Opinion: Adam Schiff's 'ham sandwich': Not an inquiry, just a show - - PressFrom - US

Opinion Adam Schiff's 'ham sandwich': Not an inquiry, just a show

17:40  12 november  2019
17:40  12 november  2019 Source:   thehill.com

'Absent yourself': Transcripts reveal what Schiff told Gaetz when he crashed secure hearing

  'Absent yourself': Transcripts reveal what Schiff told Gaetz when he crashed secure hearing There was a tense back-and-forth when Republicans apparently burst into the room during impeachment inquiry testimony.Gaetz and other Republican lawmakers apparently burst into the room, known as a SCIF, during testimony by Fiona Hill, President Donald Trump's former adviser on Russia. In what a House Intelligence Committee official has described as a "major security breach," some Republicans brought their cellphones into the room.

Adam Bennett Schiff (born June 22, 1960) is an American politician serving as the U. S . Representative for California' s 28th congressional district since 2013.

Adam Schiff , who authored a rebuttal to Devin Nunes' s memo about the Trump-Russia investigation, is now the target of conspiracy theories. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) over the release of a controversial memo attempting to discredit the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, a rumor

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Adam Schiff wearing a suit and tie: Adam Schiff's 'ham sandwich': Not an inquiry, just a show© Greg Nash Adam Schiff's 'ham sandwich': Not an inquiry, just a show

The most familiar metaphor about criminal investigations is, of course, that a prosecutor could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. Like all good metaphors, there's enough exaggeration in it to make a strong impression. It resonates, though, because it conveys the entirely accurate sense that a grand jury is a one-sided affair. We're wired to believe there are two sides - at least - to every story. That's why the grand jury rubs us the wrong way.

Adam Schiff says whistleblower testimony is 'redundant and unnecessary'

  Adam Schiff says whistleblower testimony is 'redundant and unnecessary' House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff made clear on Saturday that the Ukraine whistleblower won't be testifying in the impeachment inquiry, arguing that the individual's testimony would be "redundant and unnecessary."House Republicans earlier Saturday had submitted a list of witnesses to Democrats that they'd like to testify as part of the chamber's impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump and Ukraine. The list included the whistleblower and former Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden.

Adam Schiff uudelleentwiittasi Manu Raju. But the evidence we've uncovered of the president' s abuse of power has made that inquiry a necessity. The House just voted to recognize the Armenian Genocide – a vote I fought for 19 years to make possible, that tens of thousands of my Armenian

House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) has yet to release the transcript of the closed-door testimony of former National Security Council senior director for European and Russian affairs Tim Morrison — just two days before public hearings begin.

And that's why the impeachment show - not inquiry show - that Democrats are running should really rub us the wrong way.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and his House Intelligence Committee are taking the show public this week. The inquiry he's been running is, he claims, analogous to a grand jury investigation: It's a preliminary investigative stage before the inquiry's transfer to the Judiciary Committee for the formal consideration of articles of impeachment.

Grand juries, however, never go public. And that is precisely because they are intentionally one-sided. They are kept secret by law to avoid prejudicing the suspect.

Sen. Graham: Impeachment 'dead on arrival' in Senate if Dems keep whistleblower from testifying

  Sen. Graham: Impeachment 'dead on arrival' in Senate if Dems keep whistleblower from testifying Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., accused House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., of not caring about the truth, and said Schiff's impeachment efforts will go nowhere unless he calls the anonymous whistleblower to come forward and testify about their complaint against President Trump. House Republicans over the weekend submitted a list of witnesses they would like to call for public testimony during the impeachment inquiry, but Schiff -- who is running the probe -- was swift to reject the request to have the whistleblower come forward.

Adam Schiff ’ s claim that I was obligated to turn this e-mail exchange over to the House Intel I recognized Mr. Mueller could indict a ham sandwich but I’m not interested in being his lunch. It is to silence me as a critic of the partisan nature of their inquiry and the Gestapo tactics that they employ

Schiff Show . It’ s not a crime by statutory definition and it’ s not a crime by the fact that we still have a First Amendment. Cohen pleaded guilty to a campaign finance violation for entering into a “catch and kill” agreement with the National Enquirer’ s David Pecker, whereby the Enquirer would purchase, and

Prejudice is exactly what Schiff is aiming for, however. The point is not impeachment; it is to wound President Trump politically.

To be clear, Schiff's grand jury analogy is bogus. Congress is not a grand jury. Grand juries are designed to be at least somewhat objective - a body of impartial citizens who, by constitutional mandate, must be satisfied there is probable cause that a crime has been committed before the state is permitted to indict and try a citizen presumed to be innocent. In theory, the grand jury is there to protect the suspect from an overbearing prosecutor. Here, House Democrats are the overbearing prosecutor, not the protective grand jurors.

What is happening in the House is a political exercise. Schiff is a hyper-partisan. With the anti-Trump media leaving his absurd grand jury analogy unchallenged, he exploits it when it is useful, namely, when telling Republicans they will not be permitted to call their witnesses, and he puts the analogy aside when it is not useful, namely, in convening one-sided public hearings.

Adam Schiff Signals ‘Bribery’ Charge for Trump’s Impeachment: Founders Understood It as ‘Breach of the Public Trust’

  Adam Schiff Signals ‘Bribery’ Charge for Trump’s Impeachment: Founders Understood It as ‘Breach of the Public Trust’ House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff strongly signaled that Democrats would focus their impeachment case against President Donald Trump around a “bribery” charge. According to audio in a new NPR interview, Schiff argued that the Founders had a “broader” definition of bribery that included abuse of power and breach of the public trust by elected officials, suggesting […]According to audio in a new NPR interview, Schiff  argued that the Founders had a “broader” definition of bribery that included abuse of power and breach of the public trust by elected officials, suggesting that it would be the central crime in the “high crimes and misdemeanors” specified by the Constitution for impeachment of a president.

Lindsey Graham claims the Trump whistleblower interacted with Adam Schiff . Sen Lindsey Graham has claimed that the whistleblower whose complaint launched the Ukraine impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump 'had interactions' with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff .

Adam Schiff now says the House Of Representatives may not talk to the whistleblower in order to protect the individual’ s identity. President Trump has ramped up his attacks on the whistleblower, demanding to know their identity while railing against the impeachment inquiry as a "coup."

As a matter of due process, Schiff's made-for-TV spectacle is a bad joke. That was underscored this past weekend when (a) Democrats gave Republicans a ridiculously short deadline to propose their own witnesses, whom Chairman Schiff reserved the right to veto; (b) Republicans duly proposed witnesses on the issues of Democrats' collusion with Ukraine in the 2016 election campaign and in possible corruption; and (c) Schiff, as predictably as sunrise, ruled the GOP's witnesses irrelevant.

In point of fact, the witnesses that Republicans seek to call are entirely relevant to what would be at issue in an impeachment trial, to wit: Is any misconduct by the president alleged in an article of impeachment sufficiently egregious that he should be removed from power?

But, see, a grand jury is not a trial.

The ham sandwich metaphor is apt because the grand jury protection, though constitutionally required, is modest. The grand jury is not the forum for trying the case. Its sole role is to determine whether the prosecutor has enough evidence - just probable cause at this early stage - to warrant filing a formal allegation (the indictment), which transfers the case to a judicial court for a full-blown trial at which the prosecutor must bear the much higher, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt burden of proof.

House Intel announces additional witnesses for public impeachment hearings

  House Intel announces additional witnesses for public impeachment hearings House Intel announces additional witnesses for public impeachment hearingsChairman Adam Schiff announced that next Tuesday the panel will hear from Jennifer Williams, an aide to Vice President Mike Pence; Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, who serves as the director for European Affairs at the National Security Council; Ambassador Kurt Volker, the former U.S. special envoy to Ukraine; and Tim Morrison, a White House aide with the National Security Council focusing on Europe and Russia policy.

Read Rep. Adam Schiff ' s Opening Statement on Russian Meddling in the Election. Just prior to the convention, the Republican Party platform is changed, removing a section that supports the provision of “lethal In the weeks that follow, Stone shows a remarkable prescience: “I have total confidence that

George just wanted a ham sandwich for Christmas. But after one dead baby, hilarity and randomness ensue. Drabble, Christmas parody. And the worst part was that they spelled cheeseburger wrong. George was always good kid. He was just an eleven year old boy, bound on new sights of teen angst

In the grand jury, the prosecutor is not required to tell the defendant's side of the story. The law does not even call for the prosecutor to share with grand jurors exculpatory evidence in the government's files. The only matter up for consideration is: Does the prosecutor have enough proof of misconduct to proceed to the real ballgame - the trial?

In our system, because of the dictates of fundamental fairness, it is at the trial that things go public. That is because, at the trial, the accused is armed with all the Constitution's due process guarantees - the right to counsel, to confront witnesses, to call witnesses and present a defense, the presumption of innocence and the high burden of proof imposed on the prosecutor.

So here is what Schiff is being allowed to pull off.

He is claiming, "I'm just like the grand jury," in order to confine the hearings to witnesses who will be most damning in portraying an abuse of power by the president - the exploitation of his foreign affairs power to squeeze a foreign government into helping his 2020 political campaign by investigating a potential Democratic rival. The grand jury analogy is Schiff's rationale for excluding witnesses Republicans want to call - witnesses who could put the president's demands in context by establishing that Democrats colluded with Ukrainian officials in connection with the 2016 campaign and that prominent Democrats, such as Joe Biden's son, Hunter, corruptly cashed in on his father's political influence over Ukraine's government.

Whistleblower never met or talked with Schiff - source

  Whistleblower never met or talked with Schiff - source The whistleblower who prompted an impeachment inquiry into U.S. President Donald Trump never met or spoke with congressman Adam Schiff, the Democrat leading impeachment hearings in Congress, a source familiar with the whistleblower's contacts said.In the weeks before Wednesday's first public hearing in the impeachment inquiry, Republicans on the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee and other Trump supporters have suggested that Schiff personally met with the whistleblower.

Adam Schiff ’ s claim that I was obligated to turn this e-mail exchange over to the House Intel Committee and did not is false and if he could take a Including badgering at least eight of my current or former associates. I recognized Mr. Mueller could indict a ham sandwich but I’m not interested in

Adam Schiff (D- CA) responded to members of the House after some Republican congressmen called for Rep. TV Shows A-Z. JUST WATCHED. Hear Schiff ' s heated response after calls for resignation.

That would all be fine if Schiff would be consistent with his grand jury pretense and do all of this behind closed doors. Then, when we finally got to a public stage, the president and Republicans would have equal time and equal right to present their side of the case. But that is not what Schiff is doing. He is using his control over a kangaroo-court process to publicize his dark version of events, and to muzzle the other side.

This is a deeply un-American process.

I am not a knee-jerk Trump partisan. I am open-minded that the president may have abused his power, as all presidents do from time to time. I have always thought his best defense is that, in the scheme of things, the abuse was inconsequential: The Ukrainians got their defense aid without having to commit to investigating the Bidens; the president was within his rights to ask for Kyiv's help in examining Ukraine's role in the Obama administration's controversial Trump-Russia investigation; the Trump administration has provided lethal aid in supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression, which the Obama administration would not do.

All of that matters because, in an impeachment case, the issue is not merely whether the president abused his power but whether the abuse, on balance, was so egregious that the president should be removed from power.

Congress is supposed to explore both of those questions - was there an abuse, and how egregious was it? It should be doing so in the light of day: Both issues, in public, with full due process rights for the president.

Adam Schiff and the Democrats are not a grand jury. They should not have been permitted to take the process behind closed doors and make it one-sided. But if they are going to keep it one-sided, like a grand jury, they should stay behind closed doors the way a grand jury does.

If the case is going on national television, fundamental fairness dictates that it be the whole case. Otherwise, it's just a show, produced and directed by partisan Democrats.

Former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, a contributing editor at National Review, and a Fox News contributor. His latest book is "Ball of Collusion." Follow him on Twitter @AndrewCMcCarthy.

Rep. Adam Schiff Says Democrats Will Send 'Charlatan' Trump 'Back to the Golden Throne He Came From' .
Schiff is a leading figure in the House's impeachment inquiry, which began its public phase this week."The most grave threat to the life and health of our democracy comes from within, from a president without ethical compass, without an understanding of or devotion to our Constitution and the beautiful series of checks and balances it established," he said.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 2
This is interesting!