Opinion: Media guilty of double standard on terror attacks - - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

Opinion Media guilty of double standard on terror attacks

01:50  25 december  2016
01:50  25 december  2016 Source:   msn.com

Iowa man pleads not guilty in killings of 2 police officers

  Iowa man pleads not guilty in killings of 2 police officers An Iowa man has pleaded not guilty to murder charges in ambush-style attacks that killed two police officers last month.Scott Michael Greene submitted his written plea in a court filing Wednesday in which he also asked for a speedy trial.The 46-year-old has been jailed since he was charged last month in the Nov. 1 shootings of Urbandale officer Justin Martin and Des Moines Police Sgt. Anthony Beminio. He faces life in prison if convicted of either count of first-degree murder.The shootings took place about two miles apart within minutes of each other as both officers were sitting in their patrol cars.

Often, the media and the pundit class on the left and right are too eager to win the race to be wrong first. It's perfectly proper to not want to get More annoying is the Obama administration's studied practice of slow-walking any admission that the war on terror isn't over, but at least it's understandable.

Whenever there's a terrorist attack , the immediate response from government officials and the media is: "Let's not jump to conclusions." This doesn't really even scratch the surface of the double standard . When there's a terrorist incident, there's deep skepticism at every stage of the unfolding

People place candles Dec. 24, 2016, on the memorial at the Christmas market in Berlin that was the target of a terrorist attack earlier this week. © JOHN MACDOUGALL/AFP/Getty Images People place candles Dec. 24, 2016, on the memorial at the Christmas market in Berlin that was the target of a terrorist attack earlier this week.

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Here's a paradox for you. Whenever there's a terrorist attack, the immediate response from government officials and the media is: "Let's not jump to conclusions." Yet when there are breaking reports that Muslim or Arab Americans were allegedly victimized by bigots in some hate crime, the response is instant credulity, outrage and hand-wringing.

DHS, FBI urge vigilance by Americans against lone actor attacks

  DHS, FBI urge vigilance by Americans against lone actor attacks Officials are not aware of any credible threat, but authorities issued a bulletin after ISIS called for attacks on churchesU.S. officials are not aware of any credible threat. However, officials told CBS News the bulletin was issued after the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) made an online call for attacks against churches in the U.S.

Whenever there’s a terrorist attack , the immediate response from government officials and the media is: “Let’s not jump to conclusions.” Yet when there are breaking reports that Muslim or Arab Americans were allegedly victimized by bigots in some hate crime, the response is instant credulity, outrage and

Any attack targeting innocent civilians is intolerable. Our hearts and prayers go out to the victims' families, friends and people affected by this heinous Muge and Cecilia conducted a live streaming on YouTube to talk about this incident and analyze the media coverage and people's reactions from U.S

This doesn't really even scratch the surface of the double standard. When there's a terrorist incident, there's deep skepticism at every stage of the unfolding story. At first we're told there's no evidence that the attack is terror-related. Then, when reports come in that a shooter shouted "Allahu akbar!" or has an Arabic name, we're assured there's no evidence that the shooter is tied to any international terror groups. Days go by with talking heads fretting about "self-radicalization," "homegrown terror," and "lone wolves." This narrative lingers even as the killer's Facebook posts declaring allegiance to ISIS emerge.

Now, truth be told, I think some of this skepticism is understandable. Often, the media and the pundit class on the left and right are too eager to win the race to be wrong first. It's perfectly proper to not want to get ahead of the facts.

Turkey probing 10,000 over online 'terror' activity

  Turkey probing 10,000 over online 'terror' activity Turkey is investigating 10,000 people suspected of terror-related activity on the internet or posting comments on social media insulting government officials, the interior ministry said on Saturday. The inquiries are part of the "fight against terrorism, which continues with determination everywhere, including on social networks", the ministry said in a statement.After a coup attempt in July, Turkey declared a state of emergency and launched deep purges of perceived opponents, sparking concern among human rights groups which accuse Ankara of repression.

Brian Lilley reports on the violent professional agitators who have been showing up at Donal Trump rallies to disrupt his events. Like him or hate him

When a terrorist attack happens in this part of the world, we don't see the same international attention. It is an unfortunate and long-standing double standard that a life lost in a terrorist attack in the Media attention should be equitable and without discrimination. Terror sees no borders and

More annoying is the Obama administration's studied practice of slow-walking any admission that the war on terror isn't over, but at least it's understandable. President Obama came into office wanting to end wars and convince Americans that terrorism isn't such a big deal. It seems to be a sincere belief. The Atlantic reported that Obama frequently reminds his staff that slippery bathtubs kill more Americans than terrorism. It took Obama six years to admit that the shooting at Fort Hood was terrorism and not "workplace violence."

Regardless, my point here is that I can understand why politicians and the media want to be skeptical about breaking news events and even why they try to frame those events in ways that fit a political agenda.

The best defense of that agenda isn't the sorry effort to pad the legacy of our Nobel Peace Prize-winning president. It's the desire to err on the side of caution when it comes to stigmatizing law-abiding and patriotic Muslims with the stain of acts of terror in the name of their religion. The media doesn't want to give credence to the idea that all Muslims are terrorists, not least because that attitude will only serve to radicalize more Muslims. As we are often told, ISIS wants peaceful Muslims in the West to feel victimized and unwelcome.

Indonesian police shoot dead two terror suspects

  Indonesian police shoot dead two terror suspects Indonesian police Sunday shot dead two terror suspects and arrested two more, only days after foiling separate plans by an IS-linked group for a Christmas-time suicide bombing near the capital. The pair were fatally shot at a house in Purwakarta 100 kilometres (62 miles) east of the capital Jakarta after allegedly resisting arrest. "We ordered them to surrender and even fired warning shots, but they resisted and started to attack our officers with machetes, so we had to take them down," national police spokesman Awi Setiyono told AFP.Police raided the house after arresting and interrogating two men on Sunday morning.

Suicide attack on Indian parliament in New Delhi by Pakistan-based Islamist terrorist organizations Jaish-E-Mohammad and Lashkar-e-Toiba, aimed at eliminating the top leadership of India and causing anarchy in the country.[16]. ISIS had claimed responsibility for the knife attack through its media

And yet, here again, a gross double - standard stares us squarely in the face, as Donald Trump exhibits no such restraint when it comes to this attack . In their rush to connect this attack to international terrorism , journalists and politicians are missing a key fact. It takes no special training to run people

  Media guilty of double standard on terror attacks © Provided by Tribune Content Agency

And that brings me back to the media's instant credulity for stories of anti-Muslim bias. This eagerness to hype "anti-Muslim backlash" stories has been around for nearly 20 years, and it has always been thin gruel. According to the FBI, in every year since the 9/11 attacks, there have been more — a lot more — anti-Jewish hate crimes than anti-Muslim ones. Which have you heard about more: the anti-Jewish backlash or the anti-Muslim backlash?

Amazingly, the "experts fear an anti-Muslim backlash" stories keep popping up after every Islamic terror attack, despite the fact that the backlash never arrives. To be sure, there have been hateful and deplorable acts against Muslims. But evidence of a true national climate of intimidation and bigotry has always been lacking.

What has not been lacking is evidence that many activists want to convince Americans that such a climate exists. This effort has been old hat for the media-savvy spokesmen of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) for years. But since Donald Trump's election, there has been an explosion of freelance anti-Muslim hate crime hoaxes. A Muslim girl fabricated an attack by three Trump supporters on a New York subway. A young man pulled a similar stunt on a Delta flight this week. False fraud claims by Asian and Hispanic students at various universities have popped up as well.

The media, still in the throes of anti-Trump panic, has been quick to credit these hoaxes and grudging in clearing the air when they've been debunked. It's time the media applied at least the same level of skepticism that they reserve for real terror attacks to fake hate crimes. Why? First, because their job is to report the facts. Second, because if they're really concerned about not alienating or radicalizing American Muslims, they shouldn't hype the propaganda efforts of the idiots who are doing exactly that.

(Jonah Goldberg is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a senior editor of National Review. You can write to him in care of this newspaper or by e-mail at [email protected], or via Twitter @JonahNRO.)

Calif. woman once accused of making up abduction harassed online .
Months after a kidnapped woman’s assailant pleaded guilty, victim Denise Huskins continues to defend herself from strangers accusing her of fabricating the bizarre crime. “All I did was survive, and I was criminalized for it,” Huskins said in a Facebook post Sunday.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!