Opinion: Trump’s mass arrests are set to begin. Here’s the Democratic answer. - - PressFrom - US

OpinionTrump’s mass arrests are set to begin. Here’s the Democratic answer.

22:40  11 july  2019
22:40  11 july  2019 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Fairview NJ homicide: Four arrests made

Fairview NJ homicide: Four arrests made A 23-year-old man was found shot to death in his first floor apartment on Saturday night.

Trump’s mass arrests are set to begin. Here’s the Democratic answer.© Kevin Dietsch/Bloomberg (Kevin Dietsch/Pool via Bloomberg)

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Once again, the wrenching imagery of migrant suffering may soon fill the airwaves. Mass raids targeting thousands of undocumented families will begin on Sunday, the New York Times reports, and families will in some cases be detained, while in others, children may be separated from parents.

Trump says immigration raids starting 'fairly soon'

Trump says immigration raids starting 'fairly soon' President Donald Trump said on Friday mass deportation roundups would begin "fairly soon" as U.S. migrant advocates vowed their communities would be "ready" when immigration officers come. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

The goal of these raids, which President Trump has long threatened, is not simply removal. The fear they inspire is also meant as a deterrent: Officials hope arrests dissuade other families from Central American countries from seeking asylum at the border.

Senate Democrats are now set to introduce a major new proposal that will offer another way: It would make family separations illegal; invest much more in legal support for asylum seekers; and beef up humanitarian standards for the treatment of families and children.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

The proposal is spearheaded by Sen. Jeff Merkley (Ore.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.), and co-sponsored by three dozen Democratic senators, including those running for president.

Several arrests made in New Hampshire during DUI saturation patrol

Several arrests made in New Hampshire during DUI saturation patrol New Hampshire Police conducted a DUI saturation patrol alongside respective police departments on July 5 from 9:00 p.m. to 3:00 a.m. in the greater Claremont and Keene areas. According to the CDC's Motor Vehicle Safety website, a DUI saturation patrol consists of a large number of police officers concentrated in one area to increase visibility of enforcement. New Hampshire State Police Colonel Christopher Wagner and Lt. Michael Kokoski, Commander of Troop C, say throughout the patrol, troopers focused on impaired driving and made 97 motor vehicle stops along with five arrests.

As such, it will function as a leading Democratic answer to Trump’s immigration agenda, and to the worldview that treats deterrence through maximal cruelty as an acceptable answer to migrations.

“The strategy of treating refugees deliberately in a fashion that injures them to discourage additional immigration is unacceptable under any moral code or religious tradition,” Merkley told me.

“This legislation is a necessary step to restore America’s moral credibility, and an example of how we can deal with our immigration issues with dignity and common sense," Schumer said in a statement sent my way.

Democrats would end family separations

The Merkley-Schumer proposal would codify in law an explicit prohibition on separating families, except in certain limited circumstances, such as when it’s determined the child is in danger.

Right now, due to a court settlement, the government can detain families for 20 days, after which it must release children. The administration had continued holding adults after that period, requiring separation — while claiming this would dissuade families from seeking asylum — but halted that amid intense blowback.

House panel releases written answers from ex-Trump official

House panel releases written answers from ex-Trump official The House Judiciary Committee says a former Trump administration official who was a vital witness in special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation was blocked by the White House from answering more than 200 of its questions. 

Still, Trump could restart it at any time. And family separations might resume in a different way: The Times reports that Trump’s own acting Homeland Security secretary, Kevin McAleenan, privately opposed the new mass detentions, because U.S. citizen children (who can’t be arrested) will get separated from undocumented parents who are detained.

The Merkley-Schumer bill would make all such separations illegal, and reaffirm the court settlement limiting child detention. Functionally, this would mean the administration must release families after 20 days.

The bill would speed processing and expand migrant services

The prohibition on family separations is a direct challenge to the Trumpist argument. He claims the spike in families seeking asylum is due to a belief that they can game the system: Once they pass the initial credible fear screening, they’ll be released and will disappear into the interior while awaiting hearings to determine whether they qualify for asylum.

25 arrests made in operation ‘Fantasy Island’ in New Haven

25 arrests made in operation ‘Fantasy Island’ in New Haven NEW HAVEN — A massive gang bust in new haven has led to the arrest of more than two dozen people. Police in New Haven sent a stern warning to the criminal underworld that violence will not be tolerated. Operation ‘Fantasy Island’ started over a year ago. The goal was to get repeat violent criminals who are part of an older gang called the Island Brothers, locked up. Calling it an ongoing investigation, police wouldn’t get into names or the specifics of charges, but they did say the arrests are connected to multiple homicides and shootings. They called the Island Brothers gang a criminal enterprise that is responsible for the majority of gun violence in the city.

The Merkley-Schumer bill answers this, in two ways.

First, it provides for the hiring of many more immigration judges, to end court backlogs so far less time transpires between the initial screening and the final hearing.

Second, the bill fully funds the family case management system — a government pilot program Trump ended. This tracks and provides services to asylum seekers — both social and legal services.

The basic theory here is that Trump’s argument is false: Families actually do show up for hearings at very high rates. The best statistics show this is true, and also show that the rate climbs even higher when families have lawyers. Indeed, the family case management program that Trump nixed — and Democrats would fund — had been hugely successful in getting families to show up.

The core idea: If you make it more likely that families will succeed in qualifying for asylum, while also beefing up efforts to track and support them, they will show up en masse. In many cases, they will stay with other family members.

In short, Democrats argue that the release of families awaiting hearings is not a bad thing and is eminently manageable. “When there’s a case manager who stays in regular contact and alerts you of hearings, people show up,” Merkley told me.

The core difference with Trump

Trump Says He Will Seek Citizenship Information From Existing Federal Records, Not the Census

Trump Says He Will Seek Citizenship Information From Existing Federal Records, Not the Census President Trump on Thursday abandoned his battle to place a question about citizenship on the 2020 census, and instructed the government to compile citizenship data from existing federal records, a significant retreat in the president’s wider crackdown on undocumented immigration. Mr. Trump announced in the Rose Garden that he was giving up on the census question two weeks after the Supreme Court rebuked the Trump administration over its effort to modify the census. Just last week, Mr. Trump insisted that he “must” pursue that goal.

This is a core difference with Trump and restrictionists, who say releasing families is unmanageable and a serious threat. Of course, to make that case, Trump must regularly falsify those show-up rates.

The deeper difference here is that Trump wants fewer people to apply for asylum, because he wants to scale back our international human rights obligations. That’s why he’s also doing many, manythings to make it harder to apply and qualify for asylum — so fewer people achieve it, even if they legitimately merit it.

Trump partisans would also argue that a system that readily releases families will increase the draw to make the trek to the border, whether or not people qualify.

The Democratic answer to this is that we should make large investments in improving civil conditions in Central American countries, to reduce the factors that are spurring the migrations in the first place.

Other answers include seeking regional solutions to share the refugee burden, and creating other channels to apply from afar for refugee status — while raising the cap on Central American refugees accepted here, to incentivize using those channels — as alternatives to traveling to the border. Other Democraticbills would do these things.

As Schumer puts it, the Democratic approach would both “strengthen the asylum system” with more resources while also providing “the security assistance Central American countries need to crack down on the drug cartels and gangs that send so many fleeing.”

The bill would beef up humanitarian protections

Democratic presidential candidates criticize immigration raids as protesters confront Biden

Democratic presidential candidates criticize immigration raids as protesters confront Biden After President Donald Trump earlier this week announced plans for mass arrests of migrants across the country, Democratic presidential candidates went on the attack and issued warnings about the raids that will begin Sunday. 

Finally, the Merkley-Schumer proposal would codify new humanitarian standards. It would require an immediate professional medical assessment of children; set nutrition benchmarks for meals; require supplies for basic hygiene; set standards for physical conditions; and more.

“In all kinds of ways, this would make the immigration enforcement system more humane," Kerri Talbot, the director of federal advocacy at the Immigration Hub, told me.

To sum up: The Democratic approach would invest in repairing civil conditions in Central America and create new channels to migrate legally as refugees, to reduce the incentive to make the journey. It would combine that with beefed-up efforts to handle the influx — while minimizing detention and cruelty-as-deterrence — in order to manage it humanely, the theory being that this is achievable.

The Democratic proposals won’t get votes in the GOP Senate, of course. But Democrats can put their stamp on this debate, with plans that offer a sharp contrast with Trump’s coming mass arrests, which will no doubt be followed by other cruelties.

Read more:

Greg Sargent and Paul Waldman: Trump ordered up mass arrests for reelection purposes. Now he’s getting them.

The Post’s View: Trump’s latest immigration threat is yet another half-cooked plan

Greg Sargent: Trump’s threat of mass arrests stinks of weakness and failure

Enrique Acevedo: Trump is firing up another anti-immigrant campaign. This time, immigrants are ready.

Greg Sargent: Awful new Trump cruelties just emerged. Where are the Democrats?

Read More

16 arrested after downtown Phoenix immigration protest Friday night.
PHOENIX - Phoenix police say 16 people were arrested Friday night during a protest outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement office in downtown Phoenix ahead of federal roundups expected Sunday. The protest disrupted road and light rail traffic as protesters blocked Central Avenue. After police warned that people would be subject to arrest if they stayed in the street and on the light rail tracks, more than a dozen were arrested for continuing to block traffic. Post Police said the majority of protester complied with orders and requests from officers.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!