Opinion: Five facts that blow up the latest White House defense of Trump - - PressFrom - US

Opinion Five facts that blow up the latest White House defense of Trump

18:15  09 october  2019
18:15  09 october  2019 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Top White House aides planning impeachment response effort

  Top White House aides planning impeachment response effort "We're not going to get caught flat-footed, and we're not going to take it lying down," said one person familiar with the plan.Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and White House counsel Pat Cipollone will be among those who present the president with the plan for a rapid response effort that could come as early as Monday, according to two people familiar with the matter.

WASHINGTON — House impeachment investigators widened the reach of their inquiry on Friday, subpoenaing the White House for a vast trove of documents and requesting more from Vice President Mike Pence to better understand President Trump ’s attempts to pressure Ukraine to investigate his

President Donald Trump ’s White House offered dubious explanations on the Sunday shows to defend Trump ’s Twitter accusation that former President "Everybody acts like President Trump is the one that came up with this idea. There are multiple news outlets that have reported" former President

Donald Trump wearing a suit and tie: (Brendan Smialowski/AFP)© Brendan Smialowski/Afp Via Getty Images (Brendan Smialowski/AFP)

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

President Trump has “declared war” against the House’s impeachment inquiry, we’re told, based on an eight page letter written by the White House counsel that openly declares a posture of maximal resistance, on the grounds that the inquiry is illegitimate.

Legal experts have already torpedoed the absurd idea that the White House gets to declare the House’s impeachment inquiry illegitimate. The Constitution grants the House “sole power of impeachment,” and the chambers set their own rules. The White House claims the House must hold a full vote to render the inquiry operative, but this is simply baseless.

Grassley breaks with Trump over protecting whistleblower

  Grassley breaks with Trump over protecting whistleblower Sen. Chuck Grassley moved to stave off attacks and the unmasking of a federal whistleblower who first divulged President Donald Trump’s call with Ukraine’s president, a move at odds with many of the president’s defenders. © Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call Sen. Chuck Grassley. In a statement, the Iowa Republican, who has long fashioned himself a defender of whistleblowers, said the fact that the individual’s knowledge of Trump’s phone call and the White House restricting records came secondhand should not invalidate his reporting.

His White House team seems to be following in his footsteps when defending him. Some of Trump ’s staffers have made the argument that it is valid to use inaccurate facts to bolster larger narratives "A few days later , White House Chief of Staff John Kelly fired back at Wilson for listening in on Trump ’s

– President Donald Trump . Our first president, George Washington, selected the site for the White House in 1791. Every president since John Adams has occupied the White House , and the history of this building extends far beyond the construction of its walls.

So let’s focus on something else in the letter: It unequivocally declares that in his phone call to the Ukrainian president, Trump did nothing whatsoever wrong.

In the letter, White House counsel Pat Cipollone claims that Trump heroically released the partial transcript of that call, even though this came only under extreme political duress. “The record clearly established that the call was completely appropriate,” Cipollone insists, adding that “there was nothing wrong with the call.”

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

The partial transcript of the July 25 call released by the White House reveals that Trump directly pressed Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate likely general election opponent Joe Biden, and to try to invalidate our intelligence services’ conclusion about the Russian attack on our political system on his behalf.

Justice Department tells White House to preserve notes of Trump's calls with foreign leaders

  Justice Department tells White House to preserve notes of Trump's calls with foreign leaders The Justice Department told White House personnel on Wednesday that they must preserve all notes regarding President Donald Trump's meetings and phone calls with foreign leaders. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); "Defendants today instructed relevant personnel to preserve the information," Justice Department lawyers told a federal judge in a court filing.

White House Counsel Pat Cipollone explained the administration’s view in a letter Tuesday to If the House were to vote to impeach Trump without offering him a chance to defend himself, it would But charging that your opponents are mean isn’t a legal defense , either. “Absent a privilege of some sort

The Trump White House is now in modified limited hangout mode. The Times story did not come from the Until now the Russian investigation has illuminated the curious actions of Trump ’s outer ring of Last chance for impeachment. Trump 's latest overseas debacle. Are we too dumb for democracy?

The first of these is based on a fabricated narrative about the Bidens. The second is based on an absurd conspiracy theory designed to delegitimize the genesis of the Russia investigation.

But, putting aside the fact that Trump’s demands were based on nonsense, what’s notable here is that the White House’s official position is that the conduct itself, that is, Trump’s act of pressing Zelensky to do these things, is perfectly okay.

But the White House itself knows this is nonsense. Here are five facts that demonstrate this:

White House officials tried to bury the call. The whistleblower’s complaint says White House officials were so alarmed by the call that they stashed it on a super-top-secret computer system ordinarily used only for the most sensitive information in the government’s possession.

As Glenn Kessler demonstrates, not only has much of the whistleblower’s complaint been confirmed via outside sources; the White House itself has confirmed that this particular stashing of the call did occur. This wouldn’t have been necessary if the call was completely kosher.

Pelosi to GOP: We are not dropping impeachment probe

  Pelosi to GOP: We are not dropping impeachment probe House Speaker Nancy Pelosi fired back at Kevin McCarthy, who earlier in the day asked his fellow Californian to drop the impeachment inquiry into President Trump. © Provided by MediaDC: Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, Inc.“I received your letter this morning shortly after the world witnessed President Trump on national television asking yet another foreign power to interfere in the upcoming 2020 elections,” Pelosi said Thursday, referring to Trump’s South Lawn comments in which he called on China to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.

The White House kitchen is able to serve dinner to as many as 140 guests and hors d’oeuvres to more than 1,000. The White House requires 570 gallons of At various times in history, the White House has been known as the “President’s Palace,” the “President’s House ,” and the “Executive Mansion.”

On March 4, 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump wrote a series of posts on his Twitter account that accused former President Barack Obama of wiretapping his phones at his Trump Tower office late in

Trump keeps saying the events in the transcript didn’t happen. Trump just tweeted that the whistleblower’s claim of “pressure” on Zelensky is false. He’s made this claim on other occasions.

But the transcript simply does show pressure: After Zelensky made it clear Ukraine badly needs U.S. support for its military defenses, Trump says he wants “a favor, though,” making this a condition, and then states his demands, stressing that it’s “very important” that Zelensky implement them. If the events depicted were perfectly appropriate, Trump wouldn’t have to keep lying to obscure what happened.

The texts show Trump is lying about pressuring Zelensky. The texts released by Democrats show that the call was part of a systematic, long-running plot carried out in part by two U.S. ambassadors (Kurt Volker and Gordon Sondland) to pressure Zelensky to carry out Trump’s demands.

Just before the call, Volker texted a Zelensky aide to say that the White House had indicated to him that carrying out those investigations was conditional for getting a White House meeting. Some time after the call, Sondland described those investigations as the “deliverable” needed in exchange for that meeting.

Giuliani outlines conditions for possible cooperation on impeachment inquiry

  Giuliani outlines conditions for possible cooperation on impeachment inquiry President Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday outlined his potential conditions for cooperating with House Democrats in their impeachment inquiry into Trump.Giuliani said in an interview with Hill.TV that he may try to invoke attorney-client privilege if the House moves forward on impeachment."I would sit down with my client and with the other lawyers and we'd discuss attorney-client privilege," Giuliani said on Hill.TV'sGiuliani said in an interview with Hill.TV that he may try to invoke attorney-client privilege if the House moves forward on impeachment.

Get official White House briefings, statements, and remarks from President Donald J. Trump and members of his Administration. Remarks by President Trump at Young Black Leadership Summit 2019.

New whistleblower could blow up Trump 's main argument. Key facts and latest news. The House committees leading the impeachment probe issued Washington -- Three House committees leading Democrats' impeachment probe issued new subpoenas to the secretary of defense and acting White

Crucially, the White House isn’t defending this quid pro quo. Instead, Trumpworld has claimed there isn’t one. You don’t need a quid pro quo for this to be impeachable, but the texts simply do establish one -- and raise further questions about whether military aid was also dangled. If the call were kosher, the White House would be able to defend what actually happened, including the surrounding events that illuminate it.

The White House won’t release the full call transcript. Experts have said the White House transcript likely reflects material omissions, and Democrats have subpoenaed the full transcript. The White House’s current position of zero cooperation means it won’t be released unless the courts force it.

That wouldn’t be necessary if there were “nothing wrong with the call.” Surely the White House could at least release more of the transcript in a way that avoided revealing sensitive information.

The White House blocked Sondland from testifying. This came just hours before Sondland was set to appear. The texts show that Ambassador William Taylor repeatedly confronted Sondland, asking him why the military aid was conditioned on helping Trump’s political campaign. Sondland denied that particular quid pro quo.

Notably, Trump himself keeps citing that denial from Sondland as exonerating. Yet the White House is blocking him from scrutiny. We now know one obvious reason why: Sondland talked directly to Trump before telling Taylor there was no quid pro quo. If the call were fine, there’d be no reason to block Sondland from shedding more light on events illuminating how Trump himself intended his ongoing demands.

To sum up: The White House’s position is now that everything on the call was perfectly appropriate, but also, the most conspicuous confirmed misconduct on the call didn’t happen, the White House won’t release the full transcript of it, and the one witness to surrounding events whom Trump himself cites as exonerating him must not be allowed to face questioning.

AP FACT CHECK: Trump muddies waters on US Syria withdrawal .
President Donald Trump on Wednesday muddied the waters on America's withdrawal from Syria and the conditions on the ground there, as he distanced himself and the U.S. from the ongoing Turkish invasion into Syria. He suggested incorrectly that the Syrian Kurds who fought alongside U.S. forces against the Islamic State group deliberately released IS prisoners and wrongly said Americans have been in the Syria conflict for 10 years. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); A look at his claims:U.S.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!