Opinion Trump's Belligerence Toward Pakistan Isn't Unreasonable

00:41  03 january  2018
00:41  03 january  2018 Source:   theatlantic.com

Foreign leaders say the U.S. is losing stature

  Foreign leaders say the U.S. is losing stature One year into the Trump presidency, many international leaders, diplomats and foreign policy experts argue that he has reduced U.S. influence.France and Germany are often now the countries that fellow members of NATO look to, after President Donald Trump wavered on how supportive his administration would be toward the North Atlantic alliance.

His threatening tweet might signal increased pressure on Islamabad for its support of Afghan militants.

Donald Trump wearing a suit and tie smiling at the camera © Jim Bourg / Reuters

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

On Tuesday, Trump administration officials joined the president to criticize Pakistan’s commitment to Afghanistan’s stability, accusing Islamabad of playing “a double game for years.”

The comments by Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations,  H.R. McMaster, the national-security-adviser, and Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House spokesperson, are likely to increase the pressure on Pakistan, which is still smarting over the president’s first tweet of the year:

Excerpts From Trump’s Interview With The Times

  Excerpts From Trump’s Interview With The Times President Trump discussed a range of issues with The New York Times, including the Russia inquiry, the tax overhaul and China, at his golf club in West Palm Beach, Fla. , whose noise made some portions at times hard to hear.Sign Up For the Morning Briefing NewsletterThe following are excerpts from that conversation, transcribed by The Times. They have been lightly edited for content and clarity, and omit several off-the-record comments and asides. Read more coverage and analysis of the interview »__________The interview started with a discussion of an interview Mr. Schmidt conducted with Mr. Trump in July, when Mr.

President Trump drew infuriated reactions from Pakistan and from the Palestinians with his tweeted warnings that they might not deserve all the U.S. aid they're getting. That magazine ran a piece headlined " Trump ' s Belligerence toward Pakistan Isn ' t Unreasonable ."

Trump ' s warning to Pakistan that it must stop harboring terrorist organizations and the Taliban represents "a radical shift" in U.S. policy that could improve the situation in Afghanistan, according to analysts. In a national address Monday, Trump spoke of his new strategy in Afghanistan and South

While the topic of U.S. assistance for Pakistan may seem an odd one for Trump’s first tweet of the year, he’s long signaled his intention to get Pakistan to adhere to U.S. interests in Afghanistan. Those interests don’t always align with Pakistan’s own interests in the region. Pakistan has worked with the U.S. at times, Haley said, but it also “harbor[s] the terrorists that attack our troops in Afghanistan.” McMaster told VOA that Pakistan “goes after terrorist and insurgent groups very selectively and uses others as an arm of their foreign policy.” While the U.S. has long urged Pakistan to do more to curb militancy in Afghanistan, it has never explicitly appeared to link aid to cooperation, as Trump did in his New Year’s day tweet. But that missive was a long time coming.

The real enemy on the world's highest battlefield

  The real enemy on the world's highest battlefield It's the terrain and weather that claim soldiers' lives on the Siachen glacier, says Abid Hussain.India and Pakistan both claim the area and have thousands of soldiers stationed there. It can be a deadly posting - but not because of ongoing fighting, as BBC Urdu's Abid Hussain reports.

Hopefully Trumps unpopularity doesn' t dilute the fact Pakistan deserves to be held accountable. People who think otherwise just have unreasonable expectations of getting Pakistan to act more like one of America' s closer allies.

President Donald Trump ' s administration is exploring hardening its approach toward Pakistan to crack down on Pakistan -based militants launching attacks in U.S. officials say generally they seek greater cooperation with Pakistan , not a rupture in ties, once the administration finishes a regional review

Trump criticized Islamabad’s policy toward Kabul in his Afghan strategy speech last August. He also doubled-down on the U.S. military presence in the country, accused Pakistan of sheltering “the same organizations that try every single day to kill our people,” and, perhaps worse from Pakistan’s view, called on India “to help us more with Afghanistan, especially in the area of economic assistance and development.” Then in December, while announcing his national-security strategy, the president said the U.S. wants a “continued partnership” with Pakistan, but that “we must see decisive action against terrorist groups operating on their territory.”  Vice President Mike Pence repeated those accusations in remarks to U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Other U.S. officials and the Pentagon have also singled out Pakistan’s role.

Trump’s tweet on Monday all but guaranteed that U.S. policy toward Pakistan willremain difficult in the year ahead.As I wrote last August after his speech, clues to what that policy could look like were outlined in a policy paper published last year by Husain Haqqani, a former Pakistani ambassador to Washington who is now director for South and Central Asia at the Hudson Institute, and Lisa Curtis, then a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation who is now a deputy assistant to Trump and senior director for South and Central Asia at National Security Council. I wrote:

Perils abroad, full plate at home, as Trump opens 2nd year

  Perils abroad, full plate at home, as Trump opens 2nd year The glamour of his holiday break behind him, President Donald Trump is returning to Washington to face a hefty legislative to-do list, critical midterm elections and perilous threats abroad. Trump is starting his second year in office after a lengthy sojourn at his private Palm Beach club, capped by a New Year's Eve bash. Before his departure, he fired angry tweets at Iran and Pakistan, slamming Islamabad for "lies & deceit" and saying the country had played U.S. leaders for "fools," a reference to frustrations that Pakistan isn't doing enough to control militants.

Without offering any evidence, blame was placed on Pakistan and for the first time (outside of the In short, Washington wants India to move toward being a 'frontline' state in American belligerence If Pakistan was being slapped on the wrist now and then before, now the new 'partners in crime' - the

Trump tweets to Pakistan , accusing it of ‘lies & deceit’ : Dem: Trump puts down 'the very institutions that keep us free' Rep. Jackie Speier (D-C Trump administration to continue to withhold military aid to Pakistan . Trump ' s Belligerence Toward Pakistan Isn ' t Unreasonable .

Among other things, the paper—A New U.S. Approach to Pakistan: Enforcing Aid Conditions without Cutting Ties—argues that the U.S. should stop giving Pakistan additional aid or military equipment; that it should consider, in the long term, the option of designating Pakistan a state sponsor of terrorism; and that it should threaten its status as a major non-NATO ally, a designation that gives Pakistan access to military spare parts and privileged access to some U.S. defense programs. All this, if Pakistan fails to halt its support for terrorists and militant groups active in Afghanistan and across the region.

The president’s tweet and remarks by his Cabinet officials suggest we may be at the start of this pressure campaign. Relations between the U.S. and Pakistan, historically close during the Cold War, have worsened since last year—and not just because the U.S. has grown closer to India, Pakistan’s nemesis.

Even apparent military successes have resulted in disagreements. One example: In October, Pakistani forces said they freed a Canadian-American family who were abducted in 2012 by the Haqqani network, a militant group linked to the Taliban. That operation, they said, also resulted in the capture of a militant linked to the network. U.S. authorities, The New York Times reported last week, sought access to the militant, but Pakistan rejected those requests. In response, the U.S. delayed sending $255 million in aid to Pakistan, leading to Haley’s comment that there were “clear reasons” for why money was being withheld.

‘No more!’ Trump tweets to Pakistan, accusing it of ‘lies & deceit’

  ‘No more!’ Trump tweets to Pakistan, accusing it of ‘lies & deceit’ Angry Pakistani officials scrambled to respond to the president's early-morning attack.In his first tweet of the new year, Trump had said that the United States had "foolishly" given Pakistan $33 billion in aid over the last 15 years, "and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools.

President Donald Trump reportedly intents to use a provision in the Trade Act of 1974, which would allow him to slap tariffs and other barriers on Chinese products while circumventing the World Trade Organization (WTO) mechanisms for redressing grievances.

India hopes a connection with Trump ’ s national security advisor can tip the scales against Pakistan .

Officials in Pakistan have been indignant. Khawaja Asif, the country’s foreign minister, said on Twitter that Pakistan’s coming response will let the world know the … difference between facts & fiction.” He added: “Trump quoted figure of $33billion given to PAK over last 15yrs, he can hire a US based Audit firm on our expense to verify this figure & let the world know who is lying & deceiving.” On Monday, David Hale, the U.S. ambassador to Islamabad, was summoned to the foreign ministry to explain the president’s remarks. Following a three-hour meeting held by Pakistan’s National Security Committee over Trump’s tweet, the committee released a statement calling the allegations “completely incomprehensible as theycontradicted facts manifestly, struck with great insensitivity at the trust between [the] two nations built over generations, and negated the decades of sacrifices made by the Pakistani nation.”

Pakistan, for its part, maintains that it has moved against militants whenever the U.S. has provided it with relevant intelligence. But the killing by U.S. Navy SEALs of Osama bin Laden, the al-Qaeda leader, in a military garrison town in 2011, and the presence of other known militants on Pakistani soil has resulted in some skepticism about that assertion.Pakistan also points out it has suffered disproportionately at the hands of terrorist groups. It says it has little control over the porous border that divides its territory from Afghanistan’s, allowing militants to travel back and forth easily. It’s unclear whether this is due to Pakistan’s inability to stop the flow, or its unwillingness to do so.

Rob Kardashian denies abusing Blac Chyna in new court filing

  Rob Kardashian denies abusing Blac Chyna in new court filing Rob Kardashian has accused her of abuse.Last October, Chyna filed a lawsuit against the entire Kardashian family, saying they essentially tarnished her reputation, torpedoed her reality show with Rob and cost her millions of dollars. She also said her baby's daddy abused her in April in the lawsuit.

What is perhaps most significant is that Pakistan views the Taliban as an ally, and is believed to provide safe haven to many of its senior leaders. The U.S., which ousted the Taliban regime during the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, has been trying to bring stability to the country for the past 16 years. Yet the group now controls more of Afghanistan than at any point since the U.S.-led invasion. Its fighters have continued to wage a military campaign, attacking U.S. and Afghan troops, foreign embassies, government facilities, and civilians. Any lasting political stability in Afghanistan depends on either the defeat of the Taliban—unlikely at this point—or its integration into the political process. But Pakistan’s support of the group all but ensures that it will have little incentive to join talks with the Afghan government.  

Ultimately, as far as the Taliban is concerned, Washington and Islamabad have competing interests. Pakistan is not interested in being sandwiched between two unfriendly nations—Afghanistan and India. The Taliban gives Pakistan enough leverage inside Afghanistan to maintain its regional interests. It is this difference in how the Taliban is viewed—detrimental to Afghan stability versus pivotal to Pakistan’s regional interests—that underlie the misunderstanding between the U.S. and Pakistan.

“Trump is disappointed at the U.S. defeat in Afghanistan,” Asif, the foreign minister, told GEO TV, “and that is the only reason he is flinging accusations at Pakistan.”

Trump vs. Clinton: The feud continues even after the election .
It’s been 429 days since the presidential election, but even still President Trump and Hillary Clinton haven’t stopped their bickering. Once friends — Clinton was even a guest at Trump’s third wedding in 2005 — the two New Yorkers haven’t left their squabbling behind in what was a volatile campaign season.Here’s a look at the jabs Clinton and Trump have taken at one another since Nov. 8, 2016.Nov. 27, 2016: 19 days since the electionTrump claimed that Clinton won the popular vote by nearly 3 million people because “millions of people … voted illegally.

usr: 1
This is interesting!