•   
  •   
  •   

OpinionDershowitz: Are congressional investigations of Trump the new McCarthyism?

17:50  22 may  2019
17:50  22 may  2019 Source:   thehill.com

White House decries investigations by House Democrats, says they are not following 'rules and norms'

White House decries investigations by House Democrats, says they are not following 'rules and norms' The White House on Sunday decried Democratic-led congressional investigations, saying Democrats are refusing to abide by "rules and norms" that govern oversight authority as they issue subpoenas for documents the Trump administration refuses to hand over. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); "There are rules and norms governing congressional oversight of the executive branch, and the Democrats simply refuse to abide by them," White House deputy press secretary Steve Groves said in a statement.

By Alan Dershowitz , opinion contributor — 05/22/19 10:00 AM EDT. The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill. When I came of age during the 1950s, liberals and civil libertarians were deeply concerned about the abuses of congressional investigations to

Like Trump , McCarthy had, in the words of Boston lawyer Joseph Welch at the Army- McCarthy hearings of 1954, “no sense of decency.” The Wisconsin senator cared little about the human damage his reckless accusations caused. When he chaired his congressional investigations of supposed

Dershowitz: Are congressional investigations of Trump the new McCarthyism?© Getty Images Alan Dershowitz: Are congressional investigations of Trump the new McCarthyism?

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

When I came of age during the 1950s, liberals and civil libertarians were deeply concerned about the abuses of congressional investigations to expose communists and "fellow travelers." Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy was using congressional committees to do his dirty work.

Barr throws curveball into Senate GOP 'spying' probe

Barr throws curveball into Senate GOP 'spying' probe Attorney General William Barr's decision comes as a trio of Senate Republicans are planning their own investigations into "spying" on the Trump campaign. Attorney General William Barr's decision to tap a U.S attorney to dig into the origins of the Russia probe is throwing a curveball into investigative plans on Capitol Hill. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); Barr has appointed a U.S.

"I predict here that there will be a court case against Congress for misusing the authority of their investigation .".

Federal, state and congressional authorities are investigating Donald J. Trump ’s businesses, campaign, inauguration and presidency. As part of its investigation , which also includes possible attempts to obstruct its investigation of Russian election interference and ties between the Trump

The committee leaders would claim that they had legitimate legislative purposes in subpoenaing actors, professors, and government employees to interrogate them about their past political affiliations. The purported purposes were to legislate more effective controls over communist influence in our government and to conduct oversight of the executive branch. Most liberals and civil libertarians saw through this ruse. The obvious purpose was to expose, embarrass, and unemploy left wing individuals associated with the Communist Party during the 1930s.

My law professor, mentor, and friend at the time, Telford Taylor, the chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg war crimes trials after World War II, wrote a masterful critique of these bogus congressional hearings entitled "The Grand Inquest." In it he provided an extensive history of the misuse of hearings for partisan and ideological purposes. He called for reform, including judicial oversight of congressional excesses. A young liberal lawyer named Abner Mikva, who later became a distinguished federal judge, wrote a glowing review of the book, though he criticized Taylor for not going far enough and not being enough of a true civil libertarian.

Giuliani says Trump is 'doing the right thing' by resisting congressional subpoenas

Giuliani says Trump is 'doing the right thing' by resisting congressional subpoenas President Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani said the president "is doing the right thing" by ignoring congressional subpoenas. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); "There are six different investigations...thousands of requests for documents, it's like they're falling all over themselves," Giuliani said of House Democrats who are probing the Trump administration.

Congress must fund the government in the coming weeks, and lawmakers in both parties want meaningful legislative debates over Mr. Trump ’s trade Most House Democrats now privately agree that Mr. Trump ’s behavior clears the bar for an impeachment vote — some reached the conclusion

Alan Dershowitz is a longtime regular at the Chilmark General Store on Martha’s Vineyard.Credit Gabriela Herman for The New York Times. It is an insult to the pernicious virulence and exceptional odiousness of McCarthyism for Mr. Dershowitz , the lawyer and professor emeritus

It is quite fair to say that back in the day, virtually all liberals and civil libertarians, led by the American Civil Liberties Union, wanted to impose restrictions on the power of Congress to investigate, subpoena, and question individuals for partisan or ideological purposes. Now the shoe is on the other foot. It is the Democrats who are abusing their congressional investigations for partisan and ideological purposes. It is the Democrats who are putting forward the phony arguments about legislative purposes, such as the need for new laws and congressional oversight. It is the Democrats in the House who are determined to misuse their legislative power to gain advantages in the upcoming elections.

Now it is the Republicans who are crying foul and who are claiming that the Democrats are abusing the power of the congressional committees they control. However, no one should be surprised by this shift in attitudes because most people, especially politicians, believe in due process "for me but not for thee." Very few citizens advocate neutral rights for all.

Trump loses court round on Democratic lawmakers' demand that banks provide his business records

Trump loses court round on Democratic lawmakers' demand that banks provide his business records President Donald Trump, three of his children and the Trump Organization on Wednesday lost their bid to block Deutsche Bank AG and Capital One Financial Corp from providing financial records to Democratic lawmakers investigating Trump's businesses. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled at a court hearing in New York that Congress has the legal authority to demand the records, clearing the way for the banks to comply with subpoenas issued to them by two U.S.

Dershowitz told the New York Times in an interview published Saturday that he's been calling for Trump "to be treated fairly. Not to have it considered a crime when Despite the backlash Dershowitz has received over his defense of Trump , he told The Times he's enjoyed the debate he's sparked.

“ Is he investigating the Trump Foundation? Mr. Comey would not even confirm the existence of any investigation of Mr. Trump ’s aides when asked during an appearance in In classified sessions in August and September, intelligence officials also briefed congressional leaders on the possibility of

The decision by Judge Amit Mehta to authorize broad congressional investigations of the Trump administration and President Trump himself, going back to well before he was a presidential candidate, could easily have been written by a right wing judge in the 1950s. It swallows, whole hog, the claimed legitimate legislative purposes put forward by those committees now led by the Democrats. It goes even further and suggests that a court has no power to probe the real motives behind legislative investigations, so long as the claimed motives are plausible. Under this decision that goes against civil liberties, Congress could investigate any person for any reason as long as it pretends to be doing so for a legitimate legislative purpose. The decision is an open invitation for abuse of power.

During the 1950s, the good old ACLU would be in court challenging abuses of congressional investigatory power, but the current ACLU has one dominant agenda, which is to oppose Trump regardless of the means used and to raise large sums of money based on this agenda. So the ACLU will not side with Trump in court. It will never side with Trump in court, regardless of how abusive congressional committees may become and regardless of how many rights are violated. The ACLU is now part of the problem, not part of the solution, for this rampant abuse of civil liberties.

George Conway mocks Trump on ‘cover-ups’ by tweeting Stormy Daniels payment check

George Conway mocks Trump on ‘cover-ups’ by tweeting Stormy Daniels payment check George Conway mocks Trump on ‘cover-ups’ by tweeting Stormy Daniels payment check

Among the most important roles of the federal courts is to serve as a check and balance on the excesses of other branches of government, including the legislature. The courts should look beneath the claimed justifications for investigations of individuals and decide whether these justifications represent the real reasons behind the issuance of subpoenas and other exercises of congressional power. There should be a balancing test to weigh the legitimate interests of Congress against the rights of those targeted by its investigations. Congress should not be given carte blanche, as the decision by Judge Mehta gives it, to investigate anyone and anything for any purpose as long as the committee chairmen can recite the correct words as purported justifications for their actions.

All civil libertarians, whether Democrat, Republican, or independent, should indeed be concerned about abuses of power by congressional committees. Today, Donald Trump and his administration are the targets. Tomorrow, it may be Democrats. The next day, you could be the target.

Alan M. Dershowitz is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School. His new book is "The Case Against the Democratic House Impeaching Trump." You can follow him on Twitter @AlanDersh.

Read More

Claus von Bülow Dies at 92; Society Figure in High-Profile Case.
Claus von Bülow, the Danish-born man-about-society who in two trials was convicted and later acquitted of twice trying to murder his heiress wife, placing him at the center of one of the most sensational social dramas of the 1980s, died on Saturday at his home in London. He was 92. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); His death was confirmed by Riccardo Pavoncelli, his son-in-law. Sign Up For the Morning Briefing Newsletter Mr.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!