•   
  •   
  •   

Offbeat What it means: Supreme Court strikes down PASPA law that limited sports betting

18:41  14 may  2018
18:41  14 may  2018 Source:   usatoday.com

How people reacted on Twitter to Supreme Court’s sports betting ruling: ‘It’s on now’

  How people reacted on Twitter to Supreme Court’s sports betting ruling: ‘It’s on now’ The Supreme Court's decision cleared the way for states to legalize sports betting.The justices ruled 7-2 that a 25-year-old federal law that has effectively prohibited sports betting outside Nevada by forcing states to keep prohibitions on the books is unconstitutional. The ruling could set the stage for other states to expand legalized gambling as a source of government revenue.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of New Jersey on Monday effectively killed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act ( PASPA ), the federal law that essentially limited sports betting to one state for the last 25 years.

The Supreme Court has decided to hear New Jersey's cases for legalized sports betting . Here are the odds that each Justice votes to strike down PASPA and allow New Jersey to legally offer sports betting .

Video by MSNBC

The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of New Jersey on Monday effectively killed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), the federal law that essentially limited sports betting to one state for the last 25 years.

PASPA was declared unconstitutional in the 7-2 decision, meaning it will be up to states – including New Jersey, which has sought to establish sports gambling for years – to decide whether to allow its residents to bet on sports. 

Legal sports betting coming soon to several US states

  Legal sports betting coming soon to several US states A decision by the Supreme Court means American sports fans will soon have many more places to place legal bets on the results of football, baseball, basketball, hockey and other games. Five states have the edge in the race to legalize sports betting because they've already passed laws contingent on the Supreme Court striking down the 1992 federal ban on such gambling, which the court did on Monday. And Delaware could move quickly to expand the limited legal gambling it has already. Several other states are likely to follow them in the coming months or years as they seek to capitalize on the economic growth and tax revenue that legal gambling can bring.

Supreme Court strikes down sports betting law . PASPA is not." The leagues first sued former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie in August 2012 and won every step of the way -- until June, when the Supreme Court decided to take the case.

@USATODAY. The latest news and most interesting stories from USA TODAY. News that's meant to be shared. USA TODAY HQ, McLean, Va.

Here’s a breakdown of what the ruling by the nation’s highest court means: 

What is PASPA? 

PASPA was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush in 1992 and went into effect in January 1993. Nevada – the only state at the time the bill became law that had widespread state-sponsored sports bettors – and three other states with more limited betting (Oregon, Delaware and Montana) were grandfathered in. 

PASPA didn’t outlaw sports betting because that was already illegal. Rather, PASPA banned states – outside those given exemptions – from regulating (and taxing) sports betting. 

Despite PASPA’s existence, the American Gaming Association (AGA) estimates at least $150 billion a year is gambled on sports in the U.S. and 97% of that amount was bet illegally. 

Why legalized sports gambling is a win for millions of fans

  Why legalized sports gambling is a win for millions of fans Supreme Court ruling strikes down federal law and puts the power to legalize sports betting in the hands of the states.Load Error

The Supreme Court has struck down a federal law that banned sports betting in almost every state, a The court ruled 6-3 that PASPA ’s provisions prohibiting states from authorizing and licensing a sports “ It limits the solution to severing any problematic portions while leaving the remainder intact.”

The supreme court ruled 6-3 to strike down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act. The 1992 law barred state-authorized sports gambling with some exceptions. Paspa is not,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the court .

How soon could states offer sanctioned sports betting? 

With PASPA stricken down, states now can establish their own regulated sports betting. 

Many are expected to move quickly to establish sports betting as a means to increase their respective coffers. West Virginia Lottery general counsel Danielle Boyd told Legal Sports Report that the state – which already passed a law to authorize sports betting – could have sports betting within 90 days of PASPA's repeal. 

"That's the news every one of these states was waiting for," sports and gambling law attorney Daniel Wallach told USA TODAY Sports. "Every one of these states' legislative measures hinged on the finding of the Supreme Court that PASPA is unconstitutional. The ruling allows the states to legislate immediately and for all such laws to become effective immediately."   

PGA Tour voices support of legal sports betting in wake of Court ruling

  PGA Tour voices support of legal sports betting in wake of Court ruling PGA Tour re-asserts support for legal wagering in wake of Supreme Court ruling.PGA Commissioner Jay Moynahan had voiced his support for legal wagering on Tour events prior to the Court's ruling.

Supreme Court strikes down anti-gambling law . High court rules states can legalize sports betting ; Peter Doocy reports from Washington. PASPA is not,” the ruling said.

More: What it means : Supreme Court strikes down PASPA law that limited sports betting . More: Supreme Court strikes down ban on sports betting in victory for New Jersey.

West Virginia is among 17 states that has passed or have bills making their way through state legislatures to legalize sports betting upon PASPA's repeal, according to the AGA. New Jersey and Mississippi are two other states Wallach said he sees moving the quickest to allow betting.  

MORE: Supreme Court strikes down ban on sports betting in victory for New Jersey

Now that it's legal, what barriers remain? 

Some of the legislation – like one proposal in Pennsylvania – requires a one-time license fee of up to $10 million, along with a tax of as much as 34% on gross receipts, something AGA senior vice president of public affairs Sara Slane told USA TODAY Sports could be a non-starter for potential operators. 

"I think their intentions are good," Slane said. "I think some states will have to go back and structure a policy that will allow operators to want to come into the state."

What do pro sports leagues stand to gain?

The NBA and MLB, seeing the potential of PASPA's repeal, have pushed the idea of a 1% sports integrity fee. (This would be taken out of all sports bets before the government gets to tax bets.) While the leagues have pitched this as a way to police point-shaving and other gambling-related corruption, Slane said it would take such a chunk that it would make legalized sports betting non-viable. 

What court's ruling on sports betting means for gamblers

  What court's ruling on sports betting means for gamblers With states such as New Jersey potentially open to take bets in time for the NBA Finals at the end of the month, here is what the ruling could mean.  Removing 'shadiness' and stigmaSports gambling has always existed. According to the American Gaming Association, at least $150 billion a year is wagered on sports, 97% of which is bet illegally through such outlets as bookies, off-shore websites and other establishments  — known as sports books — that take bets on events and pay out winnings.

CONTEXT: What it means : Supreme Court strikes down PASPA law that limited sports betting . GOLF AND GAMBLING: Is golf gambling coming to California? You bet .

By striking down PASPA in its entirety, the Court placed a big bet on our Constitution’s system of federalism. Retweeted Mary #FlyTheW (@mchastain81): Supreme Court Strikes Down Federal Law That Does this mean we could have real bets made on future Supreme Court decisions too?

"The integrity fee is really a 20% grab on gaming revenue," Slane said. 

According to the AGA, the average sports book keeps only about 5% of the money wagered. The fee would also limit how much each state could earn in tax revenue. Nevada sports books have operated for decades without any such fee.

“The major professional sports leagues earn exorbitant profits from ticket sales, concessions, merchandise and advertising rights, and while we welcome their support for our efforts to end the failed ban on sports wagering, we do not agree that it is good policy for the leagues to take money away from law enforcement agencies that neither they nor their athletes have earned,” Chuck Canterbury, national president of the fraternal order of police, said in a statement. “Our professional leagues should focus on their sport and let us focus on enforcing the law.”

Could another federal law be on the horizon? 

One has already been proposed, although the bill hasn’t budged since it was outlined about a year ago and was introduced in December. 

Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) offered up the the Gaming Accountability and Modernization Enhancement (GAME) Act that hasn’t even been considered by a committee. There’s little chance it will get a floor vote as Congress is consumed by other issues ahead of the midterm elections. 

America is about to get more law-abiding

  America is about to get more law-abiding On sports wagering, the Supreme Court ruled for states and three principles of good government.Repeal of Prohibition in 1933 instantly reduced crime by reducing the number of criminalized activities, including some that millions of Americans considered victimless activities and none of the government’s business. Now, America is going to become more law-abiding, the Supreme Court having said that the federal government cannot prohibit states from legalizing what Americans have been doing anyway with at least 150 billion of their dollars annually.

SportsPulse: Supreme Court reporter Richard Wolf breaks down the SCOTUS ruling on sports betting in the United States, and what it could mean for the future of gambling in professional and college sports . USA TODAY Sports .

WATCH Supreme Court mulling scrapping law prohibiting sports betting . PASPA prohibited states from sponsoring, operating, advertising, promoting, licensing or authorizing sports gambling. The legal challenge came after former New Jersey Gov.

Part of the GAME Act is now moot, since it would have allowed states to offer legalized sports betting. But it would also mandate consumer protections, including a ban on underage betting and establish safeguards against compulsive gambling.

"I don't see Frank Pallone's bill as a relevant piece of legislation," said Wallach, a partner at Becker & Poliakoff. "There has been significant movement on the state level with no corresponding movement on the federal level. I think what we will see is a new bill coming out of one of the committees, maybe even his committee (Energy and Commerce)."

Minutes after the Supreme Court's ruling was released, Pallone used the decision to again tout the GAME Act.

"Now that the Supreme Court has struck down this unlawful and confusing law, it is time for Congress to move the GAME Act forward to ensure that consumer protections are in place in any state that decides to implement sports betting,” Pallone said in a statement. 

How soon could a new federal law be in place? 

Wallach said federal legislation – especially in a gridlocked environment on Capitol Hill –could come well after many states have already started taking bets and likely after the midterm elections. 

 "At some point, if the legislation starts to diverge from state to state and, more importantly, the leagues don't get what they want at the state level, I think you will see Congress jump into the fray and pass some kind of legislation to create more uniformity across the country," Wallach said. 

NCAA to allow championship events in states with sports gambling

  NCAA to allow championship events in states with sports gambling On the heels of the Supreme Court ruling, the NCAA said it will temporarily suspend its current policy and allow states that condone sports gambling to host championship events. In a news release Thursday morning, the NCAA announced that it is adjusting its policy in the wake of Monday's ruling to "ensure championship location continuity." The NCAA's policy had previously prevented states that allow "single-game sports wagering" from hosting championship events.The organization also clarified that Monday's decision does not change its rules prohibiting sports gambling.

Sports betting ruling will lead to costly rise in gambling addiction, experts warn. Why legalized sports gambling is a win for millions of fans. What it means : Supreme Court strikes down PASPA law that limited sports betting .

The Supreme Court ruled to strike down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act. One research firm estimated before the ruling that if the Supreme Court were to strike down the law , 32 states would likely offer sports betting PASPA is not," Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the court .

Follow Perez on Twitter @byajperez

How American sports betting became illegal in the first place .
Here’s why the Supreme Court couldn’t legalize gambling nationwide when it struck down a federal law. A big Supreme Court decision in May 2018 opened the door for legalized sports betting in America, but it didn’t make it legal on its own. A big Supreme Court decision in May 2018 opened the door for legalized sports betting in America, but it didn’t make it legal on its own. All the court did was wipe out a federal ban on more states permitting sports gambling.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!