Opinion: Democrats’ obsession with redaction is obscuring the obvious: Trump committed high crime - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

OpinionDemocrats’ obsession with redaction is obscuring the obvious: Trump committed high crime

18:26  16 may  2019
18:26  16 may  2019 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Why the Michael Flynn revelations are so important

Why the Michael Flynn revelations are so important Hearing is believing.

Trump has entwined his office with his private company, drawing scrutiny from congressional Democrats interested in whether his company is benefiting from that relationship. Opinion Democrats ’ obsession with redaction is obscuring the obvious : Trump committed high crime .

The events underscored that Pelosi has managed to hold the line on her no-impeachment stance despite Trump ’s ongoing resistance and relentless liberal pressure for Democrats to try to Opinion Democrats ’ obsession with redaction is obscuring the obvious : Trump committed high crime .

Democrats’ obsession with redaction is obscuring the obvious: Trump committed high crime© Andrea Ucini for The Washington Post/Andrea Ucini for The Washington Post

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Walter Dellinger was head of the Office of Legal Counsel from 1993 to 1996.

I have become increasingly concerned about how the country has received the Mueller report. The Republican talking point is that it exonerated the president. The message from the Democratic House, meanwhile, is that the report is inconclusive. Those responses, one mendacious, one tepid and both erroneous, have shaped public understanding. They have not only allowed the president falsely to claim vindication but also left the public without a clear understanding of just how damning the report is.

House Democrats to read Mueller report aloud in Capitol hearing room

House Democrats to read Mueller report aloud in Capitol hearing room House Democrats to read Mueller report aloud in Capitol hearing room.

Citing court documents, the Post-Dispatch reports that the 20-year-old was allegedly scrolling through Craigslist for cats and then taking them home to brutally kill them. Opinion Democrats ’ obsession with redaction is obscuring the obvious : Trump committed high crime .

“The public speculation about it that I have seen is bunk.” In its statement, the White House offered a list of household names who have vouched for Black’s character, including Henry Kissinger Opinion Democrats ’ obsession with redaction is obscuring the obvious : Trump committed high crime .

Most Americans, understandably not having read the 448-page (redacted) report, may be influenced by how the principal parties have responded. If the report were, as the Republicans insist, an exoneration, one might demand to know how this unwarranted investigation got started in the first place, which is exactly how the GOP has proceeded to turn the conversation.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

And if you thought the report was merely inconclusive, your natural reaction would be that you need to know more. You would say something like what many House Democrats are repeating endlessly: “We need to see the redactions” and “hear from witnesses” — suggesting that there is as of yet no sufficient basis for judging President Trump’s conduct.

DOJ releases second redacted version of Mueller report over FOIA lawsuits

DOJ releases second redacted version of Mueller report over FOIA lawsuits The Department of Justice on Monday released a second redacted version of the Mueller report, but the document doesn't appear to make public new details about the special counsel's investigation and findings. 

And the fact that Smollett apparently lied about a hate crime should not obscure the fact that hate crimes are increasing in the age of Trump . We, the media, must do better here. Stone denies those were crosshairs in his menacing Instagram post about Judge Jackson, but it doesn’t much matter.

Pinsky said he was pleased the governor is allowing the bill to move forward but was confused by his criticism that it lacks accountability. Opinion Democrats ’ obsession with redaction is obscuring the obvious : Trump committed high crime .

The more I review the report, the more absurd and misleading the we-need-to-know-more response seems to be. And the more it seems to have contributed to public misunderstanding. How different would it have been if a unified chorus of Democratic leaders in Congress and on the campaign trail had promptly proclaimed the actual truth: This report makes the unquestionable case that the president regularly and audaciously violated his oath and committed the most serious high crimes and misdemeanors.

Mueller’s extraordinary 2,800-subpoena, 500-search-warrant, two-year investigation fully established not merely crimes but also the betrayal of the president’s office: a failure to defend the country’s electoral system from foreign attack and acts of interference with justice that shred the rule of law. Congress doesn’t need to read more to announce what is obvious from what it should have read already.

Democrats push law that would allow Donald Trump to be prosecuted

Democrats push law that would allow Donald Trump to be prosecuted A trio of House Judiciary Committee Democrats, including South Florida's Ted Deutch, is pushing legislation to pause the statute of limitations while a president is in office. 

Many say that serious crimes have been committed and that the investigation should continue. I don’t disagree. With Trump on the ropes—arguably because of the Russia entanglements but also arguably not, especially “Why can’t we do both?” some ask of those who criticize the obsession with Russia.

President Trump ’s latest “analysis” of immigrant-related crime is Exhibit A in fake news. But it’s worth examining how the White House’s xenophobic The Department of Justice (DOJ) and Homeland Security’s new report on crime and terrorism presents professionally cherry-picked data to bolster the

I do not doubt that Congress’s investigatory oversight function is important, legitimate and firmly grounded historically. The president’s response that “we will fight all subpoenas” is unprecedented and ominous. Getting special counsel Robert S. Mueller III and former White House counsel Donald McGahn to testify is a valid and important objective. And although it appears to me that most of the redactions were justified in the first instance, Congress is entitled to see most or all of them — particularly those in Volume One that would offer the most complete possible understanding of Russia’s influence and hacking operations. As the House resolution recommending contempt against Attorney General William P. Barr explains, without this detailed information Congress “is unable to fully perform its responsibility to protect the impending 2020 elections — and thus our democracy itself — from a recurrence of Russian interference.”

My concern is that the House’s focus on process — such as requesting redacted material — constitutes a strong, implicit suggestion that what we have seen from Mueller is not enough to assess the president. That is just false. The report lays out in detail specific acts of obstruction by the president, as well as the extensive evidence that backs up those claims. More than 900 former federal prosecutors (including Republicans and Democrats) have publicly declared that, if anyone else had committed those same acts, they would be under indictment.

Trump goes off on impeachment in early morning tweetstorm

Trump goes off on impeachment in early morning tweetstorm Without Trump-related investigations, the president claimed his approval rating "would be at 65%," adding, "Too bad!"

Law Newz explained that while that notion is somewhat accurate, Waters had grossly skewed the reality of how impeachment works:The framers Trump ’s been in office less than a year, and most of what Waters is bringing against him remains in the realm of far-fetched allegation and personal dislike.

Debates over whether Trump committed " high crimes and misdemeanors"—the constitutional requirement for If you think that the media is too obsessed by Trump now, impeachment will have you longing to escape to Democrats shouldn't leave obvious illegal conduct unpunished, but even

What will we say in the event the remaining 7 percent of text adds little or nothing to the overwhelming case of presidential wrongdoing already made out by the report? By not having begun impeachment proceedings or taken other strong action, Democrats may have conceded the debate over the Mueller report’s conclusion. Democrats are fighting on process grounds where the White House has some plausible arguments and where winning may add little or nothing to what we already know.

The burden, the House should assert, is now clearly on the president to show (if he can) where the report is inaccurate and why it is not the basis for severe condemnation and sanction of the president.

I’m not one to second-guess Nancy Pelosi. She is the greatest majority leader of the House of Representatives in my lifetime. I could be convinced that an impeachment inquiry has its own time for ripening. Or that in the end some form of censure is the better disposition in light of intransigent Republican control of the Senate.

All I am saying is that every day we should have been shouting from the rooftops: “The president is failing to defend democracy from attack”; “The president’s campaign welcomed and encouraged Russia’s efforts to change our election results”; “The president obstructed justice”; and “The president daily undermined the rule of law.” But we have instead been whispering in the hallways of Congress that “we need to see the redactions.” That emphasis is a mistake that needs to be (and hopefully can be) rectified.


Pelosi: Trump is 'crying out' for impeachment but House Democrats are not on that path.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused President Donald Trump of trying to goad Democrats into pursuing impeachment but said her caucus is not taking the bait. She said Trump's vow not to work with Democrats on shared priorities such as infrastructure rebuilding was rooted in frustration that "the House Democratic caucus is not on the path to impeachment and that’s where he wants us to be.” require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 9
This is interesting!