•   
  •   
  •   

Opinion How the Right Can Make Inequality a Winning Issue

18:31  10 august  2018
18:31  10 august  2018 Source:   nationalreview.com

Judge denies Cohen request for gag order on Avenatti

  Judge denies Cohen request for gag order on Avenatti A district court judge has denied a request from President Trump's former attorney Michael Cohen to issue a gag order against Stormy Daniels's attorney, Michael Avenatti.U.S. District Court Judge S. James Otero found that while Cohen objected to Avenatti's public statements about him and the adult-film star's case, Cohen did not demonstrate how this would impact his right to a fair trial, noting that it has been delayed for several months.

The Right can no longer cede the issue and must offer a better path forward. Focusing on the lack of upward mobility would allow conservatives a fresh chance to But here’s the catch: Inequality is not a problem so long as economic mobility exists and people at the bottom can still work hard to get ahead.

Energy (and environment) was a winning issue for Obama—and Obama’s election has had a ruinous effect on economic freedom across the board. The key is to understand the fundamental tool the Democrats use to win with false ideas. Only then can we see how that tool can be used even more

Job seekers at a job fair in Uniondale, N.Y., in 2014 © Shannon Stapleton/Reuters Job seekers at a job fair in Uniondale, N.Y., in 2014

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

The progressive Left cites inequality as the central scourge of American society; per Bernie Sanders, it is “the great moral issue of our time.”

With midterm elections around the corner, we can expect to hear Democrats hammer the issue in campaign ads, at rallies, and on talk shows, advocating proposals such as free college tuition and Medicare-for-all. In the political square, progressives claim to “own” the inequality issue. But what they miss — and what the Right must seize upon — is that inequality is indelibly linked to a bigger problem, the lack of upward mobility. The Left offers regulatory and redistributive measures that often hurt the very people they are designed to help the most. The Right can no longer cede the issue and must offer a better path forward. Focusing on the lack of upward mobility would allow conservatives a fresh chance to sell the public on the free-market principles that remain the best way of improving all American lives.

On-screen diversity has barely changed in the last decade, study finds

  On-screen diversity has barely changed in the last decade, study finds On-screen diversity has barely changed in the last decade, study findsThe University of Southern California’s Annenberg Inclusion Initiative released its annual investigation into film diversity on Tuesday, finding that there has been almost no change in the number of women, people of color, and LGBT characters depicted on screen in the last decade.

Solving this level of inequality is often held up as a ‘grand challenge’ for the world. But is that the right way to look at it? While many people may already view inequality as unfairness, making the distinction much clearer is important: to improve the society we live in, these researchers are arguing

How extensive is wealth inequality in the U.S. and why is this a growing problem for the economy and the What should be universal is the right to equal opportunity. This means that health, education and some Every person has the right to the same opportunities in life as everyone else, or at least they

No one questions that inequality exists and threatens our social stability. America’s richest 1 percent holds 40 percent of its wealth, more than is held by its poorest 90 percent. Anyone who has spent time in America’s biggest cities does not need to read the statistics. To take just one example, using the Gini coefficient as a measure of inequality, New York City would rank among the ten most unequal countries in the world if it were independent.

But here’s the catch: Inequality is not a problem so long as economic mobility exists and people at the bottom can still work hard to get ahead. In a free society, people rise by producing things of value to others. Yet in today’s America, too many obstacles inhibit people’s ability to produce and ultimately achieve their dreams. Occupational licensing provides the most obvious example: The Institute for Justice’s landmark 2012 study finds that 35 of 102 lower-income occupations require more than a year of education, training, and exams. Is there any reason why a cosmetologist in Oregon needs 2,300 hours of training to receive a state license? Fishermen (41 states require licenses), massage therapists (39), door-repair contractors (35), and auctioneers (33) all find themselves subject to similarly ridiculous red tape, generally erected under the guise of “protecting the public.” Life-saving EMTs require on average 33 days of training and apprenticeship nationwide, while athletic trainers require 44 times as much experience — 1,460 days — in the 46 states where they are regulated.

This is the most unequal place in America—and it's not in New York or California

  This is the most unequal place in America—and it's not in New York or California In this metro area, the 1 percent earns an astonishing 132 times more than everyone else. That’s not to say the bottom 99 percent aren’t faring well in this metro: Their average income is $122,447, which is more than double the average income of the bottom 99 percent nationwide: $50,107. The gap is so huge because of how much the one-percenters in Jackson earn: $16.2 million. Your browser does not support this video require(["binding"], function (binding) { binding("wcVideoPlayer", "#video_player_24a81e6b-2c49-4cf4-b782-cb5f8abc8548").

You can win or lose, it doesn’t make a lick of difference as far as the casino is concerned, so long as people are playing, the casino is profiting. The difference between the RTP (Return to Player, online slots tend to average 94–97% RTP) and the amount bet, in this example 3–6% is how the house wins .

Then Work Got ‘Greedy.’ How America’s obsession with long hours has widened the gender gap. They both got jobs at big law firms, the kind that reward people who make partner with seven-figure pay packages. “Snow days are not an issue . I do all the doctor appointments on my days off.

Unreasonable requirements prevent self-starters from becoming job creators. This system disproportionately harms the mobility of disadvantaged minorities, anyone without a college degree, and ex-offenders trying to re-enter society — all groups for whom the Left purports to speak. What’s more, these regulations are promulgated with the consent of industry incumbents whose primary motivation is to keep out competitors. This is a rigged system.

Meanwhile, in inner cities, teachers unions and their progressive allies continue to demonize charter schools, even when those schools are proven to produce better or comparable outcomes for low-income and minority children. What could be more critical to one’s economic mobility than childhood education? Why can’t parents have an alternative to the local public school if they feel that their children aren’t being properly educated? The workplace protections and benefits packages of unionized teachers shouldn’t supersede the future prospects of the disadvantaged kids they’re charged with educating. This, too, is a rigged system, even more tragically so because children are the ones hurt by it.

Social Security will not protect retirees from rising income inequality, study finds

  Social Security will not protect retirees from rising income inequality, study finds Wealthier retirees will soon be doing even better, while lower-income older people will struggle more than they already are, according to the Urban Institute.That's the takeaway from a new report by the Urban Institute, a progressive think tank in Washington, D.C., and funded by the Department of Labor, which analyzed how rising inequality will shape the landscape of American retirement.

Income inequality is actually caused by government protecting and giving special rights and The difference is that you should also believe that using force to make it so is not the desired solution. Can you call yourself a thinking person if you view income inequality as the most pressing issue of

Inequality isn't just an issue for rich countries: a billion Therefore they can right their economies more quickly. "In more unequal, less socially cohesive societies, people don't buy They're more likely to oppose the painful short-term measures that governments need to take to right the economic ship.

Another area where the Left inhibits mobility is in the constant push of lower-income Americans toward college. This sounds paradoxical, because college is widely assumed to be a stepping-stone to middle-class life. But progressive efforts to tackle college affordability through low-cost loans have served to grow the student-loan bubble to an insane $1.5 trillion, more than double what it was in 2007. The bubble has fueled the soaring tuition-growth rate, which is now more than double the inflation rate, guaranteeing the need for ever-larger loans going forward, and penalizing students of all income levels in the process. Worst of all, it has decreased the value of a college degree. Employers that used to require only a high-school diploma are now at liberty to demand a bachelor’s degree, to the point where a master’s degree has become the new bachelor’s. Mobility is stunted when lower-income students are burdened with large amounts of debt that they are unable to discharge in bankruptcy, all in the name of a degree that is not worth very much. While certainly some individuals’ chances of future success can improve with college, a broad pro-college policy will never produce sustainable long-term mobility for America’s poor. Alternative vocational training and a general de-emphasis on college must be part of the solution.

How the Great Recession destroyed the American dream

  How the Great Recession destroyed the American dream Ten years ago, a financial meltdown laid bare the growing crisis at the heart of the economy — and it still hasn't been fixedThe scars from the Great Recession can be seen in everything from declining birth rates to flat wages said Eric Levitz, an associate editor at the magazine. "The Great Recession is the moment Americans lost faith…but this dream has been in decline for decades," Levitz told CBSN.

The Left’s failed efforts to address inequality extend to labor and housing policy as well. Many cities and states have adopted a $15 (or thereabouts) minimum wage. This legislation, enacted expressly for the purpose of closing the inequality gap, puts the entire burden of imposing progressives’ social agenda on the backs of small businesses. Bodegas, dry cleaners, restaurants, and the other urban enterprises that employ most low-wage workers are acutely vulnerable to minimum-wage hikes. Such small, labor-intensive businesses tend to operate on the thinnest of margins and are often owned by minority or immigrant entrepreneurs and families trying to reach middle-class status. A study of the first-year impact of Seattle’s hike showed that minimum-wage workers were suffering, having their hours reduced or being replaced by higher-skilled folks who could produce more for less.

In New York City, policies of rent control and its more recent cousin rent stabilization, designed with the intention of helping the poor and reducing inequality, have had the opposite effect. Rent control has for decades incentivized New Yorkers to hold on to their apartments as long as possible, thereby removing the natural fluidity and downsizing found in the unregulated market. Rent stabilization, which today covers half of the city’s apartments, means that a public agency decides how much rents can rise. The effective removal of 1.1 million housing units from the free market has driven housing costs skyward for everyone else, directly contributing to New York’s famously high cost of living as the city’s once-thriving middle class heads for the exits. Without these restrictions, we would see lower average rents overall due to greater apartment supply, more fluidity — including incentives for the working poor to move to lower-cost satellite cities in the region (Newark, New Haven, etc.) where jobs are plentiful but their dollar would go farther — and higher private-sector wages. Frustrated landlords are then forced to cut corners by deferring maintenance, hurting low-income tenants. Everyone loses.

Occupational licensing, public education, college tuition, labor, and housing are just some of the areas in which short-sighted policies that purport to tackle income inequality actually serve to exacerbate it. It is high time that conservatives point out the folly of such policies, forcefully exposing the Left’s more-of-the-same solutions on inequality. Conservatives can and must rebrand themselves as champions of upward mobility and the working poor by removing existing regulations and supporting free-market policies that help people get ahead.

Bernie Sanders socialism moves to Democratic mainstream .
Bernie Sanders and democratic socialism increasingly looks to be winning over the Democratic Party, raising concerns among some Democrats about whether it could hurt the party in this year's midterms, and the presidential race of 2020. The biggest Democratic star of the summer is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who, like Sanders, is a Democratic Socialist.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!