Offbeat: J&J Faces High-Stakes Trial Over 22 Women's Talc Claims - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

Offbeat J&J Faces High-Stakes Trial Over 22 Women's Talc Claims

23:50  06 june  2018
23:50  06 june  2018 Source:   bloomberg.com

Justify gallops for Baffert in training for Belmont Stakes

  Justify gallops for Baffert in training for Belmont Stakes Kentucky Derby and Preakness winner Justify has galloped at Churchill Downs in front of trainer Bob Baffert as the Triple Crown hopeful trains for the Belmont Stakes. Baffert arrived from Southern California to watch Justify gallop 1½ miles.Baffert arrived from Southern California to watch Justify gallop 1½ miles on Monday. The trainer says the 3-year-old colt could breeze Tuesday. That's a workout when Justify would easily run under a hold without encouragement from his exercise rider.

The women ’ s lawyer said multiple studies by universities, companies, agencies and even J & J itself found asbestos in talc , but that J & J had Valeant now faces asbestos suits over the body powder. The women , whose jobs range from school bus driver to executive director of a job-retraining program

J & J Faces High - Stakes Trial Over 22 Women ' s Talc Claims . The women ’ s lawyer said multiple studies by universities, companies, agencies and even J & J itself found asbestos in talc , but that J & J had “manipulated the science in J J & J Faces High - Stakes Trial Over 22 Women ' s Talc Claims .

Johnson & Johnson baby powder is arranged for a photograph in New York, U.S. © Bloomberg   (Bloomberg) -- Johnson & Johnson has defended lawsuits alleging its baby powder caused ovarian cancer in women in the past, but the stakes in a trial that began in St. Louis Wednesday are massively higher, as 22 women try to link their illnesses to exposure to asbestos in the company’s talc.

The case is part of a recent wave of trials over allegations the company sold talc in its iconic white Johnson’s Baby Powder bottles knowing it was tainted with asbestos and failed to warn consumers to protect the brand. The company steadfastly maintains there is no asbestos in its baby powder and the product is safe.

Brexit campaign chief seeks French residency

  Brexit campaign chief seeks French residency Former British finance minister Nigel Lawson, who chaired the official pro-Brexit campaign, faced claims of hypocrisy Thursday after it emerged that he is applying for a French residency card. Conservative politician Lawson, who chaired the successful Vote Leave campaign during Britain's referendum on its European Union membership, said he has started the paperwork required for a "carte de sejour"."I've just started, and don't know how it will work out but am not particularly worried," the 86-year-old told expatriate newspaper The Connexion.

The stakes are potentially high for J & J , which is facing 9,000 cases nationwide over talc . The company has had previous success in overturning large verdicts in talc cases as well as others At trial J & J had unsuccessfully sought to cast doubt on the 15 women ’ s claims to have used the same

Slemp claimed she developed cancer after four decades of using talc -containing products produced by J & J , including J & J ’ s Baby Powder and Shower J & J in a statement said it sympathized with women impacted by ovarian cancer but planned to appeal. “We are preparing for additional trials this year

“The talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder does not contain asbestos or cause ovarian cancer and we will continue to defend the safety of our product,” Carol Goodrich, a J&J spokeswoman, said in an emailed statement.

While some St. Louis state court juries have found J&J’s talc products were a cause of ovarian cancer, they’ve never focused on the claim that the product was tainted with asbestos and that women unknowingly exposed themselves to that carcinogen by using it.

“Its a risky move for the plaintiffs’ lawyers because they are testing out a new theory and it may not fly,” said Jean Eggen, a Widener University law professor who teaches about mass-tort cases. “It will come down to a question of whether the jury believes the science is there to back up the theory.”

Trump atty: Other women's claims 'irrelevant' in Zervos suit

  Trump atty: Other women's claims 'irrelevant' in Zervos suit President Donald Trump's lawyers say a former "Apprentice" contestant shouldn't be able to demand information on his campaign's discussions of other women who also accused him of sexual misconduct. But ex-contestant Summer Zervos' lawyers say Trump's reactions to all the claims are relevant to her lawsuit accusing him of defaming her by saying she fabricated her own account of unwanted advances. The dispute emerged during a largely procedural New York court hearing Tuesday.But ex-contestant Summer Zervos' lawyers say Trump's reactions to all the claims, which he vehemently denied as made-up, are relevant to her defamation lawsuit. She has accused him of slurring her by calling her a liar.

The trial was the largest test for J & J ' s talc defense to date and combined the claims of 22 women , six of whom have died. It also was the first trial in which a jury ruled on talc - and asbestos-induced ovarian cancer. J & J in a statement said it' s "deeply disappointed in the verdict, which was the product of a

a woman who claimed she developed ovarian cancer after using the company' s talc -based products like Johnson' s Baby Powder for feminine hygiene. It was a major setback for J & J , which faces 4,800 similar claims nationally and has been hit with over 0 million in verdicts by juries in Missouri.

Financial Risk

It’s a dicey situation for J&J as well, because lawyers for women targeting its talc products have persuaded other juries in the same court to award as much as $110 million to an individual. Awards of that magnitude to all 22 plaintiffs or their families would leave J&J on the hook for more than $2 billion. J&J also won a defense verdict in St. Louis and reversal of the first plaintiffs’ award.

J&J is also fighting a separate battle with plaintiffs who blame the company’s talc products for their developing mesothelioma. Asbestos is a mineral frequently found near talc deposits. It’s been closely linked to mesothelioma, a form of cancer often found in the lungs.

9,000 Suits

Last month, jurors in California awarded a woman who said she routinely used talc on children and herself $25.7 million over her mesothelioma diagnosis. A South Carolina jury couldn’t reach a verdict on similar claims the same week as the California ruling.

Triple Crowned: Justify captures Belmont, makes history

  Triple Crowned: Justify captures Belmont, makes history Justify wins the Belmont Stakes to become the 13th Triple Crown winner and second in four years.NEW YORK -- Justify has won the Triple Crown.

Johnson & Johnson suffered its first trial loss in a lawsuit claiming its talc -based products including Johnson' s Baby Powder contain cancer-causing J & J , based in New Brunswick, New Jersey, faces talc -related lawsuits by 6,610 plaintiffs nationally, largely based on claims it failed to warn women

Of the 22 women in the St. Louis trial , 17 were from outside Missouri, a state generally regarded as friendly towards plaintiffs. The majority of the lawsuits that J & J faces involve claims that talc itself caused ovarian cancer, but a smaller number of cases allege that contaminated talc caused

Those decisions followed a New Jersey jury’s finding in April that J&J and a unit of talc supplier Imerys SA must pay $117 million to a banker who claimed his cancer was tied to baby powder use.

J&J still faces talc lawsuits by more than 9,000 plaintiffs, primarily focused on ovarian cancer, according to a May securities filing. That number has grown from 1,200 in 2016. An unknown number of consumers claim that J&J’s talc products caused mesothelioma.

Mark Lanier, the women’s lead lawyer, contends he’s uncovered stacks of new evidence showing J&J officials knew by the 1960s its baby powder was tainted with at least trace amounts of asbestos and hid the product’s cancer risks to protect its reputation.

‘New Theory’

Lanier, one of the preeminent U.S. plaintiffs’ lawyers, has coaxed billion-dollar verdicts out of other juries in past pharmaceutical mass-tort cases. He’s also hit J&J hard over its artificial hips. In the St. Louis case, a unit of talc supplier Imerys SA agreed to pay at least $5 million to settle the women’s two dozen claims against it prior to trial, according to two people familiar with the deal.

Twitter reacts after Gronkowski finishes second at Belmont Stakes

  Twitter reacts after Gronkowski finishes second at Belmont Stakes While it was overshadowed by Justify’s Triple Crown win, Twitter had a ball after Gronkowski — the horse — staged quite the comeback to finish second at the Belmont Stakes. The horse, named after and part-owned by New England Patriots tight end Rob Gronkowski, spent much of the race in dead last. A late surge, however, ensured a second-place finish, and that was not lost on Twitter, who broke out the jokes.

A lawsuit by 22 ovarian cancer patients against Johnson & Johnson went to trial on Wednesday in Missouri state court, marking the largest case the company has faced over allegations its The majority of those lawsuits claim talc caused ovarian cancer in women who used it for feminine hygiene.

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻. Can't retrieve data. Possible maintenance. Please try again in a moment.

J&J’s lawyers counter the rising number of asbestos-linked talc claims against the company isn’t tied to new evidence, but to plaintiffs’ lawyers desperately scurrying to rescue cases after New Jersey and California judges rejected claims the company’s talc-based products caused cancer.

A California ruling in 2017 erased a $417 million jury verdict and a New Jersey decision in 2016 dismissed two cases headed for trial, said outside J&J lawyer John Beisner. Both rulings are on appeal. Those courts “flatly rejected plaintiffs’ theories that the talc in the challenged powder products causes ovarian cancer,’’ Beisner said in an interview.

As a result, Lanier and other plaintiffs’ lawyers “are trying to salvage their cases by shifting to argue that supposed asbestos contamination is the cause,” he said. “This new theory is completely speculative, and there is zero scientific literature tying the sort of asbestos exposure plaintiffs hypothesize to ovarian cancer.”

‘Big Fight’

In opening statements, Lanier said the “big fight” in the case was whether there’s asbestos in J&J’s talc products and whether J&J knew it and hid it.

The women’s lawyer said multiple studies by universities, companies, agencies and even J&J itself found asbestos in talc, but that J&J had “manipulated the science in more ways than I can count” to obscure the facts. The company was compelled to protect its baby powder brand as its “sacred cow,” Lanier added.

2019 Kentucky Derby already on minds of high-profile trainers

  2019 Kentucky Derby already on minds of high-profile trainers Bob Baffert, D. Wayne Lukas, Todd Pletcher and Dale Romans express optimism for winning the 2019 Kentucky DerbyELMONT, N.Y. — A countdown clock in a Louisville store caught Bob Baffert's eyes the day he left for New York in advance of the Belmont Stakes.

, 22 women claimed ovarian cancer caused by J & J baby powder. J & J knew its talc products were contaminated with asbestos and kept this information from reaching the public, Mark Lanier, the plaintiffs’ lawyer told jurors in closing arguments Wednesday.

Women still suing J & J over claims product caused cancer. The settlement comes as a trial over the women ’ s ovarian cancer claims is set to start June 6 in St. Louis, leaving J Imerys faces about 9,000 claims that talc it supplied to J & J caused ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, another form of

Peter Bicks, J&J’s lawyer, countered Lanier couldn’t offer any evidence his clients’ illnesses were caused by baby powder or had cancers associated with asbestos exposure. He said 18 laboratories, universities and agencies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, cleared J&J’s talc products of any asbestos contamination.

“To say that J&J rigged test results is false,” Bicks told jurors. “J&J always went above and beyond in testing for asbestos.”

Most of the women in St. Louis trial used baby powder, but others used Shower-to-Shower, another of J&J’s talc-based products. J&J sold the product to Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. in 2012. Valeant now faces asbestos suits over the body powder.

The women, whose jobs range from school bus driver to executive director of a job-retraining program, come from states across the country, such as Pennsylvania, California, Arizona and New York. Six of the women have died, so their families are pressing wrongful-death claims against J&J.

When Krystal Kim, one of the women suing, learned testing by her lawyers of the Johnson’s Baby Powder she used showed it was laced with asbestos, she felt sick. “I was scared and mad at the same time,” said Kim, a 52-year-old former computer consultant now battling ovarian cancer. “It certainly wasn’t what I expected to have in my house or to be putting on my body every day.”

Kim traveled to St. Louis for the trial and she’s banking on jurors holding J&J accountable for her cancer after hearing Lanier’s evidence. “I’m hoping this jury says no more little girls should be harmed by this powder,” she said. “I’m hoping it stops here.”

The case is Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, No. 1522-CC10417, Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, Missouri.

--With assistance from Tim Bross.

To contact the reporters on this story: Jef Feeley in Wilmington, Delaware at [email protected];Margaret Cronin Fisk in Detroit at [email protected]

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Elizabeth Wollman at [email protected], ;David Glovin at [email protected], Peter Blumberg

©2018 Bloomberg L.P.

'What are you going to do, shoot me?' were victim's final words, witness testifies .
Witness Kristin Copeland said she remembered her fiance’s final words before murder defendant Margaret Stockstill allegedly pulled the trigger. “He said, 'Oh yeah, what are you going to do, shoot me?' And she shot him,” Copeland said.A video of her statement to investigators in St. Tammany Parish, La., was played in court Tuesday during Stockstill’s trial in connection with the April 2017 shooting death of Cody Couch, the New Orleans Times-Picayune reported.According to the newspaper:The three had been drinking that night and things got crazy.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!