Opinion: Democratic Presidential Candidates Are Seeking To ‘Pack’ The Supreme Court - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

OpinionDemocratic Presidential Candidates Are Seeking To ‘Pack’ The Supreme Court

01:00  11 july  2019
01:00  11 july  2019 Source:   dailycaller.com

Biden’s Health Care Plan Demonstrates His Extremism On Abortion

Biden’s Health Care Plan Demonstrates His Extremism On Abortion Since the first debate, Biden’s campaign has made a concerted effort to rehabilitate his standing with liberal voters––including more emphasis on abortion.

Warren is targeting Democrats who seek progressive purity from their 2020 champion. The Washington state governor has built his campaign around the climate issue, leading the pack of RS Coverage: California Democrat Eric Swalwell Announces 2020 Presidential Run on ‘Colbert’.

Expanding the Supreme Court would go far beyond this kind of tit-for-tat. Until now, Democrats and Republicans have fought over internal Senate FDR sought to expand the court because of its opposition to the New Deal. He claimed the justices still lived in a “horse and buggy” era and could not

Democratic Presidential Candidates Are Seeking To ‘Pack’ The Supreme Court© Scott Eisen/Getty Images Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), announces her official bid for President on February 9, 2019 in Lawrence, Massachusetts. Warren announced today that she was launching her 2020 presidential campaign. (Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

One year ago this week, President Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh to a seat on the United States Supreme Court.

Today, many Democrats seek to limit Justice Kavanaugh’s impact (and that of President Trump’s other Supreme Court appointment, Justice Neil Gorsuch) by adding additional seats to the nine member court — and filling them with progressive judicial activists.

Biden open to renominating Merrick Garland

Biden open to renominating Merrick Garland Joe Biden called Merrick Garland a "first-rate person." Obama first nominated Garland in 2016 to fill the vacancy Justice Antonin Scalia's death created. However, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced the Senate would not consider an appointment until after the presidential election took place. Upon taking office, President Donald Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to fill the seat. “I think we should have been a whole heck of a lot harder on [Mitch McConnell],” Biden told Starting Line of the 2016 effort.

Progressive activist groups are pressing Democratic presidential candidates to back proposals for changing the Supreme Court , a move that could draw Pack the Courts , a recently formed group led by San Francisco State University professor Aaron Belkin, is trying to pressure candidates to support

The Democratic Party’s 2020 presidential candidates have called for a number of changes to the rules of American Senators have traditionally sought to protect the filibuster, but liberals argue that it allows relatively few states to Would you support adding justices to ‘ pack ’ the Supreme Court ?

At least 10 of the 22 Democratic presidential candidates favor some form of court-packing. Pete Buttigieg and Robert Francis (aka “Beto”) O’Rourke have floated a proposal to expand the number of justices to 15 — five appointed by Republicans; five appointed by Democrats; and five selected by the ten appointed justices.

Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, and Kirsten Gillibrand also support an enlarged court.

And a left-wing advocacy group, originally called “Pack the Court,” plans to spend millions of dollars during the 2020 campaign cycle to pressure candidates into making court-packing a priority.

No doubt, some marketing genius advised these activists that the name Pack the Court reeked of a brazen political power grab. The group now goes by the name “Take Back the Court,” which falsely implies that the court is a lopsided political institution that requires balance in order to restore its legitimacy.

Warren, Sanders, O'Rourke and Castro set for Milwaukee forum

Warren, Sanders, O'Rourke and Castro set for Milwaukee forum MILWAUKEE (AP) — Democratic presidential candidates Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Beto O'Rourke and Julian Castro are participating in a town hall in Milwaukee sponsored by the Hispanic civil rights organization LULAC. 

Five Democratic presidential candidates are contemplating proposals to expand the Supreme Court . The push to “ pack the courts ” follows Democratic presidential candidates Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Robert “Beto” O’Rourke, Pete Buttigieg, and Kirsten Gillibrand have expressed

Nearly half a dozen 2020 Democratic presidential candidates are making the U.S. Supreme Court an issue in their campaigns for the White Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York also have refused to rule out a court - packing power play.

Of course, as any 8th grade student of civics should know, the Supreme Court is not supposed to operate, like some federal commissions do, with a “balance” of members from the two major political parties. Nor is it supposed to advance certain policy positions.

Although the selection and appointment of federal judges is, inevitably, a political process, once confirmed, federal judges are supposed to rise above politics. Lifetime appointments are intended to insulate them from political pressures and from the current cultural zeitgeist.

The role of a judge is not to respond to the will of the people or to update laws for the modern era. (That is the job of our elected representatives.) The role of a judge is limited to interpreting the law as written and ensuring that laws passed by the political branches comply with the United States Constitution. As Chief Justice John Roberts famously noted, the role of a judge is like that of a neutral umpire whose job is to call balls and strikes, not pitch or bat.

Poll: Majority say the census should be able to include citizenship question

Poll: Majority say the census should be able to include citizenship question Sixty-seven percent of voters said the census should be able to ask whether people living in the U.S. are citizens, going against the recent Supreme Court decision on the matter, according to a new Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); The poll also found that the inclusion of the question was supported among members of both parties, with 88 percent of Republicans and 52 percent of Democrats supporting its inclusion.

Expanding the Supreme Court would amount to a historic power play by the next Democratic of whether Democrats should seek to reform our courts to the question of exactly what type of reform to of Indivisible, added: “Any Democratic presidential candidate who is serious about implementing a An advocacy group launched in October called Pack the Courts is vying to make court reform a

An aggressive campaign is prodding Democratic presidential candidates to back a proposal to add four judges to the nation's highest court . When Democrats responded by filibustering that nomination, the GOP majority voted to eliminate the old 60-vote rule on Supreme Court nominations.

Theoretically, this should be true irrespective of whether a judge was appointed by a Democratic or Republican president.

Unfortunately, however, progressives have long sought to use the courts to score political “home runs” and reshape social policy. This is why they fight so bitterly to stop the confirmation of judges who understand the limitations of judicial power.

In an Orwellian twist of logic, Democrats who today favor court-packing claim that their scheme is necessary to “de-politicize” the court. Of course, what they really mean is that court-packing is necessary to guarantee their desired outcomes on particular issues.

Americans should be leery of such schemes.

Although the Constitution does not dictate the appropriate number of justices, since 1869 the Supreme Court has had nine (eight associate justices plus a chief justice).

When President Franklin Roosevelt attempted to pack the court in 1937, it didn’t go well. The American public strongly opposed the measure. The Senate Judiciary committee called it “a needless, futile and utterly dangerous abandonment of constitutional principle … without precedent or justification.” Ultimately, Roosevelt backed down.

Democratic candidates court black voters; Biden addresses race criticism

Democratic candidates court black voters; Biden addresses race criticism Democratic candidates court black voters; Biden addresses race criticism

The concept of expanding the Supreme Court , like the phrase “ court packing ” itself, fell into Fallon has been in contact with a new group, Pack the Courts , which seeks to inject the idea of restructuring the Both major-party presidential candidates in 2016 outlined explicit litmus tests for their nominees.

Most Democratic candidates have backed a bill in the House that would create a commission to study reparations, or compensating descendents of slaves for the long-term damage of slavery, including structural and institutional racism and inequality. But some candidates have argued for using policies

Sadly, some Democrats today seem not to have learned history’s lesson that court-packing plans undermine the notion of an independent judiciary and (to use a current turn of phrase) threaten to “hack” our democracy by placing the power to make law in the hands of a few unelected elites.

To their credit, Democratic presidential candidates Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, and Joe Biden recognize that packing the court would set off a judicial arms race in which Republicans would retaliate by adding even more justices — until one day (as Booker puts it) “our grandchildren will ask us: ‘Hey, granddad, why are there 121 people on the Supreme Court?’”

Too bad some of their Democratic colleagues don’t see it that way.

Jennifer Braceras (@J_Braceras) is a senior fellow at the nonprofit Independent Women’s Forum and served on the United States Commission on Civil Rights from 2001-07. She is a 1994 graduate of Harvard Law School.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of The Daily Caller.

Democratic debate: CNN will hold live draw to determine each night's lineup.
CNN will conduct a live draw to determine which night each candidate will appear in the highly anticipated Democratic presidential primary debates airing later this month on the network. Dana Bash, Don Lemon and Jake Tapper will moderate the Democratic National Committee-sanctioned debates over two nights, July 30-31, from Detroit, said a network spokesperson. Both nights will air live exclusively on CNN and CNN en Español. The debates will also be simulcast on CNN International. CNN's Debates will also stream live without requiring log-in to a cable provider, exclusively to CNN.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 2
This is interesting!