letter she sent her father, Thomas Markle, in five articles published in February 2019.

It also stated that the Mail on Sunday had infringed on Meghan's copyright by publishing extracts of the letter, which was written by the duchess shortly after her royal wedding to Prince Harry in May 2018.

RELATED: Private Investigator Apologizes for 'Robbing' Prince Harry of His 'Normal Teenage Years'

During the November hearing, Associated Newspapers entered new evidence based on a witness statement from the couple's former communications secretary, Jason Knauf, which they hoped would overturn the original decision and lead to a full trial at the High Court in London.

Meghan Markle Suggests Instagram 'Dislike' Button to Stem the Tide of Negative Comments

  Meghan Markle Suggests Instagram 'Dislike' Button to Stem the Tide of Negative Comments The Duchess of Sussex said adding one simple feature "seems like such an easy solve [for] this really unfortunate cycle that I think is having an unfortunate effect on women across the world"Speaking at the The New York Times DealBook Online Summit on Tuesday, The Duchess of Sussex floated the idea of adding a 'Dislike' button to platforms.

Associated Newspapers also provided a series of previously unseen text messages and e-mails swapped between Meghan and Knauf, where the duchess explained her plans to write the letter to her father, following his decision to speak to the media after he pulled out of attending her May 2018 wedding.

"The catalyst for my doing this is seeing how much pain this is causing H," Meghan said via text in August 2018, using her pet name for her husband. "Even after a week with his dad [Prince Charles] and endlessly explaining the situation, his family seem to forget the context — and revert to 'can't she just go and see him and make this stop?'"

NYT DealBook Summit Meghan Markle at the NYT DealBook Summit in November 2021 © Provided by People NYT DealBook Summit Meghan Markle at the NYT DealBook Summit in November 2021

The duchess continued, "They fundamentally don't understand so at least by writing H will be able to say to his family… 'She wrote him a letter and he is still doing it.' By taking this form of action I protect my husband from this constant berating, and while unlikely perhaps it will give my father a moment to pause.'"

The story of Freddie Mercury you may not know

  The story of Freddie Mercury you may not know Queen frontman Freddie Mercury had a larger-than-life onstage persona and a prolific songwriting career. Stacker curated a list of 25 elements of Mercury’s life that many of his fans don’t know.

Meghan added in the text, "Obviously everything I have drafted is with the understanding that it could be leaked so I have been meticulous in my word choice."

In response to the arrival of this evidence, the duchess apologized to the court for being unable to provide the communications with Knauf at an earlier stage, stating "I had absolutely no wish or intention to mislead the defendant or the court."

On Thursday, the Court of Appeal noted this apology, adding the caveat that it was "at best, an unfortunate lapse of memory on her part." Despite this, the court stated that the texts and e-mails provided "little assistance" to the issues being heard in the courtroom and that they ultimately had very little influence on their decision to deny Associated Newspaper's appeal.

"The central question in this case was whether the (original trial) judge, Mr Justice Warby, had been right to grant summary judgment for breach of privacy and breach of copyright to Meghan, Duchess of Sussex," Master of the Rolls, Sir Geoffrey Vos, stated in court on Thursday, adding that the decision upheld Judge Warby's ruling "that the Duchess had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of the Letter."

Joe Pugliese Harry and Meghan speak to Oprah Winfrey © Provided by People Joe Pugliese Harry and Meghan speak to Oprah Winfrey

Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? Sign up for our free Royals newsletter to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more!

"Those contents were personal, private, and not matters of legitimate public interest," Voss continued. "The articles in the Mail on Sunday interfered with the Duchess's reasonable expectation of privacy."

While the case will now return to the High Court for damages to be determined, Thursday's ruling effectively brings the three-year legal proceedings to a close.

"Today, the courts ruled in my favor—again—cementing that The Mail on Sunday, owned by Lord Jonathan Rothermere, has broken the law," Meghan added in her statement. "The courts have held the defendant to account, and my hope is that we all begin to do the same. Because as far removed as it may seem from your personal life, it's not.

"Tomorrow it could be you. These harmful practices don't happen once in a blue moon—they are a daily fail that divide us, and we all deserve better."

Read the original article on People

Meghan Markle's Lawyer Accuses Senior Palace Figure of Working Against Her .
Meghan Markle's lawyer told a bombshell documentary a "senior palace source" wanted to "defeat" her privacy lawsuit against a U.K. tabloid.Meghan is suing The Mail on Sunday for printing a letter she sent her father begging him to stop talking to the media on the grounds it violated her privacy and copyright.

usr: 1
This is interesting!