•   
  •   
  •   

Opinion It's Too Late to Worry About 'Normalizing' Trump. Decades of Policy Did That For Him

18:01  13 march  2018
18:01  13 march  2018 Source:   rollingstone.com

Trump's top jokes from the Gridiron dinner

  Trump's top jokes from the Gridiron dinner When President Donald Trump announced he would attend the annual Gridiron Club Dinner last month, many wondered whether he would be able to joke about sensitive subjects like himself and his administration. The dinner, hosted in Washington and attended by hundreds of journalists, is similar to the White House Corespondents' Dinner in that it is replete with roasts and laughter. But for a president who rarely provides the country with laughs -- and who opted out of attending both dinners last year -- the spotlight on his jokes at the dinner was all the brighter.

Decades of Policy Did That For Him . The current president is just too stupid to be embarrassed about things his predecessors all did , too . The United States helped create the pre-condition for Trump by continually spreading the idea that it ' s OK to ally ourselves with leaders who abuse their subjects.

President Donald Trump is just too stupid to be embarrassed about things his predecessors all did , too . Decades of Policy Did That For Him .

President Donald Trump arrives at a campaign rally at Atlantic Aviation in Moon Township, Pennsylvania.: The United States helped create the pre-condition for Trump by continually spreading the idea that it's OK to ally ourselves with leaders who abuse their subjects. © Carolyn Kaster/AP/REX Shutterstock The United States helped create the pre-condition for Trump by continually spreading the idea that it's OK to ally ourselves with leaders who abuse their subjects.

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Max Boot, the noted Washington Post columnist, and "Jeane Kilpatrick senior fellow for National Security Studies" at the Council for Foreign Relations, thinks Donald Trump is betraying American values by meeting with Kim Jong-Un.

Such a meeting, Boot says, would mean "giving the worst human-rights abuser on the planet what he most wants: international legitimacy."

Poll: Americans list North Korea, cyberterrorism as top threats

  Poll: Americans list North Korea, cyberterrorism as top threats Most Americans view North Korea's nuclear program and global cyberterrorism as the top threats to the United States' interests, a poll released Monday found.A Gallup Poll showed 82 percent of Americans believe No rth Korea's development of nuclear weapons poses a critical threat over the next 10 years, and 81 percent believe cyberterrorism is a critical threat. Load Error Three-quarters of Americans also see international terrorism as a critical threat, according to the poll.The poll surveyed 1,044 people from Feb. 1-10, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

Hillary Sent This 1 Email and Look What She did with Ambassador Chris Stevens - Продолжительность: 8:04 Top Conservatism in the Age of Trump - Продолжительность: 1:31:12 DukeSanfordSchool 2 395 просмотров. Age 2 Son Stops Walking, Mother Knows it ’ s Not Good.

The great unraveling: Trump ' s allies are really worried about him. "Some of these things don't bother him like they do other people," offers another old friend, trying to explain the chaos, or at least how Donald Trump regards it .

Let's unpack that one for a minute. We're worried now about giving human rights abusers legitimacy?

The idea that we don't legitimize human-rights abusers is a laugh-out-loud joke everywhere outside America. You could fill a book chapter with the history of the friendly relations between American presidents and just the foreign dictators who are credibly reported to have eaten other human beings.

Here's a cheery letter from Gerald Ford inviting Central African Republic dictator Jean-Bedel Bokassa (the remains of 30 people were found in his crocodile pond upon ouster) to Washington.

We helped install Idi Amin, too. He later denied rumors of cannibalism, saying human flesh was "too salty," but he had other equally upsetting hobbies. We've supported a couple of generations of Nguemas in Equatorial Guinea, both of whom – uncle Macias and nephew Teodoro Obiang – reportedly ate their political enemies.

Trump Hates the Trade Deficit. Most Economists Don’t.

  Trump Hates the Trade Deficit. Most Economists Don’t. Economists question whether tariffs will do much to narrow the trade deficit, and whether policymakers should care about the economic metric at all.WASHINGTON — President Trump’s fixation with America’s widening trade deficit is fueling his decision to impose stiff tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. Only a small group of experts share Mr. Trump’s fixation, and few see tariffs as an effective tool to narrow the so-called trade gap.

For decades , researchers have been wrestling with the nature of falsehood: How does it arise? Can we choose to combat it ? The answers aren’t encouraging for those who worry about the *** Scarier still for those who have never supported Trump is that he just might colonize their brains, too .

Two days later , Adolf Hitler committed suicide in his bunker beneath the streets of war-ravaged Berlin. Fascism, it appeared, was dead. But by what he has said, done and failed to do , Mr. Trump has steadily diminished America’ s positive clout in global councils.

This is in addition to the countless Batistas and Suhartos and Diems and Marcoses and Pinochets who were just murdering thieving monsters we legitimized not by sitting down with them at the negotiating table, but by making them allies we showered with things like arms and money.

The problem with Trump is that he's too stupid to be embarrassed by such relationships. He constantly makes all of Washington look bad by jumping too enthusiastically in bed with the blood-soaked juntas and anti-democratic governments we more quietly embraced in the past.

Over the weekend, for instance, Trump horrified progressives when he called for the death penalty for drug dealers, an idea he said he got from Chinese President Xi Jinping. "I don't know if this country's ready for it," Trump moaned.

This is monstrous, of course, and God help us if we actually try to enact this policy.

But the fact that we're so tight with repressive China to begin with is on Trump's predecessors, who should have taken a harder line on human rights issues a long time ago.

Trump hoping to use his steel tariff plan as a global bargaining chip

  Trump hoping to use his steel tariff plan as a global bargaining chip President Trump's final order to slap sweeping tariffs on imported steel and aluminum looks less like an effort to preserve national security and more like an attempt to create a giant bargaining chip that the president can play around the world. A week after haphazardly announcing across-the-board tariffs on imported metals, Trump on Thursday signed orders that would impose duties of 25% on foreign steel and 10% on aluminum. The levies take effect in 15 days.

Taibbi: It ' s Too Late to Worry About ' Normalizing ' Trump . The current president is just too stupid to be embarrassed about things his predecessors all did , too . Bunning, meanwhile, goes with the "dumb and unashamed" style; in more than a decade of service, his sole newsworthy

He wants a meeting before it ’ s too late , but people don’t think he’s going to be very successful. Trump ’s scheduled to meet Elizabeth in the U.K. next month. Despite the perceived diss … I don’t think Meghan is too worried about this.

For decades, American officials in both parties have overlooked China's horrific record on human rights. Both continually lobbied for China to keep receiving Most Favored Nation status and other trade benefits, largely because corporate donors wanted it.

The real measuring stick we use when it comes to determining whether a foreign regime is irredeemably monstrous or an important ally is whether the leaders we're talking about are our bast***s, or their own bast***s – puppets, or free-lancers.

Dictators who take the throne with our backing get weapons and cash. The ones who do it without our backing usually find themselves getting a nice healthy dose of regime change sooner or later.

Sometimes the offender starts out as an American lapdog only to leave the kennel and instantly become a Dangerous International Human Rights Offender.

Manuel Noriega was on the CIA payroll until 1988, but later became disobedient and found himself holed up in a nunnery listening to invading American troops blaring "I Fought the Law" (the Clash version, in a nice detail) as they waited for him to surrender.

Schumer to Trump: When are you 'going to get smart' on Russia?

  Schumer to Trump: When are you 'going to get smart' on Russia? Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) blasted President Trump's policy toward Russia on Thursday, questioning when he would "get smart" on Moscow."President Trump warns all the time that we need to 'get smart' about other countries taking advantage of the United States. So President Trump, when are you going to get smart about the threat Russia poses to the United States and our allies?" Schumer asked fr"President Trump warns all the time that we need to 'get smart' about other countries taking advantage of the United States. ... So President Trump, when are you going to get smart about the threat Russia poses to the United States and our allies?" Schumer asked from the Senate floor.

It is almost impossible to see the logic of the Trump administration’ s expected recognition of This begs the question: Why is Trump doing this? Two-thirds of Evangelicals say Trump ’ s policy is already leaning toward Israel—a proportion that’ s even higher than that of the rest of the population.

“No, dopey, I would not go into Syria,” Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter in 2013 when Mr. Obama was considering a strike of his own in retaliation for a chemical attack on civilians, “but if I did it would be by surprise and not blurted all over the media like fools.”

Saddam Hussein was another friend-turned-target, as was Diem and a few others. The line between friend and pariah in our foreign policy is incredibly slim. It really has nothing to do with anything beyond the political utility, to America, of the regime in question.

This is why the debate over Trump meeting with Kim Jong-Un is so absurd. The crime here isn't meeting with a dictator – we snuggle up to worse creeps all the time – the crime is meeting with an out of pocket dictator.

Rachel Maddow last week struggled to articulate why she was so opposed to negotiations with North Korea. Her basic take seemed to be "Nobody has ever met with the dictator of North Korea, therefore nobody should ever meet with the dictator of North Korea."

A lot of self-described progressives seem to be agreeing with her. This is interesting, since the same idea was incredibly popular among the same audience not long ago.

On July 23rd, 2007, at the Citadel in South Carolina, Democratic presidential candidates held the first presidential debate of the 2008 election cycle. In it, an audience member asked if candidates would be willing to meet with leaders of countries like Syria, Iran, and North Korea.

"I would," Obama said. "And the reason is this: the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them, which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of [the Bush] administration, is ridiculous."

Kelly names Kushner ally deputy chief of staff

  Kelly names Kushner ally deputy chief of staff White House chief of staff John Kelly named Chris Liddell his deputy chief of staff for policy, the White House announced Monday. Liddell previously served as the White House director of strategic initiatives, where he worked closely with White House senior adviser Jared Kushner."Chris is widely respected across the administration and is highly qualified to oversee and coordinate our policy process. We look forward to having him in this new role," Kelly said in a statement.The move was first reported by Politico..

“I fully understand the ‘one China’ policy ,” Trump told the network. “But I don’t know why we have to be bound by a ‘one China’ policy unless we “He wishes me well, too , in my campaign, and he said that, well, we are doing it as a sovereign nation, the right way,” Mr. Duterte said last week No worries .

And, we need to say that out loud, lest we normalize the media’s failings like we did / do Trump ’s. It has to be always and only about him. Four decades ago, the true character behind the myth that It ’ s ok, as there’s lot of professions I’d like to have too but am not capable of like being a firefighter, stock

As a colleague pointed out to me over the weekend, this was one of the moments that first endeared progressives to Barack Obama, precisely because it defied bipartisan Washington consensus. True to form, after that debate, both Hillary Clinton and George Bush ("Some seem to think we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals") ripped Obama's naiveté.

The idea that the United States does not negotiate in public until the enemy has already surrendered in private has long been a bedrock principle in D.C.

It's one of the reasons why people in other countries hate us so much. It's also why our "peace proposals" so often read like ultimatums.

A classic example was the Rambouillet deal presented to Slobodan Milosevic. Milosevic agreed to the key principle of an independent Kosovo, but didn't want the deal secured by NATO troops, as outlined. He preferred the occupying troops fly under a U.N. or an OSCE flag. We told him to take the deal or be bombed.

He wouldn't budge, we bombed him, and our news media consistently misreported this war-starting sequence of events. The New York Times went so far as to say Milosevic "absolutely refused to entertain an outside force in Kosovo."

The current consensus on North Korea is basically the same. It's said repeatedly we shouldn't countenance a meet with the mad dictator until the mad dictator agrees in advance to surrender. Doing anything else makes us look weak, and gives a PR win to a murderous autocrat. And we wouldn't want that!

The flamboyant horribleness of Trump is allowing warmongering, democracy-hating hacks on both sides of the aisle to rewrite history. They're penning a new creation story that dates America's embrace of murderous dictators to Trump's election.

Trump to decide Friday on new policy for transgender troops, likely limiting their service

  Trump to decide Friday on new policy for transgender troops, likely limiting their service Trump can accept Defense Secretary Jim Mattis' proposal on transgender troops or return to pre-2016 policy that effectively bans their service.In August, President Trump sent Defense Secretary Jim Mattis a memo ordering him to propose changes to the Obama-era policy that allows transgender troops to serve openly and receive medical treatment, including sexual reassignment surgery.

While Albright does not call Trump a fascist, she says that he is "the most anti-democratic leader that I have studied in American history." That's what's so worrisome, is that fascism can come in a way that it is one step at a time, and in many ways, goes unnoticed until it ' s too late .

It is immense. If anyone thought that the Trump campaign was some kind of a show or simply a Did Trump receive a mandate from the people? Do Americans support the general direction of Trump ’ s policies ?

"Another morning in America," sighed Paul Krugman, after Trump invited Egypt's ruthless Abdel Fattah el-Sisi to Washington last year, and called him a "fantastic guy." Politico chimed in: "Critics worry the president has a love for tyrants and little interest in promoting human rights and democracy."

What these people left out of their outrage is that we'd been supplying Sisi with jets and missiles since the Obama years. As The Intercept pointed out, exactly the same thing happened when Trump and Tillerson cozied up to the repressive Bahrain regime (who began receiving arms from us in 2015).

One of the constant themes we hear on social media and from pundits is that the press has to go the extra mile to avoid "normalizing" Donald Trump. The problem is that when it comes to embracing autocratic regimes, Trump actually is normal. We should be ashamed not just of him, but of the decades of votes we cast for politicians who did the same things.

We helped create the pre-condition for Trump by continually spreading the idea that it's OK to ally ourselves with leaders who abuse their subjects – who push dissenters out of airplanes, electrocute their genitals, bomb women and children, and so on – so long as our economic interests are protected.

I would love to be able to point a finger at Donald Trump and say, "The United States does not sit down with murderous dictators!"

But we can't say that, can we? Not with a straight face, anyway.

North Korea hawk Bolton's appointment as White House adviser fans worries in Asia .
Voices of concern emerged in South Korea and elsewhere in Asia on Friday after U.S. President Donald Trump shook up his foreign policy team again, prompting worries over Trump's pending summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Trump announced in a tweet he was replacing H.R. McMaster with John Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations known for his hard-line stance advocating the use of military force against North Korea and Iran.Administrative officials in Seoul said they would continue communicating closely with Washington over the ongoing detente with North Korea, but their comments were tinged with worry.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!