•   
  •   
  •   

Offbeat Roe Is a Travesty

18:06  03 july  2018
18:06  03 july  2018 Source:   nationalreview.com

Latino leaders question Census head over citizenship query

  Latino leaders question Census head over citizenship query Latino elected officials from around the nation questioned the head of the U.S. Census Bureau in Phoenix on Saturday over the proposed addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 survey, which they strongly oppose. Members of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials said the decision to ask about citizenship status is purely political and will affect Latino communities by resulting in an undercount.Members of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials said the decision to ask about citizenship status will result in an undercount of Latino communities.

It is, in short, a travesty that a constitutionalist Supreme Court should excise from its body of work with all due haste. Roe has been commonly misunderstood since it was handed down in 1973, in part because its supporters have been so determined to obscure its radicalism.

Roe is judicially wrought social legislation pretending to the status of constitutional law. It is more adventurous than Miranda and Griswold, other watchwords of judicial activism from its It is, in short, a travesty that a constitutionalist Supreme Court should excise from its body of work with all due haste.

Signs outside the Supreme Court building during the March for Life, January 27, 2017. © Aaron P. Bernstein/Reuters Signs outside the Supreme Court building during the March for Life, January 27, 2017.

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

The prospect of overturning Roe v. Wade will be at the foreground of the battle over Justice Anthony Kennedy’s replacement, and it should be.

Roe is judicially wrought social legislation pretending to the status of constitutional law. It is more adventurous than Miranda and Griswold, other watchwords of judicial activism from its era. It is as much a high-handed attempt to impose a settlement on a hotly contested political question as the abhorrent Dred Scott decision denying the rights of blacks. It is, in short, a travesty that a constitutionalist Supreme Court should excise from its body of work with all due haste.

Cop killer granted parole after 44 years in state prison

  Cop killer granted parole after 44 years in state prison A convicted cop killer who has spent the past 44 years in prison has been granted parole, state prisons officials said. Robert Hayes, 69, was granted release on June 12 by the Board of Parole. Hayes was convicted in 1974 of shooting and killing transit cop Sidney Thompson in 1973.Thompson was trying to arrest a friend of Hayes for jumping a turnstile. Both Hayes and his friend were members of the Black Liberation Army.Hayes’ impending discharge, as soon as Sunday, follows the release in April of another convicted cop killer Herman Bell, who shot and killed NYPD officers Waverly Jones and Joseph Piagentini in 1971.

‘ Roe is a Travesty ’. Roe is bad law and bad democracy. It has no sound constitutional basis, and deserves to go the way of the Court’s other embarrassments and misfires.

National Review's Rich Lowry lists the five reasons why Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion, is a travesty .

Roe has been commonly misunderstood since it was handed down in 1973, in part because its supporters have been so determined to obscure its radicalism. It is usually thought that Roe only prohibits bans on abortion in the first trimester, when it effectively forbids them at any time, imposing a pro-abortion regime as sweeping as anywhere in the advanced world.

The confusion arises from the scheme set out in the majority opinion, written by the late Justice Harry Blackmun. In the first trimester, the Court declared, the right to abortion was absolute. In the second, states could regulate it to protect the mother’s health. In the third, states could restrict abortion in theory, but had to allow exceptions to protect the life or health of the mother, defined capaciously in the accompanying case of Doe v. Bolton to include “emotional, psychological, familial” considerations, as well as “the woman’s age.”

Look: Rodgers gets face-to-face experience during filming for 'Shark Week'

  Look: Rodgers gets face-to-face experience during filming for 'Shark Week' Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers shared an image to Instagram on Friday in advance of his upcoming appearance on Discovery Channel's "Shark Week" in July. This is me. This is a shark. This is on shark week in July.

It is, in short, a travesty that a constitutionalist Supreme Court should excise from its body of work with all due haste. Roe has been commonly misunderstood since it was handed down in 1973, in part because its supporters have been so determined to obscure its radicalism.

Even many pro-abortion scholars admit that Roe was a badly decided case. Roe is part of a recent tradition that views the Constitution as a living document subject to change---leading us to be governed by the whims Sixty million American lives have been snuffed out since Roe . What a moral travesty .

Roe struck down 50 state laws and has made it all but impossible to regulate abortion, except in the narrowest circumstances. More to the point, the argument that its particular set of policy preferences is mandated by the Constitution is flatly preposterous.

Over the years, the decision’s laughable constitutional inadequacy has been widely recognized. Shortly after it came down, Harvard Law School professor John Hart Ely, a supporter of legalized abortion, wrote that “Roe is bad because it is bad constitutional law, or rather because it is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.”

“Justice Blackmun’s opinion provides essentially no reasoning in support of its holding,” a former Blackmun clerk, Edward Lazarus, has written. “And in the almost 30 years since Roe’s announcement, no one has produced a convincing defense of Roe on its own terms.”

Man arrested after shouting ‘womp, womp’ and pulling a gun on immigration protesters

  Man arrested after shouting ‘womp, womp’ and pulling a gun on immigration protesters The armed counterprotester was chased across the park by the people he'd threatened.Demonstrators attend a march and rally on June 30 outside the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facility in Los Angeles, California against the separation of immigrant families.

Travesties is a 1974 play by Tom Stoppard. The play centres on the figure of Henry Carr, an elderly man who reminisces about Zürich in 1917 during the First World War, and his interactions with James Joyce when he was writing Ulysses, Tristan Tzara during the rise of Dada

Even many pro-abortion scholars admit that Roe was a badly decided case. Roe is part of a recent tradition that views the Constitution as a living document subject to change – leading us to be governed by the whims Sixty million American lives have been snuffed out since Roe . What a moral travesty .

That’s because none is possible. The Court in Roe purported to find the constitutional right to abortion in the 14th Amendment, which says that no state can “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”

This passage has no obvious or even subtle connection to legalized abortion (in fact, abortion laws were being tightened in the 19th century when the amendment passed). No matter. According to Blackmun, abortion is so central to liberty that no restriction on it can stand constitutional scrutiny.

He is at pains to deny that unborn children are “persons in the whole sense.” As evidence, he points to clauses in the Constitution about persons that don’t have “pre-natal application,” e.g., the requirement that persons must be 35 or older to run for president. This is too stupid for words. Just because clauses like this refer to adults doesn’t mean that minors, or unborn children, don’t have rights.

The best case that can be made for Roe is that it is a mistaken decision on the books for nearly 50 years now, so it has to be honored as a precedent. But the Court is not, and shouldn’t be, in the practice of standing by fundamentally flawed decisions. Brown v. Board of Education overturned Plessy v. Ferguson, which upheld segregated education, almost 60 years later. Just last week, the Court overturned a labor decision from 1977.

Roe is bad law and bad democracy. It has no sound constitutional basis, and deserves to go the way of the Court’s other embarrassments and misfires.

Roe V. Wade Will Survive Brett Kavanaugh .
Everyone can ignore the apocalyptic emailsJody Hice is the U.S. Representative for Georgia’s 10th congressional district.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!