Opinion: Abortion Opponents Think They’re Winning. Have They Set Themselves Up to Fail? - - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

OpinionAbortion Opponents Think They’re Winning. Have They Set Themselves Up to Fail?

18:27  16 may  2019
18:27  16 may  2019 Source:   nytimes.com

Alabama's proposed abortion ban approved by committee

Alabama's proposed abortion ban approved by committee An Alabama legislative committee has advanced a near total ban on abortion, but added an exception for rape and incest. 

Have They Set Themselves Up to Fail ? Alabama, Georgia and the fetal personhood trap. Abortion foes in state legislatures seem awfully sure of themselves lately. By passing bills that would severely restrict abortion , lawmakers in Alabama and Georgia have in effect asked the Supreme Court not

Even if they “ win ” against Trump, all they have done is practically guarantee a Democratic victory. If anti-Trump Republicans don’t want to find themselves in a similar situation in another four years, they should stop looking for ways to thwart Trump now.

Abortion Opponents Think They’re Winning. Have They Set Themselves Up to Fail?© Christopher Aluka Berry/Reuters Abortion-rights supporters outside the Alabama State House on Tuesday as senators voted for a near-total ban on  abortion.

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Abortion foes in state legislatures seem awfully sure of themselves lately. By passing bills that would severely restrict abortion, lawmakers in Alabama and Georgia have in effect asked the Supreme Court not only to overturn Roe v. Wade immediately, but also to recognize the personhood of the fetus. The history of the abortion debate suggests, though, that by going as far as these measures do, anti-abortion legislators may have overplayed their hand.

Alabama Senate to vote on bill banning abortion

Alabama Senate to vote on bill banning abortion Alabama Senate to vote on bill banning abortion

The GOP looks likely to win substantial victories next Tuesday, and may even take control of both Houses of Congress, but they 've already made their own failure . As long as Barack Obama is in the White House, and thanks to the Senate rules that they themselves used so skillfully, Republicans will

You' re not following any authors. Click the Follow button on any author page to keep up with the After either winning or losing the game, the participants were told to complete a survey about their Your problems are at your disposal. You can think about them , learn from them and respond to them in

Start with the idea of fetal personhood. Both the Alabama and Georgia measures rely on the concept of “natural law”— unchanging moral principles that have supposedly existed since before the Constitution — to support the idea that a fetus is a person. But these kinds of arguments don’t have a record of judicial success.

Sign up for the Morning Briefing Newsletter.

Natural law-based arguments for fetal personhood were pursued by anti-abortion scholars and jurists for much of the 1960s and 1970s to little avail. These anti-abortion scholars avoided originalism, the prevailing conservative approach to constitutional interpretation, and instead focused on rebuking the Supreme Court for not recognizing the fundamental right to life that would have made all abortions illegal, including in the Roe case.

Dem Senate leader on abortion vote: 'It's a sad day in Alabama'

Dem Senate leader on abortion vote: 'It's a sad day in Alabama' A Democratic Alabama lawmaker called it a sad day for the state after the state Senate approved legislation outlawing abortion, including in cases of rape and incest. "It's a sad day in Alabama; I feel like crying," state Senate Minority Leader Bobby Singleton (D) said Tuesday. "But I'm going to hold back my tears, because what you just said to my little girl is that it's OK for a man to rape you, and you've got to have his baby if you get pregnant. You just said to my little girl ... you don't matter in the state of Alabama.

They ' re getting into a part of the business where competition is fiercer. This is not in their wheelhouse. Flipping houses, mortgages, that stuff isn't nearly as scalable as the advertising David Kretzmann: And in the meantime, so far this year, Domino's is up over 50%. That kind of tells you the story there.

John Boehner had set up a 20-week abortion ban for the District of Columbia to fail , with a After the Kermit Gosnell case and the publicity that it received, I think the legislation is appropriate, and I have changed, or at least Boehner has managed to be convinced by the restive base that they have .

By the early 1980s, abortion foes generally gave up on this strategy. That’s because neither judges nor many other conservative lawyers, it seems, felt fully comfortable with recognizing rights not detailed in the text or history of the Constitution. After all, conservatives had long invoked the specter of judicial activism in criticizing their liberal colleagues, including those who issued the Roe decision.

And, as abortion opponents grudgingly recognized, natural law could open a Pandora’s box. If the Supreme Court recognized fetal personhood, the justices would probably subsequently confront claims about fetal rights in a variety of contexts, from Social Security benefits to tax law. Very early on, conservative originalist jurists like Justice Antonin Scalia called on the court to “get out of this area.” It was hard to imagine judges wanting to take on the even messier project of developing a fetal personhood jurisprudence.

The 50-Way Abortion Fight

The 50-Way Abortion Fight If Roe v. Wade is reversed, it will be only the beginning.

Abortion is very common, and people have abortions for many different reasons. Only you know what’s best for you, but good information and support can really help you make the decision that is best for your own health and well-being. Why do people decide to have an abortion ?

But I think it is a mistake to interpret a man like Steve King, the Iowa Republican sponsoring the bill, or “It pains my soul to think of the countless babies killed since abortion on demand became This bill will likely fail on the same terms similar proposals have failed , but soon enough, some new kind of

And so abortion foes turned to originalism-based arguments that stressed that the law did not recognize a right to abortion at the time the 14th Amendment — whose due process clause was the basis of Roe’s privacy right — was ratified. These promised a constrained court, one that was above politics. But these aren’t the arguments that lawmakers in Alabama and Georgia are making.

What’s more, Alabama’s law, rather than claiming to protect both women and fetal life, instead casts abortion as a zero-sum game, chastising “abortion opponents” as those who would “speak to women’s rights,” but “ignore the unborn child.” Many of the other “heartbeat” laws around the country similarly focus almost exclusively on fetal rights.

This approach ignores what many anti-abortion lawyers believed to be the lesson of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the Supreme Court’s 1992 decision preserving Roe. At the time that Casey was being decided, many expected the justices to reverse Roe. In earlier decisions, the court had upheld abortion restrictions and suggested that Roe was incoherent and potentially unworkable and that the reasoning underlying it was unpersuasive.

Southern Democratic Governor Breaks Rank on Abortion Issue

Southern Democratic Governor Breaks Rank on Abortion Issue Louisiana is next in line to pass stringent anti-abortion laws, and the Democratic governor looks to be on board.

Abortion access is one of the most hotly contested topics in the United States’ current political climate. Instead, they often feel grateful for the agency abortions offer. 8. Not all pro-choice people would choose to get abortions themselves .

Setting up to fail is a phrase denoting a no- win situation designed in such a way that the person in the situation cannot succeed at the task which they have been assigned. It is considered a form of workplace bullying.

When the justices defied predictions, establishment anti-abortion organizations believed that they knew where they had gone wrong. Groups like Americans United for Life and the National Right to Life Committee concluded that abortion would remain legal in the United States unless those against abortion could prove that the procedure hurt women. That’s because in explaining its decision in Casey, the court emphasized women’s reliance on the procedure.

“For two decades of economic and social developments, people have organized intimate relationships and made choices that define their views of themselves and their places in society in reliance on the availability of abortion,” the ruling said.

Abortion foes thought arguments about protecting women were important politically, too. In 1997, at a meeting of Life Forum, a secret gathering where abortion opponents exchanged strategy tips, Clarke Forsythe of Americans United for Life stressed that many voters believed the procedure to be a necessary evil. He predicted a backlash if his side did not manage to show that abortion was neither necessary nor beneficial for women.

Many in the movement agreed. And so abortion opponents set out to prove the procedure hurt women, making assertions about the risks and regulating clinics so strictly that they were forced to close. The fight was on between the abortion-rights and anti-abortion sides about who could claim to defend women most forcefully. That’s simply not the case for the Alabama and Georgia measures.

Missouri governor expected to sign new abortion restrictions into law

Missouri governor expected to sign new abortion restrictions into law Missouri's Republican governor could sign a law as early as this week banning most abortions in the Midwestern state after the eighth week of pregnancy, part of a wave of restrictions aimed at driving a challenge of abortion to the U.S. Supreme Court. Republican Governor Mike Parson told reporters on Friday he planned to sign the bill, which was approved by the Republican-controlled state legislature last week and would enact one of the United States' most restrictive bans. He did not set a date for the signing but has until July 14 to do so, according to local media reports.

Abortion foes: We' re winning . Bachmann, Perry, Santorum and others take a victory lap -- and say happy birthday to Phyllis Schlafly. When President Obama told the Catholic Church they had to deny their sincerely held religious beliefs and take on his beliefs, that's not what our system of government

They ' re having to make difficult decisions about whether they can care for another child. She argues that abortion opponents are putting women's John Willke, a local obstetrician, was a founder and past president of National Right to Life. In 1985, a militant group set fire to two Cincinnati abortion

One thing is clear: A conservative majority now sits on the Supreme Court, and many expect the justices to overturn Roe for a reason. But as abortion foes learned to their chagrin in 1992, how and when they ask the court to do so matters. Chief Justice John Roberts consistently expresses concern about maintaining the court’s reputation as a nonpartisan institution and just joined the liberal justices in blocking enforcement of a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges. Justice Brett Kavanaugh spent much of his confirmation hearing detailing his respect for precedent, especially “super-precedents” like Roe.

None of that changes the fact that Roe is likely to be reversed. But asking the court for too much too soon has backfired before, and it could well again.

Mary Ziegler, a law professor at Florida State University, is the author of, most recently, “Beyond Abortion: Roe v. Wade and the Fight for Privacy.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: [email protected].

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Mary Ziegler, a law professor at Florida State University, is the author of, most recently, “Beyond Abortion: Roe v. Wade and the Fight for Privacy.

Read More

Pope: Abortion is never OK, equates it to "hiring a hitman".
Pope Francis says abortion can never be condoned, even when the fetus is gravely sick or malformed, and is urging doctors and priests to support families to carry such pregnancies to term. Speaking Saturday to a Vatican-sponsored anti-abortion conference, Francis said opposition to abortion isn't a religious issue but a human one. His comments come as some U.S. states are seeking to further restrict abortions.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!