•   
  •   
  •   

OpinionThe Last Thing America Needs Is Yet Another Open-Ended War In The Middle East

17:41  20 june  2019
17:41  20 june  2019 Source:   thefederalist.com

10 burning questions for the 2019 U.S. Open

10 burning questions for the 2019 U.S. Open The 2019 U.S. Open brings a number of fascinating talking points. With them, a good amount of questions will need to be answered at Pebble Beach. 

The Western dependence on Middle Eastern energy supplies is ever diminishing. Foreign policy should reflect that strategic reality. After all, he won an election protesting against stupid Middle Eastern wars . The last thing he needs is another one. That’s a change from the last two decades

American troops are already deployed inside Syria, where Pentagon officials are privately telling CNN that the US could be drawn into a much larger war . The risk of a larger regional war in the Middle East , perhaps bringing the United States in direct confrontation against Iran, is a very real possibility.

The Last Thing America Needs Is Yet Another Open-Ended War In The Middle East© The Federalist The Last Thing America Needs Is Yet Another Open-Ended War In The Middle East

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

U.S. Air Force Gen. Paul Selva, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a rare voice of sanity and realism, told reporters recently that buck-passing the world’s security burden onto America (and Britain, while we are at it) should be a thing of the past. Other great powers that are more interested in preserving their oil and trade routes should play a more active part in securing those routes, he said, with their own blood and treasure.

U.S. Open 2019 live blog: Tiger Woods, Brooks Koepka get their opening rounds underway, Rickie Fowler leads

U.S. Open 2019 live blog: Tiger Woods, Brooks Koepka get their opening rounds underway, Rickie Fowler leads U.S. Open 2019: Complete coverage of all opening-round action with live updates from Pebble Beach Golf Links.

Thanks to the American system, which promises redress of grievances in a public forum and at the ballot box, the US has managed to Yet anyone so much as suggesting that the numbers coming out of certain cities in the middle of the night aren’t pure as driven snow is vanishing into the Memory Hole.

Articles must be published within the last calendar month. Centrism is dumb when people don't have healthcare. So the middle of the road between starving in the streets and universal It could be that Schultz is their backup plan if Democrats end up nominating Sanders or a Sanders-like candidate.

While freedom of navigation and trade in the global commons is the primary task of the U.S. Navy ever since the United States took superpower status from the Royal Navy post-1945, the situation is changing as unipolarity is coming to an end.

“We have maintained across the sea lanes of the world a position of defending freedom of navigation,” Selva said, but “that doesn’t mean it’s a US-only problem. If we take this on as a US-only responsibility, nations that benefit from that movement of oil through the Persian Gulf are bearing little or no responsibility for the economic benefit they gain from the movement of that oil.”

This should be obvious to anyone who follows geopolitics in the Gulf region, especially to the armchair commentators and politicians who are trying to portray this as a challenge Ronald Reagan faced in the 1980s. Then the Iran-Iraq war was ongoing, amid the threat of Soviets capitalizing on the chaos and choking Western energy routes. The simple reality is that this is not the 1980s.

Iran Has Ties to Al Qaeda, Trump Officials Tell Skeptical Congress

Iran Has Ties to Al Qaeda, Trump Officials Tell Skeptical Congress Administration officials are briefing Congress on what they say are ties between Iran and Al Qaeda, prompting skeptical reactions and concern on Capitol Hill that the White House could invoke the war authorization passed in 2001 as legal cover for military action against Tehran. 

When the 'cold war ' ended , anglo- America was left without a rationale to continue in its self-appointed role as upholder of the global 'peace' and bestower The US presence in the Middle East since 9/11, involving the invasion and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, the bombing of Pakistan, the overthrow

Much the same goes for American soldiers across the greater Middle East and Africa, where the Early in the Syrian civil war , the Obama administration refused Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s The United States’ wars can end —and end decently. Yet as long as militarized mindsets occupy

As Selva added, “If you think back to the reflagging operation, the Tanker War as it was nicknamed, where we reflagged and escorted tankers so that they could flow in and out of the Strait of Hormuz, we got a substantial amount of our oil from the Persian Gulf…We are now in a position where the bulk of that oil goes to … countries in Asia, and none of those countries have shown any predilection to pressing Iran to stop what they are doing. What was true in the 1980s, is not true today. We are not wholly dependent on the movement of Saudi, Kuwaiti Qatari and Emirati oil in and out of the Gulf to sustain our economy.”

Everyone with an ounce of brains can guess that. Tucker Carlson is apparently personally advising the president against a new war in the Middle East, and good for him. But the broader questions are not being answered.

What is the purpose of another intervention in the Middle East, when all the focus should be on China? American intelligence reports suggest Iranian aggression is a typical lashing out in what might be perceived as a siege mentality. While engaged in a desperate proxy war with Saudi Arabia over influence in the Middle East, Iran poses no direct strategic threat to the United States. So far they have not touched any American strategic assets, and the official American red-line for action is American lives lost.

Putin Warns U.S. War With Iran Would Be ‘Catastrophic’

Putin Warns U.S. War With Iran Would Be ‘Catastrophic’ Russian President Vladimir Putin warned that a war between the U.S. and Iran would be “catastrophic” for the Middle East and may trigger a fresh wave of refugees from the region. The U.S. hasn’t ruled out the use of force amid rising tensions with Iran in the Persian Gulf, Putin said at his annual “Direct Line” call-in show on Thursday. “I want to say at once that this would be a catastrophe for the region” that may stoke “a surge in violence and perhaps an increase in the number of refugees,” he said. © Bloomberg Vladimir Putin To contact the reporter on this story: Alexei Anishchuk in Moscow at aanishchuk@bloomberg.

The Second World War ended with the complete destruction of the enemies of Hitler's Germany and his fellow Axis nations. 14: When posting a screenshot from one of your games, you must explain in the comments what the post viewer should be looking at, and if it is an event, you must provide a write up

America has spent .9 trillion on wars in the Middle East and Asia since 2001, a new study says. Over 244,000 civilians have been killed. Another 10 million people have been displaced due to violence. The .9 trillion figure reflects the cost across the U.S. federal government since the price of

Bret Stephens, for example, cavalierly states that he doesn’t “want a war” but also that the United States should just sink Iranian ships. How does he think wars start? For what purpose would we do this? To what end? Stephens might think that this is the 19th century and Iranians are like the Barbary pirates who would just take a bombardment from an Anglo-Dutch fleet, but the reality is different.

While Iran is a minnow compared to the United States, it is fully capable of making life miserable for U.S. interests in the region, including troops. The fallacy of an analysis that doesn’t consider the opponent’s action is the exact reason we have been in so many never-ending and costly ​globalist ​policing missions in the last 20 years.

Consider the reality. Saudi Arabia and Iran ​are involved in a proxy war across the Middle East. But it is not a Western fight, and there is no Western interest other than selling weapons, preferably to both. American oil dependency is at an all-time low, and major oil importers are other great powers with large navies like India and China, powers whose navies are completely capable of securing supply lines, and are at present busy in similar operations such as against pirates on the Somalian coasts.

Scars on Middle East landscape bear witness to past peace failures

Scars on Middle East landscape bear witness to past peace failures Talk of Middle East peace is in the air again, as politicians are set to gather in Bahrain to launch the latest in a long line of initiatives to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Thousands of words and millions of dollars will likely be expended at the U.S.-led conference on June 25-26 aimed at boosting the Palestinian economy, as the first phase of President Donald Trump's long-delayed peace plan gets under way. Bearing witness to the difficulty of the task are the scars left by wars past across the landscape of Israel, the Palestinian Territories and the Golan Heights.

Research consistently shows that the Western dependence on Gulf oil supplies is minimal, due to the domestic gas revolution and the demise of the threat from Moscow post-Cold War. Regardless of how rogue an actor Iran is, does anyone think it is even logical that Iran would mine the entire Strait of Hormuz to cut off its own crude oil supply, the majority of which goes to China and India, which are essentially the lifeline of Iranian survival?

It defies history, and nation-state behavior. Autocratic and revolutionary states, unlike liberal-democratic states, care about their system’s survival far more, and try and minimize risks of getting into a war with major powers unless pushed to the wall. Even sclerotic Soviet leaders wanted their creaking system to survive in the dying days of the 1980s.

A recent statement from Defense Priorities categorically states the same: “The failure of ‘maximum pressure’ should not be used to justify an unauthorized, preventive war. There is no ‘limited strike’ option for Iran, and another prolonged Middle East war would further harm U.S. security and prosperity.”

In short, whatever Stephens or David Brooks gins up in feverish fantasies, any strike against Iran wouldn’t just stay quiet with “sinking of the Iranian Navy,” whatever in God’s name that means. It would spiral out and result in another open-ended conflict, and an inevitable push for nation building. At a time the military priority should be China, nation building and human rights promotions in the Gulf are a luxury only newspaper pundits sitting in cushy DC offices care about.

‘Urgent needs from head to toe’: This clinic had two days to fix a lifetime of needs

‘Urgent needs from head to toe’: This clinic had two days to fix a lifetime of needs The long lines and problems facing a temporary free clinic in rural Tennessee reflect the reality facing areas with diminished medical care.

Interestingly, it appears Trump understands that and has read the briefings. While one cannot attribute any coherent political idea to him, he is instinctively a restrainer on foreign policy. Trump understands that China is the biggest threat, and that promoting human rights in feudal lands with U.S. lives and dollars don’t serve U.S. interests in any discernible way, and that the United States doesn’t need Arab and Persian energy resources.

Speaking to TIME, Trump argued that the Gulf of Oman is less strategically important for the United States now than it used to be, citing China and Japan as nations that still rely on the region for significant proportions of their oil. ‘Other places get such vast amounts of oil there,’ Trump said. ‘We get very little. We have made tremendous progress in the last two and a half years in energy. And when the pipelines get built, we’re now an exporter of energy. So we’re not in the position that we used to be in in the Middle East where … some people would say we were there for the oil.’

As Tom Rogan and my colleague Curt Mills discussed a few days back, Trump seems to be a personal check on some of his administration’s hawkish proponents. After all, he won an election protesting against stupid Middle Eastern wars. The last thing he needs is another one.

That’s a change from the last two decades, and for the good. Trump needs a team more aligned with his Nixonian instincts. This is the time for conservative foreign policy realists to flock in, get out of the Middle East, and put the gun-sight firmly on China.

Read More

Trump Once Again Assails America’s Friends as He Opens Overseas Visit.
OSAKA, Japan — President Trump plunged back into the world of international diplomacy on Friday with characteristic provocation, keeping some of America’s closest allies, including his hosts, off balance even as he sought advantage on an array of economic and security disputes with profound consequences. Mr. Trump opened a series of high-stakes meetings with world leaders gathered in Osaka, Japan, for an international summit meeting after calling into question the very foundation of the relationship between the United States and two of its most important friends, Japan and Germany, and lashing out at a third partner, India.

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!