•   
  •   
  •   

Offbeat Why America Needs To Get Out Of ‘Africa’s Afghanistan’ In Somalia

19:31  08 june  2018
19:31  08 june  2018 Source:   thefederalist.com

Taliban 'talking and fighting,' says U.S. commander in Afghanistan

  Taliban 'talking and fighting,' says U.S. commander in Afghanistan The top U.S. commander in Afghanistan played down a spate of recent Taliban attacks on Wednesday, saying violence levels were still lower than average as some insurgents talked peace - a situation he described as "talking and fighting.""You see mid-level, senior-level Taliban leaders engaging with Afghans," said Army General John Nicholson, adding that a lot of the diplomatic activity was taking place "off the stage.

Consider Somalia , the perennially troubled country in the Horn of Africa . Twenty-five years after the tragic Battle of Mogadishu, on which the film U. S . military personnel in the country went from only about 50 in 2016 to more than 500 today. Since January 2017, U. S . forces carried out 48 airstrikes in

Somalia has a federal system, which means in practice that outside the capital the central government controls almost nothing. Some 55% of MPs have foreign passports, and while Mr Mohamud himself has never lived abroad, almost all of his advisers are either British or American Somalis.

Why America Needs To Get Out Of ‘Africa’s Afghanistan’ In Somalia © The Federalist Why America Needs To Get Out Of ‘Africa’s Afghanistan’ In Somalia

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

After the ambush that killed four American soldiers in Niger last year, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis has ordered a review of America’s counterterrorism role in Africa. Because of the little-noticed but sizeable increase of American troops on the continent, it is high time that policymakers step back and consider the big picture before America becomes entrenched in Africa even further.

Bomber attacks meeting of Islamic scholars in Afghanistan

  Bomber attacks meeting of Islamic scholars in Afghanistan At least 7 were killed by an attack on a meeting of several thousand Islamic scholars in Afghanistan who were discussing issuing a fatwa against such attacks.The bomber, who was on foot, detonated the explosives at around 11:30 a.m. local time near the Loya Jorga hall at the Kabul Polytechnic University, Interior Ministry spokesman Najib Danish told CNN. At least nine more people were injured in the blast, which targeted Afghanistan's Ullema Council.

To an unusual degree, the debate over the future of the Afghan war is really about its past: specifically, why a decade and a half of military operations has Some argue the problem has been America ' s unrealistic ambitions in Afghanistan —undertaking a costly nation-building campaign in the hopes of

A Somali soldier patrols next to the burnt- out wreckage of a car that was used in an attack by suspected But it still needs to be active in places like Somalia to protect its global interests. Such is the case in Somalia . Over the past few years, Washington has selectively developed a military

Consider Somalia, the perennially troubled country in the Horn of Africa. Twenty-five years after the tragic Battle of Mogadishu, on which the film “Black Hawk Down” is based, American troops are back in Somalia. U.S. military personnel in the country went from only about 50 in 2016 to more than 500 today. Since January 2017, U.S. forces carried out 48 airstrikes in Somalia, compared to just 14 in 2016, and 11 in 2015.

It doesn’t end there. Six new outposts in the Horn of Africa have been established this year alone. One of those is the newly built Baledogle base—“B-dog” in soldier lingo—in Somalia, which Vice News has learned contains room for more than 800 American troops. Already, Somalia is the third-largest area of U.S. activity in Africa, behind only Djibouti and Niger.

US says airstrike in Somalia kills 27 al-Shabab extremists

  US says airstrike in Somalia kills 27 al-Shabab extremists The U.S. military says it has carried out an airstrike in northern Somalia that killed 27 al-Shabab extremists. The statement issued Monday by the U.S. Africa command said it assesses that no civilians were killed in the attack about 26 miles southwest of Bosasso, the commercial capital of the semiautonomous Puntland state. The area has recently seen attacks on local forces by extremists aligned with the Islamic State group.

American forces have now beefed up their presence in Somalia , where the United States has been involved since 1992, in an attempt finally to gain victory over a Among the six wars in the region that the administration of President Barack Obama has kept the United States involved in — Afghanistan

"[Obama] wanted to get out ” of Afghanistan , Felbab-Brown said, adding that “he tried” but was unable to, largely because the question of what the goal of the counterterrorism operation was lingered. "The core interest is still the counterterrorism objective, but how one goes about achieving it has been a

The Pentagon has said that our troops are in Somalia to train and assist African Union (AU) peacekeepers and Somali National Army Special Forces in their fight against al-Qaeda affiliate al-Shabaab, a terror-group that has plagued the Horn of Africa for years. In reality, the fighting is increasingly being carried out by Americans.

The mission in Somalia is far from clear, too, as U.S. troops attempt to thread the needle between propping up an incompetent government in desperate need of legitimacy, and doing so much for the Somali government that it becomes even more infantilized and totally dependent on America’s support. The mission of fighting jihadists is easier said than done as well, as there is always an endless reservoir of discontented young men ready to take up arms. That’s why Gen. Thomas Waldhauser, head of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM), has promised only “slow” progress in Somalia, though he refuses to call our operations there a “war.”

South African gets life in prison for ax murders of family

  South African gets life in prison for ax murders of family Henri van Breda appeared impassive as a judge sentenced him to three life sentences.Load Error

Why are we there? At first it was retaliation for 9/11. We should “ get the people who attacked us,” as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said. How about Yemen or Somalia ? Or failing that, an American motel. Democrats in Congress will probably want to get out of this war ahead of the Republicans

But whatever happens to South Africa , the south of Africa will remain a vital point in world shipping. Billiton is not alone. Furniture giant Steinhoff International got the go-ahead from the Reserve Bank If you have qualifications that meet the criteria & can afford to get out of SA, then NZ can become your

America’s burden in Somalia looks set to grow unless a conscious decision to withdraw is made. The AU plans on withdrawing its forces by 2020, while the United States currently plans to stay behind. Somali operators, meanwhile, don’t have much autonomy of their own, and are directly under American control.

This should be concerning, for the simple fact that the U.S. military is already overstretched. With well more than 7,000 troops on the continent, the United States has troops in 50 of Africa’s 54 countries, and is conducting combat missions in roughly 20 African countries.

On the other side of Africa, our operations in Niger have run into significant trouble, which is chiefly what sparked the Pentagon’s reevaluation. A report determined that the Niger mission leading to four American deaths failed on account of poor planning, and after the Nigerian troops supporting the Americans turned tail and ran. Elsewhere, we have troops in both Syria and Iraq, and are fast nearing two decades spent in Afghanistan, where the Taliban still controls a good portion of the countryside.

Taliban assure Afghans of bright future once U.S. "invaders" leave

  Taliban assure Afghans of bright future once U.S. The Taliban told "American invaders" to leave Afghanistan in an announcement marking the end of the fasting month of Ramadan, assured the people of a bright future under Islamic rule and said it had already liberated "vast areas" of the country.The Taliban, who announced a surprise three-day ceasefire over the Eid holiday, except against foreign forces, also denounced the U.S. relocation of its Israeli embassy to Jerusalem, which "further exposes the absolute hatred of American officials towards Islam".

None of Africa ’ s problems is beyond the means and resources within the continent. What has largely lacked is proper policy making and implementation. Pro -longed drought periods result in people displacement and deplete grain reserves and loss of livelihoods for a great number of people in the

American -led efforts, despite some successes, have ended up reinforcing and accelerating the broader cycles of violence and fragmentation that have been growing since the state’ s collapse in the early 1990 s . I don’t really know how Afghanistan is going to get out of it, to be truly honest.”

Aside from the misallocation of resources, it should be obvious that it is rather impossible to kill all of the world’s “bad guys.” On this point, Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) said it best: “I don’t know if we need 1,000 troops in Niger. You have this, not just a teachable moment on the tactics … but on the broader strategic approach to special operations forces to the National Defense Strategy. If we’re putting our highest value trained soldiers on capture or kill missions, [the targets] should be individuals who threaten the country, our country.”

But trying to kill all the world’s bad guys, and failing to prioritize missions based on actual threats to the homeland, is exactly what Washington is doing today. That’s why America’s defense budget of $700 billion—near record-levels in real or inflation-adjusted terms, and greater than spending during President Reagan’s defense buildup to defeat a rival nuclear superpower, a threat far greater than anything we face today—is seen as so necessary to our politicians.

Republicans were fond of saying that Obama’s defense budgets hollowed out the military, but Obama’s budgets were still higher in real terms than the defense spending during Reagan’s eight years. The difference between now and the halcyon 1980s is that we have so many troops in so many places, and so much bureaucratic waste, that $700 billion doesn’t go as far and doesn’t deliver strategic victories like it used to.

Australia soldiers condemned over Nazi flag

  Australia soldiers condemned over Nazi flag The "utterly unacceptable" incident happened in Afghanistan in 2007, PM Malcolm Turnbull says.Load Error

Somalia ' s disintegration is reflected in its fragmented and partisan media, which operates in a hostile environment. Journalists and media outlets complain about intimidation at the hands of state security agencies. Pro -government forces make key advances against Al-Shabab militants.

The American reliance on the AU for a task so intimately linked to American interests and security is illogical and irresponsible. And in an American court, Faisal Shahzad, the Pakistani Times Square bomber, cited not the Qur'an but US policy in Somalia , Pakistan, Afghanistan , Iraq and Yemen as

But $700 billion is a ton of money. That’s building the most expensive aircraft carrier we have ever built, the USS Gerald R. Ford, more than 53 times. It should also be noted that the USS Gerald R. Ford, which cost a cool $13 billion, still has loads of technical problems compared to previous less-complicated and less-expensive models.

America’s foreign policy needs to set priorities and focus on core interests: America’s security, our prosperity, and our way of life. Our economic, diplomatic, and military power needs to rebuild and reload. We need to get back to the basics. That means more-responsible defense contracts and reducing bureaucratic waste at the Pentagon, but it also means prioritizing where we place American troops.

A rule is in order: No mission should be undertaken unless America has a clear and vital interest, a realistic definition of success, a viable path to achieving that required political end state, and an eventual exit strategy.

Policymakers must answer voters’ fundamental questions: Will things be better after we leave? Can we make things better in the long-term? Might intervention cause unintended consequences, and do those risks outweigh the potential rewards? The final question politicians must ask themselves is the most important: Would it be worth sending my son or daughter to this place, maybe to die, in order to accomplish America’s objective?

If members of Congress were forced to answer these questions about Somalia, an honest assessment—especially on the latter question—would cause America to get out immediately.

Afghan bomber kills 21, mostly Taliban celebrating truce .
Afghan official says a suicide bomber blew himself up in the middle of a gathering of mostly Taliban who were celebrating a three-day cease fire outside the Nangarhar provincial capital of Jalalabad. Nangarhar provincial Police Chief Ghulam Sanayee Stanikzai said the devastating explosion came as previously unthinkable scenes of unarmed Taliban fighters celebrating Eid, often alongside Afghan security forces, played out in cities throughout the war-shattered country on Friday and again on Saturday.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!