OpinionTrump fired Bolton before he started a war, and we should be grateful

19:31  11 september  2019
19:31  11 september  2019 Source:   usatoday.com

'I resigned': Bolton fights back after Trump says he fired him

'I resigned': Bolton fights back after Trump says he fired him Former national security adviser John Bolton is pushing back against President Trump for saying that he fired him. Bolton, 70, is instead claiming that he offered his resignation. Trump made the announcement about Bolton's job status on Tuesday morning, tweeting that he "asked John for his resignation" saying they "disagreed strongly." However, Bolton is pushing back on the president's claim. Slideshow by photo services Bolton countered against Trump in a tweet, “I offered to resign last night and President Trump said, ‘Let’s talk about it tomorrow.

At least Bolton didn't start a war before Trump fired him . For that we should be grateful . Bolton didn't get that his job was to enable Trump , not advise Bolton , of course, never publicly contradicted Trump , but he was clearly less than happy in a White House whose foreign policy was , on so many

On this episode of Going Underground, we speak to former 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Mike Gravel on the firing of John Bolton . He says Bolton was

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

In the end, it might be the great irony of John Bolton’s short career as national security adviser that he got fired for doing the right thing.

The timing suggests that President Donald Trump was looking to scapegoat one of the White House figures who opposed the unbelievably tasteless and strategically absurd idea of inviting the Taliban to Camp David on the anniversary week of the 9/11 attacks. When the whole dumb scheme blew up in Trump’s face, someone had to go.

Don't expect John Bolton to go quietly

Don't expect John Bolton to go quietly John Bolton is out. It’s no secret the hawkish national security adviser often butted heads with President Trump, and the result was his sudden departure from the White House last night. I informed John Bolton last night that his services are no longer needed at the White House. I disagreed strongly with many of his suggestions, as did others in the Administration, and therefore....— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 10, 2019 But don’t expect Bolton to go quietly. Unlike other former administration officials, Bolton’s personal loyalty to the president is already wearing thin.

He says Bolton was close to starting a war with Iran and is the reason for the current hostility between the US , Russia, and China and also says the only hope for a peaceful US foreign policy is Bernie Sanders and Tulsi Gabbard. Next, we speak to Sir David King about the climate emergency and how

Bolton has advised Trump at every turn to take the most counterproductive actions. The upshot has been more risk, higher combat losses & endless war. Worst of all, the chances for a war with Iran — which would be a far worse mistake than Iraq — are significantly higher today than when Trump took

Bolton was a natural target. He has none of the unctuous charm of other White House sycophants. He has, remarkably, tried to hold to his own views on any number of national security issues, even if he had to grit his teeth and smile while his boss made excuses for North Korean weapons tests and Russian election interference. Still, he looked to be a winner after Trump jettisoned the Iran nuclear deal and the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty with Russia, things Trump had promised to do anyway.

Trump fired Bolton before he started a war, and we should be grateful© Provided by USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc.

The dreaded Tweet of Death

But Bolton underestimated the president’s reticence to get embroiled in anything like a real confrontation with the Iranians, and he could never navigate around Trump’s obvious and abject fear of the Russians. It’s one thing to trash an arms control treaty that clears the way for more spending on nuclear weapons, it’s another entirely to actually call Vladimir Putin to account for his adventures against our friends and allies.

Fevered speculation over John Bolton's replacement as national security adviser

Fevered speculation over John Bolton's replacement as national security adviser A crop of potential candidates for national security adviser is emerging in the wake of the abrupt dismissal of John Bolton from the White House on Tuesday. © Provided by Fox News Network LLCAmid a number of disagreements with Bolton -- including over recently scrapped negotiations with the Taliban over the future fo Afghanistan -- President Trump announced in a tweet that Bolton’s “services are no longer needed” and said that he would be naming a new national security adviser next week. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

US President Donald Trump does not appear to be in control of his own administration’s Iran policy and he should fire national security adviser John Bolton , special Asked why she didn't trust Trump 's claims that he does not want regime change in Iran, Tocci said Bolton clearly has a different position

When John Bolton becomes Donald Trump ’s national security advisor later this month, he ’ll assume more influence over U . S foreign policy than he ’s ever had before . He called the analyst into his office, and threatened to have him fired . Ford fought back.

Bolton, of course, never publicly contradicted Trump, but he was clearly less than happy in a White House whose foreign policy was, on so many issues, inimical to his own instincts. And around Trump, merely hinting at principled opposition is a grave enough crime to merit the dreaded Tweet of Death. In this White House, one must never be the first comrade to stop clapping.

In a sense, Bolton never had a chance. As I predicted when Bolton was appointed in March 2018, the Trump White House is too chaotic and politically toxic for any one personality to survive or become too influential. In Bolton’s case, we might be grateful. He is a fountain of bad ideas in foreign policy who was kept out of senior Republican positions for years — by other Republicans.

A font of bad foreign policy ideas

It is impressive, in some respect, that Bolton lasted this long. Abrasive and opinionated, he was never Trump’s top choice for the job. The president has had two military officers in the position, both of whom were almost certainly more deferential as a matter of habit. (As we know, the president loves the word “sir.”)

Five takeaways on Trump's ouster of John Bolton

Five takeaways on Trump's ouster of John Bolton President Trump announced Tuesday that John Bolton was leaving his post as national security adviser, citing disagreements between the two over how the administration should tackle key foreign policy challenges. After the president trumpeted Bolton's departure on Twitter, shockwaves coursed through the Beltway. Here are five takeaways from Bolton's exit. Trump chaos takes another turn With Bolton's ouster, Trump is now searching for his fourth national security adviser in less than three years, reviving concerns about instability among the president's top advisers as he faces a series of pressing national security matters.

President Donald Trump 's homeland security adviser, Tom Bossert, was fired Tuesday as the president's new national security adviser, John National Security Adviser John Bolton — whose first day on the job was Monday — is consolidating power and Bossert's removal is the first of those steps.

Mr. Trump has the record for White House and cabinet churn in a president’s first term, according to Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, a scholar at the Brookings Institution who wrote a presidential staff turnover study.

Not ready for prime time: The Taliban hardly deserve Camp David talks with a president. What was Trump thinking?

Bolton is known in Washington as someone with formidable bureaucratic skills, and while those abilities might have served him well in a more normal administration, they were probably useless in the Trumpian snake pit.The secretaries of State and Defense can exercise their power and judgment at a remove from the White House and have the power of Senate confirmation behind them, but the national security adviser works in the White House, and the job is whatever the president wants it to be. After enough friction with Bolton, this president wanted it to be vacant.

The next national security adviser is likely to fare poorly as well. It should be clear at this point that there is no such thing as “policy” in this White House, and senior staff only survive so long as they do not cross the president, inflame his insecurities or talk about his children. Survival means soothing and praising the boss and trying to stay out of the blast radius when things go wrong.

Administration considers double-tapping Pompeo for national security adviser

Administration considers double-tapping Pompeo for national security adviser Just one day after President Donald Trump dismissed national security adviser John Bolton, administration officials are discussing the possibility of replacing Bolton with his chief rival, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Under this scenario, the country's top diplomat would absorb the national security adviser role and do both jobs, according to a senior administration official and a source familiar with the possibilities. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

But he finds himself back where he was in June, wrestling with the consequences of using force and the consequences of avoiding it, except now Iran is And beyond his own electoral prospects, Mr. Trump bristled at the idea of a wider war. “People underestimate how much emotionally he does not like the

For a start , he abhorred multilateralism. "There is no United Nations. After the U . S . invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003, Hussein spent nine months on the run before he was Such action should be combined with vigorous American support for Iran's opposition, aimed at regime change in Tehran," he wrote. When Bolton joined the Trump administration as national security adviser in 2018, replacing

Be glad Bolton wasn't worse

It is likely that Bolton’s replacement will be a temporary hire — perhaps Office of Management and Budget Director/Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney can add one more nameplate to his desk — or even a dual-hatting of someone like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, much the way Richard Nixon did with Henry Kissinger. Of course, that will just move the crosshairs onto Pompeo’s back, but in this White House, the staff live one day at a time in an environment where “serving at the pleasure of the president” is taken literally.

It's a disservice:James Mattis promotes a book that's silent about Donald Trump.

The next national security adviser will understand that he can enjoy his office as long as he enables, rather than advises, Trump on matters of national security. This could lead to a nightmare in itself, and it is sobering to think that we might one day wish for someone with Bolton’s force of personality in the West Wing.

Bolton’s critics feared he would hijack the Oval Office and lead the United States into another war in the Middle East. Trump has no appetite for such a conflict — at least for now — but Bolton certainly did enough damage in the meantime. We should not lament his departure, but we can be glad that his tenure wasn’t worse.

Rand Paul, Liz Cheney exchange insults in Twitter feud

Rand Paul, Liz Cheney exchange insults in Twitter feud Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) are engaged in a Twitter feud, with Cheney claiming Paul's motto is "terrorists first" and Paul accusing the House Republican Conference chairwoman of "warmongering."Both Republicans are arguing with each other over which one actually stands with - and has the support of - President Trump.Cheney, resurfacing a 2015 tweet from Trump in which he called the libertarian-leaning senator and then-GOP presidential rival a "spoiled brat without a properly functioning brain," tweeted that "no truer words were ever spoken.

This is a small relief, at least until we meet Bolton’s successor.

Tom Nichols is a national security professor at the Naval War College, a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors and author of "The Death of Expertise." The views expressed here are solely his own. Follow him on Twitter: @RadioFreeTom

You can read diverse opinions from our Board of Contributors and other writers on the Opinion front page, on Twitter @usatodayopinion and in our daily Opinion newsletter. To respond to a column, submit a comment to letters@usatoday.com.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump fired Bolton before he started a war, and we should be grateful

Read More

Trump lists Waddell, Kellogg, O'Brien among possible Bolton successors.
President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that the candidates he is considering to become his new national security adviser include former deputy national security adviser Ricky Waddell, Vice President Mike Pence's security aide Keith Kellogg, and hostage negotiator Robert O'Brien. © Reuters/Carlos Barria Acting U.S. National Security Advisor Kellogg arrives for U.S.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!