OpinionDemocratic Presidential Candidates Are Seeking To ‘Pack’ The Supreme Court

01:00  11 july  2019
01:00  11 july  2019 Source:   dailycaller.com

Biden’s Health Care Plan Demonstrates His Extremism On Abortion

Biden’s Health Care Plan Demonstrates His Extremism On Abortion Since the first debate, Biden’s campaign has made a concerted effort to rehabilitate his standing with liberal voters––including more emphasis on abortion.

Today, many Democrats seek to limit Justice Kavanaugh’s impact (and that of President Trump’s other Supreme Court appointment, Justice Neil Gorsuch) by adding additional seats to the nine At least 10 of the 22 Democratic presidential candidates favor some form of court - packing .

Democratic candidates are increasingly advocating " court packing ," that is , upping the number of Supreme Court justices to balance the bench -- or South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg was among the first of the Democratic presidential candidates to spotlight court overhaul proposals.

Democratic Presidential Candidates Are Seeking To ‘Pack’ The Supreme Court© Scott Eisen/Getty Images Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), announces her official bid for President on February 9, 2019 in Lawrence, Massachusetts. Warren announced today that she was launching her 2020 presidential campaign. (Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

One year ago this week, President Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh to a seat on the United States Supreme Court.

Today, many Democrats seek to limit Justice Kavanaugh’s impact (and that of President Trump’s other Supreme Court appointment, Justice Neil Gorsuch) by adding additional seats to the nine member court — and filling them with progressive judicial activists.

Poll: Majority say the census should be able to include citizenship question

Poll: Majority say the census should be able to include citizenship question Sixty-seven percent of voters said the census should be able to ask whether people living in the U.S. are citizens, going against the recent Supreme Court decision on the matter, according to a new Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); The poll also found that the inclusion of the question was supported among members of both parties, with 88 percent of Republicans and 52 percent of Democrats supporting its inclusion.

We asked the candidates whether the size of the Supreme Court should be expanded. “I think it would meet with the same fate as when Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court .” The New York Times reached out to 22 Democratic presidential candidates to ask them the same set of questions

Democratic Presidential Candidates Should Promise to Appoint This Kind of Judge to the Federal Courts . The lawyers who best understand the importance of these sorts of basic protections, of course, are public defenders. And the Supreme Court hasn’t had a justice with significant experience

At least 10 of the 22 Democratic presidential candidates favor some form of court-packing. Pete Buttigieg and Robert Francis (aka “Beto”) O’Rourke have floated a proposal to expand the number of justices to 15 — five appointed by Republicans; five appointed by Democrats; and five selected by the ten appointed justices.

Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, and Kirsten Gillibrand also support an enlarged court.

And a left-wing advocacy group, originally called “Pack the Court,” plans to spend millions of dollars during the 2020 campaign cycle to pressure candidates into making court-packing a priority.

No doubt, some marketing genius advised these activists that the name Pack the Court reeked of a brazen political power grab. The group now goes by the name “Take Back the Court,” which falsely implies that the court is a lopsided political institution that requires balance in order to restore its legitimacy.

North Carolina partisan gerrymandering state trial begins

North Carolina partisan gerrymandering state trial begins A North Carolina state court trial on whether legislative districts are illegal partisan gerrymanders starts just weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it wasn't the purview of federal courts to decide if boundaries are politically unfair. A three-judge panel prepared for two weeks of arguments and testimony beginning Monday. Common Cause, the state Democratic Party and voters challenged House and Senate maps that Republicans drew in 2017. They say the lines maximized GOP advantage beyond what political geography can explain and want new boundaries for 2020.

Democratic presidential candidates are starting to endorse the bold strategy of court - packing . This might seem like a less drastic solution than adding seats to the Supreme Court , but it might be more difficult to enact into law: Since Article III specifies that justices serve for life, imposing straight

Progressive activists are pushing 2020 Democratic presidential candidates to commit to increasing the number of Supreme Court justices in order to Pack the Courts Executive Director Aaron Belkin, a political science professor at San Francisco State University, said he thinks norms are important but

Of course, as any 8th grade student of civics should know, the Supreme Court is not supposed to operate, like some federal commissions do, with a “balance” of members from the two major political parties. Nor is it supposed to advance certain policy positions.

Although the selection and appointment of federal judges is, inevitably, a political process, once confirmed, federal judges are supposed to rise above politics. Lifetime appointments are intended to insulate them from political pressures and from the current cultural zeitgeist.

The role of a judge is not to respond to the will of the people or to update laws for the modern era. (That is the job of our elected representatives.) The role of a judge is limited to interpreting the law as written and ensuring that laws passed by the political branches comply with the United States Constitution. As Chief Justice John Roberts famously noted, the role of a judge is like that of a neutral umpire whose job is to call balls and strikes, not pitch or bat.

Democratic debate: CNN will hold live draw to determine each night's lineup

Democratic debate: CNN will hold live draw to determine each night's lineup CNN will conduct a live draw to determine which night each candidate will appear in the highly anticipated Democratic presidential primary debates airing later this month on the network. Dana Bash, Don Lemon and Jake Tapper will moderate the Democratic National Committee-sanctioned debates over two nights, July 30-31, from Detroit, said a network spokesperson. Both nights will air live exclusively on CNN and CNN en Español. The debates will also be simulcast on CNN International. CNN's Debates will also stream live without requiring log-in to a cable provider, exclusively to CNN.

Progressive activist groups are pressing Democratic presidential candidates to back proposals for changing the Supreme Court , a move that could draw Pack the Courts , a recently formed group led by San Francisco State University professor Aaron Belkin, is trying to pressure candidates to support

Democrat congressional candidate - and member of the Democratic Socialist Party of America - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has come out publicly to Not to say that it hasn’t been attempted in this country…as pointed out in other posts, FDR attempted to pack the court during his tenure in office.

Theoretically, this should be true irrespective of whether a judge was appointed by a Democratic or Republican president.

Unfortunately, however, progressives have long sought to use the courts to score political “home runs” and reshape social policy. This is why they fight so bitterly to stop the confirmation of judges who understand the limitations of judicial power.

In an Orwellian twist of logic, Democrats who today favor court-packing claim that their scheme is necessary to “de-politicize” the court. Of course, what they really mean is that court-packing is necessary to guarantee their desired outcomes on particular issues.

Americans should be leery of such schemes.

Although the Constitution does not dictate the appropriate number of justices, since 1869 the Supreme Court has had nine (eight associate justices plus a chief justice).

When President Franklin Roosevelt attempted to pack the court in 1937, it didn’t go well. The American public strongly opposed the measure. The Senate Judiciary committee called it “a needless, futile and utterly dangerous abandonment of constitutional principle … without precedent or justification.” Ultimately, Roosevelt backed down.

NBC News poll: Biden, Sanders and Warren lead 2020 field

NBC News poll: Biden, Sanders and Warren lead 2020 field Former Vice President Joe Biden is leading the pack of 2020 Democratic presidential candidates, with Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren tied behind him, according to a new NBC News|SurveyMonkey online poll. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); The poll, conducted after the first Democratic debate in late June, shows 25 percent of respondents would vote for Biden if a primary or caucus was held today, while Sanders, I-Vt., and Warren of Massachusetts each garnered 16 percent. Sen.

Sadly, some Democrats today seem not to have learned history’s lesson that court-packing plans undermine the notion of an independent judiciary and (to use a current turn of phrase) threaten to “hack” our democracy by placing the power to make law in the hands of a few unelected elites.

To their credit, Democratic presidential candidates Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, and Joe Biden recognize that packing the court would set off a judicial arms race in which Republicans would retaliate by adding even more justices — until one day (as Booker puts it) “our grandchildren will ask us: ‘Hey, granddad, why are there 121 people on the Supreme Court?’”

Too bad some of their Democratic colleagues don’t see it that way.

Jennifer Braceras (@J_Braceras) is a senior fellow at the nonprofit Independent Women’s Forum and served on the United States Commission on Civil Rights from 2001-07. She is a 1994 graduate of Harvard Law School.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of The Daily Caller.

Read More

2020 candidates pitch African American voters at Essence Fest.
Five 2020 presidential candidates will make a direct appeal to African American women at one of the largest annual African American events in the country.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!