•   
  •   
  •   

Offbeat Court rules insurers not entitled to ObamaCare payments

19:36  14 june  2018
19:36  14 june  2018 Source:   thehill.com

Obamacare premiums set to soar in 2019

  Obamacare premiums set to soar in 2019 Insurers are proposing big premium hikes for Obamacare plans for 2019.Insurers in several states have requested large rate hikes for 2019, with many pointing to steps taken by President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress as the main reasons why.

A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that insurers are not entitled to collect billions of dollars they claim the federal government owes as part of an ObamaCare program. The three judge panel ruled 2-1, giving a win to conservatives who think the payments under ObamaCare ’s risk corridor

A three-judge panel majority of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, has reversed the decision of the Court of Federal Claims, ruling on both statutory and contract grounds that a health insurer is not entitled to full payment under the risk corridors program established by the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

  Court rules insurers not entitled to ObamaCare payments © Provided by The Hill A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that insurers are not entitled to collect billions of dollars they claim the federal government owes as part of an ObamaCare program.

The three judge panel ruled 2-1, giving a win to conservatives who think the payments under ObamaCare's risk corridor program are illegal bailouts.

The lawsuit claimed two insurers were owed hundreds of millions of dollars from the program, which was created in 2014 to help cushion insurers from major losses during the early years of the law.

The court agreed with the Trump administration that insurers are not owed any money, because congressional Republicans passed legislation that required the program to be budget neutral. The federal government could only pay out what it took in and was not able to tap other sources of money to pay for insurers losses.

Federal judge hears arguments about Trump and emoluments clause

  Federal judge hears arguments about Trump and emoluments clause A federal district court judge grappled Thursday with whether a group of about 200 Congressional Democrats can sue President Trump for not seeking Congressional approval before accepting payments and benefits from foreign governments through his personal business holdings.Democrats led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) allege Trump has violated the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution, which they say was designed by the founders to prevent corruption.The lawmakers say Trump is getting the payments and gifts through his hotel in Washington, D.C.

The ruling means the Trump administration will likely avoid paying billions of dollars to Obamacare insurers who say they were stiffed by the feds. Alex Brandon/AP Photo. Court : Federal government doesn’t owe insurers Obamacare payments . By PAUL DEMKO.

But as the Obamacare marketplaces struggled, relatively few insurers paid into the program while more sought payments . In its first year, the risk The insurers can still appeal the ruling to the full appellate court or petition the Supreme Court to consider the case. Why it matters: At least three

"Congress clearly indicated its intent here," the court ruled. "It asked GAO [the Government Accountability Office] what funding would be available to make risk corridors payments, and it cut off the sole source of funding identified beyond payments in. It did so in each of the three years of the program's existence."

The insurers are likely to appeal and seek a review by the full court, rather than just a panel. If that doesn't succeed, the next step would be an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Dozens of other insurers have filed similar lawsuits over the risk corridors. All told, insurers say the government owes them nearly $12 billion. The decision could set a precedent on the pending lawsuits.

The risk corridor program was intended to encourage insurers to participate in the ObamaCare exchanges. The idea was to establish a fund that would pay insurers who suffered heavy losses because they had too many sick people on their rolls and did not make enough money off premiums.

But the program struggled because too many insurers requested risk corridor money and too few paid into the fund. Insurers were left with a hole in their balance sheets on top of other ObamaCare-related problems they were already facing.

Analysis: Obamacare faces new life-threatening conditions .
The Trump administration just moved on two separate fronts that potentially spell the Affordable Care Act's endLoad Error

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!