Opinion: Will the Media Be Trump's Accomplice Again in 2020? - PressFrom - US

OpinionWill the Media Be Trump's Accomplice Again in 2020?

16:42  11 january  2019
16:42  11 january  2019 Source:   nytimes.com

Stars to pick opponent for 2020 Winter Classic at Cotton Bowl

Stars to pick opponent for 2020 Winter Classic at Cotton Bowl The Dallas Stars will host the 2020 Winter Classic at the Cotton Bowl, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman said Tuesday, according to John Shannon of Sportsnet. The opponent has yet to be decided, but the Stars will have the chance to pick their adversary, according to Sean Shapiro of The Athletic. Until the end of 2009, Cotton Bowl Stadium was the host venue for the annual college football playoff game, the Cotton Bowl Classic. However, in 2010, the bowl game was moved to AT&T Stadium in Arlington, which doubles as the full-time home of the Dallas Cowboys. The 2020 event, to be held on Jan. 1, will be the southernmost in the league's history.

the host explains why President Donald Trump ' s chances of being re-elected in 2020 are much Speaking on Real Time with Bill Maher, the host explains why President Donald Trump ' s chances of Joe Addresses The Media Blindspot Covering Donald Trump ' s Chance At Presidency | Morning Joe

The 2020 Donald Trump presidential campaign is an ongoing reelection campaign by President of the United States Donald Trump , who took office on January 20, 2017.

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

“Pocahontas” won’t be lonely for long.

As other Democrats join Elizabeth Warren in the contest for the party’s presidential nomination, President Trump will assign them their own nicknames, different from hers but just as derisive. There’s no doubt.

But how much heed will we in the media pay to this stupidity? Will we sprint to Beto O’Rourke, Cory Booker or Mike Bloomberg for a reaction to what Trump just called one of them and then rush back to him for his response to that response? Or will we note Trump’s latest nonsense only briefly and pivot to matters more consequential?

Romney says he won't run against Trump in 2020

Romney says he won't run against Trump in 2020 “I think it's early to make that decision and I want to see what the alternatives are,” he told CNN’s Jake Tapper about whether he will endorse Trump in 2020. Romney, the failed 2012 GOP presidential nominee who will be sworn in as a senator from Utah on Thursday, penned a scathing op-ed in the Washington Post on Tuesday ripping Trump for not living up to the character of the presidency. Trump has responded to Romney’s editorial by opining that he wished Romney would be more of a team player rather than a detractor in the Senate, and reminding Romney which of the two was ultimately successful in winning the White House.

Donald Trump will certainly lose the popular vote again , by a much larger margin than 3 million. if you look at the States above which gave him the Electoral They claim to want equality and fairness and peace, but even BEFORE Trump ' s first term, they were stealing his signs from their neighbor's private

Former governor/aspiring Senate candidate Mitt Romney is pretty sure Donald Trump ' s The former Massachusetts governor called Trump a “con man” and a “fake” during the 2016 election The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.

That’s a specific question but also an overarching one — about the degree to which we’ll let him set the terms of the 2020 presidential campaign, about our appetite for antics versus substance, and about whether we’ll repeat the mistakes that we made in 2016 and continued to make during the first stages of his presidency. There were plenty.

Sign up for the Morning Briefing newsletter

Trump tortures us. Deliberately, yes, but I’m referring to the ways in which he keeps yanking our gaze his way. I mean the tough choices that he, more than his predecessors in the White House, forces us to make. His demand for television airtime on Tuesday night was a perfect example: We had to weigh a request in line with precedent against a president out of line when it comes to truth. We had to wrestle with — and figure out when and how to resist — his talent for using us as vessels for propaganda.

Trump shares parody 'Warren 1/2020' slogan

Trump shares parody 'Warren 1/2020' slogan President Trump posted a parody image of a Elizabeth Warren 2020 campaign slogan to Twitter on Thursday that reads, “Warren 1/2020.” The Daily Wire tweeted out an image of the satirical slogan on Monday after Warren announced that she launched an exploratory committee, the first steps toward launching a bid for president. T-shirts with the slogan are also available for sale on Amazon. Sen. Warren, D-Mass., released the results of a DNA test in October that revealed she could be as little as 1/1024th Native American.

3, 2020 , but President Trump is already making announcements about his next campaign. Meanwhile the same media that made Trump ' s rise possible by investing his every moronic utterance with world-historic significance is trying desperately to pose as a check on his authority.

In exit poll interviews, Mr. Trump ’ s supporters frequently cited the state of the economy to explain their vote. In this situation, Trump hangs onto support from most of the Republican Party, but others grow disillusioned with Trump and support Warren after economic growth fails to translate into income gains.

[Go beyond the headlines and behind the curtain with Frank Bruni’s candid reflections on politics, culture, higher education and more every week. Sign up for his newsletter.]

We will wrestle with that repeatedly between now and November 2020, especially in the context of what may well be the most emotional and intense presidential race of our lifetimes. With the dawn of 2019 and the acceleration of potential Democratic candidates’ preparations for presidential bids, we have a chance to do things differently than we did the last time around — to redeem ourselves.

Our success or failure will affect our stature at a time of rickety public trust in us. It will raise or lower the temperature of civic discourse, which is perilously hot. Above all, it will have an impact on who takes the oath of office in January 2021. Democracies don’t just get the leaders they deserve. They get the leaders who make it through whatever obstacle course — and thrive in whatever atmosphere — their media has created.

Beto O'Rourke contends border is 'one of the safest places' in US following Trump's Oval Office address

Beto O'Rourke contends border is 'one of the safest places' in US following Trump's Oval Office address Former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke blasted President Trump for attempting to “instill anxiety and paranoia."

How likely will Trump win again in 2020 ? Trump was the oldest person ever sworn in. Hillary would be even older. Her grip on the Democrats has slipped. They saw the media ’ s transparent attempts to mislead voters, and shape public opinion, with choreographed programming, blatant misinformation

Will Donald Trump willingly leave office even if he is defeated in November 2020 ? And if he balks at doing so, or worse, refuses outright, will the Republican Party do anything about it? But I put it to you that we are living in an era when the absolutely unthinkable has already happened over and over again .

“The shadow of what we did last time looms over this next time,” the former CBS newsman Dan Rather, who has covered more than half a century of presidential elections, told me. And what we did last time was emphasize the sound and the fury, because Trump provided both in lavish measure.

“When you cover this as spectacle,” Rather said, “what’s lost is context, perspective and depth. And when you cover this as spectacle, he is the star.” Spectacle is his métier. He’s indisputably spectacular. And even if it’s a ghastly spectacle and presented that way, it still lets him control the narrative. As the writer Steve Almond observed in a recently published essay, “He appears powerful to his followers, which is central to his strongman mystique.”

Trump was and is a perverse gift to the mainstream, establishment media, a magnet for eyeballs at a juncture when we were struggling economically and desperately needed one. Just present him as the high-wire act and car crash that he is; the audience gorges on it. But readers’ news appetite isn’t infinite, so they’re starved of information about the fraudulence of his supposed populism and the toll of his incompetence. And he wins. He doesn’t hate the media, not at all. He uses us.

Billionaire Steyer says he won't run for president in 2020

Billionaire Steyer says he won't run for president in 2020 Billionaire investor and Democratic activist Tom Steyer will not run for president in 2020.Steyer, who has paid for television ads calling for the impeachment of President Donald Trump, said Wednesday at an event in Des Moines, Iowa, that "the impeachment question" had reached "an inflection point," and he planned to focus on that. The decision comes as a surprise, given Steyer had been traveling the country promoting the political platform he released after November's midterm elections.

Today in Trump Twitter Watch: The president has once again relitigated the 2016 election by quoting himself in a tweet encouraging former secretary of state Hillary Clinton to run on the Democrat ticket again in 2020 . I was recently asked if Crooked Hillary Clinton is going to run in 2020 ?

Again we return to ratings. The media , he figures, love their ratings more than they hate him and, in crunchtime, will act in their own best interests. " We ' re going to win another four years for a lot of reasons, most importantly because our country is starting to do well again and we ' re being respected

Did that dynamic help elect him? There’s no definitive answer. But we gave him an extraordinary bounty of coverage, depriving his rivals of commensurate oxygen and agency. And while our coverage of him had turned overwhelmingly negative by the final months of the 2016 campaign, it by no means started out that way.

Thomas Patterson of Harvard’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy has been analyzing that coverage since Trump declared his candidacy for the presidency in 2015. Patterson found that for much of that year, the number of stories about Trump in the country’s most influential newspapers and on its principal newscasts significantly exceeded what his support in polls at the time justified.

And those stories were predominantly positive. “The volume and tone of the coverage helped propel Trump to the top of Republican polls,” Patterson wrote in one of his reports about the election. In stark contrast, stories about Hillary Clinton in 2015 were mostly negative.

Through the first half of 2016, as Trump racked up victories in the Republican primaries, he commanded much more coverage than any other candidate from either party, and it was evenly balanced between positive and negative appraisals — unlike the coverage of Clinton, which remained mostly negative.

Trump says Democrats fighting over border wall because they're scared of 2020, in Fox News interview

Trump says Democrats fighting over border wall because they're scared of 2020, in Fox News interview President Donald Trump told Fox News Thursday that Democrats view the battle over his promised wall along the U.S.-Mexico border as "a political thing," with their eyes on the 2020 election. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); "It's not a money thing," Trump told Sean Hannity. "[Democrats] look at the 2020 race and they're not feeling too good about it. They'll do whatever they can to win." The standoff over the wall, for which Trump has demanded $5.

Viimeisimmät twiitit käyttäjältä Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump). 45th President of the United States of America🇺🇸. Washington, DC. Things will settle down. They only want to impeach me because they know they can’t win in 2020 , too much success!

Moore seemed to referring to how Trump won the presidency despite how Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by approximately 3 million votes. Moore said that his current recommendation is for Democrats to support the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement where states will

Only during their general-election face-off in the latter half of 2016 did Trump and Clinton confront equivalent tides of naysaying. “On topics relating to the candidates’ fitness for office, Clinton and Trump’s coverage was virtually identical in terms of its negative tone,” Patterson wrote.

Regarding their fitness for office, they were treated identically? In retrospect, that’s madness. It should have been in real time, too.

But we fell prey to a habit that can’t be repeated when we compare the new crop of Democratic challengers to Trump and to one another. We interpreted fairness as a similarly apportioned mix of complimentary and derogatory stories about each contender, no matter how different one contender’s qualifications, accomplishments and liabilities were from another’s. If we were going to pile on Trump, we had to pile on Clinton — or, rather, keep piling on her.

“It was wall-to-wall emails,” said Jill Abramson, the former executive editor of The Times and the author of a book about the media, “Merchants of Truth,” that will be published next month. She was referring to the questions and complaints about Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state. “When you compare that to the wrongdoing that has been exposed so far by Robert Mueller,” Abramson told me, “it seems like a small thing.” The considerable muck in Clinton’s background never did, and never could, match the mountain of muck in Trump’s.

Abramson, who had left The Times and was writing a column for The Guardian during the 2016 campaign, maintains that Trump also benefited from the media’s excessive faith in polls and its insufficient grasp of what was happening among Americans between the coasts. “The basic flaw of the press coverage, and I count myself in it, was the total assumption that Hillary would win,” she said. “The firepower of the investigative spotlight turned on Trump was a little bit less, because no one thought he would be the president, and that was a grave mistake.”

Maple Leafs' Matthews 'pretty bummed' there won't be a 2020 World Cup

Maple Leafs' Matthews 'pretty bummed' there won't be a 2020 World Cup Fans of best-on-best international hockey aren't the only ones saddened by Wednesday's news that there will be no World Cup of Hockey in 2020. Toronto Maple Leafs superstar Auston Matthews admitted he was "pretty bummed" upon learning of the news, he told reporters Thursday, via TSN. Matthews was a member of the ever-exciting Team North America during the 2016 World Cup, which consisted of a group of players from Canada and the United States age 23-and-under. Since the tournament preceded Matthews' rookie campaign, it marked the first chance for Maple Leafs fans to see their prized No.

Want to watch this again later? Sign in to add this video to a playlist. Rating is available when the video has been rented. This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

President Trump spent most of his campaign-style rally in Las Vegas on Thursday night convincing supporters that everyone loves him—including his harshest critics in the media , who he says are sure to endorse him in 2020 . Trump , who was in Nevada to stump for Republican Dean Heller ahead of a

I’m not certain that more firepower would have made a difference. For one thing, there were many exposés of Trump’s shady history. For another, he appealed to voters who largely disregard the mainstream media and who thrilled to his exhortations that they disregard it further. And many of those voters were embracing disruption or rejecting Clinton; the tally of Trump’s sins had little bearing on that.

Regardless, he won’t get any pass along those lines in 2020. There are formal investigations galore into his behavior. The media needs only to track them — and is doing so, raptly.

We need to do something else, too, which is to recognize that Trump now has an actual record in office and to discuss that with as much energy as we do his damned Twitter feed.

By the time the 2020 election kicks into highest gear, Trump will have been president for more than three years, barring his impeachment, his resignation or his spontaneous combustion (with him, you never know). We’ll have evidence aplenty to demonstrate that he’s ineffective and incompetent, an approach more likely to have traction than telling voters that he’s outrageous. They already know that.

We just have to wean ourselves from his Twitter expectorations, which are such easy, entertaining fuel for talking — or, rather, exploding — heads. I’ve certainly been powered by that fuel, in print and on television, myself.

“You know what would be great?” said Amanda Carpenter, who worked as a communications adviser and speechwriter for Ted Cruz and wrote the 2018 book “Gaslighting America: Why We Love It When Trump Lies to Us.” “Instead of covering Trump’s tweets on a live, breaking basis, just cover them in the last five minutes of a news show. They’re presidential statements, but we can balance them.”

We can also allow his challengers to talk about themselves as much as they do about him. In 2016, Carpenter said, that didn’t happen. “It was deeply unfair,” she told me. “When the whole news cycle was microphones shoved in Republican candidates’ faces and the question was always, ‘What’s your reaction to what Trump just said?,’ there’s no way to drive your own message.”

Most voters won't support Trump in 2020: PBS/NPR poll

Most voters won't support Trump in 2020: PBS/NPR poll More than half of registered voters say they have made their minds up against supporting President Trump in 2020, according to a new poll. In a PBS NewsHour/NPR/Marist Institute survey released Thursday, 57 percent of registered voters said that they would definitely not support Trump for reelection. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); That number includes just 10 percent of Republicans but 91 percent of Democrats and almost two-thirds, 62 percent, of registered independent voters, according to the survey.

Will Donald Trump run for President again in 2020 ? On February 27, The Drudge Report claimed that Donald Trump was set to announce that he is running for re-election. Parscale had served as digital media director during the successful 2016 bid, and has worked for the Trump Organization since 2011.

And when journalists gawp at each of Trump’s tirades, taunts and self-congratulatory hallucinations, these heresies blur together and he evades accountability for the ones that should stick. I asked Rather what he was most struck by in the 2016 campaign, and he instantly mentioned Trump’s horrific implication, in public remarks that August, that gun enthusiasts could rid themselves of a Clinton presidency by assassinating her.

I’d almost forgotten it. So many lesser shocks so quickly overwrote it. Rather wasn’t surprised. “It got to the point where it was one outrage after another, and we just moved on each time,” he said. Instead, we should hold on to the most outrageous, unconscionable moments. We should pause there awhile. We can’t privilege the incremental over what should be the enduring. It lets Trump off the hook.

So does anything, really, that tugs us from issues of policy and governance into the realms of theater and sport. That puts a greater premium than ever on avoiding what Joel Benenson called “the horse-race obsession” with who’s ahead, who’s behind, who seems to be breaking into a gallop, who’s showing signs of a limp.

Benenson was the chief strategist and pollster for Clinton’s campaign, and he told me: “Cable networks have figured out that the most interesting television of the week is the National Football League pregame show, and that if you put enough experts on arguing about something that hasn’t happened yet, people will watch. And that’s what we’re doing with our politics. The media is not using their strength, their franchise, to elevate and illuminate the conversation. They’re just getting you all jazzed up about the game.”

That carried over into Trump’s presidency itself. To wit: Pew analyzed over 3,000 stories from 24 news organizations during his first four months in office to determine what the media gave the most coverage to. It wasn’t any legislative proposal or executive action such as the ban on travel into the United States from largely Muslim countries. It was his “political skills.”

I think that we’ve improved since then, and all along our efforts have included significant in-depth reporting. The Times’s acquisition and exhaustive analysis of confidential financial records of Trump’s from the 1990s — and its conclusion, in an epic story published in October, that he used questionable schemes to build his wealth — is a sterling example.

But the lure of less demanding labors (“Trump Calls Former Aide a Three-Toed Sloth Minus the Vigor!”) is always there, especially because readers and viewers, no matter how much they complain about the media’s shallowness, reward it. What they lap up most readily and reliably is Trump the Baby at the top of the newscast, Trump the Buffoon in the highlights reel, Trump the Bully in the headline. And that’s on them.

But it’s on us to try to interest them in more and to leaven that concentration of attention with full, vivid introductions to Trump’s alternatives. Dozens of Democrats are poised to volunteer for that role, and when we in the media observe — as I myself have done — that they must possess the requisite vividness to steal some of his spotlight, we’re talking as much about our own prejudices and shortcomings as anything else. We can direct that spotlight where we want. It needn’t always fall on the politician juggling swords or doing back flips.

It’s on us to quit staging “likability” sweepstakes — a prize more often withheld from female politicians than from male ones. We should buck commercial considerations to the extent that we can and give the candidates’ competing visions of government as much scrutiny as their competing talents for quips or proneness to gaffes. Every four years we say we’ll devote more energy and space to policy and every four years we don’t. But in an environment this polarized and shrill, and at a crossroads this consequential, following through on that vow is more important than ever.

It’s on us not to surrender to tired taxonomies that worsen the country’s divisions and echo Trump’s divisiveness. Black voters, white voters, urban voters and rural voters aren’t driven solely by those designations, and the soul of the country doesn’t belong exclusively to former factory workers in the Rust Belt.

“Their voices deserve to be heard, but so do the minority voices in urban America,” Rather said. “And I think we can do a better job as journalists not to overuse the phrase ‘average American,’ and also to expand the definition of it.”

The real story of Trump isn’t his amorality and outrageousness. It’s Americans’ receptiveness to that. It’s the fact that, according to polls, most voters in November 2016 deemed him dishonest and indecent, yet plenty of them cast their ballots for him anyway.

“Trump basically ran on blowing the whole thing up,” said Nancy Gibbs, who was the top editor at Time magazine from 2013 to 2017. “So what was it that the country wanted? It’s critically important that we find ways to get at what it is people imagine government should be doing and that we really look at what kind of leadership we need.”

Nicknames have nothing to do with it. So let’s not have much to do with them.

I invite you to sign up for my free weekly email newsletter. You can follow me on Twitter (@FrankBruni).

Most voters won't support Trump in 2020: PBS/NPR poll.
More than half of registered voters say they have made their minds up against supporting President Trump in 2020, according to a new poll. In a PBS NewsHour/NPR/Marist Institute survey released Thursday, 57 percent of registered voters said that they would definitely not support Trump for reelection. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); That number includes just 10 percent of Republicans but 91 percent of Democrats and almost two-thirds, 62 percent, of registered independent voters, according to the survey.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!