Opinion: The 2020 Democrats Want to Reenter the Iran Deal. That May Not Be Possible. - - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

OpinionThe 2020 Democrats Want to Reenter the Iran Deal. That May Not Be Possible.

01:20  13 june  2019
01:20  13 june  2019 Source:   slate.com

Iran says EU has failed to salvage 2015 nuclear deal - state TV

Iran says EU has failed to salvage 2015 nuclear deal - state TV Iran criticized on Monday the European signatories of its 2015 nuclear deal for failing to salvage the pact after President Donald Trump pulled the United States out of it last year and reimposed sanctions, state television reported. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); "So far, we have not seen practical and tangible steps from the Europeans to guarantee Iran's interests ... Tehran will not discuss any issue beyond the nuclear deal," said foreign ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi.

The 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries and caucuses will be a series of electoral contests organized by the Democratic Party to select the approximately 3,768 pledged delegates to the

If Democrats want pragmatism over anything else, they would struggle to do better than Bullock. A two-term governor of red Montana, he won reelection by But this might just be Holder trying to build buzz around his role in helping Democrats avoid another redistricting disaster after the 2020 Census.

The 2020 Democrats Want to Reenter the Iran Deal. That May Not Be Possible.© Provided by The Slate Group LLC Democratic presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg attends Repairers of the Breach’s Moral Witness Wednesday rally in D.C. on June 12. Photo illustration by Slate. Photo by Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images.

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

It’s Jan. 21, 2021. Still a little bleary-eyed from inauguration festivities, President Pete Buttigieg sits down at the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office and, with steely determination, signs an executive order lifting the sanctions reimposed on Iran by President Donald Trump in 2018, and recommitting the United States to the 2015 nuclear deal.

Iran's Rouhani says U.S. actions threaten Middle East stability

Iran's Rouhani says U.S. actions threaten Middle East stability KYRGYZSTAN-SCO/ROUHANI (UPDATE 1):UPDATE 1-Iran's Rouhani says U.S. actions threaten Middle East stability

2020 presidential race: Top Democrats support Iran 's hopes instead of promising sanctions. Iran ’s leaders are more convinced than ever that relief from the Trump administration’s policies could be right around the corner with 2020 Democrats . Post to Facebook.

Re -entry into the nuclear deal with Iran is fast becoming a litmus test for Democrats hoping to challenge President Donald Trump in 2020 . That argument is gaining traction in the crowded Democratic field. Harris “would rejoin the Iran deal if the US could verify Iran is not cheating and is

At least, that’s the scene that might have come to mind from the South Bend mayor’s first major foreign policy speech on Tuesday. To enthusiastic applause, Buttigieg pledged to “rejoin our international partners and recommit the United States to the Iran nuclear deal. Whatever its imperfections, this was perhaps as close to the real ‘art of the deal’ as diplomatic achievements get.”

Buttigieg wasn’t exactly going out on a limb. Nearly every major Democratic candidate has pledged to reenter the deal. It’s an easy applause line: The deal is very popular, and pledging to reenter it is an easy way to draw a clear distinction with Trump’s foreign policy. Unfortunately, it may not actually be possible.

First of all, a lot can happen in the 18 months before a Democratic president can take office. For instance, it’s possible that full-scale military conflict between the U.S. and Iran could break out. Or Trump could sit down with Iranian leaders to negotiate his own “new” deal. Neither scenario seems very likely right now, but neither can be entirely ruled out.

Trump warns Iran over tanker attack: ‘We don’t take it lightly’

Trump warns Iran over tanker attack: ‘We don’t take it lightly’ President Trump on Friday warned Iran over this week's attacks on tankers in the Gulf of Oman that the U.S. blames directly on Tehran, saying in an interview with “Fox & Friends” that, “We don’t take it lightly.”

Several major 2020 Democratic presidential candidates want to resuscitate the Iran nuclear deal , the controversial Obama-era agreement that President As I explained last year for Conservative Review, the Iran deal was not solely about nuclear weapons. The Iran deal was fundamentally an agreement

Potentially two dozen Democrats are entering a long, drawn-out primary process to take on President Trump in 2020 . Who's Running For President? The 2020 Democrats . Here are the Democrats who are running, who might be running, or taking a pass on 2020 .

But even if neither of those scenarios comes to pass, there may be no actual deal to rejoin. To refresh, under the 2015 agreement officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action—negotiated with the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council plus Germany and the EU—Iran agreed to restrictions and inspections on its nuclear program in exchange for relief from nuclear-related sanctions.

For now, Iran is still holding up its end of the deal, but it may not be doing so for long. As the New York Times reported this week, international inspectors say that Iran is ramping up its production of nuclear fuel. On May 8, President Hassan Rouhani announced a 60-day deadline after which Iran will begin enriching uranium to a higher level than allowed by the JCPOA, unless the country receives additional sanctions relief. This, he said, would be followed by a series of 60-day deadlines after which Iran would discard the terms of the deal one by one. The next U.S. presidential term won’t begin for another 590 days. This means that the next president can’t just unilaterally lift the sanctions. He or she will need to negotiate with the Iranians to get them back into compliance.

Ilhan Omar blames Trump for Iran-linked attacks on oil tankers

Ilhan Omar blames Trump for Iran-linked attacks on oil tankers Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn, is placing blame on President Trump for last Thursday's attacks on two oil tankers, which the U.S. has linked to Iran. "None of this would be happening if Trump didn't back out of the Iran nuclear deal," Omar tweeted. "America’s response should be to return to the table and reinstate the Iran nuclear deal. Increasing tensions and threats of war serve nobody's interests." President Trump declared Iran was responsible for the attacks in the Gulf of Oman, pointing to video released by the U.S. Navy showing an Iranian vessel removing an unexploded mine.

But just because an American president may want to return to negotiations does not mean Iranian leaders will jump at the invitation. As things stand, neither a sudden reversal in policy by the Trump administration nor Democratic campaign vows to reenter the deal if elected looks likely to lead Iran

Donald Trump said Tuesday that the US will ‘exit’ the Iran nuclear agreement in violation of the landmark deal .

It’s possible Rouhani is bluffing, or that some arrangement can be reached with him. European governments are currently trying to develop workarounds to allow their companies to do business in Iran despite U.S. sanctions. (These companies are understandably wary.)

But even if the deal still exists in some form in 2021, it still may not be possible to just slide right back into the JCPOA.

For one thing, if Iran keeps up its end of the deal until the end of Trump’s term, while the U.S. doesn’t, Iranian leaders might (justifiably) demand reparations for the three years of sanctions that were imposed on it. It’s hard to imagine even the most dovish Democratic president agreeing to this, or selling it to the public.

For another, the clock is ticking on the deal. Under the “sunset clauses” that were the target of much of the criticism of the JCPOA in the U.S., the U.N. embargo on conventional arms sales to Iran is due to lift in 2020, before the next election. By 2023, within the next presidential term, a ban on assistance to Iran’s ballistic missile program will be lifted, as will a ban on its research and development of some types of advanced centrifuges. Additional sunsets will come into effect over the course of the next decade, until stringent inspection requirements end in 2031. (Normal monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency will continue after that.)

Don't open 'Pandora's Box' in Middle East, China warns

Don't open 'Pandora's Box' in Middle East, China warns The Chinese government's top diplomat warned on Tuesday that the world should not open a "Pandora's Box" in the Middle East, as he denounced U.S. pressure on Iran and called on it not to drop out of a landmark nuclear deal. Fears of a confrontation between Iran and the United States have mounted since last Thursday when two oil tankers were attacked in the Gulf of Oman. The United States blamed Iran for the attacks, more than a year after President Donald Trump withdrew from a 2015 Iran nuclear deal.

If you want to save money, folks, and if you want to put people to work, we need to start acting.” After some pushback, he agrees that he might have room for them after all. Then he is gone. I am left feeling that Kerry has just the kind of CV that might sway a centrist establishment in duller times to

Israeli Ambassador to the United States Ron Dermer urged Democrats running for president in 2020 who want the U.S. to re - enter the 2015 Iran nuclear deal to “reconsider,” saying on Monday that getting the U.S. back The reason why we opposed it was because that is not what the deal does.

During the debates over the JCPOA, its proponents defended these sunsets by pointing out that that the deal was not an endpoint. If Hillary Clinton, or perhaps even a Republican other than Trump, had been elected, they could have spent the past two years building on the work of the JCPOA to negotiate additional concessions from Iran on its nuclear program—or other activities, such as its ballistic missile program or support for proxy militias throughout the Middle East—before the sunsets went into effect. The next president, by contrast, will be starting from scratch with little time.

“We’re behind schedule in terms of making progress,” said Suzanne Maloney, an Iran expert and deputy director of the Foreign Policy program at the Brookings Institution, during a panel on Iran policy at the Center for American Progress on Tuesday. “What we need to be doing today is negotiating the successor to the JCPOA. If that wraps in a reentry to the JCPOA, wonderful, but we have to be looking to extend those timelines.”

It’s also not clear that the Iranian government will be interested in restarting negotiations. By the time the next American president takes office, Iran will be a few months away from its own presidential election. Rouhani is barred by term limits from running again. It’s quite possible the next president will be far less enthusiastic about improving relations with the West. Even if another “moderate” becomes president, he will be wary about agreeing to any additional concessions to the U.S. after Rouhani’s experience. After all, what’s to stop the next president from tearing up whatever agreement they reach?

Biden slams Trump's Iran strategy as a 'self-inflicted disaster'

Biden slams Trump's Iran strategy as a 'self-inflicted disaster' Former Vice President Joe Biden weighed in Thursday on the rapidly escalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran.

Even Democrats Keep Thinking Iran Is Worse Than Saudi Arabia. With ideas like Medicare for All and the Green New Deal , the 2020 Democratic presidential contenders are challenging the ideological parameters that have defined American domestic We want to hear what you think about this article.

Is it possible the party might misplay what looks like a strong hand? Trump is clearly vulnerable, with key pieces of his 2016 coalition – starting with More than anything else, if suburban white women break against Trump in 2020 the way they broke in favor of Democrats in 2018, analysts say Trump

Ilan Goldenberg, director of the Middle East Security Program at the Center for a New American Security, told me it’s very doubtful the next president could just rejoin the JCPOA in its current form, but the Democratic campaigns’ pledges to do so aren’t merely empty rhetoric. “I think it’s a proxy for saying, ‘We’re going to go back in to seriously engage on diplomacy, which is right and correct. But realistically, it’s going to be a lot tougher. The opening position for a Democratic president should be, ‘I would like to go back into the JCPOA, and I would also like to begin negotiating on other issues of concern.’ ”

There is an admittedly optimistic but not entirely far-fetched scenario in which the arrival of a new U.S. president helps unlock the “better” Iran deal that Trump has repeatedly promised. Even before Trump’s reversal, the JCPOA wasn’t delivering the economic benefits that Iran had been hoping for, with many international firms wary of setting up shop amid an uncertain policy environment. And both the Iranian government and its foreign proxies are now feeling the pain from Trump’s sanctions.

It would be hard for the Iranian government to agree to concessions to Trump now, without it looking like surrender. But a new leader could allow for (dare I say it) a reset.

Goldenberg suggests this could initially take the form of a short-term freeze in exchange for limited sanctions relief, along the lines of the 2013 Joint Plan of Action that preceded the final agreement. That could then set the stage for a new, more comprehensive deal.

A lot still has to happen before this is even a possibility—not the least of which is that a Democrat has to beat Trump. The only certainty is that the political reality of the Middle East will look far different than it does today, not to mention how it did in 2015.

While I supported the intentions of the Iran deal, I’ve argued in the past that the Obama administration’s single-minded focus on it caused Obama and his advisers to neglect other pressing priorities. The Trump administration, in its single-minded focus on undoing Obama’s legacy, made the shortsighted decision to blow up the JCPOA rather than work to strengthen it.

The next president can’t make the same mistakes. He or she should absolutely work to restart engagement with Iran and undo the damage caused by Trump, but it won’t be as easy as simply turning back the clock.

Read More

Democrats can help Trump avoid war with Iran.
Trump clearly senses the risk, and that is why a resolute, united stand by the Democrats can help him make the choice for diplomacy. By making it clear to the American public that this would be Trump's war - an avoidable, unnecessary war of choice - it could help to save the United States from another disastrous military intervention in the Middle East.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!