Opinion: Trump restrictions on legal immigration betray America’s immigrant heritage - PressFrom - US

OpinionTrump restrictions on legal immigration betray America’s immigrant heritage

20:15  15 august  2019
20:15  15 august  2019 Source:   foxnews.com

Trump Rule Targets Legal Immigrants Who Rely on Food Stamps and Other Aid

Trump Rule Targets Legal Immigrants Who Rely on Food Stamps and Other Aid The Trump administration will penalize legal immigrants who rely on public programs, such as food stamps and government-subsidized housing, as part of a sweeping new policy to slow legal immigration into the United States and reduce the number of immigrants who are granted permanent legal status. 

President Trump ’ s action this week to restrict legal immigration by people who might need public assistance in the future is a rejection of our proud heritage as a nation of immigrants It seems pretty clear that if President Trump ’ s new restrictions on legal immigration had been in effect in 1885, his

Immigration policy and, specifically, illegal immigration to the United States, was a signature issue of U. S . President Donald Trump ' s presidential campaign

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Trump restrictions on legal immigration betray America’s immigrant heritage© FoxNews.com Ken Cuccinnelli

President Trump’s action this week to restrict legal immigration by people who might need public assistance in the future is a rejection of our proud heritage as a nation of immigrants and has the effect of erasing the beautiful and welcoming words on the Statue of Liberty.

"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore,” Lady Liberty beckons in a poem on the statue’s pedestal. “Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Large majority of Americans want undocumented immigrants in US to be granted legal status: poll

Large majority of Americans want undocumented immigrants in US to be granted legal status: poll A large majority of Americans says that there should be a way for undocumented immigrants to remain in the U.S. legally as long as they meet certain requirements, according to a new survey from the Pew Research Center. 

America ’ s legacy as a nation of immigrants is increasingly under threat as the administration attempts to cut back on legal options.

With an executive order last month and a pair of Department of Homeland Security memos on Tuesday, the Trump administration has significantly hardened the country’ s policies regarding illegal immigration .

Instead of those warm and kind-hearted words written by poet Emma Lazarus, we have been offered a new version by Ken Cuccinelli, Trump’s acting director of Citizenship and Immigration Services: "Give me your tired and your poor who can stand on their own two feet and who will not become a public charge," Cuccinelli said in an interview with NPR.


Millions of American citizens – immigrants and descendants of immigrants – would never have been admitted to our great country under the new Trump rule that favors affluent and well-educated immigrants over “the wretched refuse” Lazarus wrote about.

Since Europeans first landed in what’s now the United States, many poor, struggling immigrants who didn’t speak a word of English when they arrived have gone on to become productive, taxpaying citizens. And many of their children, grandchildren and generations beyond have earned college degrees and become doctors, scientists, teachers, inventors, artists, business owners and elected officials. Even billionaires. Even presidents of the United States.

Trump’s Commonsense Rule on Immigrant Welfare Use

Trump’s Commonsense Rule on Immigrant Welfare Use The welfare state is much bigger than just cash benefits.

Immigration lawyers and advocates and public health researchers say it would be the biggest change to the legal immigration system in decades Miller, along with several of his former congressional colleagues who now hold prominent positions in the Trump administration, have long sought to

All the ways President Trump is cutting legal immigration . During his presidential campaign, Trump said he was opposed to illegal immigration , not The administration has looked into restrictions on visas for high-tech workers, and ignored calls by the agriculture industry to expand the guest worker

Donald’s Trump’s grandparents, his mother, and two of his three wives were all immigrants. As the Washington Post reported, Trump’s grandfather Friedrich Trump arrived in New York Harbor in 1885 as a 16-year-old barber’s apprentice who didn’t speak English, without a high school diploma, and with nothing but “some clothes crammed into a small suitcase.”

It seems pretty clear that if President Trump’s new restrictions on legal immigration had been in effect in 1885, his own grandfather wouldn’t have been allowed into our country. No one knows if Friedrich’s descendants would be living in Germany today, but it’s pretty unlikely one would be in the White House.

The Trump administration’s so-called “public charge rule” that was announced Monday will allow immigration officials to consider a whole slew of factors to determine if immigrants already in the U.S. legally on temporary visas should be granted what’s known as a green card. A green card gives an immigrant permanent resident status, and the green card holder can go on to apply for U.S. citizenship after five years.

Trump wants to make immigration white again

Trump wants to make immigration white again On Monday, Emma Lazarus wept. Lazarus, of course, was the poet who celebrated that the United States welcomes the tired, the poor, the huddled masses of other lands. But on Monday, the Trump administration unveiled a new immigration policy that upends that tradition. The poor are no longer welcome. Instead, the immigrants with the best chances at getting past the gatekeepers and settling in America going forward will be rich, credentialed, and white.

Trump ' s immigration plan promises to reduce illegal immigration . It includes a wall on the Mexican Curb legal immigration . Trump faces an uphill battle. Up to 1% of the total population of Guatemala President Trump ’ s “ America First” policy and national security concerns are bent on tightening the

[Update: Trump ’ s immigration plan gets a Rose Garden rollout and a cool reception.] “The proposal will not include any reduction in the overall level of legal immigration , not even a symbolic one.” Lisa Koop of the National Immigrant Justice Center said she had no reason to think that the Trump

The new rule, which is scheduled to go into effect Oct. 15, is being challenged in court by two California counties that claim the rule violates federal immigration law.

Under the rule, officials will consider an immigrant’s age, health, family status, assets, resources, financial status and education in deciding whether to grant a legal immigrant permanent resident status.

The rule is clearly the Trump administration’s way of embracing and favoring the wealthy over the poor when green cards are being handed out. Let’s face it: this is an aggressive wealth test and will disproportionately harm non-white immigrants.

Remember back when then-candidate Donald Trump was running for president and said: “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. …They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing … drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

At that time and since, Trump supporters have said he meant “illegal” immigrants when he made that statement. If any of us dare to accuse Republicans of being anti-immigrant they insist that they’re not. They say they only oppose illegal immigration. They claim to welcome those who come here legally.

5 things you should know about Trump's latest legal immigration crackdown

5 things you should know about Trump's latest legal immigration crackdown A public charge rule announced this week will make it harder for immigrants who qualify for government benefits to become citizens.

Mr. Trump , who has regularly smeared immigrants as terrorists and criminals, has Imposing these restrictions and ending the diversity visa lottery would cut in half the number of legal immigrants . But immigration in itself has been widely regarded as good for America and for the American dream.

On legal immigration , though, the latest White House proposal puts them miles apart. Trump has denounced America ’ s immigrant communities in personal and false terms, telling supporters that these groups represent “the worst of the worst” and that foreign governments conspire behind the


Then why is this new rule directed at the very people the Republicans claim to say they support? This rule is clearly an attack on people who have come here legally, who have followed the rules, and who have gone through or are going through the system. Some currently hold green cards.

Under this new rule, President Trump and his administration are shunning immigrants who are struggling and who come to the United States in search of a better life for themselves, their children and grandchildren. People like his own grandfather!

The new rule makes exceptions for pregnant women, children, refugees, members of the military and those who already hold green cards. However, the rule also states that immigration officials have the authority to refuse a green card recipient citizenship.

If the new rule survives legal challenges, legal immigrants will fear taking temporary public assistance because that could make it impossible for them to get or keep permanent resident status in our country. Pregnant women who need proper prenatal care and new mothers who need assistance to provide for their babies will fear to take such assistance, risking their health and that of their sons and daughters.

The new rule demands that legal immigrants coming to the U.S. or who are already here be “self-sufficient.”  In other words, if you aren’t young and educated with money, you can be denied permanent legal residency. This is a terrible precedent to set. It is not who we are as a nation and not how America was built.

Trump’s Immigrant-Welfare Rule Is Bad Policy, But Clever Politics

Trump’s Immigrant-Welfare Rule Is Bad Policy, But Clever Politics The Trump administration has moved to block new immigrants who need welfare

Trump ' s willingness to provide citizenship to undocumented immigrants has received some criticism on the right from groups like Heritage Action for “I appreciate the president putting forth a clear framework on immigration that includes many of my key concerns — ending chain migration and the

Rather than bundle legal immigration , border security, and enforcement reforms into one comprehensive package, legislation addressing A major reason for the huge backlog in America ’ s immigration courts is the fact that immigration judges do not have the summary judgment authority

Public assistance programs such as food stamps, welfare, assisted housing, and others were put in place to be a helping hand up and out of an individual’s current situation. The overwhelming majority of immigrants in this country work and pay taxes and are not seeking a handout, despite what President Trump claims. If they need public assistance, it is usually for just a brief period while they get settled.

Under the new green card rule, a family of four must earn $64,000 or more to be considered a good prospect for self-sufficiency – an amount many American families don’t earn.

And the new rule doesn’t take certain situations into account. What if someone is a seasonal worker? Laid off? Sick? Or becomes disabled on the job or in a car accident? Should all such people lose their green cards or their chance of getting a green card?

Immigration officials will also be given broad leeway to determine whether legal immigrants are likely to need public assistance in the future and use that determination to deny the immigrants a green card or citizenship.

In other words, someone may not be getting public assistance now, but could be barred from permanent resident status because a federal official thinks the person may need public assistance in the future.

This is a very subjective process. If any official bears any resentment toward any person or group of people – for example, Muslims or Hispanics – the official could deny such a person a green card.

This would clearly allow the Trump administration and immigration officials to shape the future demographics of the United States.

My hope is that legal challenges will keep the new rule from taking effect. It stands in opposition to everything America stands for, and turns our proud status as a magnet for immigrants from around the world on its head.

I understand the debate over immigrants coming here without legal authorization. But there should be no debate about legal immigration.

America didn’t become great in spite of immigrants – it became great because of them. And unless you’re a Native American, you too have immigrant roots. Want to see the result of legal immigration? Just look in the mirror.

Federal judge approves DHS request to force feed immigrant detainee on hunger strike.
A Federal judge in San Diego approved Thursday a request from the Department of Homeland Security to force feed and hydrate an immigrant detainee on hunger strike.The San Diego Union-Tribune reports the 41-year-old man, a Russian citizen, has not eaten since Aug. 4 and has consumed only water, though he has refused to tell officials at the ICE facility how much.The man is also refusing any medical examination, clinical director at Otay Mesa Detention Center said in a declaration. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 6
This is interesting!