Opinion: Jim Mattis: Duty, Democracy and the Threat of Tribalism - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

OpinionJim Mattis: Duty, Democracy and the Threat of Tribalism

15:40  28 august  2019
15:40  28 august  2019 Source:   online.wsj.com

Steyer to leave campaign trail for jury duty

Steyer to leave campaign trail for jury duty Tom Steyer is taking a week off from his presidential campaign to report for jury duty, a spokesperson told The Hill Sunday.The billionaire philanthropist and activist, who is running for the Democratic nomination, will report for jury selection in San Francisco if he's ultimately selected."It is every American's civic duty to serve on a jury with their peers," Steyer said in a statement."

The Threat of Tribalism . Alone among modern Western democracies , the United States maintained extensive race-based slavery within its borders, and the Constitution protected that institution. The causes of America’s resurgent tribalism are many. They include seismic demographic change, which

The challenge to democracy in Africa is not the prevalence of ethnic diversity, but the use of identity politics to promote narrow tribal interests. There are those who argue that tribalism is a result of arbitrary post-colonial boundaries that force different communities to live within artificial borders.

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Jim Mattis: Duty, Democracy and the Threat of Tribalism© Army Sgt. Amber I. Smith/DOD/ALAMY

In late November 2016, I was enjoying Thanksgiving break in my hometown on the Columbia River in Washington state when I received an unexpected call from Vice President-elect Mike Pence. Would I meet with President-elect Donald Trump to discuss the job of secretary of defense?

I had taken no part in the election campaign and had never met or spoken to Mr. Trump, so to say that I was surprised is an understatement. Further, I knew that, absent a congressional waiver, federal law prohibited a former military officer from serving as secretary of defense within seven years of departing military service. Given that no wavier had been authorized since Gen. George Marshall was made secretary in 1950, and I’d been out for only 3½ years, I doubted I was a viable candidate. Nonetheless, I felt I should go to Bedminster, N.J., for the interview.

Shots Fired At Off-Duty CPD Officer In Burnside Neighborhood

Shots Fired At Off-Duty CPD Officer In Burnside Neighborhood Shots were fired at an off-duty Chicago police officer in the Burnside neighborhood early Saturday morning. According to police, an off-duty officer was approached near 91st and Ellis by three men in two different cars around 2:30 a.m. The officer had just parked his car when the vehicles rolled up and the men got out, police said. Police said one of the men pulled out a gun at aimed it at the officer, who responded by grabbing his gun. Shots were fired, but police said no one was hit by gunfire. The three men ran back to their cars and sped off, police said.

Tribalism was an urge our Founding Fathers assumed we could overcome. And so it has become The project of American democracy — to live beyond such tribal identities, to construct a society The greatest threat to a politician today therefore is less a candidate from the opposing party than a

Tribalism is the state of being organized by, or advocating for, tribes or tribal lifestyles. Human evolution has primarily occurred in small groups, as opposed to mass societies, and humans naturally maintain a social network.

I had time on the cross-country flight to ponder how to encapsulate my view of America’s role in the world. On my flight out of Denver, the flight attendant’s standard safety briefing caught my attention: If cabin pressure is lost, masks will fall…Put your own mask on first, then help others around you. In that moment, those familiar words seemed like a metaphor: To preserve our leadership role, we needed to get our own country’s act together first, especially if we were to help others.

Get news and analysis on politics, policy, national security and more, delivered right to your inbox

The next day, I was driven to the Trump National Golf Club and, entering a side door, waited about 20 minutes before I was ushered into a modest conference room. I was introduced to the president-elect, the vice president-elect, the incoming White House chief of staff and a handful of others. We talked about the state of our military, where our views aligned and where they differed. Mr. Trump led the wide-ranging, 40-minute discussion, and the tone was amiable.

Allegheny Co. DA To Seek Death Penalty Against Man Accused In Fatal Shooting Of Off-Duty Police Officer

Allegheny Co. DA To Seek Death Penalty Against Man Accused In Fatal Shooting Of Off-Duty Police Officer Investigators are releasing new details today in the case against the man charged with homicide in the shooting death of an off-duty officer last month in Homewood. © Provided by CBS Local, a division of CBS Radio Inc Christian Bey is charged with criminal homicide, carrying a firearm without a license, possession of a firearm without a license and persons not to possess, use, manufacture, control, sell or transfer firearms. Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen Zappala has informed the court that the Commonwealth will seek the death penalty against Bey.

On Spiegelgracht, in Amsterdam, yesterday. A few days ago I argued that sins-of-omission by Paul Ryan and his fellow Republicans in the House, and Mitch McConnell and his fellow Republicans in the Senate, amounted to de facto shirking of their “check and balance” duty relative to Donald Trump.

The reasons for tribalism and tribal discrimination may include the following: The first is history, as many a tribalist traces the It is arguable that the negative effects of tribalism permeate all African countries. Millions have been killed, maimed or displaced in civil wars in sub-Sahara Africa over the

Afterward, the president-elect escorted me out to the front steps of the colonnaded clubhouse, where the press was gathered. I assumed that I would be on my way back to Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, where I’d spent the past few years doing research. I figured that my strong support of NATO and my dismissal of the use of torture on prisoners would have the president-elect looking for another candidate.

Standing beside him on the steps as photographers snapped away, I was surprised for the second time that week when he characterized me to the reporters as “the real deal.” Days later, I was formally nominated.

During the interview, Mr. Trump had asked me if I could do the job. I said I could. I’d never aspired to be secretary of defense and took the opportunity to suggest several other candidates I thought highly capable. Still, having been raised by the Greatest Generation, by two parents who had served in World War II, and subsequently shaped by more than four decades in the Marine Corps, I considered government service to be both honor and duty. When the president asks you to do something, you don’t play Hamlet on the wall, wringing your hands. To quote a great American company’s slogan, you “just do it.” So long as you are prepared, you say yes.

Mattis swipes at Trump, warns of ‘storm clouds gathering’ amid fractured alliances

Mattis swipes at Trump, warns of ‘storm clouds gathering’ amid fractured alliances Former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis took several implicit swipes at President Trump’s leadership in a newly published op-ed.

It is the alarming decay of liberal democracy in Europe and the United States, accelerated by escalating Russian efforts at subversion. The most urgent foreign-policy question now is how America will respond to the mounting threat that Putin’s Russia poses to freedom and its most

Mattis , who was appointed in January 2017, becomes latest high-profile Trump official to step down.

When it comes to the defense of our experiment in democracy and our way of life, ideology should have nothing to do with it. Whether asked to serve by a Democratic or a Republican, you serve. “Politics ends at the water’s edge”: That ethos has shaped and defined me, and I wasn’t going to betray it, no matter how much I was enjoying my life west of the Rockies and spending time with a family I had neglected during my 40-plus years in the Marines.

When I said I could do the job, I meant I felt prepared. I knew the job intimately. In the late 1990s, I had served as the executive secretary to two secretaries of defense, William Perry and William Cohen. In close quarters, I had gained a personal grasp of the immensity and gravity of a “secdef’s” responsibilities. The job is tough: Our first secretary of defense, James Forrestal, committed suicide, and few have emerged from the job unscathed, either legally or politically.

We were at war, amid the longest continuous stretch of armed conflict in our nation’s history. I’d signed enough letters to next of kin about the death of a loved one to understand the consequences of leading a department on a war footing when the rest of the country was not. The Department of Defense’s millions of devoted troops and civilians spread around the world carried out their mission with a budget larger than the GDPs of all but two dozen countries.

Mattis rules out run for president: ‘Like a five-year jail sentence’

Mattis rules out run for president: ‘Like a five-year jail sentence’ Former Secretary of Defense James Mattis did not have much to say about President Trump during a wide-ranging interview with CBS Sunday Morning, but did warn the president is "unusual" and warned against the "rabid nature of politics." © Provided by MediaDC: Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, Inc.Mattis also said he has no desire to run for president, despite many people wanting him to. Describing a campaign and presidency to one man at his favorite bar in Washington state, he said, "Terry, it would be like a five-year jail sentence.

Tribalism (Jihad) versus Globalism (‘McWorld’): a threat for democracy ? The cases of Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Different developments of diverse scales - Mummies and The Afterlise Mythology and beliefs are a very large part of Ancient Egypt’s culture. Polytheism religion has its own way of running

It is a threat because it inspires people to vote on the basis of group loyalty rather than on policies or even the quality of leadership, and because policies are geared But tribalism encourages you to see those who vote differently from you as your enemies, rather than just dissing your opponent’s platform.

On a personal level, I had no great desire to return to Washington, D.C. I drew no energy from the turmoil and politics that animate our capital. Yet I didn’t feel overwhelmed by the job’s immensities. I also felt confident that I could gain bipartisan support for the Department of Defense despite the political fratricide practiced in Washington.

My career in the Marines brought me to that moment and prepared me to say yes to a job of that magnitude. The Marines teach you, above all, how to adapt, improvise and overcome. But they expect you to have done your homework, to have mastered your profession. Amateur performance is anathema.

The Marines are bluntly critical of falling short, satisfied only with 100% effort and commitment. Yet over the course of my career, every time I made a mistake—and I made many—the Marines promoted me. They recognized that these mistakes were part of my tuition and a necessary bridge to learning how to do things right. Year in and year out, the Marines had trained me in skills they knew I needed, while educating me to deal with the unexpected.

Beneath its Prussian exterior of short haircuts, crisp uniforms and exacting standards, the Corps nurtured some of the strangest mavericks and most original thinkers I encountered in my journey through multiple commands and dozens of countries. The Marines’ military excellence does not suffocate intellectual freedom or substitute regimented dogma for imaginative solutions. They know their doctrine, often derived from lessons learned in combat and written in blood, but refuse to let that turn into dogma.

Mattis says divisiveness is the biggest threat to U.S. democracy

Mattis says divisiveness is the biggest threat to U.S. democracy "[We're] constantly finding reason to cheer against each other instead of working together," Mattis told "CBS This Morning"

However tribalism has an advantage. It helps keep individuals committed to the group. Social divisions between groups create special interactions with It also gives us a sense of identity; it is where we derive a sense of pride in being African. We need to take advantage of our strong tribal ties to create

Jim Mattis outside the Pentagon.CreditCreditMark Peterson/Redux, for The New York Times. But some of Trump’s old friends and associates speculate that he is drawn to Mattis and the other military men Like her, Mattis was an advocate of muscular diplomacy backed by credible threats of force.

Woe to the unimaginative one who, in after-action reviews, takes refuge in doctrine. The critiques in the field, in the classroom or at happy hour are blunt for good reasons. Personal sensitivities are irrelevant. No effort is made to ease you through your midlife crisis when peers, seniors or subordinates offer more cunning or historically proven options, even when out of step with doctrine.

In any organization, it’s all about selecting the right team. The two qualities I was taught to value most were initiative and aggressiveness. Institutions get the behaviors they reward.

During my monthlong preparation for my Senate confirmation hearings, I read many excellent intelligence briefings. I was struck by the degree to which our competitive military edge was eroding, including our technological advantage. We would have to focus on regaining the edge.

I had been fighting terrorism in the Middle East during my last decade of military service. During that time, and in the three years since I had left active duty, haphazard funding had significantly worsened the situation, doing more damage to our current and future military readiness than any enemy in the field.

I could see that the background drummed into me as a Marine would need to be adapted to fit my role as a civilian secretary. It now became even clearer to me why the Marines assign an expanded reading list to everyone promoted to a new rank: That reading gives historical depth that lights the path ahead. Books like the “Personal Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant,” “Sherman” by B.H. Liddell Hart and Field Marshal William Slim’s “Defeat Into Victory” illustrated that we could always develop options no matter how worrisome the situation. Slowly but surely, we learned there was nothing new under the sun: Properly informed, we weren’t victims—we could always create options.

Jim Mattis says he won't be running for president in 2020 and that he's eager to see 'fresh ideas'

Jim Mattis says he won't be running for president in 2020 and that he's eager to see 'fresh ideas' "There's not a hesitation," Jim Mattis said. "I'm just trying to think how to say 'no' even stronger." In 2018, Mattis said he "never registered for any political party." Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories. Former Defense Secretary and retired four-star Marine Corps general Jim Mattis said he will not be running for president in the 2020 US presidential election and that he was "eager to see the fresh ideas" from the candidates. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

President Trump has given Jim Mattis the authority to allow troops at the Southwest border to perform "military protective activities." The memo also said that Mattis could determine the duration of this deployment but shall consult with the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security prior

Radical Islam, tribalism , and the "Clash of Civilizations"Edit. Twenty-five years later, the most serious threat to the end-of-history hypothesis isn't that there is a higher, better model out there that will someday supersede liberal democracy ; neither Islamist theocracy nor Chinese capitalism cuts it.

Fate, Providence or the chance assignments of a military career had me as ready as I could be when tapped on the shoulder. Without arrogance or ignorance, I could answer yes when asked to serve one more time.

When I served as Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, a new post created in 2002 to help streamline and reform NATO’s command structure, I served with a brilliant admiral from a European nation. He looked and acted every inch the forceful leader. Too forceful: He yelled, dressing officers down in front of others, and publicly mocked reports that he considered shallow instead of clarifying what he wanted. He was harsh and inconsiderate, and his subordinates were fearful.

I called in the admiral and carefully explained why I disapproved of his leadership. “Your staff resents you,” I said. “You’re disappointed in their input. OK. But your criticism makes that input worse, not better. You’re going the wrong way. You cannot allow your passion for excellence to destroy your compassion for them as human beings.” This was a point I had always driven home to my subordinates.

“Change your leadership style,” I continued. “Coach and encourage; don’t berate, least of all in public.”

But he soon reverted to demeaning his subordinates. I shouldn’t have been surprised. When for decades you have been rewarded and promoted, it’s difficult to break the habits you’ve acquired, regardless of how they may have worked in another setting. Finally, I told him to go home.

An oft-spoken admonition in the Marines is this: When you’re going to a gunfight, bring all your friends with guns. Having fought many times in coalitions, I believe that we need every ally we can bring to the fight. From imaginative military solutions to their country’s vote in the U.N., the more allies the better. I have never been on a crowded battlefield, and there is always room for those who want to be there alongside us.

Mattis had problems with Trump -- and with Obama, Biden and Bush (Opinion)

Mattis had problems with Trump -- and with Obama, Biden and Bush (Opinion) Lost in much of the one-dimensional coverage of Mattis' book is what is actually in it, writes Peter Bergen. It's true that Mattis implies sharp criticism of Trump, but he also registers strong disagreement with George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, who he argues have made strategic errors that have been costly to the American military and to American interests. Interviewers on Mattis' book tour have pressed him about Trump, but he has largely maintained what he refers to as the French virtue of the "devoir de réserve" -- the duty of silence -- that he says former public servants should keep about their work.

Most Americans assume that democracy and free markets go hand in hand, naturally working together to generate prosperity and freedom. Capitalism creates a small number of very wealthy people, while democracy potentially empowers a poor majority resentful of that wealth.

A wise leader must deal with reality and state what he intends, and what level of commitment he is willing to invest in achieving that end. He then has to trust that his subordinates know how to carry that out. Wise leadership requires collaboration; otherwise, it will lead to failure.

Nations with allies thrive, and those without them wither. Alone, America cannot protect our people and our economy. At this time, we can see storm clouds gathering. A polemicist’s role is not sufficient for a leader. A leader must display strategic acumen that incorporates respect for those nations that have stood with us when trouble loomed. Returning to a strategic stance that includes the interests of as many nations as we can make common cause with, we can better deal with this imperfect world we occupy together. Absent this, we will occupy an increasingly lonely position, one that puts us at increasing risk in the world.

It never dawned on me that I would serve again in a government post after retiring from active duty. But the phone call came, and on a Saturday morning in late 2017, I walked into the secretary of defense’s office, which I had first entered as a colonel on staff 20 years earlier. Using every skill I had learned during my decades as a Marine, I did as well as I could for as long as I could. When my concrete solutions and strategic advice, especially keeping faith with our allies, no longer resonated, it was time to resign, despite the limitless joy I felt serving alongside our troops in defense of our Constitution.

Unlike in the past, where we were unified and drew in allies, currently our own commons seems to be breaking apart. What concerns me most as a military man is not our external adversaries; it is our internal divisiveness. We are dividing into hostile tribes cheering against each other, fueled by emotion and a mutual disdain that jeopardizes our future, instead of rediscovering our common ground and finding solutions.

All Americans need to recognize that our democracy is an experiment—and one that can be reversed. We all know that we’re better than our current politics. Tribalism must not be allowed to destroy our experiment.

Toward the end of the Marjah, Afghanistan, battle in 2010, I encountered a Marine and a Navy corpsman, both sopping wet, having just cooled off by relaxing in the adjacent irrigation ditch. I gave them my usual: “How’s it going, young men?”

“Living the dream, sir!” the Marine shouted. “No Maserati, no problem,” the sailor added with a smile.

Their nonchalance and good cheer, even as they lived one day at a time under austere conditions, reminded me how unimportant are many of the things back home that can divide us if we let them.

On each of our coins is inscribed America’s de facto motto, “E Pluribus Unum”—from many, one. For our experiment in democracy to survive, we must live that motto.

—Gen. Mattis served as secretary of defense during the Trump administration and served in the U.S. Marine Corps for more than four decades. This essay is adapted from his forthcoming book “Call Sign Chaos: Learning to Lead,” co-authored with Bing West, which will be published Sept. 3 by Random House.

Read More

Mattis had problems with Trump -- and with Obama, Biden and Bush (Opinion).
Lost in much of the one-dimensional coverage of Mattis' book is what is actually in it, writes Peter Bergen. It's true that Mattis implies sharp criticism of Trump, but he also registers strong disagreement with George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, who he argues have made strategic errors that have been costly to the American military and to American interests. Interviewers on Mattis' book tour have pressed him about Trump, but he has largely maintained what he refers to as the French virtue of the "devoir de réserve" -- the duty of silence -- that he says former public servants should keep about their work.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 2323
This is interesting!