Opinion: Are We Really on the Brink of Electing a Socialist President? - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

OpinionAre We Really on the Brink of Electing a Socialist President?

17:25  11 february  2019
17:25  11 february  2019 Source:   nationalreview.com

Americans still love capitalism. Here are three reasons why they aren't flocking to socialism

Americans still love capitalism. Here are three reasons why they aren't flocking to socialism In a world where we now have three so-called "democratic" socialists in office (which is an oxymoron if I've ever seen one), you'd think the American public must be increasingly moving to the left. But you would be wrong. A brand-new Fox News poll disputes that thesis. The poll, which was released on February 13 finds that “Fifty-seven percent of voters have a positive opinion of capitalism. That’s more than twice the number who feel the same about socialism (25 percent).” How about that. (And, if you ask me, the actual figure is probably even higher because most people, especially millennials, can't even define socialism.

When socialist candidates win elections they face a dilemma: How do you reconcile the daily work of being a politician with the longer-term goal of ending capitalism? If the on - the -ground experience of socialism can vary so much in South America, what would a socialist shift look like in the US ?

Adam Posen, the president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics The USA choose wisely electing Trump over Hillary Clinton. He's had a tough job undoing all of The interest payment on the war debts incurred in Iraq and Afghanistan (16 years and counting, 3 different presidents

Are We Really on the Brink of Electing a Socialist President?© Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Has the socialist moment finally arrived in the United States? Increasingly, the Democratic party seems to think so. Capitalism has had a nice run for the past couple hundred years, but now it is time to let the technocrats take control of . . . pretty much everything — from health care to education to energy to banking.

Coulter calls border agreement Trump's 'Yellow New Deal'

Coulter calls border agreement Trump's 'Yellow New Deal' Conservative commentator Ann Coulter ripped President Trump on Tuesday, saying he is "afraid" to fight for a border wall and calling a bipartisan compromise to avert a government shutdown his "Yellow New Deal." "Trump talks a good game on the border wall but it's increasingly clear he's afraid to fight for it," Coulter tweeted to her 2.13 million followers. "Call this his 'Yellow New Deal.'" Trump talks a good game on the border wall but it's increasingly clear he's afraid to fight for it. Call this his "Yellow New Deal.

Sanctions freeze Venezuelan president ’s assets under US jurisdiction and prevent US citizens from doing business with him.

US President Donald Trump officially recognised Juan Guaidó as the legitimate president of Venezuela just minutes after the latter had said he would take over the executive powers. Image caption Juan Guaidó has called on his supporters to keep up the pressure on the government.

This kind of view has long had a space in the Democratic party — recall Huey Long’s slogan, “Every man a king” — but it seems to be going mainstream. The wacky ideas of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are not limited to the lefty fringe of the House backbench but instead are being endorsed by major presidential candidates. And why not? Winning the Democratic nomination is going to require somebody to forge a coalition between minority voters and upscale white progressives, and the latter can’t get enough of AOC’s statist utopia.

But does this make for good politics? National Journal’s Josh Kraushaar — one of my favorite political analysts — is dubious. In a typically sober analysis, he argues:

What’s so remarkable about this rapid leftward shift is that it’s working against the party’s best interests — both for the individual candidates and their chances of defeating Trump next year. So many candidates are trying to fill the most progressive lane of the party that they’re splitting that share of the vote evenly. At the same time, there’s plenty of evidence that many rank-and-file Democrats are looking for a pragmatist who can actually win the presidency.

Ocasio-Cortez, progressives accuse Trump of using socialism as scare tactic

Ocasio-Cortez, progressives accuse Trump of using socialism as scare tactic Progressive Democrats accused President Trump of engaging in scare tactics for his warning in the State of the Union address about new calls for socialism in the United States. 

As the FBI investigates claims that Russian meddling helped Donald Trump become president , FactCheck looks at America's The New York Times has likened his personal politics to a “European-style democratic socialist ”, but Arbenz’s reforms Are we on the brink of a general election ?

As he faces a mounting political crisis at home, the US president may see a war with North Korea as a means of shoring up his administration and crushing domestic political opposition. Confronted with the most powerful military on the planet armed to the teeth with thousands of nuclear weapons, the

Far be it from me to doubt somebody with as solid a track record as Kraushaar’s. And I certainly hope he is correct. But as Allahpundit likes to say, “Dude, I’m worried.”

My anxiety is bottomed on the simple fact that Donald Trump’s job-approval rating is in the toilet right now, where it has been since virtually the day he was inaugurated. The RealClearPolitics average has him at just 42 percent and has never once tracked him above 50 percent. And this is despite the fact that we have peace and prosperity today.

I am worried that voters are willing to elect a would-be socialist over a president they have never actually liked. More important: I am worried that they won’t even recognize that this is what they are doing. That is how little confidence I have in the discernment of American voters — they won’t connect the dots and realize that the Democrats are calling for a government takeover of pretty much everything. I am worried that the people have ceded to the ideological fringes of both parties the power to select the two-party nominees, and then choose between them based on their view of the incumbent administration — whether that means electing a celebrity television star like Trump or a socialist like Bernie.

Venezuela opposition leader rejects mediation offers

Venezuela opposition leader rejects mediation offers Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido says he's declining offers from the presidents of Mexico and Uruguay to negotiate with President Nicolas Maduro.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro was re- elected to a second six-year term. Venezuela on the brink . The last straw. In March 2017, violent protests erupted across the country in response to a Supreme The opposition, however, accuses the Socialist government of economic mismanagement.

The President of Albania is elected through a secret vote and without debate by the Parliament of Albania While the two major parties (the ruling Democratic Party and the oppositional Socialist Party) are "Our country needs consensus, and our country seems on the brink of early elections ."[17].

I think back to the 1932 Democratic nomination, when Franklin Roosevelt squared off against Al Smith. FDR represented a notable break from past practice, while Smith would have governed more in the mold of Grover Cleveland. But I do not think either would really have mattered for the outcome in 1932 — either of them could have won. Perhaps the only thing that might have gotten in Smith’s way was his Catholicism. But ideology did not matter.

Ditto 2008. Barack Obama was virtually a blank slate, but what little we knew about him suggested he was going to mark a dramatic shift to the left. He ran against John McCain, who had carved out for himself a more moderate role. Did Obama’s liberalism matter? Not really.

Or how about 1980? Ronald Reagan was a break from recent Republican nominees, while George H. W. Bush was not. In the end, ideology did not make that much of a difference.

There are contrary examples, to be sure. It is quite likely that both Barry Goldwater in 1964 and George McGovern in 1972 won fewer votes than they otherwise would have because they were so far outside the mainstream.

And to be clear, I’m not explicitly disagreeing with Kraushaar. I’m just worried that Trump’s unpopularity could ultimately bring a socialist into the White House.

This president needs to get his act together and start behaving like a president is supposed to. Of course, he probably will not do that, which means he is going to limp into 2020 with anemic approval ratings. And then we might finally discover whether America is actually on the brink of a socialist moment, one spurred on by an ideological fringe and accepted by a disengaged, ill-informed public.

Conservatives need to brace themselves and begin preparing to work hard to retain the Republican majority in the Senate — for that might be the only thing that ultimately stops the socialist tide.

Colombian president addresses John Bolton's '5,000 troops' note.
Remember national security adviser John Bolton's note saying “5,000 troops to Colombia"? Colombian President Ivan Duque Marquez doesn't. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); He was asked about it during a Fox News interview Wednesday. "National security adviser John Bolton, had this pad — and I’m sure you’re aware of it. Had a briefing, in which it said on there '5,000 U.S. troops to Colombia.' So have you seen any additional U.S.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!