Opinion: The Supreme Court and Congress must defend Dreamers - - PressFrom - US

Opinion The Supreme Court and Congress must defend Dreamers

17:40  12 november  2019
17:40  12 november  2019 Source:   cnn.com

Trump Bid to End DACA Puts Supreme Court Back in Political Fray

  Trump Bid to End DACA Puts Supreme Court Back in Political Fray The U.S. Supreme Court is again poised to test the bounds of Donald Trump’s presidential powers, this time in a politically charged clash over the fate of 700,000 people who were brought into the country illegally as children. © Bloomberg Demonstrators sing and hold signs during a rally supporting the DACA program, or the Dream Act, outside the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C. in 2018. The case, set for argument Tuesday, will mark the climax of Trump’s two-year campaign to unravel former President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

When the Supreme Court hears arguments on Tuesday, the administration’s attempts to end the program protecting “ Dreamers ” could rest on a top aide’s actions in 2017. A rally in Los Angeles supporting the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, for young undocumented

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Tuesday on the Trump administration’s attempt to shut down a program protecting about 700,000 young immigrants known as “ Dreamers .”. The case, one of the most important of the term, will address presidential power over immigration

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

a group of people holding a sign: TOPSHOT - People take part in a kick of rally of the © Johannes Eisele/AFP/Getty Images TOPSHOT - People take part in a kick of rally of the "Home Is Here" March for DACA and TPS on October 26, 2019 in New York City. They begun a march from New York City to Washington DC, to the US Supreme Court. - The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments regarding termination of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy on November 12. (Photo by Johannes EISELE / AFP) (Photo by JOHANNES EISELE/AFP via Getty Images)

For the last two and a half years, President Donald Trump has led a campaign of unprecedented cruelty towards immigrants, especially children.

Trump lawyers to appeal tax return decision to Supreme Court next week

  Trump lawyers to appeal tax return decision to Supreme Court next week President Trump's personal attorneys told a federal judge on Friday that they intend to petition the Supreme Court next week to review an appeals court decision that said the Manhattan district attorney can subpoena the president's tax returns.Trump's lawyers and the district attorney's office said in a joint letter to a federal judge that the decision will be appealed to the high court by Nov. 14.

The best case for Dreamers is that the court decides the decision to end Daca was unlawful and the program can continue. The ruling will be Alarcón was an excellent student and decided to stay in New York City, fighting for Congress to create a path to citizenship for Dreamers and their families.

Demonstrators at the Supreme Court on Sunday. The court will hear arguments on Tuesday about the status of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals It came about after more than a decade of failed negotiations in Congress over how to deal with the Dreamers . The Dream Act never passed, but it

A major front in the President's war on immigrants is his attack on Dreamers, young immigrants who came to the United States as children and are American in every way except their immigration status. President Trump is fighting to end deportation protections for hundreds of thousands of Dreamers, and whether or not his anti-Dreamer agenda succeeds will depend on the Supreme Court and Congress.

In 2012, in response to bipartisan calls from Congress, former President Barack Obama used his legal authority to establish Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, also known as DACA. DACA provides two-year, renewable protection from deportation to Dreamers on an individualized basis if they register with the government, pay a fee, and pass criminal background checks, among other requirements.

'Historic moment': Young DACA recipients to rally as Supreme Court hears arguments

  'Historic moment': Young DACA recipients to rally as Supreme Court hears arguments "When I talk to my kids or other people in the future about this, I want to be able to say that I did everything I could," a Georgetown student with DACA status says."With DACA, there was an immediate sense of relief, knowing that I'd be able to go to college and apply to scholarships," Gonzalez Porras, a junior majoring in American Studies at Georgetown University, told NBC News. "I remember getting my first paycheck at Georgetown and not having to think twice about inserting a social security number, which was a major consideration before DACA.

Federal courts hearing separate lawsuits challenging the DACA cancellation in California, New To qualify for DACA permits, which must be renewed every two years, applicants must have been The fate of more than 660,000 ‘ dreamers ’ comes before the Supreme Court on Tuesday as the Trump

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday declined an unusual White House request that it immediately decide whether the Trump administration The move meant that the immigrants, often called “ Dreamers ,” could remain in legal limbo for many months unless Congress acts to make their

More than 800,000 Dreamers came forward and received DACA. DACA unleashed the full potential of Dreamers, who are contributing to our country as soldiers, engineers, medical students, teachers, small business owners, and in myriad other ways.

DACA is also a lawful exercise of the President's authority to establish deportation priorities.

Past administrations -- Democratic and Republican -- have stopped deportations of low-priority cases and courts have long recognized this authority. For example, in its 2012 decision striking down most of Arizona's controversial immigration law, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the federal government has broad authority over whom to deport. Justice Anthony Kennedy, on behalf of the court's majority, noted: "A principal feature of the removal system is the broad discretion exercised by immigration officials."

DACA is also a smart and realistic approach to immigration enforcement. There are millions of undocumented immigrants in the United States, so the government has to set priorities about whom to deport, and whom not to deport, based on its enforcement priorities and limited resources. Under the Obama administration's policy, it was a high priority to deport those convicted of serious crimes or who posed a threat to public safety, and limited resources were not to be used to deport Dreamers.

Editorial: Regardless of what the Supreme Court does, Congress should make DACA stronger, and permanent

  Editorial: Regardless of what the Supreme Court does, Congress should make DACA stronger, and permanent If the court ultimately finds that President Trump has the authority to end the program regardless of his spurious rationale, the damage to the so-called Dreamers receiving protections, and to the communities in which they live, could be disastrous. It would give the court’s imprimatur to one of the harshest approaches to immigration in modern American history. DACA, for those who don’t remember, is the process Obama crafted in 2012 to defer deportations for people who have lived in the United States illegally since they were children, provided that they are employed or attending school and have not been convicted of serious crimes, among other criteria.

Supreme Court again confronts Trump’s authority, this time over DACA recipients. Anahi Figueroa Flores, a DACA recipient who attends Georgetown University in Washington, speaks during a rally last week in front of the Supreme Court . She and others gathered there to defend the Deferred Action for

And I urge the Supreme Court to agree. No amount of hateful anti-immigrant rhetoric can dim the hopes and dreams of Dreamers . Bob Menendez is the senior U.S. senator from New Jersey, the highest-ranking Latino in Congress and a member of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

On September 5, 2017, President Trump ended DACA. Hundreds of thousands of Dreamers faced losing their work permits and being deported to countries they barely remember. When he announced the repeal of DACA, President Trump called on Congress to "legalize DACA," but since then, he has rejected numerous bipartisan deals to protect Dreamers.

Instead, the President tried to put his entire hardline, anti-immigration agenda on the backs of Dreamers. In exchange for a path to citizenship for DACA recipients, Trump's administration proposed a plan that would slash legal immigration and family reunification, and dramatically cut protections for women and children fleeing persecution.

Trump then endorsed a bill placing significant limits on legal immigration in exchange for a path to citizenship.

However, the Senate rejected the Trump-backed plan by a bipartisan supermajority.

Federal courts stepped in to block the end of DACA, but the President appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, which will hear the case on Tuesday. In October, we led 49 senators and former senators and 123 US representatives and former representatives in filing a bipartisan amicus brief in the Supreme Court in support of DACA.

The NSA has stopped collecting location data from US cellphones without a warrant

  The NSA has stopped collecting location data from US cellphones without a warrant Intelligence agencies stopped the practice last yearLast year, in a landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled against authorities looking to search through electronic location data without a warrant. Citing the ruling, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), a privacy hawk in Congress, wrote a letter to then-Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats asking how agencies like the National Security Agency would apply the court’s decision.

The Supreme Court will have the fate of these four DREAMers and some 660,000 others in its hands Tuesday when it considers the Trump administration's decision to end the DACA program, which has provided a reprieve for some undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday in a case that will determine their fate. An overwhelming majority of Americans support protection for DREAMers (as they have been called since Congress began considering various forms of the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien

As we explain in our brief, a new administration has the right to change deportation rules, but the law requires the government to provide adequate reasons for any change. However, the Trump administration's decision to end DACA was based on the false claim that DACA is unlawful. Therefore, the repeal does not have a legitimate basis and is unlawful.

This should be a straightforward case for the Supreme Court, based on the court's own precedents. It's up to the justices, especially Chief Justice John Roberts, who has long spoken about the importance of the court's neutrality and calling balls and strikes fairly, to follow the law and reject the President's illegal ending of DACA.

Congress also has a responsibility, as an independent branch of the federal government, to stand up for the Dreamers. The House of Representatives responded to President Trump's cruel decision to repeal DACA by passing the American Dream and Promise Act on a strong bipartisan vote. The American Dream and Promise Act is now pending in the Senate, as is the bipartisan DREAM Act, which Senator Durbin introduced with Senator Lindsey Graham, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Hundreds of thousands of Dreamers are now counting on the Senate to solve the DACA crisis that President Trump created. It would be an American tragedy to deport these young people back to countries they barely remember. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell can give the acts a chance if he would simply call a vote.

Dreamers have benefited America through their talents, hard work and service. Their future hangs in the balance.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg returns to Supreme Court bench after stomach bug .
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg returned to the bench on Monday after missing a day at the court last week due to a stomach bug. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); Ginsburg, 86, took her seat wearing one of her lace collars. The justices were there to grant new admissions to the bar, not to hear arguments. Justice Stephen Breyer was not present because he is traveling.This comes after the four-time cancer survivor missed an argument day last week.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 2
This is interesting!