•   
  •   
  •   

Opinion Asian Americans Are The Tipping Point For Rejecting Affirmative Action

18:26  05 july  2018
18:26  05 july  2018 Source:   thefederalist.com

Justice Kennedy, the pivotal swing vote on the Supreme Court, announces retirement

  Justice Kennedy, the pivotal swing vote on the Supreme Court, announces retirement His departure will likely trigger a bitter partisan showdown over President Trump’s selection of a replacement.Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post 

In an interview, Michael Dannenberg, director of Education Reform Now, points out that these policies "don't reward merit. In fact, they undermine both and are fundamentally unfair." When the goal of ending affirmative action is not specifically to better Asian American 's change of admission

Affirmative action in the United States is a set of laws, policies, guidelines, and administrative practices "intended to end and correct the effects of a specific form of discrimination."

Asian Americans Are The Tipping Point For Rejecting Affirmative Action © The Federalist Asian Americans Are The Tipping Point For Rejecting Affirmative Action

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

This week the Trump administration reversed an Obama-era policy that encouraged colleges to use race as a consideration in admissions. While the move itself is mostly symbolic, it coincides with the retirement of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, who in 2016 was the swing vote in a case upholding the University of Texas’ race-based admissions policies.

The Latest: Trump says election no reason to hold court pick

  The Latest: Trump says election no reason to hold court pick President Donald Trump is deflecting a question on whether he should wait until after the midterm elections to announce a successor to retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy. Trump says in the Oval Office that he hasn't "really thought about that" and that he thinks it should happen "as soon as possible."Video by Reuters

As Egan points out, Asian Americans comprise roughly 5% of the US population but represent anywhere from And yet, 61% of Asian American voters rejected Prop. The real question then about Asian Americans and affirmative action — one that Egan and the NYT don’t ask — is why?

The Thorny Relationship Between Asians and Affirmative Action . But as I’ve written in the past, the suggestion that admissions officers are actively rejecting Asian applicants solely because In 2005, a Princeton study found that Asian Americans must score 140 points more than white students of

In addition to these two developments, a New York City plan to use race as an element in admissions to elite public high schools that are now dominated by Asian students, and allegations that Harvard University is discriminating against Asian applicants, have woken a sleeping dragon. What has been known for some time but is now getting the attention it deserves is that affirmative action programs disproportionately harm Asians. In fact, they harm them far more than they harm whites.

Destroying the Historical Basis for Affirmative Action

Historically the basis and justification of race-based admissions was that white students benefited from centuries of racial injustice in myriad ways. As a result, affirmative action was meant to redress historical imbalances and level the playing field for minority students. But now that we see race-based admissions are disadvantaging Asians more than they are whites, this basis simply falls apart.

Trump to rescind race guidelines in college admissions, WSJ reports

  Trump to rescind race guidelines in college admissions, WSJ reports The Trump administration plans to revoke guidelines that encourage considering race in the college admissions process as a way of promoting diversity, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday. The guidelines, put in place in the Obama administration in 2011 and 2016, put forth legal recommendations that Trump officials contend "mislead schools to believe that legal forms of affirmative action are simpler to achieve than the law allows," the Journal reported, citing two people familiar with the plans.Trump administration officials plan to argue the guidelines go beyond what the Supreme Court has decided on the issue.

The Department of Justice is currently investigating admissions policies at Harvard to see whether they discriminate against Asian - Americans .

Advertisement. Supported by. Affirmative Action Battle Has a New Focus: Asian - Americans . Image. A Princeton study found that students who identify as Asian need to score 140 points higher on the SAT than whites to have the same chance of admission to private colleges, a difference some

It is farcical to imagine that somehow centuries of systemic white supremacy are benefiting Asian students, many of who are first-generation Americans or even immigrants themselves. Moreover, there is no plausible way to suggest that these recent arrivals had any hand in creating the systems that disadvantage other minority groups.

None of this, however, stopped the Congressional Black Caucus from essentially calling the president a racist for his new policy. Its leader, Cedric Richmond, had this to say: “While I am not surprised, I continue to be disappointed that the president of this great country cares so little for its non-white residents and their interests.”

Unless we have suddenly decided that Asians are in fact white, this statement is absurd on its face. By far, the greatest beneficiaries of ending affirmative action would be non-white Asian students.

Trump Administration Reverses Obama on Affirmative Action

  Trump Administration Reverses Obama on Affirmative Action The justice and education departments will encourage the nation’s schools and universities to adopt race-blind admissions policies, reversing Obama administration guidance.WASHINGTON — The Trump administration will encourage the nation’s school superintendents and college presidents to adopt race-blind admissions standards, abandoning an Obama administration policy that called on universities to consider race as a factor in diversifying their campuses, Trump administration officials said.

Such tips are increasingly common in the college-advising world; it’s not unusual for consultants They’ve since been inundated with stories about prodigiously accomplished Asians being rejected SFFA also points to a widely cited Princeton study, which in 2005 found that an Asian American According to Moua, “the faction of Asian Americans publicly opposed to affirmative action is

In numerous surveys, large majorities of Asian Americans have supported race-conscious college admissions and rejected efforts to use Asian Americans as a wedge group against other communities of color who support affirmative action .

It's Time For A New Justification

The Congressional Black Caucus, the Democratic National Committee, and many in the liberal media simply ignore the harm done to Asian students under this program. For a while, that worked. But now, Asian-American activists, Republicans, and the conservative media are shining a bright light on the issue that cannot be ignored. As a result, new justifications for race-based admissions that do not rely on unfair advantages bestowed upon whites must be created. So far, the results are not promising.

In the Washington Post, the newly woke Max Boot weighed in. He was once a conservative opponent of affirmative action who has in response to Trump become something very close to a progressive. To his credit, Boot frames the problem correctly. He is upfront about the fact that hard-working Asian kids are being thrown under the bus. Although he agonizes over it, ultimately he throws up his hands and says we have no choice. This is where he begins flailing for new answers.

The first ham-fisted answer he comes up with is that testing isn’t dispositive of future success in life. Sure. There is no perfect predictive model that colleges can use to determine who will or won’t go on to success. But what this has to do with affirmative action is unclear. After all, empirical data shows us that first-born children have greater measurable success than their younger siblings do. Should colleges therefore prefer first-born children?

Congressional Black Caucus bashes Trump’s move to scrap affirmative action

  Congressional Black Caucus bashes Trump’s move to scrap affirmative action The head of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) hammered the Trump administration on Tuesday for revoking federal guidelines that encourage colleges to consider race in their admissions determinations, calling the move an unveiled attack on minorities.Rep. Cedric Richmond (D-La.), who has long accused President Trump of pursuing policies that are overtly racist, said rescinding the Obama-era affirmative action guidelines will "turn baRep. Cedric Richmond (D-La.), who has long accused President Trump of pursuing policies that are overtly racist, said rescinding the Obama-era affirmative action guidelines will "turn back the clock" on efforts to encourage diversity on college campuses across the country.

Another added: “Maybe affirmative action was necessary at one point in time, but it is outdated today and we need a new formula.” The university does not reveal how many applicants in each group it rejects . For Asian - Americans across the country, the Fisher case is a source of ambivalence.

As an Asian - American , Wang has a personal interest in the issue of affirmative action . With a perfect ACT score and 13 Advanced Placement courses under his belt, he applied to seven Ivy League universities and Stanford in 2013. After most of them rejected him

The key component Boot is missing here is that whatever standards a college uses to determine who is likely to succeed should be equally and fairly applied to all applicants. In arguing that fewer Asians should be accepted because there is no guarantee they will be successful, he is opening the door a whole host of subjectively applied predictive models that could be used to advantage or disadvantage any group. But here in the real world, what this amounts to is “There are too many Asians in top schools.”

Diversity Is Its Own Reward

Boot’s second argument, and the one more likely to gain purchase on the Left, is that diversity in student bodies is its own reward. He writes: “You learn more about life if you go to class with people who are different from you — who have different abilities, different geographic origins, different social classes, different sexualities, different religions, different political views and, yes, different ethnicities. You don’t necessarily want a student body made up entirely of bookworms.”

First of all, it is far from clear why colleges, the entire purpose of which is to educate, wouldn’t want a student body entirely made of bookworms. But even if we accept that college has some social function served by exposure to all different kinds of people, it is important to understand that not all Asians are bookworms. Of the seven demographic boxes Boot creates here, Asians can check off all of them.

When we enact policies that knowingly and purposely disadvantage Asian applicants, we are harming disabled Asians, and geographically diverse Asians, poor Asians, gay Asians, and Marxist Asians. Boot would show all of these people the door simply because there are already too many people who look like them and do well on tests. In fact, that is exactly what Harvard is alleged to have done: giving Asian applicants intentionally lower scores on non-academic standards to produce fewer Asian students.

Democrats and progressives may continue trying to ignore the harm being done to Asian students, and pretend that it isn’t happening. After all, it destroys the entire narrative backing up their approach to affirmative action and diversity in schools. But their ability to hide this consequence from Asians themselves and the public at large is fast crumbling under the weight of reality.

Income inequality: Asians in the United States are highest earners, but also most divided .
Asians typically have the highest incomes in the nation. But that statistic belies the fact that the group is also the most economically divided, and the gap is growing larger, a new report from the Pew Research Center found. The highest-earning Asians in the United States make 10.7 times as much as the poorest Asians in 2016, according to Pew, which compared those in the top 10% of the income ladder versus those in the bottom 10%. Those at the top earn just over $133,500, while those at the bottom make just under $12,500.Asians now surpass blacks as the racial and ethnic group with the highest level of income inequality.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!