Opinion: Here's why Dems want to generate climate panic (as they ignore ways to reduce carbon emissions) - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

OpinionHere's why Dems want to generate climate panic (as they ignore ways to reduce carbon emissions)

12:21  18 september  2019
12:21  18 september  2019 Source:   foxnews.com

Greta Thunberg Takes Climate Strike To Trump’s White House

Greta Thunberg Takes Climate Strike To Trump’s White House WASHINGTON -- Greta Thunberg, the famous 16-year-old Swedish environmentalactivist who kicked off a global movement of students leaving school to demandaction on the climate crisis, joined other youth activists at a rally outsidethe White House on Friday.A few hundred people, mostly teenagers and young children, gathered on theEllipse south of the White House carrying signs that read "I want you topanic!" and "Why are we studying for a future we won’t have?” They chanted, “This is a crisis, act like it!” and “No more coal, no more oil, keep that carbon in the soil.

That helps explain why progressives are attempting to generate climate panic while opposing practical means for reducing carbon emissions . It also explains why they favor massive tax increases, excessively burdensome regulation and spending virtually incomprehensible sums on far

USDT (Tether) is a stable coin by Bitfinex. Learn more about Tether here .

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Here's why Dems want to generate climate panic (as they ignore ways to reduce carbon emissions)© Provided by Fox News Network LLC

Whether you accept or reject the climate change narrative, most people agree that we should avoid pouring massive amounts of anything with potentially harmful consequences into the atmosphere.

There is scientific evidence that excessive levels of carbon in the atmosphere could adversely impact our climate – and we are emitting a lot of carbon.

What interests me is that the politicians issuing the loudest warnings about catastrophic climate change are the same people who vigorously oppose the most practical and effective means of combating it.

Virginia governor sets renewable energy goal: 100% by 2050

Virginia governor sets renewable energy goal: 100% by 2050 Gov. Ralph Northam has issued an executive order setting a goal for Virginia to produce 100% of its electricity from carbon-free sources by 2050. 

Members. Andy Puzder: Here ' s why Dems want to generate climate panic ( as they ignore ways to reduce carbon emissions ). The Trump administration has released 0 million in military aid for Ukraine, lawmakers announced Thursday as they were set to rebuke the administration for initially

If Democrats refuse to strike a deal, we will know that they do not care about the Dreamers, or about border security, but want to preserve what they view as a valuable wedge Andy Puzder: Here ' s why Dems want to generate climate panic ( as they ignore ways to reduce carbon emissions ).

AOC SAYS SHE'S WOKEN UP AT 3:30 A.M. BECAUSE OF HER ANXIETY ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE

According to BP’s 2019 Statistical Review of World Energy, an energy economics publication, global carbon emissions grew about 2 percent in 2018 to 33,890.8 million metric tons, due primarily to increased demand for heating and cooling services.

While U.S. carbon emissions also increased in 2018, the U.S. has been the world’s leader in reducing carbon emissions for over a decade.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, carbon emissions in this country declined 14 percent between 2005 and 2017, “mainly because more electricity has been generated from natural gas” – a more efficient and “less carbon-intensive fuel than either coal or petroleum.”

Obama meets with teen climate activist: 'She's unafraid to push for real action'

Obama meets with teen climate activist: 'She's unafraid to push for real action' Former President Barack Obama on Monday met with Swedish teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg as part of her visit to Washington, DC, to promote environmental issues. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); "Just 16, @GretaThunberg is already one of our planet's greatest advocates," Obama tweeted after his meeting with Thunberg. "Recognizing that her generation will bear the brunt of climate change, she's unafraid to push for real action.

Those who come here do so at the discretion of the president and the Congress, which represents we the people. You might want to explain that to your shrieking, naïve, delusional Andy Puzder: Here ' s why Dems want to generate climate panic ( as they ignore ways to reduce carbon emissions ).

Andy Puzder: Here ' s why Dems want to generate climate panic ( as they ignore ways to reduce carbon emissions ). Rob Smith: Dems pander for black votes by exploring reparations for slavery – my vote isn’t for sale.

The EIA is forecasting a 2.2 percent decline in U.S. carbon emissions in 2019 as natural gas continues to replace coal in generating electricity.  Fortunately, we have natural gas in abundance, thanks to a private sector-developed extraction process known as fracking.

Fracking does release methane gas, but according to the Environmental Protection Agency’s 2018 Greenhouse Gas Inventory, released in April 2019, U.S. methane emissions declined 15.8 percent between 1990 and 2017, while natural gas production increased by 51 percent.

More energy, less methane and carbon.  Sounds like progress.

Nonetheless, virtually every Democratic presidential candidate who participated in CNN’s recent seven-hour climate change marathon opposes fracking.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR OPINION NEWSLETTER

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, said she would “ban fracking – everywhere” on her first day as president, a mandate that would undoubtedly increase our carbon emissions.  Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., never one to rigidly tether his policies to reality, would “ban fracking on all public and private lands.”

A global climate strike isn't enough

  A global climate strike isn't enough There are better ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions than encouraging people to leave jobs or schools for a day.A collective of influential green groups and corporations is supporting a campaign for a global climate strike from Sept. 20-27. The strike pushes young people to walk out of schools and workplaces to protest the energy sources that keep us alive and thriving.

From media elites to members of Congress, progressives are often reduced to tantrum-like fits because they are so frustrated by living in the shadows of this Andy Puzder: Here ' s why Dems want to generate climate panic ( as they ignore ways to reduce carbon emissions ).

In the meantime, though, we just wanted to give you some idea of how stupid and buffoonish the wall coverage has been recently, in case you missed it. Andy Puzder: Here ' s why Dems want to generate climate panic ( as they ignore ways to reduce carbon emissions ).

In any event, reducing the world’s carbon emissions is not something any American president alone can achieve.  While U.S. emissions are significant and should be reduced, they constitute only 15.2 percent of the world’s total.

China emitted 27.8 percent, or 9,428.7 million metric tons, of carbon in 2018. That’s more than the U.S. (5,145.2 million) and the European Union (4,248.4 million) combined.

To reduce emissions we need plausible alternatives. Renewable energy sources such as wind and solar are currently incapable of meeting the world's energy demands on their own.

As respected environmentalist and former renewables advocate Michael Shallenberger explains in a piece in Quillette magazine titled "Why Renewables Can’t Save the Planet," both wind and solar currently lack the capacity to generate or store sufficient energy to meet global demand.

Hydroelectric and geothermal energy production are limited geographically.  With current technology, renewables alone simply are not a viable alternative.

Instead, Shallenberger has become an advocate of nuclear energy – a safe and inexpensive means of significantly reducing carbon emissions.

Climate change 'accelerating', say scientists

  Climate change 'accelerating', say scientists A snapshot of the latest science, published as politicians gather in New York, says climate change is speeding up.The data, compiled by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), says the five-year period from 2014 to 2019 is the warmest on record.

Which is precisely why there are legal and ethical rules which demand recusal based on prior relationships. Tucker Carlson: What GOP victories in North Carolina's special elections really say about 2020. Andy Puzder: Here ' s why Dems want to generate climate panic ( as they ignore ways

Andy Puzder: Here ' s why Dems want to generate climate panic ( as they ignore ways to reduce carbon emissions ). Rob Smith: Dems pander for black votes by exploring reparations for slavery – my vote isn’t for sale.

Nuclear energy already cleanly supplies over 10 percent of the world’s electricity and, according to a February 2019 report from the World Nuclear Association, almost all reports "on future energy supply from major organizations suggest an increasing role for nuclear power as an environmentally benign way of producing reliable electricity on a large scale.”

In fact, it’s difficult to take anyone seriously who rails against increased carbon emissions but either refuses to consider nuclear power as part of the mix (Sanders), opposes building new reactors (former vice president Joe Biden), or declines to take a position on nuclear energy (Warren).

Clearly, certain Democrats are more determined to scare us into accepting socialism than in reducing carbon emissions.  Otherwise, why reject effective solutions that we know will reduce – and are today reducing – carbon emissions without reversing the incredible progress we have made since the Industrial Revolution in reducing extreme poverty, hunger and infant mortality - increasing life expectancy and improving standards of living to the highest levels in human history.

Opposing not only natural gas but also nuclear energy raises the question of what Democrats are actually trying to accomplish under the guise of climate change. There have been some clues.

Gabon becomes the first African country to receive funding for preserving its rainforests

  Gabon becomes the first African country to receive funding for preserving its rainforests In an effort to fight climate change, the United Nations announced Sunday that Gabon will become the first African country paid with international funds to preserve its rainforest. © AFP/Getty Images About 80 per cent of Gabon is covered by forests, sheltering a rich variety of wildlife. Through the Central African Forest Initiative (CAFI), Norway will pay $150 million to Gabon to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and battle deforestation. The announcement was made at the Climate Action Summit in New York, where world leaders gathered to discuss how to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions.

Why did the Titanic’s eight musicians continue to play on the deck even as the ship was going down? Andy Puzder: Here ' s why Dems want to generate climate panic ( as they ignore ways to reduce carbon emissions ).

"This idea … that we want to change the electors’ minds who have been dedicated to Donald Trump very early in the process I think is just misguided,” he said. Andy Puzder: Here ' s why Dems want to generate climate panic ( as they ignore ways to reduce carbon emissions ).

Saikat Chakrabarti, New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s former chief of staff, admitted in July that the true motivation behind the Green New Deal wasn’t a “climate thing.”  It was “a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing,”  he said.

That helps explain why progressives are attempting to generate climate panic while opposing practical means for reducing carbon emissions. It also explains why they favor massive tax increases, excessively burdensome regulation and spending virtually incomprehensible sums on far less effective,  if not ineffective, approaches.

Clearly, certain Democrats are more determined to scare us into accepting socialism than in reducing carbon emissions.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Otherwise, why reject effective solutions that we know will reduce – and are today reducing – carbon emissions without reversing the incredible progress we have made since the Industrial Revolution in reducing extreme poverty, hunger and infant mortality --  increasing life expectancy and improving standards of living to the highest levels in human history.

We have the means to reduce carbon emissions without rendering ourselves subservient to a class of government elites, surrendering our freedoms, or destroying our economy – despite the left’s continuing attempts to scare us into serfdom.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM ANDY PUZDER

Read More

Trump slammed for trolling Greta Thunberg climate speech .
US President Donald Trump stirred up fresh outrage on social media Monday with a tweet mocking an impassioned speech made by 16-year-old activist Greta Thunberg at the UN climate summit in New York. © Johannes EISELE Hours after her impassioned speech against world leaders for failing to act on climate change, Donald Trump described Greta Thunberg as a 'very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future' Her voice shaking with emotion in an address that was the defining moment of the summit, Thunberg accused world leaders of betraying her generation by failing to act on rising emissions, repeating the word

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 2
This is interesting!