Opinion: Why Conservatives Should Stop Giving To Arts Organizations - PressFrom - US

OpinionWhy Conservatives Should Stop Giving To Arts Organizations

18:20  10 june  2019
18:20  10 june  2019 Source:   thefederalist.com

Germany's Greens shoot into first place in poll, overtaking Merkel's conservatives

Germany's Greens shoot into first place in poll, overtaking Merkel's conservatives The Greens have overtaken Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives to become the most popular party in Germany, an opinion poll released on Saturday showed, while her Socialist SPD coalition partners fell to an all-time low. The poll, asking voters which party they would back in a national election, showed the Greens at 27% support, one point ahead of Merkel's conservative CDU/CSU bloc. It suggests a trend which saw the Greens surge past the SPD into second place in a European election a week ago has only intensified since.

Even smaller organizations can succeed without depending on the federal government. As Bradley Scholar William Craig Rice argues cogently in The The threat to quality art from federal subsidies was already crystal clear to Toffler in the 1960s: "Recognizing the reality of the danger of political or

You should be conservative because the conservative philosophy is a simple and direct means of fighting totalitarianism. Organizations , especially those with guns, like government, naturally accumulate and centralize power. There's no bad motive needed, in fact

Why Conservatives Should Stop Giving To Arts Organizations© The Federalist Why Conservatives Should Stop Giving To Arts Organizations

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

It’s no big secret that arts organizations in the United States skew incredibly leftist in comparison with the general citizenry's ideas and attitudes. It is almost axiomatic that our theater companies and museums are operated by and support the art of people with left-leaning politics and social views. It is something we just take for granted, as if artists by their very nature will always tend to be leftists.

Trump calls Mexico an 'abuser' of US: 'America has had enough!'

Trump calls Mexico an 'abuser' of US: 'America has had enough!' President Trump in early morning tweets on Sunday called Mexico an "abuser" of the United States, warning that threatened tariffs would force companies to move back to the U.S. if nothing is done to stop illegal immigration. "People have been saying for years that we should talk to Mexico. The problem is that Mexico is an "abuser" of the United States, taking but never giving. It has been this way for decades," he said. "Either they stop the invasion of our Country by Drug Dealers, Cartels, Human Traffickers...

But why are many conservatives acting (as they did four years ago with Sarah Palin), as though he already belongs in the conservative hall of fame? This has got to stop . There isn't anything wrong with Republicans highlighting the best qualities of the men on the GOP ticket. There isn't anything

Conservatives should reject Trump’s hollow, Euro-style identity politics. But conservatives have far more to learn from his campaign than many might Why is there a double standard when it comes to evaluating Donald Trump? Why are other politicians excoriated when they change their minds — as

But leftist hegemony over the arts is not merely the product of some genetic feature of artistic types that makes them prefer Democrats to Republicans. Another significant reason for this is the not-for-profit funding model used by the majority of country’s arts organizations. In most cases the successful arts organization is not the one that reaches out to audiences and generates the most earned income, but the ones that can keep the free donated money rolling in.

There are a number of reasons why a not-for-profit model will tend to make organizations leftist. The first is that the very nature of asking for money, rather than simply selling tickets, suggests some higher purpose for the arts than mere entertainment. At one point in time, this higher purpose was viewed to be the edification of citizens, providing them with a well-rounded understanding of culture. But increasingly that higher purpose has come to be activism, especially leftist activism. That leads conservative donors to a question: Should they be funding the arts?

Kiefer Sutherland Urges Ontario Politician to Stop Using Grandfather's Name

Kiefer Sutherland Urges Ontario Politician to Stop Using Grandfather's Name The '24' star told Doug Ford, the brother of late Toronto mayor Rob Ford, on Twitter: "I knew Tommy Douglas and you Sir, are no Tommy Douglas."

I am convinced that government should finance the arts . There are many branches wich are not able to survive without additional support from the state I believe the United States should given more funding to the arts . I believe the country needs more public art projects to uphold the population of

Across the world, blue-collar voters ally themselves with the political right – even when it appears to be against their own interests. Is this because such parties often serve up a broader, more satisfying moral menu than the left?

Let’s take the example of Jubilee 2020, a project originally organized within the theater commons Howlround. The original concept behind the Jubilee was that for one year all of the theater produced on American stages would be written by women, people of color, the disabled, LGBT – well, it’s easier just to say anybody except straight, white, non-trans men.

The current website is a bit more coy about what exactly is intended, likely a result of accurate complaints that the Jubilee is engaging in discrimination, but the original intent still shines through. The essay defining the Jubilee has this polite little section telling white dudes to shut up: “This is also a time for straight, white men to rejoice, to witness, to listen, and to be fed for one year by the stories they’ve also been denied.”

Thus far, about 80 theater companies nationwide as well as some universities and even secondary schools have signed the pledge to produce only works written by the supposedly marginalized. Among these theaters are some of the nation's best-known and most important, including HERE arts center in New York City, The Bloomsburg Theatre Ensemble in Pennsylvania, Arena Stage in Washington DC, and the Marin Shakespeare Company in California. These are not outliers. In fact, they are a fairly representative cross-section of the not-for-profit arts world. That is to say, this level of political correctness is fairly uniform across the arts.

Asheville police investigate armed robbery in the River Arts District

Asheville police investigate armed robbery in the River Arts District An Asheville man says he was followed by a group of people in an SUV who stole his 2001 black Honda Civic. The man wasn't hurt.

Why ? Conservative editor-in-chief of The Daily Wire and PragerU contributor Ben Shapiro was barred from speaking on campus, prompting him to call campus leftists “fascists.” We all should want to help the next generation. But do it with institutions that believe what you believe and advance what

Thus conservatives from different parts of the world—each upholding their respective traditions—may disagree on a wide range of issues. According to Quintin Hogg, the chairman of the British Conservative Party in 1959: " Conservatism is not so much a philosophy as an attitude, a constant

In addition to direct government grants to these companies, which is a whole other story, as 501(c)3 corporations they receive millions of dollars in tax-deductible donations. Now if one is a conservative who believes that people should be treated as individuals, not representatives of their race, sex, or any other identity, if one believes in equal opportunity rather than redistributed opportunity, if one believes that human beings ought not be defined by their demographic proximity to historical oppression, but rather by their unique experiences and abilities, then how can one give money to organizations dedicated to the exact opposite?

Now, I know the receptions are nice. And celebrities come out and you get to mingle with them. They tolerate you for a few minutes to help the theater company or arts space they are shilling for. That’s fun, and nice. You get photos to put on Instagram. I get it. But maybe you should stop. Because every dollar you give them feeds a fecund and fierce hatred of basic American values.

And it isn’t just identity politics. Non-profit arts organizations often create content in support of gun control and abortion. They create versions of Julius Caesar in which Donald Trump is stabbed to death on stage. Theatre Communications Group, the leading industry organization of non-profit theater companies, has as part of its mission “activism,” which it describes as a “fight for effective cultural and economic policies.”

Elizabeth Lederer, Prosecutor of Central Park Five, Resigns From Columbia Law

Elizabeth Lederer, Prosecutor of Central Park Five, Resigns From Columbia Law Elizabeth Lederer, the lead prosecutor in the Central Park jogger case, which resulted in the wrongful conviction of five black and Latino boys, said on Wednesday that she would not return as a lecturer at Columbia Law School. 

We all should want to give back. There are dozens of worthwhile organizations that are helping level the ideological playing field. These groups promote and preserve the American ideals of free speech, limited government, and free markets – ideas that made America the most successful society

He should be president! A governor is doing well in a state that is usually run by the other side. Rubio, who has an impressively conservative voting record and a generally winsome character, erred on the This inclination helps to explain why Ronald Reagan is so chronically misremembered, too.

Arts organizations do all of this based on the support of taxpayers and donors. When conservatives pull out their checkbooks, thinking, “My, how wonderful and important it is to support the arts,” they should think twice. Not only are they very likely giving to organizations that actively promote a political and cultural agenda they oppose, they are also funding the development of artists who will go on to write our television shows and movies, who will help to enact progressive cultural change without any significant input from the American people.

Some argue that without this funding the arts will simply disappear, that conservatives should hold their nose and give because no art is worse than art that supports a progressive agenda. But this is a stupid argument. Art is one of the oldest and most fundamentally human phenomenon that exists. There will never be a time when there is no art. Even when governments actively try to suppress art, people make art.

Would moving the arts to a free-market model change them? Yes, absolutely. It would look and feel different, but art is a living thing. It is meant to change. Would moving the arts to a free model help break up the leftist hegemony? Here again the answer is likely yes.

There is one art form we can look to that is relatively untouched by the non-profit movement. Stand-up comedy exists almost entirely in the free market, and it is more or less the only art form that dares to mock the leftist shibboleths of identity politics and political correctness. Comedians like Jerry Seinfeld and Dave Chappelle regularly challenge the taboos of the left. The universe of stand up has room for the “unfunny” woke comedy of a Hannah Gadsby, but it also has Bill Burr taking aim at progressives.

The rest of our art, our plays, operas, ballets, and museum exhibits should reflect the wide range of American political and social views that stand-up does. Right now that is not the case. The best thing that conservatives can do to fix it is to stop giving. Stop feeding a system that we can blatantly see is a breeding ground for leftist ideologies. Let a new system emerge to create art that better reflects what America truly is.

Charitable giving by individuals down in first year under Trump's tax law: study.
Charitable giving by individuals declined in 2018 amid a complicated climate for donations to nonprofits that included tax-code changes in President Trump's 2017 law, according to a report released Tuesday.Giving by individuals declined by 1.1 percent without adjusting for inflation and by 3.4 percent after adjusting for inflation, according to the report, which was published by Giving USA Foundation and was researched and written by Indiana University's Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. The authors of the report said several competing factors may have influenced charitable giving in 2018.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!